State Significant Development
Glenellen Solar Farm
Greater Hume Shire
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Development of a 200 MW solar farm and associated infrastructure.
Consolidated Consent
Modifications
Archive
Notice of Exhibition (1)
Request for SEARs (1)
SEARs (1)
EIS (11)
Response to Submissions (2)
Agency Advice (19)
Amendments (14)
Additional Information (11)
Recommendation (3)
Determination (2)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (6)
Reports (1)
Notifications (1)
Other Documents (2)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
There are no inspections for this project.
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Matt Hicks
Support
Matt Hicks
Message
NAFEES KHAN
Support
NAFEES KHAN
Message
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AUTHORITY
Comment
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AUTHORITY
Message
Attachments
Rebekah Moore
Object
Rebekah Moore
Message
The direct view from my kitchen will be of this project. Some may say it could be worse... but for me I can't imagine anyone would support such a loss of such breath taking country side. As well document, this area is PRIME agricultural land, how anyone could justify turning such valuable land into a solar farm clearly doesn't know what peace and productivity the country side of this quality can offer. My main concerns are;
1. Proposed Transport route – Urana road, Jindera- Walla Walla road - this then lead to Lindner Rd - that I travel daily, my children ride their bikes to meet the school bus daily - how can any safety be guaranteed for them accessing this road for school and minimal disruption to our travels, when such a significant increase of traffic is proposed along this road. I live here and I will choose my route to access the main roads and that road is the quickest and most direct route, I will not be forced to travel other ways around to my house. I pay my rates to access this road also. The Corner of Ortlipp Rd and Lindner Rd are mere meters from my house (and my neighbours who is unable to have a voice, due to personal reasons), that this increase of 200 plus vehicle a day will be a constant disruption with noise, dust, road delays etc. We live here not the developers and I ask them how would they feel about owning a piece of serene country side, a place for their children to grown up on, to be country kids and get away from town life, when this would be in our back yard.
Clearing of fully establish gum trees/ other native vegetation – how, I can't get my head around clearing such incredible and historical vegetation (I have attached a photo of the view from my kitchen window - every tree you see from my back fence to the table top mountain in the horizon will be CLEARED)...... in 30yrs time how do they suggest a "decommission strategy that will ensure the land is returned to its predevelopment state"? This again would be a loss to the community and the majesty of the area.
I may only be one voice, but I have to express my opinion. I had developers stand in my kitchen and tell me that the environmental reports state that there would be no visual impact from my property... He stood there and could not find the words to reassure me, that this was fact, when he could see with his own eyes the direct impact this will have on my view, not to mention the financial loss on the value of my property! So basically I will be stuck with a property that will loose retail value and an inability to sell, as who would want to live with that in the back yard. How am I compensated for this if the project goes ahead?
I again may only be one person / one voice, but I have travels across vast areas of this country that people (especially CEO's of companies in Sydney) couldn't even imagine the remoteness and desert like country side that would be more suitable for this project. I ask regardless of the power station in close proximity, why would they not consider these proposed project in areas that can't benefit from grazing live stock, to utilise the hash climates and longer day light hours and sun exposer to maximise capabilities for solar farming. I have lived here only briefly and in this time is have experienced high level of rainfall, overcast days, morning of thick fog that doesn't clear till mid morning, it just doesn't seem like the ideal place to generate and maximise the potential of a solar farm, and I propose that there are other areas that would be more fitting for such projects.
Attachments
Tom Muntz
Support
Tom Muntz
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
It’s also good farming country.
Please build solar farms in desert country areas.
I’m a resident along the road and wouldn’t like to have the dust, dirt and noise from building this project.
WaterNSW
Comment
WaterNSW
Message
Attachments
Biodiversity and Conservation Division
Comment
Biodiversity and Conservation Division
Lincoln Weidner
Support
Lincoln Weidner
Message
Christopher Hobbins
Support
Christopher Hobbins
Message
Sharon Brand
Object
Sharon Brand
Message
Louise Dawson
Object
Louise Dawson
Message
To close to the township of Jindera
Lucinda Palmer
Object
Lucinda Palmer
Message
Amanda Walters
Object
Amanda Walters
Message
I find the concept of a 332 hectare solar farm in this location abhorrent given its location within close proximity to a large number of residential lots and within 3.5 kilometers from the village of Jindera, which is a community that has experienced significant growth over recent years.
The impact on surrounding land owners and residents will be significant across many aspects given the magnitude of the development and I find this an unacceptable intrusion into the lives of the residents that have invested in their properties in good faith to enjoy a rural lifestyle.
My most significant concerns, which form the foundation of my objection include:
• The use of a significant parcel of prime agricultural land for the construction of the solar farm.
• The visual impact of the solar farm with the height of the panels being proposed at 5 meters.
• The transformation of a charming rural landscape to one that emulates an industrial estate and the impact this will have on surrounding residents.
• The location within a semi rural community with 84 residents being directly impacted.
• The radiant heat effects and transmission of heat out of the solar farm into neighbouring properties, many of which are located within a few hundred meters of the solar farm.
• The impact on future development through this growth corridor as a result of the adverse visual impact of the large scale development.
• Lack of any suitable access road infrastructure to allow for the immense increase in heavy vehicle movements, expected to peak at over 200 movements per day.
• The loss of natural vegetation and mature trees as a result of the construction. This is currently detailed at the removal of 11.4 hectares of native vegetation and the removal of 81 trees.
Whilst I acknowledge the importance of ensuring our country has a sustainable approach to the provision of energy into the future, this cannot come at the cost of sacrificing large parcels of productive land and directly impacting residents within close proximity.
The guidance in relation to site selection for developments of this nature is very clear in stating that agriculture is an identified site constraint. Given a large percentage of the proposed site is classified as Class 3 high capability land this must be given due consideration. I further note that the Greater Hume Shire Council Director of Environment & Planning did not support the project following analysis of the Environmental Impact Statement due to broad ranging concerns across multiple areas.
I hold grave fears for the impact this will have on the surrounding residents should this development be allowed to proceed and request that significant and genuine consideration be applied to assessing these impacts and in particular recognising that the proposed location is inappropriate for a development of this nature. I wish to reiterate in the most unequivocal terms my objection to the construction of the Glenennen Solar Farm in the proposed location.
Susan Palmer
Object
Susan Palmer
Message
Our home, Drumwood, was the original homestead in the Jindera area and appears on Schedule 5, Environmental heritage of the Greater Hume Local Environmental Plan of 2012. Our farm cottage, which is occupied, is only some 50 metres from the proposal. Our land is used for sheep farming as well as the growing crops. The success of my family property, including maintaining its property values, directly impacts the livelihood and wellbeing of my family.
I am objecting to the Glenellen solar farm proposal and would like to raise the following concerns that I believe will adversely affect the success and value of my own land, and that of 83 other landowners, should the project go ahead.
Air quality: The choice to live in this rural area and enjoy the fresh country air was a factor in my family’s choice to live here. We already endure dust and debris which comes from gravel/ dirt roads in the area associated with current traffic. The proposal clearly recognises that traffic number will increase significantly. How would the impact on air quality be mitigated during construction? '
Roads and traffic: I have already outlined concerns about the heavy vehicles, there are minimal suggestions to upgrades to nearby roads, given the acknowledgement that the Jindera community is primarily made up of young families sure consideration needs to be made to reducing speed limits to access roads and when heavy vehicles are within the township. The proposal suggests 18 months of heavy and oversized vehicles driving to and from the proposal site and compacted unsealed gravel roads on the site. The speed limit is currently 100km/h outside of the township and often the road is dangerous for residents exiting and entering their driveways, for stock crossing and for the school bus picking up and dropping off children.
Heat Island Effect: Our family are most concerned about the very real prospect of the heat island effect. Last summer we had temperatures in excess of 45 degrees, should this increase any further it would surely render our property unviable.
Screening: We are most concerned about the visual industrial appearance of the proposal. As the panels will stand at 5 metres it will be impossible to minimize the glare and hideous appearance which we will have to encounter on a daily basis. The planting of tube stock will not mitigate this.
Social Effect: Currently local residents enjoy the quiet enjoyment of this area and find it a peaceful retreat with breath taking views of the Table Top Mountain. We see many people of all ages walking, riding their bikes or horses and exercising their dogs along Drumwood Road. This project will change the fabric of the whole area and change its natural beauty into an ugly industrial hub.
Therefore I object most vehemently to the Glenellen Solar farm for the future of Jindera and its residents.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
I recognise the importance of the future sustainability of energy provision, however believe this needs to be effectively balanced with suitable site selection to ensure both maximum value from a solar generation perspective together with avoiding the use and degradation of prime agricultural land. This is supported by the Department of Planning, Industry and Environments Large Solar Energy Guidelines which specifically detail agriculture as an identified site constraint. I am particularly concerned that the site selection has solely been based on accessibility to existing electrical infrastructure rather than the genuine suitability of the location.
My key points of objection in relation to the proposed development are as follows:
• The proposed development will directly impact 84 residents and is located within 3.5 kilometres of the Jindera Township.
• The site is prime agricultural land that is currently used for primary industry production.
• The development would have a significant impact on the amenity of the area with the current rural landscape and character of the land being effectively transformed into having an industrial appearance. The solar panels are proposed to be erected at a height of 5 meters with the perimeter fence limited to 2.5 meters, which would have far reaching impacts from a visual perspective.
• The proposed development is located in a growth corridor for Jindera with a 30 plus lot residential housing development having recently been completed within 1 kilometre from the site. Any future development would be directly affected due to the poor visual effects of the solar development.
• The proposed site is located within both a rural and semi rural area with a large number of residential lots within close proximity, making the location completely incompatible with this form of industrial development.
• The impact of future radiant heat, glare and dust nuisance given the close proximity to our home and many other residences, including the township of Jindera.
• Impacts in biodiversity and the effective management of the land including removal of 11.4 hectares of native vegetation and 81 paddock trees, future weed control, pest management, and bushfire mitigation limitations.
• Lack of suitable accessibility corridors for the large increase in heavy vehicle traffic of up to 200 movements per day both through the construction and ongoing operational phases of the development. The Greater Hume Shire Council have already identified that the existing road infrastructure is not suitable for this level of traffic and would pose significant safety issues for local residents.
• The lack of willingness on behalf of the developer to address our concerns or enter into any form of reasonable negotiation.
Our family have been long time residents of the area and have invested much of our lives in maintaining our land and ensuring the historical aspects of our property have been preserved for future generations. We are greatly concerned that our physical, mental and financial wellbeing and that of our neighbours will be put at significant risk should this development proceed. I therefore wish to reiterate in the strongest possible terms my objection to the development of the Glenellen Solar Farm.
DPI Agriculture
Comment
DPI Agriculture
Adam Dixon
Support
Adam Dixon
Message
Solar farms produce safe and locally produced energy. That come with many benefits, I have listed just a few below.
1) The land where solar farms are constructed can provide a better habitat for animals and plants. More times than not, the area around a solar farm is grass, and it is safe for the local wildlife to graze between the rows of panels.
2) Solar panels have no moving parts, noise is not an issue at solar farms.
3) They reduce carbon emissions. Solar farms create clean energy that doesn’t harm the environment.
Installing solar systems creates solar energy that is clean, renewable, and good for the environment.
4) Scientists predict that solar power will soon contribute to almost a quarter of the world’s energy.