State Significant Development
Inner Sydney High School
City of Sydney
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Consolidated Consent
Modifications
Archive
Request for SEARs (4)
SEARS (1)
EIS (102)
Response to Submissions (44)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (38)
Notifications (1)
Other Documents (13)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
Official Caution issued to Hanson Yuncken Pty Ltd (SSD-7610 as modified, City of Sydney LGA)
On 14 December 2020, the Department issued an Official Caution to Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd (HY) for failure to comply with the approved Construction Traffic & Pedestrian Management Plan (CTPMP) for the Inner Sydney High School. The Department will continue to monitor construction traffic movements at the site and HY have updated, and will review and update of the CTPMP, to reflect current construction traffic movements.
Penalty Notice issued to Hanson Yuncken Pty Ltd (SSD-7610 as modified, City of Sydney LGA)
On 13 January 2021, the Department issued a $15,000 Penalty Notice to Hansen Yuncken Pty Ltd (HY) for failure to comply with the approved construction hours at the Inner Sydney High School development at times during September, October, and November 2020. The Department will continue to monitor the site to ensure works are undertaken within the approved construction hours to ensure impacts on the local community are minimised.
Official Caution issued to Schools Infrastructure NSW (SSD-7610 as modified, City of Sydney LGA)
On 28 January 2021, the Department issued an Official Caution to Schools Infrastructure NSW (SINSW) for failure to carry out the development in accordance with the approved plans for the Inner Sydney High School development. Unapproved external lighting was installed on a new 13 storey building at the development adversely impacting the local amenity. SINSW have not commissioned the lighting. The Department will continue to monitor compliance with conditions of consent.
Inspections
14/01/2020
6/08/2020
6/08/2020
27/08/2020
27/08/2020
28/08/2020
28/08/2020
24/09/2020
2/10/2020
20/10/2020
17/11/2020
20/11/2020
13/03/2024
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Name Withheld
Comment
Name Withheld
Message
1) staff parking
2) drop-off & pick-up points for parents of the 1,200 students
3) visitor parking, particularly when the school is holding functions
Will current parking restrictions in the Redfern area be further restricted as a result of the huge numbers of people & cars expected to come into the area when it opens eg: 2 hrs to 1 hr, 1hr to 30 mins, etc?
Will the school employ traffic controllers to cater for students crossing busy Cleveland St or Elizabeth St before & after school?
Will the school cater for a fair mix of students from every background, or will it be swamped by Chinese students like our Universities or other schools in certain suburbs?
Will City of Sydney Rangers and/or Police patrol Prince Alfred Park & Central Railway Station to prevent is becoming a 'hang-out' in large numbers of students pre/post school hours?
Robyn Blomfield
Comment
Robyn Blomfield
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
The site currently houses a small school that does not have any adverse impact on traffic, or the amenity of residents. The proposed site seeks to bring a large influx of students and by proxy their parents, to what is already a very busy vehicular area. The added mass will cause no end of traffic disruption and may well make it difficult to ensure the safety of pedestrian and students without causing undue interruption to traffic flow.
The addition of a large body of students, parents and teachers will cause loss of amenity for resident. Prince Alfred Park, the pool and the tennis courts for which the residents sufferd and paid for over a long period may well now serve as an extension to the schools grounds and play areas.
The height of the tower is totally out of keeping with the area and shows total lack of regard to the are and the sensitivities. It will be the proverbial pimple on a pumpkin and will cause loss of privacy, overshadowing. The proposed volume of users will require exit and entrances to occur via the park side causing more congestion and loss of amenity for residents .
This is a gross over development and proposed use and introduces a scale of architecture that is very incongruous to the corner of a very important public park. The application should be rejected
Ross Thomson
Object
Ross Thomson
Message
Secondly, I am also concerned about the traffic effects on Cleveland / Chalmers Streets given these are already highly congested.
Thirdly what will be impact to the Prince Alfred Park? It is a fabulous park enjoyed by local people and having an extra 1,200 students spill out onto the park for recreation and other purposes sounds like it will significantly reduce the pleasure and enjoyment of this space.
I live only one block away from the site so I am very in tune with these impacts. I would prefer a more modest plan fitting with the character of the area, traffic issues and use of public park space; if this cannot be achieved then I object to the plan in its current form.
Matthew Han
Comment
Matthew Han
Message
R.J Gardiner
Object
R.J Gardiner
Message
Attachments
NSW Environment Protection Authority
Comment
NSW Environment Protection Authority
Message
Attachments
Office of Environment and Heritage
Comment
Office of Environment and Heritage
Message
Attachments
Maureen Kingshott
Comment
Maureen Kingshott
Message
Attachments
Transport for NSW
Comment
Transport for NSW
Message
Attachments
City of Sydney
Comment
City of Sydney
Message
Attachments
Sydney Water
Comment
Sydney Water
Message
Attachments
NSW Heritage Division
Comment
NSW Heritage Division
Message
Attachments
Roads and Maritime Services
Comment
Roads and Maritime Services
Message
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Attachments
john dunlop
Object
john dunlop
Message
You might have thought of something more imaginative like South Sydney High School - the school is in Sydney and in the South.
Changing the present name gets rid of the School's 100 year + heritage and history, an important aspect of a school's identity.
Can you imagine the outcry if you changed the name of Fort St High School to Inner Sydney High School.
I concur with the other listed objections concerning the development.
Helen Kennedy
Object
Helen Kennedy
Message
I object to the name "Sydney Inner High School" for the new development of the Cleveland Street school. It's far from appropriate, Cleveland Street school being historically one of Sydney's oldest government non-denominational public schools.
Cleveland Street School, which operated until 1977 as a high school, was founded in 1857, just six years after Fort Street High School.
Imagine if Fort Street was renamed `Inner West' High. It would be a travesty!
Within two kilometres there's also Sydney Boys High, Sydney Girls High and Sydney Grammar. There are already enough `Sydney' high's and the name Sydney Inner High sounds just as generic.
Let's keep our history! After all, how incredible that Cleveland Street school has kept educating continuously since 1857!
Yours faithfully,
Helen Kennedy
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
It will serve the community well to reinstate the school's prior use. It was a public school, serving the local community for the vast majority of its long life and catered to far greater numbers than the current fluctuating 150-300.
Density and the building heights that come with it, are inevitable. The community suggested other sites with a larger foot print but the Departments of Planning and Education, chose this site. Unless the school caters for 1800 students, the enterprise will be of short lived benefit. Compromise is appropriate here and therefore I accept and support the design as a whole.
The only thing I object to, is the theft of the name of the school. It is absurd for the relocated Intensive English school to take the name Cleveland Street with it. The name Cleveland High School belongs to this site and should be retained.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
I feel that local residents would be very much directly affected by the proposed development. I have concerns with the tall building shadow and the loss of privacy for local residents, living next to a high-rise building with a large number of students. This would increase the noise level associated with much more students, compare with the current school.
A tall building can reflect light and heat to adjacent residential buildings. There would be much more additional impact to local traffic with students drop off/pickup, creating even more bottleneck and also impact to parking.
The development would impact on the open space and would dominate Prince Alfred public park and pool, with a tall building and much larger number of students in the area.
In my opinion, a local school around Green Square area would be better, as there are much more residential developments in the area.