State Significant Development
Narrabri Gas
Narrabri Shire
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
The project involves the progressive development of a coal seam gas field over 20 years with up to 850 gas wells and ancillary infrastructure, including gas processing and water treatment facilities.
Attachments & Resources
SEARs (3)
EIS (71)
Submissions (221)
Response to Submissions (18)
Agency Advice (46)
Additional Information (8)
Assessment (8)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (46)
Reports (4)
Independent Reviews and Audits (2)
Notifications (2)
Other Documents (1)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
There are no inspections for this project.
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Mathew Keyzer
Object
Mathew Keyzer
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Zara Hallett
Object
Zara Hallett
Message
Karen Deegan
Object
Karen Deegan
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
The Narrabri gasfield poses a real risk to our two most precious water resources: the Great Artesian Basin and the Murray-Darling Basin. The area of the Great Artesian Basin with the highest recharge rates is almost entirely contained within the Pilliga East forest. In a worst-case scenario, the water removed for CSG extraction could reduce water pressure in the recharge areas--potentially stopping the free flow of waters to the surface at springs and bores across the whole Great Artesian Basin.¹
Creeks in the Pilliga run into the Namoi River--a part of the Murray Darling Basin. This system is vulnerable to contamination from drilling fluid spills and the salty treated water produced from the proposed 850 wells.
2. The Gamilaraay Traditional Custodians are opposed
There are hundreds of cultural sites as well as songlines and stories connecting the Gamilaraay to the forest and to the groundwater beneath. Gamilaraay people are deeply involved in the battle against CSG, and have told Santos they do not want their country sacrificed for a coal seam gas field.
3. Farmers and other local community reject the project
Extensive community surveys have shown an average of 96% opposition to CSG. This stretches across a massive 3.2 million hectares of country surrounding the Pilliga forest, including 99 communities. Hundreds of farmers have participated in protest actions unlike any previously seen in the region.
4. The Narrabri Gas Project has a long history of spills and leaks of toxic CSG water--Santos cannot be trusted to manage the project safely
Santos has already contaminated a freshwater aquifer in the Pilliga with uranium at levels 20 times higher than safe drinking water guidelines, as well as lead, aluminium, arsenic and barium². In addition, there have been over 20 reported spills and leaks of toxic CSG water from storage ponds, pipes and well heads. Santos cannot be trusted.
5. The Pilliga is a haven for threatened wildlife
The Pilliga is one of 15 nationally listed `biodiversity hotspots' and is vital to the survival of threatened species like the Koala, Spotted-tailed Quoll, Black-striped Wallaby, Eastern Pygmy-possum, Pilliga Mouse and South-eastern Long-eared Bat. The forest is home to over 200 bird species and is internationally recognised as an Important Bird Area². The Santos gasfield would fragment 95,000 hectares of the Pilliga with well pads, roads, and water and gas pipelines--damaging vital habitat and threatening the survival of endangered species.
6. Coal seam gas fuels dangerous climate change
Methane is by far the major component of natural gas, and is a greenhouse gas 72 times more powerful than CO². CSG fields contribute to climate change through the leakage of methane during the production, transport, processing and use of coal seam gas.
7. Human health is compromised by coal seam gas
A range of hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds can be released into the air from coal seam gas operations, including flaring of gas wells. The effects of volatile organic compounds vary, but can cause eye, nose and airway irritation, headache, nausea, dizziness and loss of coordination⁴. These impacts have been documented in human populations nearby to existing gasfields in Queensland, Sydney and in America.
8. The nation's premier optical astronomical observatory is at risk
The Siding Springs Observatory, situated in the Warrumbungles and adjacent to the Pilliga, is under threat from the Narrabri Gas Project due to light and dust pollution⁵. The area has been internationally recognised as a `dark sky park'⁶ and the 50m high gas flares proposed by Santos threaten the viability of the facility.
9. Thousands of tonnes of salt waste will result from the project
Santos has no solution for disposing of the hundreds of thousands of tonnes of salt that will be produced. Between 17,000 and 42,000 tonnes of salt waste would be produced each year. This industry would leave a toxic legacy in NSW.
10. Risk of fires would increase throughout the Pilliga's tinder-box conditions
Methane flare stacks up to 50m high would be running day and night, even on total fire ban days. The Pilliga is prone to severe bushfires. The project would increase ignition sources as well as extracting, transporting and storing a highly flammable gas right within this extremely fire-prone forest.
- See more at: https://www.wilderness.org.au/final-push-pilliga#sthash.wPWlDArM.dpuf
Paul Clissold
Object
Paul Clissold
Message
The risks to the many overwhelmingly outweigh the benefit to the few with this project.
If you go ahead with this destructive endeavour many of us will do whatever we have to do to influence those around us to ensure they never spend a single cent on the byproducts of this terrible business.
Please shift your attention to renewables and leave our beautiful landscape alone.
Regards,
Paul Clissold
Robert Fisher
Object
Robert Fisher
Message
Dean Reynolds
Object
Dean Reynolds
Message
Zachariah Mason
Object
Zachariah Mason
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
I say NO to the Santos!!!!
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
The risks to water tables and resulting food production are not worth the comparitively small number of jobs and even small royalty income NSW would receive.
Additional CSG wells does nothing to address the structural problems in Australian energy policy and any such suggestion is either misguided or malcious.
Robert & Mrs Geraldine Johnson
Object
Robert & Mrs Geraldine Johnson
Message
Creeks in the Pilliga run into the Namoi River--a part of the Murray Darling Basin. This system is vulnerable to contamination from drilling fluid spills and the salty treated water produced from the proposed 850 wells.
Santos has already contaminated a freshwater aquifer in the Pilliga with uranium at levels 20 times higher than safe drinking water guidelines, as well as lead, aluminium, arsenic and barium². In addition, there have been over 20 reported spills and leaks of toxic CSG water from storage ponds, pipes and well heads. Santos cannot be trusted.
The Pilliga is one of 15 nationally listed `biodiversity hotspots' and is vital to the survival of threatened species like the Koala, Spotted-tailed Quoll, Black-striped Wallaby, Eastern Pygmy-possum, Pilliga Mouse and South-eastern Long-eared Bat. The forest is home to over 200 bird species and is internationally recognised as an Important Bird Area². The Santos gasfield would fragment 95,000 hectares of the Pilliga with well pads, roads, and water and gas pipelines--damaging vital habitat and threatening the survival of endangered species. - See more at: https://www.wilderness.org.au/final-push-pilliga?utm_source=phplist&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=FEB_17_wildnews-%5Bmessageid%5D&utm_content=story1#sthash.tzZyovPk.dpuf
A range of hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds can be released into the air from coal seam gas operations, including flaring of gas wells. The effects of volatile organic compounds vary, but can cause eye, nose and airway irritation, headache, nausea, dizziness and loss of coordination⁴. These impacts have been documented in human populations nearby to existing gasfields in Queensland, Sydney and in America.
Extensive community surveys have shown an average of 96% opposition to CSG. This stretches across a massive 3.2 million hectares of country surrounding the Pilliga forest, including 99 communities. Hundreds of farmers have participated in protest actions unlike any previously seen in the region.
We are very concerned that the damage caused by these csg wells will be irreversible and have long lasting consequences to us all. Please do not allow any company to put any coal seam gas wells in the heart of the Pilliga forest, including Santos.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Narelle Patterson
Object
Narelle Patterson
Message
If this proposal goes ahead great damage will be done to the Pilliga forest because is the largest intact woodland in eastern Australia, stretching across half a million hectares in north-western New South Wales. It is a unique ecological refuge, home to 25 nationally listed and 48 state-listed threatened species, such as the Pilliga Mouse, which rely on the Pilliga for survival.
The sandstone under the Pilliga is a vital recharge area for the Great Artesian Basin, and creeks that flow through the Pilliga provide clean water into the Murray Darling Basin. These water sources are the lifeblood of farming communities throughout the southeast and inland Australia.
- See more at: https://www.wilderness.org.au/final-push-pilliga#sthash.8KP2Osu7.dpuf
Santos, an energy company, has plans to industrialise the Pilliga with 850 coal seam gas wells--threatening this natural refuge, the precious groundwater, and the communities who rely on it.
In addition if we're to maintain a safe climate and keep global warming below 2 degrees, projects like this cannot go ahead. - See more at: https://www.wilderness.org.au/final-push-pilliga#sthash.8KP2Osu7.dpuf
It is imperitive that this project does not go ahead as there is too much at stake for people and the environment.
Your sincerely
Narelle Patterosn
Jennifer Nicholls
Object
Jennifer Nicholls
Message
Allowing the extraction of coal seam gas in the Pilliga would damage or destroy:
* The Pilliga itself, a biodiversity hotspot and home to several threatened animal species and no doubt some plants as well. Fragmentation of ecological communities is a well-known damaging process, along with the reduction in area of the Pilliga due to clearing for well pads, roads, pipelines and other infrastructure
* Precious water sources, including Australia's largest groundwater aquifer the Great Artesian Basin, which is already under pressure from human extraction
* Cultural sites of the Gamilaraay Traditional Custodians
* The health of the humans who live and work in the area
* The nation's premier optical observatory and the internationally recognised "dark sky park".
Santos' safety and environmental record in the region is not good, with a history of spills and leaks, including contaminating a freshwater aquifer that was no doubt part of the whole system keeping the Pilliga running, not just from a human point of view but from a whole ecosystem point of view. Further, Santos apparently has no real plan for safely disposing the hundreds of thousands of tonnes of salt that would be produced. This toxic legacy would add to the damage and destruction caused by extracting coal seam gas in the Pilliga.
Coal seam gas contributes to climate change through the removal of carbon sinks, otherwise known as old-growth ecosystems, the leakage of methane during the production, transport, processing and use of coal seam gas. Australia needs to become more serious about reducing our carbon emissions and opening new coal seam gas fields is going in the wrong direction.
We don't need the gas. In 2011 researchers at the University of Melbourne and the not-for-profit Beyond Zero Emissions published an article showing how Australia's energy could be from 100% renewables in just 10 years, Matthew Wright and Patrick Hearps, "Zero Carbon Australia 2020:Stationary Energy Sector Report - Executive Summary" (2nd ed.), University of Melbourne Energy Research Institute and Beyond Zero Emissions, August 2011, pp. 1-6. We could be nearly 100% renewable by now if there was sufficient political will.
Victoria has declared itself coal seam gas free. It is time for NSW to join it. Please reject Santos' application to further destroy the Pilliga in particular, and NSW in general.
June Larkin
Object
June Larkin
Message
Emma Lindell
Object
Emma Lindell
Message
Totally OBJECT to this project.