UNSW G25 Education Building

My objection is not so much that the Education building is being constructed but more to do with its positioning in such close proximity to a major residential area that has been in existence for many years.What other areas with the UNSW precinct, for example in High Street below Botany Street, may exist for this project. Having lived here for 15 years, and my wife for 25 years, we are well aware of the huge impacts this construction will have on this property, having lived with the experience and social disruption of a residential home being constructed at No.24 Norton Street for the last year and a half, and find your assessments often to be at variance to our experience. I enclose our submission with regard to your project and look forward to any further community interaction we will have in the future.

Lachlan Mackay
26 Norton Street
[email protected]
0410024087
20th May 2025

Submission regarding the effects of the UNSW G25 Education Building

Unfortunately I was out of the country for much of the consultative process so here is my belated submission.

1: A question regarding the solar impact:
Our house backs onto Oval Lane and, having lived here for 15 years, I am very aware of the impact of the loss of sunlight, particularly in the autumn/ winter months. In the light of that and having read your assessment of the effects of reduced sunlight and minimum margins on our property and dwelling, I make these following remarks.
At the time of writing, being the cross over between Autumn and Winter, the sun skirts the tree canopy or is covered by it reducing this to 60% of our back yard by noon to 90% by 3pm. At that later time direct sunlight on the dwelling is also likewise reduced. The height of the proposed building makes it certain that the whole of our back yard and dwelling would be covered by morning leading to no sunlight in those months. This is a major concern for Oval Lane residents. The solar impact will affect residents on the left side of Norton Street. Not considered is the construction of a large and high dwelling at No. 24 Norton Street which reduces sunlight on the West side of our property in the afternoon.

2: A question relating to privacy.
I guess not much can be done about that, but it does raise concerns for us regarding the viewing of our private life by anyone who chooses gaze upon our backyard. The previous position of neighbouring houses has always meant privacy for all our neighbours. I simply raise this as a concern as it does not appear to figure in your social impact report.

3: A question relating to Car Parking. “No car parking is proposed to be provided for construction staff” Appendix N
The availability of parking spaces for residents in Norton Street is already affected by the increase in students looking for spaces. The loss then of fifty parking spaces at the University will further impact on residential parking. Some residential parking space for residents is available in Oval Lane but this already being used by students as are parking spaces in Norton Lane on either side of Norton Street. We will also lose several parking spaces to construction workers as noted, as we did during the building of the new Hospital, but no solution is offered apart from relying on the good graces of the construction workers. This more than an inconvenience. Where do residents park?

4: A question relating to Construction hours.
The use of the whole of a Saturday, 7am to 6pm, plus the probability of construction activity outside of these hours, directly affects quality of life for residents of Oval Lane and the relevant areas of Norton Street. This factor, crucial to personal, social, and communal wellbeing is simply ignored or glossed over. We can rent you a room for the 27 months of construction should you wish to do an “on site” study of these factors 😊 We have been living with the building and social effects of the construction at No. 24 so we are fully aware of the impact of construction noise and consequent social disruption. Forget the traditional Saturday “lie-in” or the ubiquitous Aussie Bar-BBQ Saturday arvo.
Appendix P doesn’t exist
Note the high rate of Asthma and Stroke complaints in relation to the lower rates for Greater Sydney in the effected area. This includes me living directly behind the construction area.

5: A question relating to Effect on Property value. The impact of the above factors will significantly and negatively impact upon value of the house, and others in Oval Lane, should it be up for sale. Has this been considered as it does not appear in the Social Impact statement.

Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

Kind regards

Lachlan Mackay and Deborah Heke

The current development of the University of NSW does not dominate the area, it is separated from surrounding houses by a wall of trees. From the verandas and balconies of most houses, residents can admire the extensive views of the surrounding area - the city, the Blue Mountains, Botany Bay. All the residents agree that we live in a village that is right in the middle of the city - lots of greenery, birds, silence, sunshine and space.
Demolishing the existing 6-storey buildings on the grounds of the University of NSW and replacing them with 13-storey buildings will destroy our oasis, our homes, our privacy and our lifestyle. We will no longer be able to admire the charms of our beautiful area. Tall buildings will begin to shade us, the privacy of our homes will cease to exist. The loss of views will also contribute to a large decrease in the value of houses surrounding the development and a decrease in our quality of life. In general, the design of the new facility should take into account the great impact that this proposed building will have on the surrounding area. In addition, in order to obtain the necessary space, it is not necessary to build upwards - laboratories can be located underground. The need for additional rooms/space cannot destroy and dominate the entire area.
In addition, eliminating more parking lots will contribute to even greater cluttering of our streets - more cars driving in circles desperately looking for parking, and cars coming from opposite directions have a problem passing each other in the narrow streets increasing accident rate. Currently, people, mostly hospital employees and construction workers, sleep in their cars from 4 am to block the parking lot.

To whom it may concern,

I am writing to formally object to the proposed UNSW G25 Education Building development, currently under review. While I support educational advancement and thoughtful development, this proposal raises several significant concerns for residents living in close proximity, particularly those on the northern side of Norton Street.

1. Loss of Privacy
The height and scale of the proposed building will result in direct lines of sight into our homes and gardens. This invasion of privacy is deeply concerning and incompatible with the character and expectations of residential living in this area.

2. Loss of Natural Light
Due to the building’s excessive height, substantial overshadowing will occur, particularly in the morning and late afternoon. The northern side of Norton Street will be disproportionately affected, with homes and gardens losing valuable sunlight for much of the day. This not only affects livability but also has broader implications for health and wellbeing.

3. Overbearing Visual Impact
The proposed scale of the development is entirely out of keeping with the surrounding residential character. The low-rise homes nearby will be dwarfed by this structure, creating a sense of enclosure and domination that will negatively impact the local streetscape.

4. Loss of Parking and Increased Congestion
The removal of 59 existing car parks will further exacerbate parking pressure in an area already suffering from a lack of available spaces. Past experiences with university construction projects have shown little regard for community needs—contractors frequently park on residential streets, further reducing available parking for residents. Parking is already atrocious and provides significant stress for residents living on Norton street.

5. Increased Aircraft Noise
The proposed building’s height will necessitate the rerouting of helicopter flight paths servicing the nearby hospital. This will result in increased noise levels directly over our homes, which is both disruptive and distressing, particularly for young families and those working from home.

6. Lack of Accountability for Contractor Parking
Despite repeated concerns raised during previous redevelopment projects, UNSW has consistently failed to provide adequate off-street parking for construction workers. This has led to daily disruptions and parking congestion in surrounding streets. There is no indication this issue will be addressed differently during this development.

In conclusion, the scale and design of the G25 Education Building are incompatible with the surrounding residential environment. The cumulative impact on privacy, light, amenity, noise, and congestion is unacceptable. I urge the Planning Department to reject the current proposal or require substantial amendments to mitigate the effects on local residents.

Sincerely,

I am writing as a member of the Norton Street Precinct Group, Kingsford, in respect of the SSD Application -74670005 for the UNSW G25 Education Building proposed for construction on an existing open ground level carpark on the upper campus of UNSW.
I have been a resident in a private dwelling in very close proximity to the UNSW since 1995. Since then, the upper campus expansion on High Street and Botany Street the compulsory acquisition of Eurimbla Avenue and Botany Street residences for high rise development of the Prince of Wales Hospital on High, Barker and Botany Streets and the private residential development of Newmarket, not to mention the Light Rail development, have shattered the residential character and amenity of the neighbourhood, created a visual eyesore, an acoustic nightmare, intense nightime lighting, restricted access to our properties on weekends, vibration during building works night and day, a wind tunnel effect along Botany Street and dust infiltration of mega proportions both inside and outside our residences. During this time, I nursed my terminally ill husband who had to withstand the inconvenience and distress of these onslaughts and I have had enough disruption to what should be an expectation of a reasonable quality of residential life in a location which was not identified at the time of our house purchase to be subject to such intense development.
The proposed development by UNSW was misleadingly identified to be located at 8 High Street, away from the residential precinct to the south. Not so it turns out, being more accurately located to the southern border of UNSW on Oval Lane, overlooking residential properties.
The height of the proposed building, given the surrounding redevelopments on the upper campus and PoW Hospital is unacceptable and its shading will effectively deny residents backing onto Oval Lane, an unacceptable and unhealthy amount (1 hour sunlight per day) of sunshine. I request an amendment to the height limit to 8 stories to afford residents an acceptable entitlement to sunshine for their physical and mental health.
My primary objection to the proposed development is the impact that the loss of 60 parking spaces will manifest on the streets adjoining the University. Randwick City Council no longer provide residents with permit parking, the number of parking spaces on the street do not provide residents, their visitors nor essential tradespeople with space to park. The few available unlimited parking spaces are now snapped up by hospital workers, University employees and the continiuing use by tradespeople engaged on these never-ending developments. Norton Street has become a rat run and Botany Street is a dangerous road with aggressive and speeding drivers, cyclists you can't see and blind spots if you are trying to exit your property.
I also raise concerns about the 24 hour noise of UNSW plant and air con which is invasive and very distressing, particularly at nightime. Theproposed development will only increase this.
I implore you to reconsider the necessity to build a facility of 13 stories in close proximity to a residential environment with a unique heritage character and historical associations with NSW horse racing industry pre UNSW establishment and the relocation of G25 away from the immediate environs of residents who have suffered way too much during 10+ years of infrastructure developments.

The project will overshadow houses on Norton street, materially reducing natural light while raising privacy concerns for the inhabitants of the street.
This project removes much needed parking capacity in the area while increasing the parking demand substantially. A project of this significance should address existing problems in the community not add to them.
The project will increase traffic on already congested streets including Norton street, Botany street and Barker street.
Since the new buildings have been erected on Botany street (UNSW and hospital) over the last decade, speeding in these streets has become a real safety concern for our family and our community. This project will exacerbate this problem.

This project removes much needed parking capacity in the area while increasing the parking demand substantially. A project of this significance should address existing problems in the community not add to them.
The project will increase traffic on already congested streets including Norton street, Botany street and Barker street.
Since the new buildings have been erected on Botany street (UNSW and hospital) over the last decade, speeding in these streets has become a real safety concern for our family and our community. This project will exacerbate this problem. The project will overshadow houses on Norton street and raise privacy concerns for the inhabitants of the street.

I am writing to express my deep concerns regarding the proposed UNSW G25 Education Building project. As a resident of Norton St, Kingsford (#47), I am incredibly worried about the significant negative effects this development will have on our community.
One of the most pressing issues is the excessive height of the proposed building, which will compromise privacy for residents.
The loss of natural sunlight is another serious concern, and the overall location of the building is highly inappropriate, given its proximity to residential properties. This scale of development does not respect the character of our neighborhood.
The reduction in parking spaces will further worsen an already dire situation. Norton St has long suffered from severe parking shortages due to construction workers, hospital staff and visitors, as well as university students parking in our streets. This overcrowding has led to vehicle damage, congestion, and the misuse of our street as a ‘rat run’. The additional loss of parking spaces will make it even harder for residents to find parking near their homes.
We have already endured years of disruption due to the ongoing hospital construction, and this new project will only prolong the noise and dust pollution, as well as the inconvenience we continue to suffer. Additionally, the building’s excessive height will force a change in emergency helicopter flight paths, leading to significantly louder and more frequent overhead noise, further impacting the quality of life for residents.
Another major concern is the excessive noise pollution from air-conditioning and ventilation systems. As it stands, residents already struggle with disruptive noise levels, and this project will only make matters worse, denying us the right to peaceful enjoyment of our homes.
I strongly urge those involved in planning this development to reconsider its impact on the community and reduce the height of the building to six or seven levels—a much more suitable scale that would help minimize its intrusion into residential spaces. Additionally, incorporating underground parking would significantly ease the burden of losing existing parking spots.
I ask that these concerns be taken seriously, as many members of the community share my frustrations and worries about this project. I appreciate your time and consideration, and I look forward to your response.
Sincerely,
Patricia Adams

I am writing on behalf of my neighbour, Dr Bob Giles of 37 Norton Street Kingsford. Dr Giles is not able to set up an account to make a submission on his own behalf. He can however be contacted via his telephone number (please do not publish 04********)
Dr Giles is concerned about the development adding to the already congested and overdeveloped area. He does not want a large building bearing down on his house. He would prefer that the building be erected in an area of the university that does not look down on dwellings and impinge on his privacy. He is concerned that Botany Street has become a wind tunnel and does not want the development to change the wind patterns of Norton Street. He has been subjected to construction and the associated noise and dust for many years. He also questions why more buildings need to be built, given there is a cap on the growth of overseas students. He also questions what community consultation has occurred. Given he lives in direct line of sight of the proposed building, why was he not informed of the plans. Who conducted the impact studies?

To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing to formally express my concerns regarding the proposed UNSW G25 Education Building project. As a resident of Norton St, Kingsford (#47), I believe this development, as currently planned, will have a significant negative impact on the surrounding residential community.
Firstly, the excessive height of the building will compromise the privacy of nearby homes, allowing direct visibility into windows and gardens. Additionally, it will lead to a substantial loss of sunlight, affecting many residents. The building’s location, so close to residential properties, is simply inappropriate and does not align with the character of our neighbourhood.
The reduction in available parking spaces is another critical issue. The area already suffers from severe parking shortages due to construction and hospital workers, plus university students parking on Norton St. This has contributed to vehicle damage and increased traffic congestion, with Norton St frequently used as a ‘rat run.’ The further loss of parking spots will only exacerbate this ongoing problem.
Furthermore, the community has already endured years of disruption from hospital construction projects, with noise and dust pollution affecting daily life. The addition of another large-scale development will prolong and amplify these disturbances. The emergency helicopter flight path adjustment to avoid the building at its planned height will also result in significantly louder and more frequent overhead noise.
Moreover, excessive noise from air-conditioning and ventilation system will further diminish residents’ ability to enjoy peaceful surroundings, depriving us of quiet enjoyment in our homes.
Given these concerns, I urge you to consider reducing the height of the building to a more suitable scale—such as six or seven levels—in order to mitigate its impact on the neighbourhood. Additionally, incorporating underground parking in the development would help alleviate the loss of ground level parking, which will otherwise make bad situation worse for residents.
I strongly encourage careful reconsideration of this project to ensure that it respects and preserves the well-being of the community, many of which are equally as concerned as I am. I appreciate your time and attention to these matters and look forward to your response.

Sincerely,
Paul Adams

Please find attached 3 documents outline my concerns and objections related to the G25 development proposal.

Dear Planning Portal,

My concerns regarding this project are as follows:
- inadequate consultation with community and social impact assessment (I was unaware of this project until neighbours recently told me, where was the true consultation? I have concerns re accuracy of impact reports eg assessment of effect on sunlight hours - I request more information regarding methodology of assessment please, including margins of error in the calculations).
-construction process. Impact of flux of site workers on parking and local environment. From current hospital precinct projects we have ++trade cars speeding in our street, ++improper use of street parking including obstruction of footpaths and driveways, ++ cigarette butts discarded over local natural environment. Ongoing issues due to lack of dedicated parking with new builds. Construction workers discarding cigarette butts while taking breaks in groups on surrounding streets with no concern of their environmental impact. Please take a look there are now used cigarettes all over botany and high street, it’s disgusting.
-increased shading affecting local environment and solar panel function
-decreased privacy
-noise from construction and then building fans

In the very least, a reduction of building height so it’s out of the line of sight from local houses backyards would seem a necessary compromise.

I look forward to your response and in-depth community consultation on this matter.

Live in close proximity and object to impact on my home and surrounding area both during construction, after construction and with further reduction in parking availability. There are already high traffic burden on Norton St with illegal parking occurring daily and speeding.

I am a resident and homeowner on Norton Street, adjacent to the proposed development (14a Norton Street). We are writing to detail our objections to the above mentioned proposal. The purpose of this is to share a number of our core concerns with the proposed development, with the hope that we are offered the opportunity to meet and discuss the concerns ahead of any finalisation of the project plans or details.
We will also be raising a few questions, and requests for more detailed information in addition to the documents provided with the current application.
This submission will focus on:
Parking and Traffic (Questions related to Appendix N & Q)
Privacy
Light and Visual Impact (Questions related to Appendix J)

There are other concerns we hold that will not be outlined in this submission related to; noise and vibration, application process and community engagement. We would like to address these at a future date as part of a community meeting.

I have attached 3 documents to support this submission detailing my concerns and objections.

Although I am a UNSW staff member, I am writing this submission in the capacity of a community member whose home is impacted by the proposed UNSW G25 Building. Although I’m positive about development in general in the area, it has to be done in genuine consultation with local residents and first nations people and for UNSW G25 Education Building this has not occurred to date.
I’d also like to see the benefits of this kind of development shared with the local community, residents and first nations people. The current approach seems to be a lot of downside for residents and a lot of upside for ‘out of area’ people and international students.
Lost opportunity. Finally, I see this as a chance to use $170 million to build something spectacular with lasting positive impact for the area. However the design seems to be a “dressed up” large overbearing 70s style block that is optimised for office space, rather than an interesting, beautiful building.
Main points needing improvement are outlined below. These are expanded on including images in the attached PDF.

BUILDING HEIGHT AND SOLAR ACCESS
The main issue I have with the design is its height and overshadowing.
The investigations undertaken and conclusions reached in Architectus's Design Report (Appendix E) are insufficiently detailed and clear in respect of overshadowing by the proposed new build and its effects on the Norton Street residents.

WIND IMPACTS
The Wind Assessment Report by ARUP describes the wind impact that the proposed building would have at ground level. I’m also interested in whether the building would cause any wind effects that would intensify wind around Oval Lane. In particular, would it cause any increase in wind that could negatively impact the tree canopy? This would increase the risk of tree limbs dropping from increased wind.

CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS
I would like to draw attention to the following negative impacts of the proposed 2-3 year construction phase that have been brushed over in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) without having regard to the actual impacts to residents over the long duration of the build. This is because the community hasn’t been consulted properly on construction impacts. Residents in the area are, unfortunately, very experienced when it comes to understanding construction impacts – we have had constant disruption for many, many years with the redevelopment of the hospital and Newmarket precincts.
Noise and vibration. The consultants reports provided as part of the EIS on noise and vibration seem to talk about what the “acceptable” standards of noise and vibration are, and how these should be mitigated if these standards are breached. They note that in the absence of understanding construction methods, more detail can’t be provided.
Parking. The EIS states that there will be no parking provided for construction workers and hopefully babbles about construction workers and university workers adopting ‘sustainable means of transport’. Again, the community has a very different lived experience of parking in the area that has not been reflected in the EIS.
UNSW should be required to provide parking for construction workers for the duration of the build so as not to put more pressure on residential streets.

PARKING IMACTS
A new building would increase capacity for students on campus. This would further add to the current parking problems around Norton Street, Oval Lane and Botany Street See attached images of current illegally parked cars across our garage other driveways and in no parking areas. When approached students (often English as a second language UNSW students) who have blocked our access ways have often refused to move their cars stating they are “late for UNSW” and "everyone parks here". It’s not currently possible to get their cars towed from our garages/access ways without a police order. This causes substantial and random inconveniences for example, when needing to pick up young children after school on rainy days.

UNSW should be required to provide sufficient parking for students so on Campus before building new building that increase students on campus. Any new building plan needs to further provide sufficient additional parking for the increase in student numbers.

UNSW LEADERSHIP IN BUILT ENVIRONMENT AND FUTURE CITIES?
Good built environment design benefits the local community. How can UNSW on one hand claim to hold high its reputation for academic excellence in built environment and future cities, then on the other hand present for approval such a poorly thought through ill-designed proposal as demonstrated by the UNSW G25 Education Building submission.

LOCAL COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Local community engagement has been minimal and best.
UNSW needs to extend an invitation and activity sit down with local residents, local politicians and local first nations people to come up with a new plan that also benefits the local community, whilst delivering the extra capacity UNSW is after. There is a strong community of interested residents, and we are happy to have representatives of our group meet with UNSW and local politicians to provide our collective input into this process.

SUMMARY
In summary, given the current housing crisis, increasing rents and soaring international student enrolments, I’d like to see the benefits of this kind of development be shared with local living people. The current approach seems to be a lot of downsides for residents and a lot of upsides for ‘out of area’ people and international students.

Please refer to the attached objection submission.

I wish to formally object to the proposed development of the new G25 university building. After reviewing the submitted materials, I find the justification for this new building vague and unconvincing. It is not clear why an additional structure is necessary, particularly given the scale of existing university facilities nearby.

The proposed development raises several concerns for the local community:

Disruption during construction: This project will add to the already significant level of construction in the area, contributing to increased noise, dust, and air pollution, which will negatively affect residents' quality of life.

Loss of public amenities: The development would result in the loss of valuable car parking spaces and place further pressure on local infrastructure.

Poor land use: The site could be better utilised for community benefit—such as green space, a park, or affordable housing—which would enhance wellbeing and provide long-term value to the area.

Given the cumulative impact of ongoing developments, I urge the planning authority to reconsider this proposal and seek options that prioritise the needs of local residents and the environment over institutional expansion.

Submission to the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure
Re: Objection to Proposed 13-Storey Development (Application Number SSD-7467005)
Date: 19 May 2025
Submitted by: Nathan Burgoyne
Address: 39 Norton Street, Kingsford NSW 2032
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing to formally lodge my strong objection to the proposed development under Application Number SSD-7467005, which involves the demolition of an existing car park and the construction of a 13-storey building in Kingsford. As a resident of 39 Norton Street, Kingsford, I am deeply concerned about the significant adverse impacts this development will have on the local community, particularly in terms of noise pollution, increased traffic and parking issues, and loss of sunlight to residential homes. My objection is grounded in both personal experience and broader concerns for the well-being of the Kingsford community.
1. Ongoing Noise Pollution Concerns
The most pressing issue with the proposed development is the potential for significant and ongoing noise pollution, particularly from mechanical equipment such as air conditioning units and cooling towers, which are likely to operate 24 hours a day. As a resident, I have already experienced considerable noise disturbances in the area, and I have previously lodged complaints with Randwick City Council regarding these issues. Unfortunately, the response and actions taken by the Council have been unsatisfactory, and the noise problems persist.
The addition of a 13-storey building, which will likely include commercial, residential, or mixed-use components, will inevitably introduce new sources of noise. Mechanical systems such as air conditioning units, ventilation systems, and cooling towers are known to produce continuous low-frequency noise that can be highly disruptive to nearby residents, especially during nighttime hours when people rely on quiet for rest and well-being. The proposed development’s scale suggests a significant number of such systems, which will exacerbate the existing noise issues in the area.
My previous complaints to Randwick City Council highlight the inadequacy of current noise mitigation measures in Kingsford. The Council’s failure to resolve these ongoing issues raises serious concerns about their capacity to enforce effective noise controls for a development of this magnitude. Without stringent, enforceable conditions to limit noise emissions—particularly from 24/7 mechanical equipment—I strongly believe this development will make living conditions in the area intolerable for residents like myself.
2. Increased Traffic and Parking Issues
The demolition of an existing car park to make way for a 13-storey building will have a detrimental impact on parking availability and traffic congestion in Kingsford. The car park currently serves as a critical resource for residents, visitors, and local businesses, particularly given the limited on-street parking in the area. Removing this facility without providing adequate replacement parking will place additional strain on already scarce parking spaces.
Furthermore, a 13-storey building is likely to generate significant additional traffic, both during construction and once operational. The influx of residents, workers, or visitors associated with the development will increase vehicle movements on local roads, which are already heavily congested, particularly along Anzac Parade and surrounding streets. This will exacerbate existing traffic issues, leading to longer travel times, increased road safety risks, and further frustration for residents.
The application does not appear to adequately address how the loss of the car park or the increased traffic demand will be mitigated. Without a comprehensive traffic and parking management plan, the development risks creating chaos in an area that is already struggling to cope with current demands.
3. Loss of Sunlight to Residential Homes
The proposed 13-storey building will cast significant shadows over nearby residential properties, including my home at 39 Norton Street. The height and bulk of the development will block sunlight to homes that currently enjoy natural light, particularly in the morning and afternoon. Loss of sunlight has well-documented negative impacts on mental and physical health, as well as on the amenity and liveability of residential areas.
Kingsford is a low- to medium-density suburb with a mix of single-storey homes and low-rise apartment buildings. A 13-storey structure is grossly out of character with the existing built environment and will create a jarring contrast that disrupts the area’s aesthetic and functional harmony. The overshadowing effect of such a tall building will diminish the quality of life for residents, particularly those whose homes or gardens will lose access to sunlight for significant portions of the day.
4. Broader Community Impacts
Beyond the specific concerns outlined above, the proposed development raises broader questions about its compatibility with the character and needs of the Kingsford community. The scale of the project appears to prioritize developer interests over the well-being of existing residents. The cumulative impact of noise, traffic, parking shortages, and loss of sunlight will erode the liveability of the area, making it less attractive for families, retirees, and other long-term residents.
Additionally, the lack of transparency and community consultation in the planning process for this development is concerning. Residents deserve to have their voices heard and their concerns addressed before such a significant project is approved. The Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure has a responsibility to ensure that developments align with the public interest, and I urge you to carefully consider the long-term consequences of approving this proposal.
5. Recommendations and Conclusion
In light of the issues raised, I strongly urge the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure to reject Application Number SSD-7467005. The proposed 13-storey development will exacerbate existing noise pollution problems, worsen traffic and parking issues, and cause significant loss of sunlight to residential homes. These impacts are unacceptable and will severely diminish the quality of life for Kingsford residents.
If the Department is inclined to consider the application further, I request the following conditions be imposed:
• Noise Mitigation: A comprehensive noise impact assessment must be conducted, with enforceable conditions to ensure that mechanical equipment (e.g., air conditioning and cooling towers) does not produce noise levels exceeding acceptable limits, particularly at night.
• Traffic and Parking Plan: A detailed traffic and parking management plan must be developed to address the loss of the existing car park and the increased demand generated by the development.
• Sunlight Protection: The building height and design must be revised to minimize overshadowing of residential properties, preserving sunlight access for existing homes.
• Community Consultation: Meaningful engagement with residents must occur to ensure their concerns are addressed before any approval is granted.
As a resident who has already endured unresolved noise issues and lodged complaints with Randwick City Council to no avail, I am gravely concerned that this development will make an already challenging situation far worse. I implore the Department to prioritize the well-being of the Kingsford community and reject this proposal in its current form.
Thank you for considering my submission. I am happy to provide further information or participate in any public consultation processes related to this application.
Yours sincerely,
Nathan Burgoyne
39 Norton Street, Kingsford NSW 2032

I am a resident in Norton St and formerly object to the UNSW G25 Education Building SSD 7467005.
The proposed building will remove 59 parking spots not replaced, could possibly cast a shadow of approximately 76m & have views over the local areas and our properties. Our property is located on the northern side of Norton St and would appear to have sunlight removed from our back garden.
The 13 stories plus plant equipment will approximately 50m will directly invade our privacy and peaceful enjoyment of our home and surrounding dwellings.

The high raise building complex will create huge negative impact on the residential houses surround and bring chaos to our daily life:
1, worsens the car parking situations which is already critical
2, privacy issues from the top of the building overlooking our backyards,
3, creates shadows and blocks the sun lights to the our north aspect backyard
4, decreases our house value
5, creates an overly crowded environment to both residents and UNSW campus
6, lack of style of architecture design
7, further ruins the reputation of UNSW campus planning