Residential development with infill affordable housing, 59-63 Trafalgar Avenue 1A&1B Valley Road Lindfield

With respect to the residential development at 59-63 Trafalgar Avenue and 1A & 1B Valley Road, Lindfield I do not believe this is in keeping with NSW Planning Requirements as the subject development is within a designated Heritage Conservation Area (Ref PP-2020-352) by NSW Planning and specifically highlighted as no new dwellings and jobs. This heritage conservation area was determined by a number of heritage experts. The bulk and height of the development will have detrimental impact on the surrounding area, not just traffic but also significant overshadowing due to height, increased ground water runoff directly leading to Gordon Creek having an impact of the existing flora and fauna surrounding the creek. Furthermore I understand that Ku-ring-gai Council has submitted to the NSW Planning Department an alternative proposal for TOD which aligns with NSW Housing Targets for the council area that does not impact heritage conservation zones and this should be considered for new residential developments. I understand that this is still to be considered by NSW Planning and suggest that the residential development submission (SUB-83901708) not procced till this is finalised to take account of the unique heritage conservation area as other more appropriate development sites are identified.

Subject: Objection to SSD-78996460 – Proposed Development at 16–24 Lord Street & 21–27 Roseville Avenue, Roseville NSW 2069

To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing to formally object to the State Significant Development (SSD-78996460) application for the proposed residential development at 16–24 Lord Street and 21–27 Roseville Avenue, Roseville. While the intention to provide affordable housing is commendable, I believe the scale and nature of this development are incompatible with the character and heritage of the Roseville area.

1. Incompatibility with Local Heritage and Character

The proposed development's scale and design are inconsistent with the established low-density, heritage-rich character of Roseville. The area is known for its significant twentieth-century architecture and conservation efforts, which are at risk of being overshadowed by such large-scale developments. The introduction of a 10-storey building in this context could irreversibly alter the area's aesthetic and historical integrity.

In addition to this, as strict development rules imposed by Ku-ring-gai Council on residents living in both Heritage and Heritage Conservation Zones with the intention of protecting and conserving the heritage of the Roseville local area have been in place, many residents have spent significant amounts of hard earned money to comply. This development completely undermines these Council rules and the efforts and financial impacts these have caused the local families as they have worked together to come to a common balance to both improve their homes and retain the architectural heritage character of their community.

2. Overdevelopment and Infrastructure Strain

The proposal involves the consolidation of nine existing properties to create a high-density development. This level of intensification is concerning, as it will place unnecessary pressure on local infrastructure, including roads, public transport, and community services, which are already operating at capacity. The potential for increased traffic congestion and strain on public amenities warrants a thorough assessment. Given the proximity to local schools, this also poses a huge safety risk for families and their children with the increase in traffic and vehicles that would be using the local streets putting pressure on parking and access to local streets.

3. Environmental and Ecological Concerns

Roseville's natural environment, including local flora and fauna, contributes significantly to the area's appeal. A development of this magnitude could lead to the loss of green spaces and negatively impact local biodiversity. It is essential that any new development considers the ecological footprint and implements measures to mitigate environmental degradation.

4. Community Consultation and Engagement

There is a need for more comprehensive community consultation regarding this development. Residents and local stakeholders should have a meaningful opportunity to engage with the planning process and express their concerns. Transparent communication and consideration of community feedback are crucial in ensuring developments align with the values and needs of the local population.

Conclusion

While the provision of affordable housing is important, it should not come at the expense of the community's heritage, environmental integrity, and quality of life. I urge the Department of Planning and Environment to reconsider the proposed development in its current form and explore alternative solutions that balance housing needs with the preservation of Roseville's unique character.

Thank you for considering my submission.

Sincerely,

Mrs Naomi Reiter
14 McLeod Ave Roseville, NSW 2069
Ph: 0404 866 460

I object on the basis of the scale of the development, the impact that it will have on the surrounding area , the impact on traffic, the impact on the amenities, loss of environmental and heritage of the area.

Please do not make any long decision on the project until the state and the council has reached an agreement as it will affect the long term living conditions of the flora, fauna and the existing residents as well as the heritage values of the area