State Significant Development
Narrabri Gas
Narrabri Shire
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
The project involves the progressive development of a coal seam gas field over 20 years with up to 850 gas wells and ancillary infrastructure, including gas processing and water treatment facilities.
Attachments & Resources
SEARs (3)
EIS (71)
Submissions (221)
Response to Submissions (18)
Agency Advice (46)
Additional Information (8)
Assessment (8)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (46)
Reports (4)
Independent Reviews and Audits (2)
Notifications (2)
Other Documents (1)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
There are no inspections for this project.
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Scott Monro
Object
Scott Monro
Message
* Trauma to the local indigenous community and the traditional owners - the Gamilaraay people - due to interfering with land that holds spiritual and cultural significance to them. This impact cannot be quantified nor compensated, as the connection to country is irreplaceable and invaluable.
* Clearing almost 1,000 hectares of the Pilliga forest, causing fragmentation of the remaining temperate woodland. This will negatively impact the health and function of the ecosystem while releasing carbon and reducing ecosystem services. It will also threaten the survival of species including the Koala, Spotted-tailed Quoll, Eastern Pygmy-possum, the endemic Pilliga Mouse and critically-endangered Regent Honeyeater, by the destruction of their already scarce habitat.
* Risks to groundwater of the Great Artesian Basin and contamination of tributaries of the Murray-Darling Basin. The extraction of 35 billion litres of water and subsequent depressurization will likely alter groundwater flows, preventing recharge of surface springs and bores, and causing an overall drawdown of the watertable. Tributaries feeding to the Murray-Darling could be contaminated from drilling fluid leaks and spillage from brine wastewater ponds. It is not fair on the communities that rely on these water resources to have them threatened in this way.
* Creation of thousands of tonnes of salt waste, up to 115 tonnes a day, with no way to dispose apart from containment in landfill. This amount of waste shows an extremely inefficient method of production and sending it to landfill is unacceptable as we need to move away from this `disposable' attitude. We need technology that does not create such a high amount of waste - such as renewable energy.
* Farmers have shown enormous opposition to the project and fear threat to their agricultural productivity from the potential impacts on groundwater - putting state food production in jeopardy and causing stress for farmers.
* Coal seam gas is still contributing to global warming through the release of greenhouse gases - both carbon dioxide from combustion and methane from fugitive emissions. Flaring will have to be performed and this imposes a fire hazard in the region which, when coupled with climate change, will result in conditions for extreme weather and disastrous fire events.
* The blatant lies of the gas industry in generating the `gas crisis' scenario. There is no need for new gas production in Australia as we know there are plentiful gas resources being tapped into and the majority is exported. Domestic prices have risen dramatically, and this is a direct result of the actions of the industry in pursuing greedy motives. If we need gas, we can redirect it to domestic instead of overseas; however we should be striving for renewable energy, NOT more fossil fuels.
Overall, I strongly believe that the potential environmental impacts to land, water, biodiversity, and climate change are reasons enough to prevent this project going ahead. Combine them with the guaranteed social impacts on indigenous culture and farming communities - it further reinforces that the negatives outweigh the positives in this project. Furthermore, the justification that more gas wells are needed in order to ease the supposed `gas crisis' in NSW and assist with reducing energy costs is flawed.
I urge you to strongly consider these points, in particular recognising the need to move away from fossil fuels in order combat the threat of human-induced climate change; but also that the social impacts to individuals and communities of all backgrounds - particularly indigenous - cannot adequately be quantified nor compensated. On these grounds I recommend that this project be rejected.
Kind Regards,
Scott Monro
Attachments
Rosemary Nankivell
Object
Rosemary Nankivell
Message
Attachments
Methuen Morgan
Object
Methuen Morgan
Sarah Ciesiolka
Object
Sarah Ciesiolka
Message
Attachments
Matthew Ciesiolka
Object
Matthew Ciesiolka
Message
Attachments
Graeme Holmes
Object
Graeme Holmes
Message
Attachments
Julie Kingswood
Object
Julie Kingswood
Erica Jankus
Object
Erica Jankus
Message
Attachments
Jacinrta Green
Object
Jacinrta Green
Russell DAvie
Object
Russell DAvie
Message
The risk factors are due to the massive salt waste water that will come from the mines production which has been estimated to be 430,000 tonnes of salt over the life of the project. The environmental protection that this project offers is to line the ponds with a liner that has a limited life span. This salt water has the potential to ruin any prospective agricultural projects that are adjacent and down stream of the ponds.
In addition to the salt pollution, the pumping of artesian water out of the mine area to dewater the rock strata to allow gas extraction will reduce the head pressure of the water. This has been predicted to effectively reduce all downstream extraction of users down stream.
In short, the combined effect of water pollution and reduced ability to extract artesian water will reduce the economic viability of farms and other non-mine industries and communities down stream.
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Hugh Barrett
Object
Hugh Barrett
Coonabarabran Residents Against CSG
Object
Coonabarabran Residents Against CSG
Message
Coonabarabran Residents Against CSG
Attachments
Friends of Siding Spring Observatory
Object
Friends of Siding Spring Observatory
Message
Attachments
Cumberland Bird Observers Club Inc
Object
Cumberland Bird Observers Club Inc
Message
Attachments
ANNA CHRISTIE
Object
ANNA CHRISTIE
Message
Attachments
Peter Small
Object
Peter Small
Message
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Please find attached my submission,,,
thank you for the opportunity to voice my heartfelt fully mindful consideration of this project even if i have only taken the choice to submit the short version of the facts... time and health had made this necessary.
...our planet as our home needs more considered care than to impact it with such actions...
Regards
Tracy Emerton