State Significant Development
Mangoola Coal Continued Operations Project
Muswellbrook Shire
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
The Project involves the extension of open cut mining at Mangoola Coal Mine to a new mining area immediately north of the existing operation. The Project would extract approximately 52 million tonnes of additional ROM coal.
Attachments & Resources
Request for SEARs (1)
EIS (27)
Response to Submissions (2)
Agency Advice (23)
Amendments (1)
Additional Information (11)
Recommendation (3)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (50)
Agreements (1)
Community Consultative Committees and Panels (1)
Reports (5)
Notifications (1)
Other Documents (9)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
11/04/2022
21/06/2022
16/02/2023
4/04/2023
8/03/2024
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Carlin Plumb
Object
Carlin Plumb
Message
India Wilton-howarth
Support
India Wilton-howarth
Message
Damien Ryba
Support
Damien Ryba
Message
Mangoola has demonstrated a strong focus and commitment to mining rehabilitation, and is leaving a legacy of high quality rehabilitation to act as flora and fauna habitat and connectivity pathways. The company has shown that they go over and above any minimum Development Approval requirements for rehabilitation, and consistently introduce improvements through measures such as flora translocations, refinement and diversity in species selection, endemic seed collection programs, fauna habitat establishment, timber salvage, nest box programs, weed management and on-going research into threatened species conservation.
Mangoola mine is often visited by other mining company representatives, environmental science university students and other rehabilitation practitioners, seeking to view and understand how high quality rehabilitation is carried out at the site.
The proposed Mangoola Coal Continued Operations Project area is largely degraded and poor quality grazing country, with large tracts suffering from dryland salinity, due to poor historical land management practices. Post-mining, the area would be rehabilitated into a functioning ecosystem of eucalyptus woodlands and native grasslands, further contributing to regional habitat connectivity and ecosystem provision.
From a social viewpoint, the extension of the current operations would provide employment security for many local families, support spending in the local area, and continued funding to the many local organisations that Mangoola has supported over many years.
All major developments have environmental impacts, however I believe that Mangoola has shown a responsible, diligent and very successful approach to environmental management, through robust and comprehensive systems to manage noise, dust, water and ecosystem rehabilitation.
On balance, given the high standard of environmental management measures that Mangoola has in place and the enormous ongoing benefits to the broader local community, and considering the poor existing land capability of the proposed MCCO project area, I believe that the project should definitely be approved.
Michael White
Object
Michael White
Message
Attachments
Margot White
Object
Margot White
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
The Hunter Valley is a well established mining area & the Mangoola Extension is not an isolated case.
The continued operation of Mangoola will secure many existing, and potentially new, employment opportunities and continue to provide ongoing support & benefit to both local & wider communities & districts. Thankyou.
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Shinead Gillespie
Object
Shinead Gillespie
Message
alexander Charles
Support
alexander Charles
Message
owen cook
Support
owen cook
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
From an environmental perspective, extending the Mangoola Coal Mine will continue to pollute the air with coal dust and carbon monoxide. Not to mention the noise pollution that comes with the operation of heavy mining vehicles in an otherwise serene, rural landscape. The Wybong area is in the midst of an extensive drought so there is also generally more dust in the air, and the use of precious water to operate the mine puts a strain on our already depleted resources. Then there is the naturally occurring underground water system of springs which will undoubtedly be disturbed, as it has already with the current mine, causing further strain on our precious resource. Not great in a drought. Wildlife is displaced. Old growth Flora is lost.
On a personal note, I grew up on a farm not far from the current mine. My parents still reside there and we often visit them with our kids. We are concerned that living so close to the mine is having a negative effect on their health. I believe that fine coal dust can cause irreversible damage to the lungs. But it is also a concern when we visit them and our kids are potentially breathing in coal dust as well. There has also been an effect on my parents emotionally. The farm that they searched for and purchased in 1979 - their own piece of paradise - isn’t a serene rural landscape anymore. The whole Wybong community has been fractured. Families who lived in the area for generations have been forced to sell up. My parents can see the mine to the South, from their house, and the cooling Southerly breezes bring a cloud of dust directly from the mine. My parents have put up with their noisy neighbours (the mine) for years and done everything they can to preserve the unique property they have, but they should not be forced to leave simply because it is a danger to their health to stay there.
Renewable energy is the future. Why can’t the mines start investing in it instead of destroying our precious Australian landscape?
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Jarrod Cameron
Support
Jarrod Cameron
Message
lee curran
Object
lee curran
Message
1. The value of property in proximity to a mine is significantly diminished. In our community there are several members who are reaching the age where they will be needing to move. Their financial future is in jeopardy with the decreased value of their property. Anyone in the community who needs/wants to move will also experience difficulty in selling, if indeed they are able to sell at all!
2. A sense of Community is an important part of rural life. Already many members of the Wybong community have been displaced and an expansion would further impact on the disintegration of our community feel. The Hall, once a hub of social life holds a small percentage of activities compared to years gone by. Many of the community members mourn this loss.
3.There is also the very obvious environmental concerns. The beautiful landscape with its unique flora and fauna will be replaced by massive destruction. By Glencore's own admission it will be 15-20 years before the land is usable again after the mine operations are finished. It is intolerable that 2 extremely large voids will be left. So much for the landscape being "rehabilitated".
4. I am concerned about the air quality. I don't care how many tests have been done I know the dust is an issue every time I clean the house, look at my white car, look out over the hills. Every time I drive to town the air is worse than Sydney's polluted skyline. If the mine comes closer this is only going to get worse.
5. The noise of the mine is already louder than it was as it is moving. At night there is a steady rumbling and blasting is louder. Again, tests mean nothing when the proof is in the living with it.
As an overview, these 5 points taken together add up to a drastic deterioration in lifestyle for the people who live and/or work in this community. The project extends the mine life by 5 years. It destroys the landscape for at least 20 years, displaces people for the rest of their life, pollutes the air for the life of the mine and creates no extra employment for the local area. The council receives an extra 5 years of revenue - then what? They still need to provide services. Does/has this extra revenue kept businesses open in Muswellbrook? No. Does/has this extra revenue provided the Wybong community with any extra services? No.
As far as I can see, there are no real benefits to this project and the effects it will have on our community are significant. Approval for this project must be considered to be detrimental to the continuing welfare of this rural community and so therefore I would urge it to be denied.
Thank You
Lee Curran
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Iain Hayes
Support
Iain Hayes
Message
The mine provides employment for people with very diverse backgrounds, some with previous mining experience & some, like myself, without previous mining experience. I feel each of those individuals has something to add to the continued life of the mine. An extension of the mine project gives those people a sense of certainty.
The mine site has existing infrastructure, most of which I understand will be used for the Continued Operations Project rather than taking up new areas of land & new resources to build the infrastructure from scratch.