Mixed use development including infill affordable housing - Chatswood Grand Residences

I strongly support this proposal.
The reason as to why are the following
1. This proposal represents an excellent proposal for more much needed housing supply
2. It is a short walk from shops, services, and Chatswood station that offers bus, train, and metro services
3. It is expected to provide some retail & commercial use on the ground level & a childcare centre at level 2
4. The amount of parking while seemingly in breach of the council's DCP maximum amount of parking in the Chatswood CBD area as per ECM_6906040_v4_Willoughby Development Control Plan 2023 (page 221 for the map of the Chatswood CBD area & page 211 - for e) of the Residential specification) seems like it is permitted by the Housing SEPP (I personally believe that the minimums should not have been specified for affordable housing in-fill for the non-affordable housing dwellings & left out otherwise it seems that an applicant can use the minimums and ignore maximums that are set by council & or the NSW Government). Given the location, there are arguments that less parking could be provided but the amount being provided doesn't seem unreasonable in my non-expert opinion. If the parking maximums were applied to the market housing - we end up with a maximum of 220 spots being permitted for the residential portion which is far less than 342 stated minimum amount of parking.

Note: The proposal documents include the following -
"Based guidance for in-fill affordable housing noted in Part 2, Division 1 of the State Environmental Planning Policy (Housing) 2021 (‘Housing SEPP’), a consent authority may not refuse an in-fill affordable housing development, if the following minimum parking requirements met:" which is why I am suggesting that there is an issue with the current 2021 Housing SEPP when it comes to market housing parking rates.

Please see attached Submission dated 1 May 2025.

As per submission attachment

This submission objects to the proposal, with amendments requested.

I'm writing in support of the project. With so much infrastructure in Chatswood, including two different train stations, it would be foolish to turn this down. In such an intense housing crisis we need more housing of all types especially affordable housing.

I will give birth soon, and the noise and dust from the construction will negatively affect both my recovery and my newborn’s well-being. A quiet, clean environment is essential during this period and also after given birth.
I kindly request that the responsible parties reconsider the schedule or take measures to reduce the impact on nearby residents.

My primary reason for this objection is that my child is expected to be born soon. The anticipated construction noise, dust, and general environmental disruption will pose significant risks to the health and development of a newborn. Constant loud noise, vibrations, and air pollution can adversely affect a baby’s sleep, respiratory system, and overall well-being. These impacts are especially critical during the early stages of life, when a quiet, clean, and stable environment is essential.
I kindly urge the relevant authorities and developers to reconsider the timing and scope of this project, and to explore alternative schedules or mitigation measures that would minimize the negative impact on nearby residents, especially vulnerable individuals like newborns.
Thank you for your attention and understanding. I hope my concerns will be taken into serious consideration.

I do not support the project in its current form as I have concerns about the impact of this development on road traffic. Specifically:

1. Traffic impact calculations have been made on the basis of the number of parking spots, rather than the GFA of the site. This assumption seems to be flawed, as it ignores the increasing use of rideshare in this area.

2. The traffic report notes that the site includes land that is intended to be acquired by Transport for NSW for the widening of the Pacific Highway. Such widening would greatly improve southbound traffic flow as one lane is frequently tied up by traffic waiting to turn right into Fullers Road. The traffic report states that "The design takes this potential future road widening into consideration by not locating any permanent structures within the SP2 zoned land", but it's not clear what impact such a land acquisition would have on the Pacific Highway setback and pedestrian and cycleway access. I ask that further work be done to show the impact if/when the road widening does proceed.

I also oppose the requests for variation of FSR and building height. These "problems" are easily solved by removing one or two floors from the design. The circa 4,300 sqm site provides ample opportunity for a high-quality development without the need for compromises on FSR and height, particularly given the 30% FSR and height uplift already added to the project. If these non-compliances are approved for this project, it sets a precedent for the other projects planned for this area.

Subject: Objection to Proposed Height Increase of Development at 849,853, 859 Pacific Highway and 2-8 Wilson St Chatswood.

Dear Department of planning, housing and infrastructure,
I am writing to formally object to the proposed amendment to increase the height of the development at 849,853, 859 Pacific Highway and 2-8 Wilson St Chatswood from 32 storeys to 36 storeys — representing a 30% height and floor space bonus — under the current planning application.
As a resident of 11 Railway St Chatswood which is directly adjacent to the proposed site, I am already significantly affected by the original 32-storey design. The proposed increase will result in a further and unacceptable deterioration of my living conditions, and I wish to express my strong opposition on the following grounds:
1. Severe Loss of Privacy
The additional height and increased number of units will result in even more windows directly overlooking my living room, balcony, and master bedroom. This is a direct intrusion into my private space, severely impacting my daily living and sense of comfort within my own home.
2. Overshadowing
The proposed increase will cast further shadows onto my apartment, particularly over my living room and master bedroom. Natural light will be significantly reduced, affecting both my wellbeing and the quality of life within my home.
3. Increased Traffic Congestion in Obrien street and Railway Street
Obrien Street small in size, but the developer has chosen to utilize it as the main entrance and exit driveway for their upcoming project. Previously known for its quiet and safety, the street is now facing the potential consequences of increased density due to the development. This heightened density will inevitably lead to heightened daily congestion to Railway street, posing a threat to pedestrian safety and causing a rise in noise and pollution levels within this once peaceful residential area.
4. Overdevelopment of the Site
The original proposal was already ambitious. The additional 30% height and floor space bonus being sought by the developer represents a clear overreach and an attempt to overdevelop the site at the expense of surrounding residents and the local environment.
5. Community Impact and Precedent
Allowing this height increase would set a concerning precedent for future developments in the area. The character and livability of the neighborhood would be irrevocably altered, with long-term implications for community cohesion and residential amenity.
I respectfully urge the planning authority to reject this proposed increase and uphold the original height restriction — or reconsider the approval of the development altogether, given the adverse impacts.
Please acknowledge receipt of this objection. I would welcome the opportunity to speak further on this matter at any upcoming planning meetings or hearings.

Yours sincerely,
N Tzou
1607/11 Railway street, Chatswood
0409240685
22-April-2025

Objection to proposed development
SSD-74319707
Mixed use development with infill affordable housing
849, 853, 859 Pacific Highway & 2-8 Wilson Street, Chatswood

As residents in 1 Day Street we are deeply concerned about the negative impacts of proposed development to the neighbourhood and would like to voice our strong objection to the proposed development.

The proposed two 32-storey high-rise apartment will block the views and severely diminish the external lighting and ventilation of residents in 1 Day Street and neighboring residential apartments and houses. It will certainly infringe the privacy of the residents of the individual balconies and common spaces of residents in 1 Day Street. All these will seriously affect the wellbeing of residents in 1 Day Street and the neighbourhood.

The proposed multi-storey buildings and developments is incompatible with the neigibourhood with mostly low rises and houses in the vicinity of the Heritage Conservation Area, and affects the local landscapes.

The problem is further aggravated with the already-proposed developments of multiple hig-hrise apartments clustering around the neighbourhood of Anderson Street and Day Street.

The residents in 1 Day Street will also be greatly affected by the noises from the demolition and construction. The negative impact will likely be compounded with the multiple development projects being proposed around Anderson Street, adding to the grievance of the residents in 1 Day Street.

The multi storey apartments will certainly generate extra vehicle traffic, which will affect the neighbourhood and will also significantly cause inconveniences to residents in 1 Day Street.

We urge the local authorities to listen to our voice and seriously consider the aggravations towards the residents of 1 Days Street caused by the combined effects of the series of proposed high rise apartments, and reject this development.

The proposed development is inappropriately excessive. It will worsen the already-severe traffic congestion in the area, including the neighbouring Anderson St which is a major thoroughfare into Chatswood. Zinnia Lane (the lane for Violet and Tulip St residents to access their garages) has seen an increased number of drivers speeding through (from Archer St to Anderson St then onto Wilson St and Pacific Highway) who have reckless disregard for the safety of residents getting in and out of their own homes. The proposed development will exacerbate this issue.
A development of this height and scale (including demolition of existing trees) will invade the privacy of existing residents including their backyards.
The inclusion of Affordable Housing will introduce security concerns in this traditionally safe and family-oriented community.
The proposed development must be halted and heavily-curtailed to prevent destruction of the amenity and sustainability of this neighbourhood.