State Significant Development
Martins Creek Quarry Project
Dungog Shire
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
The proposal involves the extraction of 1.1 million tonnes of material per annum, comprising of andesite hard rock, expansion into new extraction areas and the consolidation of existing operations and approvals.
Attachments & Resources
Notice of Exhibition (1)
Request for SEARs (6)
EIS (69)
Engagement (2)
Response to Submissions (2)
Agency Advice (43)
Amendments (21)
Additional Information (20)
Assessment (1)
Recommendation (3)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
There are no post approval documents available
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
There are no inspections for this project.
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Tessa Hyde
Object
Tessa Hyde
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Louise Askew
Object
Louise Askew
Message
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
1. Martins Creek quarry has existed in our community for over one hundred years and had not been an issue at the historical rate of extraction and whilst using rail cartage.
The proposed (and more recent last 5-7 years) rate of extraction and transportation from the site is incapable of being handled by the existing road transport infrastructure with particular reference to the crossing of 19th/early 20th Century road bridges which were never designed to handle vehicles of this weight and width along with local traffic. The proposed cartage of heavy loads in articulated vehicles through the right angle and dog-leg bends of the 19th century village of Paterson is an accident just waiting to happen and may very well result in loss-of-life. Paterson village road infrastructure, by virtue of its heritage, is not designed to handle modern multi-axle road transport in the volumes desired by this development. An alternative route must be found or increase the use of the rail corridor to a centralised dump (or dumps) in closer proximity to the market where it would be presumed that better heavy vehicle road infrastructure was already in place (or reinstate the 300,000 ton extraction rate).
Whilst it is obvious that road transport gives the developer greater supply flexibility, and the capital cost is largely born by the transport contractor, it must be incumbent on the developer to seek other solutions than road transport, which will significantly increase the developer's costs and rightly so as the developer is the only party to gain from this exercise.
Paterson village is already experiencing higher traffic volume as the result of increased residential development within Dungog Shire which is unlikely to abate. Adding higher volumes of bulk material transport to the mix is only going to exacerbate this developing issue.
2. Dust generated from quarrying is unavoidable but must be mitigated. Our property is located 5.5Km due south of the quarry and yet the overflow chamber of the rain gauge (still air) collects grey granite-like dust which must be falling from the sky. I presume from the quarry. On a still, clear day a plume of dust can be seen rising from the Martins Creek Quarry.
WH&S are now raising issue with the use of granite bench tops and associated dust generated during the production of these bench tops.
If we're getting quarry dust in the rain gauge then we're breathing it as well.
The existing 300,000 ton extraction limit should be reinstated and policed. We all need the quarry product but there are other sources (some local).
Cathy Easdown
Object
Cathy Easdown
Message
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
We witness a large amount of near misses of accidents turning out from Bolwarra road onto Paterson road and from Paterson road into Bolwarra road where cars let alone trucks can safely go around the turning car ... you guessed it holding handfuls of school children. And that’s just the misses! I have helped many people in accidents both when I’m at home and attending through the local RFS.
Our eldest son suffers from bad asthma and we do all the prescribed solutions from our specialists and actively use natural ways of helping him overcome this but the amount of dust and dirt from the hauling trucks is something we can not control.
The air quality will severely impact his and others children’s health!
Not only do we live on the main road currently impacted by high traffic, our home will be inundated by noise, driving issues and our house price!
Please do not make the mistake of allowing this to proceed! Many families, animals, Infrastructure and the quality of life will be affected.
Les Johnston
Object
Les Johnston
Message
Attachments
Ben Paterson
Object
Ben Paterson
Message
Knowingly going well over and above what was allowed. Putting extra pressure on already struggling road infrastructure.
The amount of trucks proposed is beyond a joke for a small down of Paterson and the built up areas of Bolwarra.
Janice Haviland
Object
Janice Haviland
Message
A. based on the history of the company and their unwillingness to comply with their license
B. the negative ramifications for the community
C. the EPBC Act regarding environmental damage and loss of habitats and threatened species.
Communities and commerce within the existing Maitland Hinterlands and Paterson Valley districts are thriving; with local agriculture, residential construction, equine industry and services, tourism, wedding venues, hospitality and agricultural tertiary education all providing jobs and economic support to the region. According to 2011 Australian Bureau of Statistics for the Dungog Shire these sectors provide 1719 local jobs. An expansion of hard rock mining which pays no state royalties and contributes little to the local economy will place at risk many of these local jobs and local businesses as well as have a detrimental affect on the standard of living for the community.
Finally, the EPBC Act which was reviewed by Graeme Samuel has been a failure for our wildlife and the environment and is fundamentally flawed. Unlisted and even listed threatened species and ecosystems are not receiving the protection they need and are entitled to under the Act. Such as the failings of this system that have allowed assessments and approvals to take place with little or no scrutiny to protect our wildlife and their habitats. As this proposal and past actions by Daracon demonstrates, we need transparent environmental assessments and holding decision makers and corporations to account if they fail their obligations to protect critical habitats (Ramsar Listed Wetlands), fauna and flora. We firmly oppose the Martins Creek Quarry Expansion proposal completely.
Please refer to our attached PDF document for our detailed reasons to support our views.
Yours sincerely
Janice Haviland Martin Derby
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Attachments
Lew Linnertson
Object
Lew Linnertson
Message
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Fiona Linnertson
Object
Fiona Linnertson
Message
Attachments
Catherine Craven
Object
Catherine Craven
Message
Jennie Curran
Object
Jennie Curran
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
My objections to increased quarry production and expansion are:
1. ROAD ISSUES
• The local road transport network was not designed to be used by large trucks, let alone an increase to the number of truck movements.
• Our local roads are already being damaged by these heavily-laden trucks. As rate-payers and road users the cost falls back on us in repairs to our roads and vehicles that suffer from the damage caused.
• The safety aspects of these increased truck movements is of real concern. Paterson village obviously exists for the benefit of its residents. Depending on where residents live they need to be able to safely walk or drive (and park) to access Paterson’s businesses and services. Parking spaces are already limited. The idea that making changes that would remove parking spaces to allow trucks to more safely negotiate the t-intersection in the centre of Paterson is ludicrous. Paterson roads don’t exist for the sole benefit of a quarry owner for the transportation of their products.
• From a personal point of view I am finding it increasingly difficult to access facilities in my own village. I often walk to visit local businesses and services. Safely crossing the busy road through Paterson with traffic levels as they exist now can be particularly frustrating and time-consuming, let alone dangerous. I have witnessed numerous “near-misses” with trucks involved.
• Driving brings its own set of concerns. I need to turn right at King Street to reach my house. There is no turning lane for me or the main traffic turning left at this intersection. Add trucks into the traffic flow and it becomes an accident waiting to happen.
2. AIR QUALITY
• Dust emissions from the quarry as it exists are of concern to our health. The tangible evidence in our rain gauge shows the fallout from the quarry’s production. Obviously the air that we breathe contains this same substance. The dust cloud pall which is visible above the quarry and its surrounds is an issue that needs to be addressed. A system of dust monitoring should be established for the protection of the residents of Paterson and surrounds.
3. NOISE
• The noise of empty trucks in the early morning disturbs a large corridor within the Paterson community. Transport hours should be restricted and closely monitored as this is regularly flouted.
Martins Creek Quarry’s expansion proposal is not in the best interests of the residents of our area. The damage already being caused to our safety, health and environment cannot be justified in the profits of the quarry owner. The quarry does provide employment in our region. It does not need to be expanded to continue this employment to the detriment of the area’s residents.
Daracon has proven itself repeatedly to be a less-than-honest corporate citizen. As a company it has shown that it is willing to operate outside the legal constraints applied to it. Careful monitoring of its future behaviour is obviously warranted.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Application Number SSD-6612
My opposition to the physical expansion, increase in production and expansion of operating hours is based on the following.
As a resident of Paterson village for some years and as a pedestrian and road user in the wider area with a young family, I am very concerned with the proposal to expand hours and production.
I believe the increased truck movements dramatically increases the potential danger on our narrow country roads and in our local villages.
Increased trucks also mean increased noise and disruption to the amenity of our local villages and increased road damage.
The proposed intersection of Dungog Rd and the proposed new quarry entry road would be dangerously located on a windy section of road.
Three out of four road routes to and from the quarry are across a single lane bridge and from my experience not many trucks really want to slow down or stop to give way to a car. The 4th road route is over a rail bridge and is signposted 25kph.
The main road through Paterson is periodically cut by floodwater at which time traffic is diverted directly past our house. Every truck would then be diverted onto streets that are even tighter for heavy vehicles to negotiate. Bringing with them all the noise and associated dangers to young kids living on a normally quiet street.
The increase in truck traffic by whatever route through the local area is a catastrophe in the making.