New Health Research Facility

I am both the owner and resident at 110 Wyndham St in Alexandria. I have lived at this address for over 12 years and now reside here with my husband and son.
As a longstanding resident, I object to the proposed development covered by applications D/2024/885 and D/2024/937.
These are significant developments that will materially change the streetscape and cause significant impact during their construction and future operation.
I'm particularly concerned as the developers have made no attempt to engage directly, other than a cursory public exhibition (poorly advertised) lasting a couple of hours, to understand the concerns and the implications for the immediate residents. Given our proximity to the proposed development, we are directly affected by both the development and the building process.
The nature and bulk of the buildings will result in a significant loss of privacy, (with proposed terraces) and also overshadowing implications for the existing homes, including my own. I believe there will be a material loss of winter sunlight which is already sparse and precious.
The construction phase which encompasses deep excavation will give rise to intolerable and unacceptable noise, vibration, dust, congestion and a host of other impacts which will make our home uninhabitable for the duration. This is unacceptable with an infant child. None of these impacts appears to be either accurately assessed nor have proposals for mitigation been set out in the lodged documents. Again, given our proximity, we expect thorough dilapidation reports, the option of blackout construction periods and recourse for local complaints that are immediately actioned at the expense of the council and developer.
This is further compounded by changing working patterns and the requirement to work from home, making this particularly egregious.
The loss of parking, the volumes of demolition and excavation material, the construction materials and workers attending the site over the extended duration of the construction will be challenging.
Further the ongoing servicing and operation of the facility will significantly increase the passing traffic and also give rise of biohazard concerns given the proposed nature of the treatments.
We ask the Council to consider these implications when assessing the application and consider the impacts on the long-term residents and their right to the quiet enjoyment of their property as tax-paying, voting citizens of the City of Sydney.

My family live at 91 Wyndham St, Alexandria NSW 2015. And I've learned there is a new major development
happening almost at our door.
In concept I'm fully supportive of this investment, the major issue is Parking.
We already struggle with Parking:
- During the weekdays with people, I'm assuming mostly working for CBA, parking in the area leaving us without
space to park when chance we need to take the car to go somewhere;
- During Fridays and Saturday nights due to people, I'm assuming, going to Parties and/or Pubs in the area.
Now with the addition of 10000 plus jobs in the area, even if only 10% occasionally brings the car to work, it will
make the residents' parking impossible.
In a nutshell, all in favour of the investment, even if in the short/medium term it is a hassle with all the issues of a
construction site. But only if the council solves the parking situation for the residents - including during construction.
For example, reserved spaces for residents (one for household).
Thank you

Please do not do 5 storeys on Wyndham st, please limit to 3 like everywhere else on the street. Please ensure buildings along Wyndham st do not look out of place. Use Mitchell rd as a guide above metro Woolies. They only have 3 storeys at the front and higher at the back.
Please also restrict height on botany rd as I feel sorry for the houses on Wyndham st behind it

see attached

see attached

see attached

see attached

see attached

see attached

I am a resident and owner of a neighbouring property.
Please find attached feedback and comments on the DA for 100 Botany Road.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
Regards
Donna

To the City of Sydney,
Just five minutes ago I received notification from a concerned resident Group (nothing from council) regarding the above development.
On looking up the proposals, to say I was stunned is an understatement.
Not only have we had the constant noise and upheaval from the building of towers over Waterloo Metro station but now we can look forward to years of more disruptions (and displaced rats)
The shadowing, the lack of privacy, the noise and the fact that it is being built as a Life Sciences Campus has raised so many questions that I can’t believe locals have not been notified by council.
Please register my distress at this planned development
Your very concerned resident,
Diane Mullen
54 Gerard St
Alexandria

I would like to express while we are supportive of the DA and its intent we have concern about a number of issues:
1. Dust suppression during the demolition process. My family suffer from asthma and poorly controlled dust management is of significant concern to us. It was handled poorly on the Sydney Metro project and we fear it will similarly occur on this project.
2. The safe removal of asbestos containing material during the bulk excavation phase of the project. It must be managed with appropriate air sampling and cleared by an accredited hygienist.
3. The impact of the removal of parking on Wyndham street during the construction period. The construction management plan encourages workers to use public transport but the reality is that many will drive to the site and park on the street. This has been experienced on Wyndham St for the last 4 years at the 75-83 wyndham development. Workers on that site routinely take local parking and park all day reducing the amenity for residents. Increased parking monitoring in this area is needed to ensure compliance with local parking requirements. Residential parking also needs to be reimposed post completion and removal of the temporary works zone to minimise degradation of resident parking in the evenings and on weekends.
4. Traffic congestion post completion of the project. Wyndham St is already highly congested and this will add in more congestion. The traffic reports models limited impact which we believe will be more than limited. Entey and Exit from the development onto Wyndham St should be limited to 'left in, left out' only. Turning right out of the development carparking into Wyndham St should not be allowed.
5. Noise during construction. Noise prior to 7am needs to be managed. It is a residential area. Construction workers arrive for the 7am start are often loud and disruptive.
6. Movement of large trucks should be done off and onto Botany Rd to minimise impact on residents on Wyndham St.
Thanks
Ben Cohen
93 Wydham St

### **Objection to the Proposed Development at 100 Botany Road, Alexandria**

The proposed development at 100 Botany Road, Alexandria, raises serious concerns about its compliance with planning principles, environmental stewardship, community welfare, and heritage preservation. This objection outlines the significant deficiencies and inconsistencies identified, explains their critical importance, and offers actionable recommendations to address them. The objective is to highlight the ways in which this development, as currently proposed, falls short of meeting requisite thresholds for approval and fails to deliver sufficient benefits to the community.

---

### **1. Environmental and Health Concerns**
#### **Contamination Risks**
- **Issues Identified**:
- The **Remediation Action Plan (RAP)** and **Detailed Site Contamination Investigation** confirm the presence of friable asbestos, elevated lead levels (up to 71,000 mg/kg), hydrocarbons, and other hazardous substances.
- Contaminants are dispersed in the soil and groundwater, with risks exacerbated during excavation and construction.

- **Why It Matters**:
- Inadequate handling of contaminants can have long-term health implications for nearby residents and workers. Airborne particles pose respiratory hazards, while contaminated groundwater risks polluting broader water systems.
- The Botany Groundwater Exclusion Zone imposes restrictions on usage, yet the proposal insufficiently details measures to manage dewatering and prevent contamination spread.

- **Recommendations**:
- Strengthen remediation protocols with enforceable safeguards for monitoring air quality and water contamination during and after construction.
- Implement an independent environmental management audit to ensure compliance with NSW EPA and SEPP (Resilience and Hazards) 2021 guidelines.

---

### **2. Heritage and Character**
#### **Impact on Heritage Conservation**
- **Issues Identified**:
- The proposed height and bulk of the development overshadow nearby heritage-listed buildings and the Alexandria Park Heritage Conservation Area, as highlighted in the **Visual Impact Assessment**.
- The modern design is incongruous with the area’s historical character and detracts from its cultural significance.

- **Why It Matters**:
- Heritage conservation is a cornerstone of planning principles, preserving the unique identity of a locality. Overwhelming scale and unsympathetic design diminish the visual integrity of the conservation area.
- Residents and visitors value the aesthetic and historical appeal of this precinct, which contributes to the cultural fabric of Alexandria.

- **Recommendations**:
- Scale down the building heights to comply with the Sydney LEP 2012 and ensure compatibility with the heritage precinct.
- Incorporate design elements that reflect and enhance the architectural vernacular of the area, ensuring harmony with the conservation zone.

---

### **3. Public Realm and Community Benefit**
#### **Inadequate Public Spaces**
- **Issues Identified**:
- The **Public Realm Design Report** indicates minimal public open space provision, with insufficient permeability and connectivity between Botany Road and Wyndham Street.
- Landscaping proposals prioritize aesthetic enhancements over functional green spaces or ecological restoration.

- **Why It Matters**:
- Public open spaces are vital for community interaction, recreation, and mental well-being. With an increasing local population, the development does not address the need for inclusive and accessible community spaces.
- Missed opportunities to integrate ecological restoration undermine broader sustainability objectives.

- **Recommendations**:
- Redesign landscaping plans to prioritize green spaces with community-focused amenities such as play areas, shaded seating, and urban biodiversity zones.
- Introduce a pedestrianized central corridor to enhance connectivity and reduce vehicular dominance.

---

### **4. Traffic and Infrastructure**
#### **Congestion and Safety Concerns**
- **Issues Identified**:
- The **Traffic Impact Assessment** predicts increased traffic congestion on Botany Road and Wyndham Lane, compounded by the addition of a shared laneway.
- Inadequate separation between pedestrian and vehicular traffic raises safety risks.

- **Why It Matters**:
- Increased traffic flow and poor infrastructure design jeopardize pedestrian safety, particularly for children and elderly residents.
- Without significant upgrades, local transport infrastructure is ill-equipped to handle additional demands.

- **Recommendations**:
- Develop a clear strategy for traffic management, including traffic-calming measures and designated pedestrian pathways.
- Expand public transport links to reduce dependency on private vehicles.

---

### **5. Construction and Operational Disruptions**
#### **Noise, Dust, and Vibrations**
- **Issues Identified**:
- Demolition and excavation activities are expected to generate significant noise, dust, and vibrations, as detailed in the **Remediation Action Plan**.
- Measures to mitigate these disruptions lack specificity.

- **Why It Matters**:
- Prolonged construction disruptions will affect the quality of life for residents and businesses. Dust and vibrations may also damage nearby heritage structures.
- Effective construction management is critical to maintaining community trust and minimizing adverse impacts.

- **Recommendations**:
- Implement stricter noise and dust control measures, including real-time monitoring and rapid response protocols.
- Establish construction-free periods during sensitive hours to minimize community disturbances.

---

### **6. Compliance with Planning Controls**
#### **Height and Floor Space Ratio (FSR) Breaches**
- **Issues Identified**:
- The development exceeds height and FSR controls stipulated in the Sydney LEP 2012, with a reliance on Clause 4.6 variation requests that fail to adequately justify non-compliance.

- **Why It Matters**:
- These controls are designed to ensure balanced development that aligns with the character, infrastructure capacity, and environmental considerations of an area. The proposed scale undermines these objectives.

- **Recommendations**:
- Revise the proposal to comply with height and FSR limits, demonstrating alignment with local planning policies and objectives.

---

### **Conclusion and Path Forward**
The development, as proposed, falls short of meeting critical planning thresholds and offers insufficient benefits to the community. By addressing the identified deficiencies, the project can be transformed into one that respects the heritage and character of Alexandria, prioritizes environmental sustainability, and enhances the quality of life for all residents. This requires meaningful community engagement, adherence to planning controls, and a commitment to delivering greater public value.

As a resident living in an adjacent terrace within the heritage conservation area, I am deeply concerned about the proposed development at 100 Botany Road, Alexandria. This project poses significant risks to our neighborhood’s safety, well-being, and cultural integrity. Below is a summary of key issues and inadequacies identified through a review of the development's documentation.

1. Environmental and Health Risks
Contamination Dangers
- Findings: The reports prepared by Douglas Partners (e.g., "Remediation Action Plan" and "Detailed Site Contamination Investigation") confirm the presence of hazardous materials, including friable asbestos, lead, and hydrocarbons, far exceeding safe thresholds.
- Key Concerns:
- The removal and handling of these materials during excavation could release dangerous particles into the air, posing health risks to residents.
- Contamination in the soil and groundwater has not been adequately addressed, leaving open the possibility of long-term environmental harm.

2. Heritage and Aesthetic Impacts
Loss of Neighborhood Character
- Findings: The design, as outlined in the "Landscape and Public Realm Design Report" by ASPECT Studios, includes large-scale, modern buildings that overshadow and visually dominate the surrounding heritage conservation area.
- Key Concerns:
- The towering structures will block sunlight from adjacent terraces and cast shadows over nearby parks.
- The architectural style is completely out of place, undermining the charm and historic integrity of the neighborhood.

3. Public Amenity and Community Well-being
Inadequate Open Spaces
- Findings: Despite claims in the "Public Realm Design Report," the development offers minimal public benefit in terms of open, green, and safe spaces.
- Key Concerns:
- Local families rely on accessible, green areas for recreation. The proposed spaces do not adequately address the needs of the growing community.

4. Traffic and Safety Issues
Increased Congestion
- Findings: The "Traffic Impact Assessment" reveals that the development will significantly increase traffic on Botany Road and Wyndham Lane.
- Key Concerns:
- Increased traffic and shared laneways create safety risks for pedestrians, particularly children walking or cycling to school.
- The design fails to separate pedestrian paths from vehicular traffic, heightening the risk of accidents.

5. Construction and Operational Disruptions
Noise, Dust, and Vibrations
- Findings: The demolition and excavation plans outlined in the "Remediation Action Plan" detail significant disruptions, including dust, noise, and vibrations.
- Key Concerns:
- Noise and airborne particles during years of construction will disrupt daily life, affecting residents' ability to work, study, and enjoy their homes.

6. Planning and Compliance Concerns
Zoning and Development Breaches
- Findings: According to the "Design Excellence Report" by Ethos Urban, the development exceeds permissible height and floor space ratios as per the Sydney Local Environmental Plan.
- Key Concerns:
- These violations demonstrate a disregard for established planning rules designed to protect communities like ours.
- The justification provided for these breaches fails to account for the development's direct impact on neighboring residents.
---
Recommendations
1. Stronger Health and Safety Protections:
- Implement stringent air quality monitoring and contamination safeguards during construction.
- Develop robust strategies to mitigate noise and vibration impacts on nearby homes.
2. Respect for Heritage and Community:
- Revise the design to reduce building heights and ensure compatibility with the existing heritage streetscape.
- Enhance open spaces with community-friendly features, such as play areas and shaded seating.
3. Traffic and Pedestrian Safety:
- Introduce clear pathways that prioritize pedestrian safety, particularly for children traveling to and from school.
4. Transparent Community Consultation:
- Conduct meaningful consultations with local residents to address their concerns and incorporate their feedback into the development.
5. Comprehensive Environmental Accountability:
- Ensure all contamination and remediation plans are independently reviewed and monitored to protect public health and the environment.
---
This development has the potential to transform our neighborhood irreparably. I urge the relevant authorities to consider the profound effects on the surrounding community when evaluating this proposal. It is essential to prioritize safety, health, and heritage preservation in any approved plans.

The owner of 102 Wyndham Street objects to the project for the reasons set out the in the attached Submission document including the Noise Review and lawyers letter in relation to the separation of development application processes for related development.

An Engineers Report reviewing the potential impacts to the structural integrity of 102 Wyndham Street is currently being prepared and will follow shortly.

As a resident who lives very close to the site I hope building hours will be restricted so residents will not be impacted by continuous noise. My preference would be no construction in the evenings, before 7am in the morning and none on weekends. Also, my children and I have asthma and we hope dust pollution is managed well at the development site.

Parking on Wyndham St is already very difficult so I hope the work zone can be more limited than what is shown, as there are elderly people and people with children who need to park near their houses.

I am concerned about the impact of this development in terms of
noise, hours of operation will need to be restricted.
Dust and other pollution. Having a number of family members with Asthma I am deeply concerned about the potential dust pollution and can see no plans to mitigate dust and other pollution
Parking availability during the development process. Any excessive work zone needs to be removed to allow for resident parking
Vibration and potential damage to existing dwellings. We are directly opposite this development and have no pre inspection of our site to enable identification of damage during the excavation phase of the project

HI

See attached objection.