Skip to main content
Back to Main Project

SSD Modifications

Assessment

Modification 4 Longwall 317 and 318 Modification

Wollongong City

Current Status: More Information Required

Interact with the stages for their names

  1. SEARs
  2. Prepare Mod Report
  3. Exhibition
  4. Collate Submissions
  5. Response to Submissions
  6. Assessment
  7. Recommendation
  8. Determination

Reconfiguration of Longwall 317 and addition of new longwall 318

EPBC

This project is a controlled action under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 and will be assessed under the bilateral agreement between the NSW and Commonwealth Governments, or an accredited assessment process. For more information, refer to the Australian Government's website.

Attachments & Resources

Early Consultation (1)

SEARs (2)

EPBC (1)

Modification Application (17)

Response to Submissions (23)

Agency Advice (29)

Additional Information (7)

Submissions

Filters
Showing 41 - 60 of 216 submissions
Liz Herdson
Object
GERRINGONG , New South Wales
Message
No more coal mining - stop poisoning everything
Andy Telfer
Object
MOSSY POINT , New South Wales
Message
As a graduate Environmental Engineer from the University of Wollongong, and as a resident of the South Coast of NSW, I can say that we are all affected by the dangers to water security to the Sydney Water Catchment. As we move into an unstable future climate, water security and planning for a sustainable, healthy water catchment is necessary for the regions resilience to climate impacts, let alone the addition Carbon released by expanding coal extraction and use from this mine.

The risk to the upland swamps and streams feeding the Woronora Reservoir are critical natural public infrastructure which directly serve us for our most precious resource, drinking water! Why risk threatening these systems by undermining further into the this catchment. I strongly oppose the expansion to this longwall mine operation in our drinking water catchment.
Name Withheld
Object
WOOLOOWARE , New South Wales
Message
Our drinking water is precious and mining underneath Woronora Reservoir water catchment is a bad idea. The government should draw a line that protects the catchment area. Already we have issues of coal pollution in the Royal National Park. Peabody Metropolitan Colliery discharged into Royal National Park waterways in 2022 and 2023. The company was convicted and received a $500,000 fine, including costs. Can this company be trusted?
Darryl Best
Object
WOONONA , New South Wales
Message
I am opposed to this extension. The reasons are detailed in my submission, but to summarise they are:
I worked entirely in coal mines for all of my career. I know what damage they cause.
Peabody have an appalling track record with environmental vandalism.
No mining should be under a major city's water catchment area.
We should be establishing renewable industries in these areas, not adding to the devastating effects of climate change by approving more coal.
Longwall mining causes major subsidence which effects the surface landscape, which includes several creeks, rivers, rock platforms and many species of wildlife.
This will increase the methane emissions.
This decision should be sent to the IPC.
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Caringbah South , New South Wales
Message
Good evening
I am writing to object to the proposal to expand the longwall mining in the Metropolitan mine at Helensburgh.
I am a long-term resident of the Sutherland Shire and have spent many years working at the Woronora Reservoir and I am concerned that an expansion of the longwall mining will affect the water quality in the dam which is a major source of drinking water for Helensburgh and the Sutherland Shire. Longwall mines have been shown to cause subsidence of land above the mining and this puts the upland swamps at risk of draining and subsequently drying out. In their natural condition the swamps store water during wet periods and gradually release this water into the downstream streams and into the dam. If the swamps are drained the runoff following rainfall will be more rapid leading to erosion and poor water quality in the dam making the water more difficult to treat to the standards required by Sydney Water. During times of low rainfall there will be less runoff from the surrounding land because the swamps will have been drained due to the subsidence and the water in the dam will not be replenished by slow release of water from the swamps. This change in stream flow will most likely have a major effect on the biodiversity in streams below the swamps as well as in the swamps themselves.
The impact of further mining will also release methane, which is a very powerful greenhouse gas, from the coal seams which will add to the impact of climate change.
Even though this is just one source of emission, the addition of more methane to the atmosphere reduces the chance of keeping the global temperature below 2 degrees centigrade and so increases the risk of increase in extreme weather events and the cost to society of repairing damage caused to infrastructure in addition to the disruption to peoples' lives.
Please do not allow this expansion to proceed.
Matthew Beresford
Object
KAREELA , New South Wales
Message
I object to the proposal of digging tunnels underneath the water catchment area that supplies drinking water to Sydney. During a recent outbreak of contamination worronora water was mixes in with warragamba catchment to dilute and ensure safe drinking water. We will be unable to do this if damage to the dam bed and tributaries results in a net loss of drinking water. Peabody has historic offences against them when they released coal sludge into the pristine port hacking River damaging eco systems. While I believe that peabody think they can do it safely and follow the coal $$$ through that area, we must recall mining accidents in the past where an entire lake in the us drained into the mine killing many. We cannot risk loosing our drinking water. Perhaps on a wet august like today there is enough water falling out of the sky, but we have all lived through droughts in Sydney and mandated water rationing. With the growing population of Sydney and Wollongong, we cannot allow to risk this reckless greed to impact the very future of our city.
Philip Beresford
Object
HAMMONDVILLE , New South Wales
Message
Dear Assessment Officer,

I write to strongly oppose the proposed expansion of the Metropolitan Colliery into the northern area beneath the Woronora Reservoir and its catchment. This proposal poses unacceptable risks to Sydney’s drinking water security and to the integrity of surrounding protected ecosystems, and it should be refused on both environmental and public interest grounds.

1. History of Environmental Harm at Metropolitan Colliery

Peabody’s Metropolitan Colliery has an established track record of environmental damage in the Illawarra and adjacent Royal National Park:

Pollution incidents: In 2022 and 2023, the mine discharged coal waste into Camp Gully Creek and the Hacking River. The NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) prosecuted Peabody, resulting in penalties and enforceable undertakings totalling $3.6 million [NSW EPA, 2025]. These events directly polluted waterways within Royal National Park.

Ongoing failures of containment: In August 2023, an embankment collapse released further coal waste downstream, prompting EPA clean-up and prevention notices [NSW EPA, 2023].

This is not an isolated event but a pattern of operational failure and environmental harm.

2. Damage to Local Waterways and Drinking Water Supply

Independent panels and government reviews have repeatedly documented damage caused by longwall mining from the Metropolitan Colliery to streams that flow into the Woronora Reservoir:

Subsidence-induced fracturing and water loss: Pools along the Eastern Tributary cracked and drained following longwall mining, requiring repeated grouting interventions to attempt to restore flow [NSW DPE, “Sydney Metro Mining Panel Reports,” 2019–2022].

Iron oxide contamination: Mining-related fractures have altered flow pathways, causing iron oxide “staining” and degraded water quality in tributaries [NSW DPE Independent Panel, 2020].

Catchment function reduced: The Independent Expert Panel for Mining in the Catchment (IEPMC) found that mining has reduced surface water availability and increased the risk of leakage into subsurface pathways in the Special Areas that feed Woronora Reservoir [IEPMC Annual Report, 2022].

Any extension beneath the reservoir itself risks catastrophic and irreversible impacts on one of Sydney’s key drinking water supplies.

3. Impacts on Royal National Park and Sensitive Species

The mine’s discharges and hydrological alterations extend into the Royal National Park, a protected biodiversity refuge:

Platypus habitat degradation: Platypuses (Ornithorhynchus anatinus), recently confirmed in the Hacking River catchment, depend on clean, reliable streamflow. Coal fines, sedimentation, and altered hydrology directly threaten their habitat [University of NSW Platypus Survey, 2020].

Amphibian impacts: Following the 2022 pollution events, surveys recorded sick and debilitated green stream frogs (Litoria phyllochroa) in the Hacking River catchment, an alarming indicator of water quality stress [Sydney Morning Herald, reporting EPA investigations, 2023].

The expansion proposal places both aquatic ecosystems and iconic native species at further risk.

4. Wetlands and Upland Swamp Damage

Illawarra upland swamps, listed as an Endangered Ecological Community under NSW legislation, are vital to maintaining catchment hydrology. Scientific studies have found:

Longwall mining causes swamp cracking and accelerated drying, leading to irreversible ecological change [Young, A., “Swamp Impacts from Underground Mining,” IEPMC report, 2019].

These upland swamps act as natural sponges that regulate flow and filter water entering reservoirs. Damage to them reduces both yield and water quality for the Woronora system.

Expansion under the reservoir catchment would place additional upland swamps at risk of drying and degradation.

5. Conclusion

The Metropolitan Colliery has already demonstrated an inability to operate without causing serious environmental harm. Its track record includes:

Proven pollution offences and EPA prosecutions (Camp Gully Creek, Hacking River).

Subsidence and water loss from key tributaries to Woronora Reservoir.

Documented damage to Royal National Park waterways, affecting platypus and frog populations.

Ongoing destruction of endangered upland swamps.

In this context, permitting expansion under the Woronora Reservoir — a critical drinking water supply — is indefensible. I respectfully submit that the NSW Government must refuse this proposal to protect Sydney’s water security, preserve the ecological integrity of Royal National Park, and prevent further damage to endangered wetlands.

Yours sincerely,



Key References

NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA), Peabody prosecuted for coal pollution into Royal National Park (2025).

NSW Department of Planning and Environment, Sydney Metropolitan Mining Panel Reports (2019–2022).

Independent Expert Panel for Mining in the Catchment (IEPMC), Annual Report 2022.

Young, A. (2019), Swamp Impacts from Underground Mining, IEPMC Technical Report.

University of NSW (2020), Platypus Surveys in the Hacking River Catchment.
Shan Patterson
Object
Cremorne Point , New South Wales
Message
To whom it may concern,
I am writing to express my extreme anguish at the proposed extension of the Metropolitan Coal mining operation. The proposal is disgraceful, as is the whole mining operation. The operation should never have been approved in the first place but the least that can be done now is to disallow any further mining activities. The mine threatens the Sydney drinking water catchment and biodiversity in the Royal National Park and Woronora Plateau. It also threatens the cultural heritage of our precious Royal National Park, Australia's oldest.
The mining operations have already polluted the Hacking River and the Royal National Park more broadly, so how any further developments are even considered beggars belief. When the general public is not even allowed to walk inside the catchment area the proposed mine would site under, or risk severe fines, how is longwall mining that threatens the very groundwater we, and broader biological values, in the Sydney region rely on even conceivable?
I hope my strong opposition is listened to and that common sense prevails.
LYNETTE FARMER
Object
WORONORA , New South Wales
Message
The proposal for mining company to "Modify" the coal mining in the Woronora Catchment is disgusting. Mainly because it is NOT a Modification but a new project - which if reviewed as a new project it would not comply with current Environmental guidelines.

The American company undertaking the coal mining, Peabody, pays NO Tax to Australia, it pays a small royalty - but makes billions from mining. I demand my Government explain why permission would be given to an overseas company to pollute the water I drink; to ruin the environment - the destruction is well documented; and to expand mining activities without proper consultation. This company has a terrible track record when it comes to Environmental aspects.

I voted for a Government to govern and rule for the betterment of Australia; not overseas mining companies. Many people are concerned that our Government is not meeting legislative requirements for water and environmental protections. More and more people are becoming concerned about destruction of environment and the Government must act upon its electorate's concerns.

The company, Peabody, make very weak claims that they "fix" damaged swamp lands - which is impossible; and that they do Carbon Offsets. Carbon Offsets are not meant to counteract DAMAGE - they are to help reach net zero for carbon emissions; they do not negate damage and pollution .
The project should NOT go ahead - it is so bad it is hardly believable that any Government Department or sector of Government could consider giving permission for any expansion. It should be wound back, not expanded.
Lyn Farmer
Sam Short
Object
HELENSBURGH , New South Wales
Message
The ecological responsibility of this mine is questionable as its history has shown.
Allowing continued mining in and under the water catchment is dangerous to our future.
Please do not allow this to go ahead .
Allan Pryor
Support
Figtree , New South Wales
Message
Submission in support of the extension of Metropolitan Colliery
Coal is NSW’s most valuable export and is Australia’s second most valuable export.
Our national, state and local economies rely heavily on coal mining which provides multiple benefits for all Australians.
The modification will generate a net economic benefit for NSW and for the Illawarra local community.
Coking coal from coal mines in the Southern Coalfield has ideal qualities for steel production and it has fewer impurities, such as sulphur and phosphorus, than coal from countries in Asia. Australian coal contains less than 0.5 percent of sulphur, whereas Indonesia that has more than 2 percent sulphur content in its coal.
The coal mined by Metropolitan Colliery is high quality metallurgical (coking) coal, with about 10 percent of its product of thermal coal quality. Coking coal is essential to make steel with current technology.
It is vital that high quality metallurgical (coking) coal is produced locally to supply the Bluescope steel works and overseas industries. Local coal production minimises transport costs and ensures that high quality coke is produced. This assists Australia to maintain its competitive advantage compared with overseas producers.
The federal government’s ABS tables of multiplier effects show that more than three times as many indirect jobs are created for every person directly employed in a coal mine.
Australia and NSW need to focus on the positive aspects of coal mining and its many benefits so as not be distracted by ideologically driven anti-mining activists. Everyone should be proud of what coal mining is doing for NSW and Australia.
Coal is literally building our future. Without it, we couldn’t make steel to build our homes, bridges, schools and hospitals.
The report submitted demonstrates its comprehensive coverage of all environmental issues. The benefits from the continuation of this coal mine are immense.
For all of these reasons I fully support the proposal.
Attachments
Name Withheld
Support
FIGTREE , New South Wales
Message
Submission in support of the extension of Metropolitan Colliery
Our national, state and local economies rely heavily on coal mining which provides multiple benefits for all Australians.
The modification will generate a net economic benefit for NSW and for the Illawarra local community.
Coal is NSW’s most valuable export and is Australia’s second most valuable export.
Coking coal from coal mines in the Southern Coalfield has ideal qualities for steel production and it has fewer impurities, such as sulphur and phosphorus, than coal from countries in Asia. Australian coal contains less than 0.5 percent of sulphur, whereas Indonesia that has more than 2 percent sulphur content in its coal.
The coal mined by Metropolitan Colliery is high quality metallurgical (coking) coal, with about 10 percent of its product of thermal coal quality. Coking coal is essential to make steel with current technology.
It is vital that high quality metallurgical (coking) coal is produced locally to supply the Bluescope steel works and overseas industries. Local coal production minimises transport costs and ensures that high quality coke is produced. This assists Australia to maintain its competitive advantage compared with overseas producers.
The federal government’s ABS tables of multiplier effects show that more than three times as many indirect jobs are created for every person directly employed in a coal mine.
Australia and NSW need to focus on the positive aspects of coal mining and its many benefits so as not be distracted by ideologically driven anti-mining activists. Everyone should be proud of what coal mining is doing for NSW and Australia.
The report submitted demonstrates its comprehensive coverage of all environmental issues. The benefits from the continuation of this coal mine are immense.
Coal is literally building our future. Without it, we couldn’t make steel to build our homes, bridges, schools and hospitals.
For all these reasons I fully support the proposal.
Attachments
Name Withheld
Support
KANAHOOKA , New South Wales
Message
Supporting locals, with means of employment
Sonia Chase
Object
Sylvania , New South Wales
Message
I strongly object to this project as I believe this project will damage our public water supply. This company has already pleaded guilty to criminal offenses for discharging coal waste into the Royal National Park.
Cherrida Hardaker
Object
Tarrawanna , New South Wales
Message
My name is Cherrida Hardaker and I am a 79 year old great grandmother living in the Illawarra. I am writing to tell you that I most strongly object to the proposed Metropolitan Coal Mine modification 4 Longwall 317 and 318 Modification (MP08_0149-Mod-4 ‘Modification’).
I most vividly remember the Peabody mine and the coal sludge they inflicted on a tributary of the Hacking River in the Royal National Park not that long ago. This isn’t a ‘Not in my backyard’ submission even though it is in my local government area. This mine and its emissions have implications at a global scale. That is why, even if I wasn’t a resident of the Illawarra, I would still strongly object to the modification for reasons listed in this submission.
Objection to the Modification Proposal
The Metropolitan Coal Mine is an existing underground coal mine located in Helensburgh, and is owned by Peabody Energy Australia Pty Ltd. It currently operates under Project Approval 08_0149 which relates to Longwalls 20-27, 301-317, granted in 2009. The proposed MP08_0149-Mod-4 (the Modification) seeks to:
 expand on the existing approved area by extending the already approved Longwall 317 to the north;
 add an additional Longwall 318 to the west;
 add First Workings mining also to the west; and
 relocate an approved but not yet constructed ventilation shaft (#4) approximately 3 km to the west.
The Metropolitan mining lease sits entirely within the Wollongong Local Government Area (LGA), and the proposed expansion Modification also is within Wollongong LGA’s borders. The Modification proposes to expand mining significantly beyond their Mining Lease boundaries. The Modification (i.e. the expanded underground mining areas and proposed site for the relocated ventilation shaft) is located on land zoned in the Wollongong LEP as C2 (Environmental Conservation).
The Metropolitan Coal Mine mines under the legislated Woronora Special Area of the Greater Sydney Drinking Water Catchment (GSDWC). Special areas are areas recognised as having very high water, water infrastructure and ecological values, and are ‘protected’ under the law. Hefty fines apply to members of the general public who enter without appropriate permission. The Modification proposes to expand further into and further undermine the Woronora Special Area.
The proposed additional Longwall 318 would undermine the large upland swamp (# 106). Under NSW legislation, upland swamps are an endangered ecological community type, and their occurrence contributes to the very high water and ecological values of the Woronora Special Area. Upland swamps help capture water and release it slowly to their surroundings. Longwall mining by Peabody at Metropolitan has already destroyed and damaged other upland swamps through fracturing and subsidence of the geological strata under the swamps. Once the rocks and clays and other geological layers that hold water (under the swamp) are broken up, then when rain falls, the water flows through the swamp rather than being held by it. The swamps dry out: wetland species (plants and animals) die, and peat dries and becomes fuel for fires.
Furthermore, the fracturing and subsidence of the ground caused by underground longwall coal mining allows for methane-rich gases released hundreds of metres underground at the cut coal seams to percolate up and be released into the atmosphere. Whereas upland swamps are natural fire barriers, desiccated upland swamps can increase fire risk. On top of this, the water that would have been retained by the swamps and moved through surface water systems, instead percolates through the fissures and fractures and becomes polluted with heavy metals before it finds its way either down into mine voids and/or out into the wider environment.
I object to this Modification proposal on the following grounds:
 Climate change impacts from both projected and unaccounted-for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions:
o This Modification will lead to yet more projected GHG emissions – Scopes 1, 2 and 3 as outlined in the proposal. Given experience to date of coal mining in Australia, these projected emissions will significantly under-estimate the Scope 1 fugitive methane emissions during the life of the mine and during decommissioning.
o This Modification will lead to GHG emissions that are not accounted for in the proposal. Methane-rich GHG emissions will likely continue for decades, if not centuries, well beyond the mining and decommissioning period – directly from the disrupted landscape and via unsealable infrastructure such as adits and shaft vents. Even if the company follows through with their stated decommissioning and removes the shaft-vent above-ground structures in a timely way and plugs the shaft with reject, there is still no way to reseal the landscape. The use of polyurethane/grout or other materials attempting to repair and plug cracks and repair rock platforms, simply does not work. High-pressure coal seam gases escaping from deep underground will find their way out through other weak spots or openings in the mining-disrupted landscape.
o The Bulli Coal Seam which Metropolitan mines is notoriously gassy. Metropolitan is NSW’s fifth highest emitting coal mine with a very poor track record of GHG abatement. Its Scope 1 emissions in FY24 were at their highest level since the Safeguard Mechanism was introduced in 2016 (at almost 700,000 t CO2-e). Furthermore 80% of Scope 1 in FY24 was methane (554,603 t CO2-e).
o According to the NSW Net Zero Emissions Dashboard, NSW is not on track to meet its 2030 GHG emissions reduction target. Since April 2025, NSW DPHI has approved new coal projects that will very likely be responsible for ~24% of the projected 2030 overshoot. NSW is in an even worse position related to its 2035 target. Approving this Modification will only make meeting NSW emissions targets more difficult. Moreover, experts (e.g. Climate Council, CSIRO, Ember etc) argue that during the next decade the world needs to urgently cut fossil fuel methane emissions – due to the methane’s high warming potency and short lifespan in the atmosphere – while we find ways to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. However, keeping our world within 1.5oC warming now seems already out of reach.
o The Illawarra is already experiencing the beginnings of climate chaos – with seven natural disasters declared since July 2019. Many in our community have been impacted directly by flooding, wind, heat and smoke. In the same time period, the Illawarra Emergency Operations Committee was activated more than 12 times. Our council is still carrying costs from these events. Our community is wearing rising costs resulting from climate change – including higher insurance premiums and rising food costs.
 Further negative impacts on the quantity and quality of water in the GSDWC: this is inconsistent with the neutral or beneficial requirement in the EP&A Act. Metropolitan has already caused very significant damages in the Woronora Special Area (e.g. as discussed in the Independent Expert Panel on Mining in the Catchment reports) – much more than was predicted at the proposal stages, with impacts on water quantity and quality. An extensive literature demonstrates that longwall coal mining busts up the geological strata as evidenced by subsidence, hogging, tilting, fractures, cracks and the like – and this damages the landscape with impacts on water flows and water quality. Moreover, Peabody has released polluted waste material into a waterway which flows through the Royal National Park on numerous occasions through 2022, in January, July, August, September, October, November, and December. In January 2023 the NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) reported yet another spill of “grey, turbid water with possible coal material present.” In March 2023 the NSW EPA reviewed the mine’s license to pollute and tightened some conditions, but this has failed to prevent further damage to the park. In August 2023, the embankment of the mine site next to the adjacent creek collapsed, coal waste material again spilled into the creek, and from there into the Hacking River, which flows through the heart and length of the Royal National Park. Throughout these incidents no effective emergency management procedures were put in place to stop the coal waste polluting the Hacking River and Royal National Park.
 Potential destruction of Aboriginal cultural heritage through damages to sites and to the cultural landscape – occurring across an estimated study area of 455 hectares. The proposal indicates that a total of 29 cultural heritage sites were identified in a survey of just 9% of the area. Consulted Aboriginal parties argue that cultural heritage sites should be considered wholistically and all have high cultural significance even though the Niche assessment did not identify any as having high scientific significance. The report notes potential fracturing of exposed sandstone at grinding groove sites and potential for rockfalls at overhang sites. 25 of the 29 confirmed Aboriginal heritage sites located in the Modification area could experience subsidence-driven ground movement, potentially leading to loss of cultural value.
 Damage or destruction of fragile ecosystems, including specifically to the upland swamp 106.
 Impacts on our biodiversity and species that result from: 1. Geological impacts and altered hydrogeology caused by ground subsidence and fracturing from underground longwall mining; and 2. Direct land, ecosystem and water disturbances associated with surface infrastructure such as shaft vents and sealing of roads and heavy vehicle movements – extending beyond the current impacted Mining Lease zone. Australia is already in a biodiversity and species extinction crisis.

As I was unable to fit the complete submission here I have added the whole submission as an attachment.
Attachments
Name Withheld
Support
Auchenflower , Queensland
Message
I fully support Metropolitan mine's application to modify its existing operations on the basis of the critical economic and social benefits the mine delivers to the Illawarra region as a major employer, partner to local businesses and supplier of metallurgical coal to the local steelworks. The mine supports hundreds of local jobs, injects hundreds of millions of dollars into the local economy in wages and supplier contracts and donates to many local community groups, sporting groups and local charities, including a recent significant donation to encourage platypus populations in the Royal National Park. The coal the mine produces is currently the only affordable heating source to produce steel which is so essential for our daily lives and very important to protect the jobs at the local steelworks as well. I understand community interest in the mine's environmental performance but note that there is no evidence to suggest the mines activities have affected water supply in the Woronora reservoir and that the mine has taken steps to improve its stormwater management during times of very heavy rainfall. I have full confidence in the NSW Planning Department's assessment of this modification application and that they will appropriately balance environmental, social and economic matters when making their decision.
Geoffrey Tolhurst
Support
GWYNNEVILLE , New South Wales
Message
To Whom It May Concern
I wish to support the submission for the extension of Metropolitan Mine. I have worked in the Coal Industry for the past 44 years, in the Illawarra District. The last 7.5 years at Metropolitan.
I also have 3 sons that are, or have been, employed in the Coal Mining Industry, in the Illawarra, and wish for them to have a future that they can rely on, as I have. The people that work at Metropolitan Mine deserve a reliable future, and that will be achieved by the extension of the Project, and beyond.
The Management Team At Metropolitan have gone to extreme lengths to ensure that the mine complies with all regulations, and minimize its 'footprint' in the area.
As per the media release, Metropolitan Mine contributes, significantly, to the community, not only locally, but to the state of NSW, both economically and environmentally.
Name Withheld
Object
BUNDEENA , New South Wales
Message
I object to the proposed modification of longwalls 317 and 318. I am a resident of the southern edge of Sutherland Shire. I have maintained a close watch on the steady expansion of Metropolitan mine and am well versed in the controversial impacts that this mine has had on the local environment and its associated threat to our water supply. I have personally witnessed the evidence of coal waste from spread all the way down the Hacking River to Audley - which the mine was finally prosecuted by the EPA. I am aware of the subsidence impact from earlier longwalls on the Waratah Creek and Eastern Tributary. I fear similar impacts will occur on Honeysuckle Creek tributary. The critical upland swamps hove already suffered from earlier longwalls and despite claims that LW 317 & 318 will minimize swamp impacts, the maps provided do indicate mining will be in close proximity to swamps. Indeed, Metropolitan in their summary of impacts admit at least 6 upland swamps will have a risk of greater than negligible impact. It appears to me that Metropolitan are asking to continue to impact the environment to the similar extent to that experienced from their previous LW mining. I do not believe it is acceptable to continue to impact on the environment and our valuable water sources on the grounds that the damage witnessed from previous mining was allowed.
Keelah Lam
Object
FAIRLIGHT , New South Wales
Message
I object strongly to this proposal for risky underground mining in our drinking catchment.
. This company is known to have breached the law before.
. Previous underground mining such as under Therlmere Lakes has proven disastrous for not only water supply for humans but to the environment and species which depend on continuous lifesaving water.
. The extension of coal mining must be seen as criminal when the disastrous climate effects of extending the burning of fossil fuels is so clear around this planet.
. Our children and theirs deserve responsible decision making, and that means no coal mine extensions.
What is needed is introduction of laws which rapidly reduce the dangers of climate chaos and that includes no new coal.
Nicholas Parsons
Support
BOOMERANG BEACH , New South Wales
Message
In addition to supporting the local community for over a century, the Metropolitan Mine is a key source of steelmaking coal in the Illawarra region, essential for the efficient and stable production of Australia's only operating integrated blast furnace steel making facility. Without Metropolitan steelmaking coal, Australia's national security is affected through the detrimental impact to our ability to produce our own high quality steel for advanced technological applications. The alternative is a high-risk strategy to rely on foreign trade partners, like China.

Pagination

Project Details

Application Number
MP08_0149-Mod-4
EPBC ID Number
2025/10103
Main Project
MP08_0149
Assessment Type
SSD Modifications
Development Type
Coal Mining
Local Government Areas
Wollongong City

Contact Planner

Name
Melanie Hollis