The Timberyards by RTL Co.

Buildings are too high
Not enough parking for vehicles { 1188 units vs 216 parking spaces }
Traffic congestion will occur during and after the construction.
Schools may become 'overcrowded' with an extra 1,000 or so residents moving into the area.

I formally object to the proposed development of The Timberyards by RTL Co. (SSD-76927247) due to its significant and detrimental impact on my property at 122 Sydenham Rd, along with countless others throughout Marrickville and Sydenham.

While I understand the need for urban renewal and increased housing options, the current proposal raises several concerns that must be addressed:

1. Loss of Natural Light: The proposed buildings, ranging from eight to thirteen storeys, will overshadow my property, leading to a substantial reduction in natural light. This will severely affect the quality of life for myself and other residents of Marrickville, along with reducing property value. Why should hundreds of residents in Marrickville have to be subject to this?

2. Increased Noise and Traffic: The scale of the development, including 1,188 apartments and commercial spaces, will inevitably lead to increased traffic congestion and noise pollution in the area. Sydenham road is already quite busy and congested at peak hour, the construction of this building will only dramatically exacerbate these issues and increase travel times.

3. Environmental Concerns: The removal of existing trees and the potential strain on local infrastructure, such as water and electricity, are alarming. The development must prioritise sustainable practices and ensure adequate infrastructure upgrades. Marrickville is already heavily urbanised, it doesn’t need the removal of even more plant life.

4. Community Impact: This should go without saying, but the introduction of high-density housing without sufficient public amenities and green spaces will strain existing community resources. The proposed development must include provisions for parks, schools, and healthcare facilities to support the growing population, otherwise there will be a dramatic decrease in the quality and availability of these services in Marrickville.

I urge the Department of Planning and Environment to reconsider the current proposal and work with the community to address these concerns. A more balanced approach that respects the needs of existing residents while accommodating growth is essential.

The Inner West of Sydney is in a terrible housing crisis creating mental and physical stress to its residents and the broader community. Increasing housing supply to projects like this will in some way help reduce that stress.

I strongly support the project.

This is fantastic. We need more apartments near major public transport hubs. Build it and they shall come. Don't just ask existing homeowners, but all potential homeowners.

This is exactly what we should be working towards for Marrickville and Sydney.
We should be doing everything we can to add housing at our transport nodes and Marrickville/Sydenham is the ideal spot with adaptable land and good proximity to work and services and world class transport links.
Projects like this ensure that our suburb will have opportunity and growth and a future as a key suburb within the city fabric.
I support this wholeheartedly.

I object to this development for the following reasons:
- Ruins the street scape of our local residential street Frampton Avenue with a project too large and high at 13 stories when the max height of any building in the surrounding area is 4-8 stories.
- Cramming 7 buildings onto the site is allowing high volume of residents/workers with not enough parking onsite itself and surrounding streets which are already congested since the TOGA development started development. The 9 hour car park behind Frampton Avenue with 112 spaces is already full by 8am each day. Many residents who live on Frampton Avenue can't even find parking at any time during daylight hours because of this, let alone visitors. The project is only providing 216 car spaces for 1188 units - where is everyone else meant to park???? there is no more room. People who will flat share and families tend to have 2 or more cars. The car space vs potential car owners implies a large shortage of parking availability.
- The Farr St access will bring more traffic to the local school posing a higher risk to students, families and staff.
- 1188 units quoted as 2500 renters does not seem an accurate calculation given there are 40x3 beds, 272x 2 beds - potential to reach 5000 people
- 3 years ago I was hit by a car whilst I was crossing a pedestrian crossing on Marrickville Rd on the way to Sydenham station due to people rushing to get to work and not having the patience to follow road rules. This development will greatly increase traffic , increasing the risk of more accidents. The number of times I have seen cars NOT give way at pedestrian crossing along Marrickville Rd and surrounding streets is numerous. Conversely increasing the number of residents commuting to Sydenham station be it on foot or bike riders increases the risk or more accidents given the increased traffic congestion

The scale of the project is too large for local area.
I am very concerned about traffic on Victoria and Sydenham Roads and the effect on local parking.
8 storeys on Sydenham Road is too much

I am writing to formally object to the proposed Timber yard project. 8-storey high-rise development consisting of 1,188 residential units, with only 216 parking spaces allocated. While I understand the need for development, I have significant concerns about how this project will negatively impact our community's quality of life for those who have lived her for over a decade or more.

Firstly, the proposed parking provision is grossly inadequate. With only 216 parking spaces for 1,188 units, the overflow of vehicles will undoubtedly strain the already limited parking resources in the area. Access to essential services such as daycare facilities and medical centers is already challenging due to insufficient vacancies and already limited parking. We find most of the time being unable to park in front of our own homes due to clearway restrictions and local business.
This development will worsen the situation, making it even more difficult for residents and visitors to access necessary services.

Secondly, the proposed building's height and density will have severe consequences for the surrounding environment. The height of the structure will drastically reduce sunlight exposure to my home and neighbours, allowing only approximately two hours of sunlight each day. This is a matter of concern, particularly for my children who suffer from asthma. Limited sunlight exposure can worsen respiratory conditions and diminish their overall well-being.

Additionally, the influx of residents from such a large development will put immense pressure on local infrastructure, including roads, public transport, and community services. It appears that the proposed plan does not adequately consider the detrimental impact on the existing community.

I respectfully urge the planning committee to reconsider this proposal and work toward a more suitable, balanced development plan that genuinely accounts for the welfare of the existing residents and the infrastructure of our neighborhood.

Thank you for considering this objection. I would appreciate acknowledgment of receipt of this letter and the opportunity to be kept informed of the progress of this proposal.

I am writing to express my vehement objection to the proposed 8-storey high-rise development, which would irreparably harm our community. The sheer density of 1,188 residential units, coupled with a grossly inadequate 216 parking spaces, would create a parking crisis that would devastate our neighborhood.

The existing parking infrastructure is already overstretched, and this development would push it to the breaking point. Residents, visitors, and local businesses would be severely impacted, with access to essential services like daycare and medical centers becoming increasingly difficult.

Furthermore, the proposed building's excessive height would cast a permanent shadow over our homes, blocking out essential sunlight. This is not just a matter of aesthetics; it has serious health implications. My children, who suffer from asthma, would be particularly vulnerable to the reduced sunlight, which would exacerbate their condition.

The strain on local infrastructure would be catastrophic. Our roads, public transport, and community services are already under pressure; this development would push them to the point of collapse.

It is appalling that the proposed plan so blatantly disregards the well-being of existing residents and the integrity of our neighborhood. I demand that the planning committee reconsider this proposal and prioritize the needs of our community.

I request acknowledgment of this objection and regular updates on the proposal's progress. I will not stand idly by while our community is destroyed by reckless development

This is a great project that will provide mid-high density housing in exactly where it needs to be. The location (close to Marrickville Rd, where buses are available, Sydenham Station where the Metro is available, etc) is prime for this type of a housing development. This location will encourage people who to be more conscious about using public or active transport rather than getting in their cars. With the number of bike spots, people will be encouraged to ride their bikes, boosting public health and keeping our air clean. We need housing in prime locations such as this to combat climate change.

The housing crisis is exactly as it sounds. Now more than ever, people are struggling to achieve home ownership in this city. There is a strong preference of owner-occupiers toward detached houses. This preference might exist only because the alternative (mid-high density living) in our city is in such a sorry state. This project is well designed, visually appealing, and when constructed correctly will be the step in the right direction that our city desperately needs! More excellent proposals like this in locations such as this and over time we will shift the zeitgeist away from detached housing and toward communal, sustainable and affordable high-density living.

Love the project

location will encourage people to catch all of the convenient nearby public transport rather than jumping in their cars

Good for environment
Good for housing crisis

Bike spots will encourage people to get on bikes and try active transport

Housing crisis is so bad right now, and everyone wants a detached house, but that's probbaly because the alternative (high density apartments) is so tragic in sydney.

This will be a good example of high density done right, and help to shift the preference

To whom it may concern,
I object to SSD-76927247 - The Timberyards by RTL Co.
The 8-storey building would overshadow homes on Sydenham Road, especially in the afternoons and evenings. This would reduce the natural light residents currently enjoy, with some homes receiving only about 30 minutes of sunlight per day, which will make our homes much darker and less welcoming.

the proposed storeys are above the legal limit and will significantly overshadow our homes in the surrounding area, losing most of our sun. 1188 units proposed with only 216 parking spots planned, parking in the area will be even more difficult. Too many units proposed.

This development provides 1200 units of badly needed housing in an area of high demand 10 mins walk from the Metro station. It will bring more people and business to the Marrickville neighborhood and more students to the Public school (which is under capacity). Given the housing crisis in Sydney approving this thoughtfully designed development in a neighborhood with great public transport is a must.

Marrickville is in high demand, and this will add to housing supply and improve affordability. The location is ripe for renewal and is in close proximity to both public transport and shops. The project also adds affordable housing and a diverse mix of housing options, which is perfect for young people. It is an excellent project for a rather bleak part of Marrickville.

I am a very nearby resident living on Sydenham Road, with two young children. I am concerned about an influx of parked vehicles driving competition for parking in the area. I note that there are proposed to be almost 1,000 more apartments at the new development than there will be parking spaces. I use my car to get to daycare, supermarkets and child activities, and so I worry about regularly being forced to park my car hundreds of metres away.

If this development goes ahead without major adjustments to the parking deficit, I would ask government to provide parking security to the existing residents of Sydenham Road and other streets with a permit system, similar to what currently exists for residents of Frampton Street and Garners Avenue.

The height of this project is proportionally not in keeping with the area and the nearby streets and particularly across on the road on Sydenham Rd and the street perpendicular, Frampton Av. Parking on these streets is already over subscribed and with so few parking spaces in the new development the local streets will be even more congested and therefore unsafe for pedestrians and more importantly the elderly and children in the area. A ratio of only one car space to six apartments is extremely short sighted. There should be at least one parking spot for every apartment and anything less is simply poor planning. There is a huge and inaccurate assumption that the new owners/tenants will not have vehicles. This is an irresponsible assumption . The local schools and child care centres are overcrowded. How is the council preparing for over an additional 1188 apartments without the infrastructure and facilities? The walkway along Sydenham Rd to Sydenham Metro and Train Station is in disrepair and you want over an additional 1000 families committed to using it as they can not own a car. This whole development is unrealistic and without consideration for current and future residents.

While it's unlikely that I personally won't be able to live in this exact region given that it is currently more financially feasible as a student to continue living with my parents, since I'm still a resident of Sydney I would like to see and encourage the proliferation of healthy urban developments such as this in shaping the character and liveliness of my city as a whole.

The planned development is well-located and the increased density will benefit the surrounding area and beyond. In addition to allowing for new integrated retail and commercial spaces, nearby existing businesses will see increased patronage. Proximity to these shops and services, as well as Sydenham and Marrickville station will encourage forms of transport other than driving, including cycling, walking, and public transit which will result in lower emissions that would result from having potential residents live far from services and amenities by which the only reasonable means of transport would be by private vehicle. These are the features of accessibility that make this area an excellent location for development and urban densification.

In comparison to traditionally detached housing, this form of residence makes for a much more efficient use of land space. If the corresponding number of detached houses were to be built on new land, it would result in a footprint many times greater than the space taken up by the development. Swathes of land would have to be cleared, infrastructure would have to stretch further, and again, potential residents would likely find themselves having only the option of driving in order to get anywhere.

This submission supports the proposed Marrickville Timberyards development. The development would provide 1,200 new residential units in a high-demand area. Marrickville is experiencing significant housing demand, and this additional supply would contribute to addressing housing affordability challenges in the region. Increasing housing supply in areas of high demand is consistent with established economic principles for improving affordability.

The development is located approximately 10 minutes walking distance from Sydenham Metro station and approximately 7 minutes from shops on Marrickville Road. The development also includes a substantial number of bicycle parking spaces, providing residents with options that prioritise active and public transport. The emphasis on non-car transport options would contribute to reduced car emissions, supporting climate change mitigation objectives and improving air quality.

Marrickville Public School is presently below its capacity. The proposed development would help increase enrolments, ensuring efficient use of existing public infrastructure.

The development includes retail space, affordable housing and public space contributions. These elements would deliver additional economic and social benefits to the local community beyond the direct housing supply benefits. Furthermore, the development features high-quality design elements that would be visually appealing and integrate effectively with the surrounding area.

The Marrickville Timberyards development would deliver significant economic and social benefits through increased housing supply, appropriate transport connections, utilisation of existing educational infrastructure, community contributions, and quality design. For these reasons, the development warrants support.

I totally reject this proposal as a total over stretch of developer flex. It does not address any concerns of the local area and will only serve to reduce the quality of life in the neighbourhood.
There is little affordable housing. Less than 10% of these units are set aside for Affordable Housing. This plan does not provide enough housing for low-income residents. In today's climate we need more housing assistance.

The design does not suit the character of the neighbourhood and it it too high. The Sydenham Road block is 8 storeys high. The legal maximum is 3 storeys.
This increased height significantly impacts the existing homes on surrounding roads by overshadowing, creating wind tunnels and reducing privacy in existing homes being overlooked by this monstrosity.

Parking in the area will become impossible. There are 1,188 units being built, with only 216 parking spaces planned. Where are the other 972 households park? This is ridiculous! I know it is close to public transport but people who can afford to buy here will have a car. It is naive to say otherwise. The number of parking spots must be increased.

The numbers of apartments with less than two bedrooms is ridiculous. This doesn't address the middle housing gap so prevalent in the Inner West see article https://www.smh.com.au/politics/nsw/the-sydney-suburbs-excluded-from-missing-middle-housing-plan-20250226-p5lfa8.html
Of the 1,188 units coming, there are only 40 3-bedroom units and 275 2-bedroom units. This plan does not offer housing for families who desperately need it. More 3 and 4 bedroom apartments are needed to support families.

I do hope that the council will see fit to block this development in its current form. It needs to be only up to 6 stories and design d to step back appropriately from the roads. There needs to be more multi bedroom apartments and much more parking.