Monaro Rock Quarry Project

To whom it may concern,
I am writing as a concerned resident of Tralee to express my profound opposition to the proposed Royalla quarry, asphalt, and concrete plant. This project poses a clear and present danger to the health, safety, and environment of our community, and the process for public feedback has been woefully inadequate.
My Core Objections
Health and Air Quality: The plan to introduce a massive new source of fine particulate matter, including silica dust, into our air is deeply concerning. Given that our region already suffers from poor air quality due to bushfires and winter wood smoke, this quarry will only exacerbate existing health issues, particularly for our most vulnerable residents—our children and the elderly. The long-term health consequences of breathing these pollutants are simply not worth the risk.
Water and Environment: This project threatens our most precious resource: clean water. The proposed operations risk contaminating our groundwater and local waterways, which are part of Canberra's drinking water catchment. Furthermore, clearing land for the quarry will destroy critical wildlife habitats and significantly increase the risk of bushfires in an already fire-prone area.
Traffic and Safety: Our roads, especially the Monaro Highway, are already congested and unsafe. Adding a constant flow of heavy quarry trucks will inevitably lead to more accidents, increase road damage, and disrupt daily travel for thousands of commuters.
Lack of Public Benefit: The promised economic benefits, such as a small number of jobs, are minimal when weighed against the severe and irreversible costs to our health, safety, and environment. The primary beneficiaries of this project are the operators, not the local community.
Property Values and Quality of Life: The presence of this quarry will negatively impact the value of our homes and the overall quality of life in our neighborhood. No one wants to live next to a source of noise, pollution, and increased traffic, and this project will make Tralee and the surrounding suburbs less desirable for future families.
My Call to Action
I urge you to consider the immense and irreversible damage this project will cause. This is not just a commercial development; it is a decision that will affect the well-being of our community for generations. Please act now to:
* Formally oppose this project and reject the application.
* Insist on an extended public submission period to allow for genuine community consultation.
* Commission an independent review to fully assess the health and environmental risks.
The people of Tralee, and all affected communities, deserve a safe and healthy environment. Please do not fail us.
Sincerely,

Resident of Tralee

Please review the attached document which details our (my neighbourhoods) vehement objection to this proposal.

Please see attached document

As a resident of Conder since 1996 having built our home in this unique and beautiful area with an abundance of wildlife at our doorstep , we are located backing nature reserve near the power station on Tuggeranong Hill, are concerned the impact this Quarry will have on not only the environment but also the impact of blasting and silica dust and the increased traffic congestion of heavy machinery leaving the site.

Our house is estimated to be only 3-4 km away based on where the escavation is located on the proposal.

Blasting on the sites will definitely be felt at our home and could cause movement or subsidence and property damage. On the proposal and environmental submission, monitors were being placed in all suburbs for vibration and noise. One monitor is placed next to the power station near us. This is a major power station providing power to Lanyon Valley and adjacent suburbs. Explosions in the area has a probability of affecting our power grid. Also what is the expected Db from the site and how will this impact those living closest? More studies need to be done!

Explosions would be heard as we currently hear loud trucks on the monaro highway especially when entering into the roundabout off Monaro to Johnson Drive. As this is only a single lane on Monaro congestion will be an issue as well as noise from heavy trucks breaking going downhill to traverse the roundabout. During peak snow season the situation would be more congestion. The proposal indicated additional 500 trucks per day and current road structure may not support this and may require expansion and traffic lights to enter and exit the site.

Further the impact of dust and pollution will impact residence. Coastal breezes would push dust particles over the Lanyon Valley as well as Theodore Calwell and adjoining suburbs. We live in a windy area being on the tablelands with mountain ranges. Silica dust is a concern if not properly managed with sprinkler systems.
I am a novacastrian lived in Newcastle where mines and polution was a big issues being an industrial area. My parents home recently underwent soil testing due to a Gas works once existed on the property next door to them. The result was they were inside acceptable levels but other homes were demolished and the land detoxified by the local council which resulted in 35 homes having excessive level of toxins including petroleum products and arsenic. They were also advised not to consume and fruit or vegetables grown on their land.

I mine of this magnitude would require a depot to store feul and other toxic materials that would affect waterways with run-off. Environmentally this could affect local and endangered wildlife as well as residences in Royalla. Run-off can also impact local streams that feed areas of heritage significance such as London Bridge in Burra Or worse still run off into local water supply in Googong Dam and Tuggeranong.

Location of this Quarry would impact 31,000 residents in ACT / NSW in close proximity and 92,000 in 10kms. It is situated too close to residential areas.

If you look at Boral Quarries Seaham in Balckera which is a 30-40 million ton mine for asphalt and aggregates for concrete in Newcastle it shows pictures of the type of mining activity that would take place in Royalla. The proposal here is similar but it is located near a major residential areas unlike the Boral mine. The proposed site is 67.6ha mine site being 21ha with auxiliary processing plants for asphalt, concrete mixing and recycling.

When looking at emissions and impact of mine the contours reach as far as the Rob Roy Range facing monaro hwy. Homes are less than 1km away from this point so am concerned about pollution should wind gusts exceed the model used in the epa study.

BLAST NOISE IS ANOTHER MAJOR CONCERN.

If we can here Train whistle from locomotive on the railway line to Royalla we would surely hear a blast. Which could dramatically impact certain residences and individuals with PTSD or sensory processing issues as well as respiratory issues.

My concerns have not entirely been satisfied therefore I object to the project.

Regards
Carmelina and Gregory Stokoe
Resident of

I am writing to you to express my concerns about the proposal to develop a further rock quarry in the immediate vicinity of our property in the Royalla Station Country Estate.

We already have 2 quarries in close proximity to our homes, and 1 a bit further removed between Nimmitabel and Cooma. I question the need for this quarry. These quarries are not operating at full capacity, so there is no excess demand and there is capability to achieve further economies of scale.

I am concerned for my health, and for that of my partner and neighbours. Operation of a quarry produces dust which can cause cancers. This is very well known. It can also affect air quality.

I am concerned for the beautiful environment we have out here; the impact on flora and fauna. I understand that we have both on the critically endangered list.

I am concerned about the effect of quarry operations on ground water/water table. Quarrying uses a significant of water. The water table here has dropped significantly over the recent years.

i am concerned about the increased traffic movements as trucks enter and leave the quarry. My understanding is that there will be up to 200/250 movements a day. The amount of road kill out here is already horrendous.

I am concerned about noise pollution from blasting and other quarry activities.

I am concerned that land which has been zoned for a specific purpose can easily be re-zoned for other purposes if money is to be made or vested interests considered.. I would have thought that declaring something as critically endangered would be enough in itself to prevent any destruction of the environment!

I am concerned that management/owners can make unsubstantiated claims to argue their case. For example, 'there are no significant concerns of nearby residents which need addressing'. 'And the quarry will significantly reduce the cost of construction for housing an other projects]. ] And that 30 new jobs will be created' (will they be local people?)

I am concerned about the integrity of the proposal when it is claimed that the local community has been consulted. There are 500 homes in Royalla. Some 126 leaflets were distributed here. How they were chosen is unknown. But areas impacted by the quarry, using a 10 k radius, extend from North Fyshwick in the North to Carwoola in the East to Calwell/Condor in the West and to The Angle and Williamsdale in the South. It is unknown whether any of these areas were consulted.

I am concerned that the venture will not adhere to all the rules/regulations and requirements that they will have to follow to operate.

I am concerned about the fairness of this whole process. The quarry proponents have had significant time and professional resources to put together their proposal. We have 28 days to respond to lengthy and complex documents for which most of us would be unskilled to fully understand and contribute the required amount of time and dilgence.

y And lastly I am concerned because I feel like Im being treated with contempt in respect to how my opinions are sought, heard and dealt with. It feels like the attitude is "We'll just build a quarry. Doesnt matter that it is near houses. They might complain but we have resources to fight them. And we know the processes to be followed and any 'noise' will soon pass. They'll give up."

I retired out here. Its beautiful. I love it. Why can someone come and destroy it? If we need the hard rocks so desperately, go find it somewhere removed from residential areas.


Thank you.
john hyland

I am writing to oppose the proposed Royalla quarry.

As a resident of Theodore, my residence is less than 5km away from the proposed site. I am concerned about air quality issues arising from the quarry for all residents in adjacent valleys to the quarry, as well as the likelihood of run-off entering Tuggeranong creek. Substantial remediation work is underway in downstream catchments of Tuggeranong creek which will be undermined by the introduction of sediments, particulates and other contaminants from this proposed quarry.

The increased traffic on the Monaro Highway is also an issue for residents of Eastern Tuggeranong given its use as a major connection to other areas of the city, and from the noise to residents in Chisholm, Richardson, Calwell, and Theodore as well as residents of South Jerrabomberra and Royalla.

To whom it may concern,
I acknowledge the need for building materials for the construction industry and development, however as a director of a construction company i am acutely aware to the need to perform risk assessments on both where and how these materials are sourced.
Currently silica dust and its health implications are a priority in how to manage and eliminate the risks.
The location of the proposed site relative to not only Royalla homes but the rapidly growing township of Googong housing homes schools and places of business, with the suburb of Theodore within the ACT all within a short relative distance.
Exposing these homes and residents to the potential of dust / silica needs far more detailed consideration, is it indeed worth the risk i have several family members living in Googong along with my wife and i in Royalla.

The additional traffic on an already underdeveloped road infrastructure needs heightened consideration, the roads in the area regrettably already have a high accident rate without the addition of high frequency heavy vehicles.
The impact on local wildlife would appear to be restricted to the site only, road deaths in the area are higher than other areas in the region.

I have lived in Royalla for over 15 years, toward the southern end, there are two quarry sites located in Willamsdale on Knowles lane a relatively short distance away. Both are on a smaller scale than the one proposed. I am well placed to comment on the impact of regular blasting, sadly it go's a little further than straightening up the odd picture frame. Along with dust blown across the valley, and the dimming of lights when the crusher starts up.

i object to the development based on the above items Silica is a long term killer with no cure, the land was not zoned for this development when sold it should retain its original zoning or a a more palpable use for the broader community.
Yours Sincerely
Doug Prail

To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing to formally express my strong opposition to the proposed quarry development near Royalla, New South Wales. While I recognize the potential economic benefits that such a project may bring, I believe the long-term social, environmental, and economic costs far outweigh these benefits.

1. Environmental Impact

Royalla is located in a region that is rich in natural beauty, biodiversity, and ecological value. The development of a quarry would have severe consequences for the local environment. The disruption of local ecosystems, the clearing of native vegetation, and the potential for soil erosion and water contamination are just a few of the risks that would accompany this project.

Royalla’s water systems, including nearby streams and aquifers, could be significantly impacted by the proposed extraction processes. The risk of dust pollution is also a major concern, particularly during dry periods, as it would affect air quality and pose health risks to both humans and wildlife in the area.

2. Impact on the Royalla and Southern Canberra Communities

The Royalla community is a peaceful, rural area, and many of us moved to this region precisely for its tranquility and proximity to nature. The proposed quarry would introduce significant noise pollution, traffic congestion, and general disturbances that could drastically reduce the quality of life for residents.

The impact of this quarry is not limited to Royalla alone but would also affect the broader Southern Canberra region. Royalla lies in close proximity to the growing suburbs of Tuggeranong, Weston Creek, and Woden, and the proposed quarry would directly influence these communities.

The traffic generated by quarry trucks and machinery would place considerable strain on the already congested roads linking Royalla to the southern suburbs of Canberra, particularly the Monaro Highway and the Cotter Road. These roads are vital for the daily commuting needs of residents in the area, and the increase in heavy vehicle traffic would pose safety risks, degrade road conditions, and contribute to further congestion. Moreover, the added dust and noise pollution would affect both the quality of life and the health of residents in these nearby suburbs, many of whom moved to the area to enjoy cleaner air and a more peaceful environment.

3. Economic Considerations

While proponents of the quarry may argue that it would create jobs and stimulate the local economy, it is important to consider the type of economic development that is being promoted. Royalla’s economy is predominantly agricultural, with local farmers relying on a stable and healthy environment to maintain their livelihoods. A quarry could undermine the agricultural potential of the area, through soil degradation and water contamination, which may have long-term negative effects on local farming operations.

In addition, the tourism and local services industries, which also contribute to the region’s economy, would be adversely impacted. The proposed quarry would make the area less attractive to tourists and potential new residents, particularly those who are drawn to the quiet rural lifestyle.

Furthermore, the southern suburbs of Canberra, including areas like Woden and Tuggeranong, have seen significant growth over the past decade, and as the population in these areas continues to increase, so too does the demand for a clean and sustainable environment. The expansion of a quarry in Royalla could severely hinder the future growth and liveability of these suburbs by introducing environmental degradation and reducing the overall quality of life for nearby residents.

4. Lack of Consultation and Transparency

The community’s concerns must be given proper weight in decision-making processes, and it is critical that consultation with local residents and stakeholders is conducted thoroughly. Thus far, there has been limited transparency regarding the full extent of the environmental and social impacts of the quarry. A proper Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) that takes into account all possible consequences—especially on the quality of life for residents in both Royalla and the surrounding suburbs of southern Canberra—is essential before moving forward with such a development.

Conclusion

For all of the reasons outlined above, I strongly oppose the proposed quarry development in Royalla, NSW. The environmental, social, and economic risks posed by this project are too significant to be ignored. I urge decision-makers to consider the long-term impacts on both the local community in Royalla and the broader southern Canberra region, and to explore alternative, more sustainable economic opportunities for the area.

Thank you for considering my submission.

My family and I (several people) respectfully object to the Monaro Rock project. We object on the following grounds.

1. The proposed quarry is very large and very close to existing residential and rural properties - including our own home which is close - as the crow flies - to the proposed development. Our understanding is that quarries of this scale are, and should be, located much further away from existing residential properties and houses and sensitive areas.

2. We are deeply concerned by the noise impact and respirable silica dust emissions that would emanate from the proposed site. We are concerned that the strong southerly winds that are prevalent during parts of the year would drive these emissions right over our property. We are also concerned about the aggravating health and other impacts of the combination of silica emissions, woodsmoke and air traffic across our property. We are not satisfied that the scientific analysis has addressed these risks. It has looked at a small number of factors in isolation divorced from the wider context. Nor has the analysis been adequately explained to the community. A member of our family is a disabled NDIS client with respiratory vulnerabilities. On a very personal level we are concerned by the impact on her.

4. The proposed quarry is in a bushfire zone. We are concerned about activity there compounding bushfire risks (trucks and operations sparking fires) and that the silica dust will mix with bushfire smoke and dust prevalent in the area during summer.

6. The traffic impact - including noise and emissions - which will see significant numbers of trucks turning off and on the Monaro Highway and using the narrow Old Cooma Road will pose unacceptable risks to public health and safety risks.

5. The vibrations and explosions from the quarry will irrevocably damage the habitat and watercourses in the region (with particular concern about Jerrabomberra Creek which flows into the environmentally sensitive - and beautiful - Jerrabomberra Wetlands). We have undertaken two Land Care tree plantings on our land (and helped to remove willow trees on the banks) to try to preserve for the future the habitat for black cockatoos alongside Jerrabomberra Creek. We have been delighted to see 10 black cockatoos on our land in recent days. Numerous steps have been taken by the NSW Government, QPRC and the local community to preserve and protect the environment along the Creek. This is reflected in the planning and zoning of the area. We simply cannot understand how the proposed quarry can be in any way reconciled with these environmental efforts and the money expended on them in the past by the NSW Government, the QPRC, community groups and individuals.

6. We consider that over time the explosions, vibration and seismic impact at the proposed quarry will damage the substructure in the area affecting the environment and the foundations of homes including our own.

7. Consultation regarding the proposed development has been infrequent and inadequate with all stakeholders and owners. There is a perception that it has been perfunctory and represents the bare minimum.

Against this backdrop we respectfully urge the NSW Minister and Government not to approve this project. If the NSW Minister and Government is not disposed to do so despite the factors enumerated above we urge that the most stringent and lasting conditions be attached to the project including to limit and monitor emissions, time limit quarry operations and truck movements, prevent any expansion, require ongoing remediation of the surrounding environment and protect flora and fauna and watercourses.

Thank you for considering this submission and our concerns.

I am one of the developers of Royalla Reserve, the direct neighbour of the proposed quarry.

We have 3 blocks left in our development and it has taken us 3 years to try and sell the blocks due to the quarry.

We have had in excess of 50 offers accepted however once the buyers find out about the proposed quarry they withdraw.

This has resulted in me having lost over $100,000 so far due to ongoing holding costs and I won't make a cent of profit because no one wants to live near a quarry. My financial loss is directly as a result of the proposed quarry.

I strongly oppose the quarry being approved.

Thank you for this opportunity to comment on the EIS. We were residents of Monaro Station Road for some 17 years (and still live nearby at Googong) from its initial sale hence we do know the location well.
The EIS is a well-presented document with great attention given to statistics and the history of the surrounding area.It appears to place reliance on many other authorities. It also presents critical comments on the proposed Monaro Hard Rock Quarry in great detail. What it does not do in over 100 pages, in our view, is provide convincing or even satisfactory answers to those criticisms it has so eloquently expressed. In my view, it pays lip service but nothing substantial. There are a wealth of platitudes.
My broad objection to the project is that it is profit-based and not based on any need. On the one hand the EIS claims it "may" create various jobs in different areas but on the other hand, if there is increased supply, there must be over supply to some degree - hence reduced demand for labour and materials. The existing hard rock quarries in the region meet current demand and the proponents are simply directing their project at lessening their input costs. Even if the long term demand may exist, there are many hard rock sights within a reasonable distance which would have virtually no impact on the local community certainly to the extent which this particular site has! Hence why chose such a provocative site close to so many people and facilities. Have we not learnt from the problems associated with the existing local quarries?
Back to the EIS. I do not believe the 117 page document addresses many of the concerns it has collected from complainants. More significantly it does not much more than give "consideration" to those concerns. It simply states that they have been taken into account (and, in my opinion, appears virtually discard them). Nowhere do I see any true commitment or guarantee which would safeguard any of the arguments raised. For example, it claims that the latest proposal has re-directed all heavy traffic to the Monaro Highway. Firstly, that route was also in the original proposal. It continues to state that only workers and light vehicular traffic will use Monaro Station Road and Mates Drive. However, there is no guarantee that the proponents would not use Monaro Station Road and Mates Drive at the drop of a hat in the event that they chose to. Why not lodge a guarantee with a severe penalty clause.
Section 6.4.3 goes into great detail quoting other authorities on traffic and the impact of a significant increase in the number of heavy vehicles. What it does not mention is the destination of those heavily laden trucks. If they were travelling North they need to either travel through Canberra or along the Old Cooma Road to Queanbeyan! Further, there is no mention of the dangers associated with loose rocks falling from heavily laden trucks and their effect on other vehicles. Further, how can there possibly NOT be a much higher risk of accident with 500 extra trucks entering a major highway each day at the top of a hill where there is a 100Km speed limit?
Similarly, the project claims to have a minimal impact on the water table and the water supply in general. There are bores within one or two kilometres of the site but little discussion appears on the risks of an already dwindling water table and certainly no commitment to compensation in the event that the water table becomes depleted because of the need to utilise water to minimise silicon dust at the site!
We find the EIS best described as a "Swiss Cheese". To us, it is full of holes and does not suit the purpose of convincing an impartial reader that the Monaro Rock Quarry Project should go ahead at the location selected.

Objection to the Monaro Rock Quarry Project (SSD-27223807), Royalla NSW
To: NSW Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure
Cc: Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Council (QPRC); NSW EPA; Transport for NSW; ACT Government
Project: Monaro Rock Quarry – extraction up to 1,000,000 tpa for ~30 years
________________________________________
1) Summary position
I oppose the proposed Monaro Rock Quarry at Royalla. The project is inconsistent with the Queanbeyan-Palerang Regional Local Environmental Plan 2022 (QPRLEP 2022), fails to meet objectives of the Palerang Development Control Plan 2015 (as amended 2022), and is strategically unnecessary given the two existing regional quarries already operating.
I request the Department refuse this application. Alternatively, it should be referred to the Independent Planning Commission (IPC) for public hearings due to the scale, cross-border significance, and level of community objection.
________________________________________
2) Key grounds of objection
A. Health and dust (silica risk)
• Extraction and crushing of 1 Mtpa of hard rock will generate respirable crystalline silica (RCS), a proven health hazard.
• The EIS does not adequately model worst-case meteorology or cumulative emissions.
• The prevailing winds carry dust toward Royalla and Tuggeranong, exposing thousands of residents.
Request: Independent health risk assessment for RCS; real-time monitoring with public dashboard; stop-work thresholds.
________________________________________
B. Traffic, road safety and Monaro Highway
• The quarry will generate up to 200 truck movements per day, impacting Monaro Highway (a classified arterial road).
• QPRLEP cl.7.18 requires development near arterial roads to minimise visual and acoustic impacts and protect road function. This proposal fails to do so.
• The DCP requires safe access design for classified roads — not satisfied by the current haulage plan.
Request: Cap truck numbers, ban haulage in school peaks/weekends, require left-in/left-out with acceleration lanes, GPS-based compliance reporting.
________________________________________
C. Biodiversity and water
• The site and surrounds include habitat for the Pink-tailed Worm-lizard, Striped Legless Lizard and other endangered species.
• QPRLEP C2/C3 zone objectives require protection of ecological values and water quality. The scale of clearing, blasting and runoff risks direct conflict.
• Tuggeranong Creek and local bores are at risk from sediment and groundwater drawdown.
Request: Targeted threatened species surveys; avoidance buffers; strict groundwater and surface water controls; independent ecological peer review.
________________________________________
D. Noise, blasting and amenity
• Thirty years of blasting and crushing conflicts with the Palerang DCP General Provisions (Noise, Amenity, Landscaping).
• Residents and livestock will experience ongoing disturbance.
Request: Shorter operating hours, stricter blast vibration limits, independent compliance auditing.
________________________________________
E. Visual impact and scenic protection
• QPRLEP cl.7.14 Scenic Protection requires consent authorities to minimise visual impacts and incorporate conservation measures.
• The quarry would cause permanent scarring of a rural landscape valued for its amenity and cross-border vistas.
Request: Independent visual simulations from ACT and NSW vantage points; enforceable rehabilitation benchmarks.
________________________________________
F. Existing supply and strategic need
• There are already two major hard-rock quarries servicing the ACT/Queanbeyan region:
1. Holcim – Cooma Road Quarry (NSW), a significant regional supplier.
2. Boral – Mugga Mugga Quarry (ACT), Canberra’s largest hard-rock quarry.
• QPRLEP cl.7.16 even recognises the Cooma Road Quarry in its buffer provisions, proving Council already accounts for its long-term role.
• The proponent has not demonstrated unmet demand. The project is primarily about vertical integration, not community need.
Request: Independent alternatives and supply analysis comparing existing quarries’ capacity; refusal if no overriding demand is proven.
________________________________________
G. Cumulative and cross-border impacts
• The district already hosts quarries; adding another compounds dust, traffic, noise and amenity loss.
• The ACT population directly downwind will bear impacts but has no planning consent authority.
• The Palerang DCP requires cumulative impacts to be considered when assessing large proposals.
Request: Comprehensive cumulative impact assessment across ACT and NSW quarries and haul routes; IPC hearing with ACT Government input.
________________________________________
3) LEP / DCP non-compliance summary
• QPRLEP 2022:
o C2 / C3 objectives conflict with quarrying.
o cl.7.14 Scenic Protection, cl.7.16 Cooma Road Quarry buffer, and cl.7.18 Arterial Roads are not satisfied.
• Palerang DCP 2015 (amended 2022):
o Part B General Provisions (biodiversity, roads/parking, stormwater, erosion, landscaping, waste) not met.
o Variations inconsistent with LEP aims are not permitted.
________________________________________
4) Relief sought
1. Refuse SSD-27223807 due to non-compliance with LEP/DCP and lack of strategic justification.
2. Alternatively, refer to the IPC for full public hearings.
3. If approved despite objections, impose strict conditions: truck caps, RCS monitoring, threatened species protection, rehab bonds, independent audits.
________________________________________
5) Closing
This proposal is inconsistent with the local planning framework, unnecessary given two existing quarries, and imposes unacceptable cumulative impacts on a densely settled cross-border community. I respectfully request refusal.

The quarry project will have significant negative environmental impact on the region.
The increase heavy vehicle traffic will ruin the already damaged roads, the noise level will drastically interrupt the ambiance of why many residents live here, the dust will create multiple health issues especially to those with existing respiratory concerns.
Not only is this quarry unnecessary as there already are 2 working quarries in the area, it is ridiculous to build in this area so close to existing homes and estates.

I am objecting to this project on a number of grounds;
These are all extremely important points, in no particular order.
Although there is plans to build an intersection with the Monaro Highway, trucks will turn left out of the quarry at certain times of the day, and then head down Old Cooma Road towards Queanbeyan, this will increase the number of trucks that will use and potentially damage the road. Wait until the electric trucks start using these roads, these trucks will be allowed to carry more payload, and then with the extra battery weight, the damage to the road will be significant. There will be a constant long line up going down the Monaro highway towards Johnson drive roundabout, and serious accidents are going to occur.
If the ACT government decide not to allow an intersection, then the traffic on Old Cooma Road will be chaotic at best.
My house is close to the quarry, and is built on a rock seam, so I am expecting a lot more siesmic activity during blasting and potential house damage occurring, so I am sure that I will be in a dispute about damages, and I am also sure that this process will drag out while waiting for some compensation.
This will have an enormous effect on my family, which is unfair. We moved out here to enjoy the country life, not expecting to put up with some quarry activity.
Royalla is a very windy area, especially in Spring, so the dust that will blow over my property will be a health hazard, The winds can come from all directions, so this will also affect over 40,000 residents in the ACT.
The ACT borders the quarry, but as it is in NSW, there has been NO community contact with the ACT people.
I also use bore water on my property, and I bet that this will diminish if the quarry goes ahead. Not only is it a quarry, but a concrete recycling plant, asphalt production and industrial estate.
No matter how good the safeguards are supposed to be, there will be "accidents, spills, etc " and a paltry fine may be imposed, and then business as usual.
So this is a State Significant Development, but have you considered that this will be a State Significant Health risk???Can you imagine the health risks that can come from silica dust, engineered stone has been banned for that reason, silica dust.
I will have a property inspection done of my house if the proposal goes ahead ( in consultation with Monaro Rock ) and then we will see what damage is done as blasting occurs, I will also have a seisomometer on my property to monitor vibrations.
Local residents near the Williamsdale quarry ( not far away )have had ongoing dust problems and have been advised to have health checks, small comfort if the damage to health is already done.
My drinking water comes from rainfall on the roof, if the roof gets silica dust on it then the water will be of no use what's so ever,
not even for washing, bathing, and definitely not drinking.
And on another note, the other quarries that are close by are not at full capacity, not by a long shot.
I believe that this proposal is short sighted, and only benefits a few , but will endanger the lives of thousands, and I need to mention the biodiversity issues, with endangered flora and fauna, which I believe is Federally protected in this area, or does money trump everything?

Objection to the New Quarry Project
I’m writing to object to the proposed new quarry near my home in Tralee. I understand the need for development, but this project would have a big impact on my family, my health, and the community.

I live in a small family home in Tralee, close to Royalla. One of the main reasons I moved here was for the quiet, semi-rural feel. I love seeing the open fields, wildlife, and having space to walk with my baby. The thought of a quarry so close really worries me.

I have an autoimmune condition, and I’m already careful about my health. The silica dust from a quarry is a real danger, not just for me but for my baby too. Even small amounts of dust could cause long-term harm, and knowing that trucks and blasting would put our family at risk every day is really frightening.

Water is another concern. Living near Canberra, we’ve seen droughts many times. The quarry would take millions of litres from the groundwater, and even though we mostly use town water, I worry about the impact on the environment and the broader community.

Traffic and safety are also huge worries. I drive on the Monaro Highway to get to work, family, friends, and other essentials. Hundreds of heavy trucks every day would make the road unsafe, noisy, and stressful. Within Tralee, where I walk my baby, the dust and noise from the quarry could still affect our local streets and the peaceful environment we enjoy.

There are already quarries nearby. I don’t understand why we need another one here, in an area that is meant to protect rural and conservation values. It feels unnecessary and unfair to the people who live here.

Even if I can’t see the quarry from my home, I visit family who would have it in full view. It would be ugly, noisy, and lower property values. We’ve worked so hard to buy our home here and planned for a future in this community, and a quarry threatens that.

Tralee is meant to be a growing, welcoming community. The amenities being built and the future growth are part of why people move here. A quarry would make people think twice about moving in and could stop the community from growing.

For all these reasons, I ask that the Department reject the new quarry project. The risks to health, the environment, property values, and the future of our community far outweigh any short-term benefits.

Thank you for listening to my concerns. I hope you will consider the impact this project would have on families like mine and the community we are trying to build.

Sincerely
Sarah Janse van Rensburg

There is a very high risk that respirable crystalline dust will be emitted which are cause for great concern for both our family and livestock welfare. The noise disruption and road maintenance required by the possible 250 trucks per day are also another huge concern and are unacceptable. Locals move to rural areas for a quiet healthy life , not to be stressed or in constant fear of health problems for family and livestock. There are already four existing quarries within 30 kilometres of proposed site. That’s surely enough on the local infrastructure. Build elsewhere!

I strongly object this project as it has dire health consequences particularly for people with asthma and other health complications. I live in Googong and came to this suburb because of its clean air and emphasis on nature. I moved away from Canberra centre particularly for my asthma and now the suburb is about to create a worse environment for me because of the fine silica dust that will spread because of the Monaro quarry. I live very close to where the quarry is proposed to be and I am extremely concerned for my health but have no opportunity to move because of finances. I also run a piano studio here and have established a good customer base so it is very difficult for me to pack up and go. I am currently teaching over 40 children in the area and I am also extremely worried because this project is very harmful for someone with my condition and for the young children in the area. With three schools in the area and many young and upcoming families, this project will have an impact on these children that will affect them for life as fine silica dust accumulates in the lungs over time and there is currently no treatment for silicosis. Even if the children are exposed with small amounts over many years, this all accumulates and severely impacts life quality and expectancy. Googong and the surrounding areas need to be kept clean and provide an alternative for people who are already susceptible to the pollution of the bigger cities and need a place a bit further out for their health. This project gives us few options to live close to Canberra but still have the clean fresh air of the suburbs. In addition to the health consequences, the quarry also has financial implications as fewer people will want to risk their children living near such an establishment, leading to diminishing house value and less people in a bustling developing suburb like Googong and the surrounding areas. There has been so much investment in schools, shopping, etc. that will go wasted because of the diminishing value of the suburb due to this project. I am writing this submission with a heavy heart as these areas are so beautiful and clean and this project will tarnish that beauty. We live next to a damn and significant conservation areas which we need to protect. Investment has been made for hotels so that people can visit these places of nature and beauty. The Monaro quarry project will diminish these investments significantly as no one wants to risk their health. As people with health problems know, health is so important for quality of life and allows us to live and work to our fullest. Please do not ruin the health of people, the beauty of these suburbs all for small financial gain. The long-term impact is dire as there will be less people, less tourism, severe long-term health effects and less business.

We have lived at Royalla for 9 years and we bought the residence and land because of the view and access to shops at Calwell and other Canberra facilities including the hospital. We are a family of 5 with a 4 year old grandchild residing.
This quarry will be directly in our line of sight and we are downwind from the prevailing winds (Northwesterly) which are very strong at times.
The quarry will possibly put our grandchild’s and our health at risk from silica dust pollution which the Quarry admits will go into the air.
Allowing up to 25 heavy trucks per hour (one every approximately two minutes ) on the Monaro highway will impact travel times to Calwell shops significantly.
The presence of this quarry would impact the value of our investment , being an eyesore and increasing travel time to the nearest shops.
The quarry will mainly service Canberra demand, and I suggest the quarry be located in the ACT not NSW.

I wish to formally object to the proposed Monaro Rock Quarry development.

As someone who has a deep personal connection to the Monaro region, I am gravely concerned about the long-term environmental, social, and community impacts of this project. The Monaro is not just a landscape — it is a way of life. It is a place where silence still has value, where native grasslands stretch across rolling hills, and where communities are built on trust, connection, and respect for the land. This quarry threatens to tear into that, quite literally.

The Monaro is home to delicate ecosystems and endangered native species. Blasting and excavation will permanently scar this unique landscape. Dust, noise, and vibration will disrupt local fauna, and could have significant negative impacts on water tables and creeks that sustain both wildlife and agriculture. This project risks irreversible environmental degradation for what is ultimately a short-term commercial gain.

The Monaro is one of the last truly quiet, untouched rural communities in New South Wales. The introduction of heavy truck traffic, industrial noise, and dust will destroy the tranquility that residents — many of whom have lived here for generations — have fought to preserve. Families did not choose to live here expecting an industrial site next door. The quarry will irreparably change the character of this community.

Dust from quarry operations has well-documented impacts on human health, particularly for children and the elderly. The increased truck movements pose real risks to road safety on rural roads not designed for heavy freight. Our emergency services are already stretched — this development would only place further strain on a fragile system.

The visual intrusion of a large quarry will damage the heritage value of the region. The Monaro is renowned for its open, unspoiled views and cultural history. This quarry would be a scar on a landscape that holds significance not only for locals but for all Australians who understand the value of our rural heartlands.

I urge the Department of Planning to listen to the community. This is not just about one project — it is about setting a precedent for how we value rural Australia, its people, and its land.

Please reject the Monaro Rock Quarry proposal. It does not align with the principles of sustainable development or community-led planning.

Sincerely,
Isabelle O’Toole

I write to register my strong objection to the proposed Monaro Quarry at Enchanted Hill. After reviewing the project details and environmental assessments, I believe the development would have significant and unacceptable impacts on our community, environment, and cultural heritage. My key concerns are outlined below.
1. Biodiversity Loss
The project will clear approximately 22.4 hectares of critically endangered Box–Gum woodland and a total of 77.83 hectares of native vegetation, destroying habitat for more than 300 species of native flora and fauna.
Such destruction directly conflicts with state and federal biodiversity conservation objectives.
2. Traffic and Safety
The quarry is expected to generate around 300 vehicle movements per day, including numerous heavy dispatch trucks on the Monaro–Cooma Road.
This will increase noise, road wear, and the risk of accidents on a route already used by local commuters and school buses.
3. Dust and Air Quality
Operations will release fine particulates, including respirable silica dust, posing serious health risks such as respiratory illness for nearby residents.
Dust will also settle on homes, gardens, rainwater tanks, and solar panels, creating ongoing maintenance and contamination issues.
4. Odour and Blasting
Proposed hot-mix asphalt production will create persistent industrial odours.
Regular blasting will generate noise, vibration, and additional dust, disrupting the amenity and wellbeing of nearby households.
5. Electricity Reliability
Heavy industrial activity can cause brownouts or surges, risking damage to household appliances and electrical equipment in surrounding suburbs.
6. Aboriginal Cultural Heritage
Surveys have already identified culturally modified ring and scar trees, as well as other Indigenous artefacts and archaeological deposits.
Proceeding would risk irreversible damage to these irreplaceable cultural sites.
7. Water Use and Pollution Risk
The quarry would extract up to 42.4 million litres of groundwater annually for dust suppression and asphalt/concrete production.
This threatens flows in neighbouring watercourses that feed into the Tuggeranong catchment.
On-site concrete recycling and equipment washing create a serious risk of chemical contamination.
8. Economic and Community Considerations
Four existing quarries within 30 km already have capacity to meet regional demand for more than 100 years.
The proposed site lies within 10 km of around 49,000 residents, a number projected to grow—placing thousands of families in the immediate impact zone for little demonstrated economic benefit.

While I appreciate the need for construction materials, the environmental, cultural, health, and social costs of this proposal far outweigh any potential benefits. Sustainable alternatives exist through current quarry capacity without sacrificing endangered ecosystems or the wellbeing of our community.
Having to face such a proposal in 2025 is an absolute disgrace. I therefore respectfully request that the Monaro Quarry proposal be refused.