Part3A Modifications
Determination
Mod 4 – Changes to Mining & Water Supply
Forbes Shire
Current Status: Determination
Attachments & Resources
Application (2)
EA (13)
Response to Submissions (5)
Additional Information (6)
Recommendation (3)
Determination (3)
Submissions
Showing 41 - 48 of 48 submissions
Forbes Shire Council
Object
Forbes Shire Council
Object
Forbes
,
New South Wales
Message
Thank you for the opportunity to make a submission in relation to modification 4 to the approved development for the sunrise nickel/cobalt mine within the Lachlan Shire Council, approved as a part of DA 374-11.
Forbes Shire Council makes the following submission in response to modification 4 to the approved development for the sunrise nickel/cobalt mine within the Lachlan Shire Council.
Water supply from the borefields and Surface Water Extraction from the Lachlan River
The raw water supply intake for the sunrise nickel/cobalt mine is proposed to be drawn from the southern borefield and Lachlan River, drawing water from the Lachlan Formation groundwater system and Lachlan River.
The approved development initially was drawing a raw water supply from the Lachlan Formation only from groundwater extraction from the southern borefield. This modification proposes to extract water from both groundwater and surface extraction from the Lachlan River.
The raw water demand for the operation of the mine was originally estimated and approved up to approximately 17.5ML/D or an annualised basis, up to 6,387 ML/year.
An optimisation study has since been completed by Clean TeQ resulting in the opportunity to increase the efficiency of the mining and process operations, as well as increasing the recycling of water on-site and therefore reducing the water demand from external water supply sources. It is estimated that 662 ML/year to 789 ML/year of the raw water will be comprise of recycled water.
This will reduce the demand for raw water extracted from the borefields within the Lachlan formation to 5598 ML/year to 5725 ML/year. This water could be supplied solely from the groundwater extraction from the Lachlan borefields which have the capacity to pump 6308 ML/year based on the long term trial that has been carried out on the constructed borefield.
If the recycled water was not provided this would result in a deficit of 79 ML/year based on the maximum capacity of the Lachlan formation borefield.
Given the analysis above why would the Sunrise Nickel/Cobalt Mine need to secure 350ML/year from general access licences (surface water extraction) from the Lachlan River?
At most they would only need to secure the deficit of 79 ML/year from general access licences (surface water extraction) from the Lachlan River.
The Water Management Assessment also specifies that "where available they would obtain further surface water extraction general access licences to the Lachlan River". If Sunrise Nickel/Cobalt Mine have secured adequate water supply from the general access water licences (surface water extraction) which equate to 350 ML/year and extract 6308 ML/year from the borefields within the Lachlan formation, why would further general access licences need to be obtained? And how many would be obtained?
Obtaining further surface water extraction general access licences from the Lachlan River would negatively impact on the primary production (irrigated and non-irrigated) agricultural sector within the Forbes Local Government Area.
The agricultural sector is the largest sector of the economy of Forbes LGA and the loss of this resource from securing general access licences (surface water extraction) from the Lachlan River would be significant. A local agronomist has quantified the loss in agricultural production would equate to $1.2 million.
A socio-economic assessment should be prepared to assess and quantify the impact from the loss of general access licences (surface water extraction) from the Lachlan River on agricultural sector within the Forbes Local Government Area.
Attachments
OEH
Comment
OEH
Comment
Dubbo
,
New South Wales
Message
See attached
Attachments
DRG
Comment
DRG
Comment
Hunter Region Mail Centre
,
New South Wales
Message
See attached
Attachments
RMS
Comment
RMS
Comment
Parkes
,
New South Wales
Message
See attached
Attachments
CL&W
Comment
CL&W
Comment
Sydney
,
New South Wales
Message
See attached
Attachments
EPA
Comment
EPA
Comment
Dubbo
,
New South Wales
Message
See attached
Attachments
RFS
Comment
RFS
Comment
GRANVILLE
,
New South Wales
Message
See attached
Attachments
DPE - Resources Regulator
Comment
DPE - Resources Regulator
Comment
Sydney
,
New South Wales
Message
See attached
Attachments
Pagination
Project Details
Application Number
DA374-11-00-Mod-4
Main Project
DA374-11-00
Assessment Type
Part3A Modifications
Development Type
Minerals Mining
Local Government Areas
Forbes Shire
Decision
Approved
Determination Date
Decider
IPC-N
Contact Planner
Name
Rose-Anne
Hawkeswood
Related Projects
DA374-11-00-Mod-3
Determination
Part3A Modifications
Mod 3 - Scandium Oxide Production
Fifield New South Wales Australia
DA374-11-00-Mod-5
Determination
Part3A Modifications
Mod 5 – Timing of Hazards Studies
Fifield New South Wales Australia
DA374-11-00-Mod-4
Determination
Part3A Modifications
Mod 4 – Changes to Mining & Water Supply
Fifield New South Wales Australia
DA374-11-00-Mod-6
Determination
Part3A Modifications
Mod 6 – Relocation of Accommodation Camp
Fifield New South Wales Australia
DA374-11-00-Mod-2
Determination
Part4Mod
Mod 2 - Modified Borefield Layout
, ,Fifield,New South Wales,,Australia
DA374-11-00-Mod-1
Determination
Part4Mod
Mod 1 - Increased Extraction & Production
, ,Fifield,New South Wales,,Australia
DA374-11-00-Mod-7
Determination
SSD Modifications
Mod 7 - Design Changes
, ,Fifield,New South Wales,,Australia