State Significant Infrastructure
Blast Furnace 6 Reline
Wollongong City
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Reline, commission and operate blast furnace no. 6 at the Port Kembla Steelworks
Consolidated Approval
Modifications
Archive
Notice of Exhibition (2)
Application (2)
SEARs (3)
EIS (11)
Response to Submissions (2)
Agency Advice (12)
Additional Information (1)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (18)
Independent Reviews and Audits (1)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
There are no inspections for this project.
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Martin Castelli
Support
Martin Castelli
Message
Aaron Porteous
Support
Aaron Porteous
Message
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Simon Took
Support
Simon Took
Message
Materials to sustain our economy and sovereign capability. It is clear that with the current technology available this project will do the best it can to optimise green house gases and be able to adopt improved technologies should
They become viable.
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Although it is without question that existing iron and steelmaking technologies are coming toward the end of their feasible lifetimes due to many factors (primarily environmental), there still has to be due consideration of the alternative approaches to steel supply for our nation.
If the No. 6 BF reline project were to not go ahead, Australia's demand for steel would not reduce, the supply would just come from overseas. Although we have a great history of applying the out of sight, out of mind mentality, the importation of cheap iron and steel doesn't solve any environmental issues. In the short term these carbon emissions reductions will appear to have occurred, and if the population and governments aim is to simply not have the emissions on our books then maybe the closure of the steelworks is a good idea. However, if the aim is a longer term goal to reduce emissions and begin restoring the balance of the Earths environments and ecosystems through carbon emission reduction, then the importing of internationally manufactured steel is not the answer and has the compounding effect of impacting many local jobs and sacrificing national security in addition to losing the ability to control emissions.
As a current student studying metallurgy (including sustainability) I believe that current proposed intentions for the 6 Blast Furnace project is as close to environmentally friendly as it can be given the fundamental constraints of the existing infrastructure and industry-ready technologies. I strongly believe that 6BF is not the solution but will act as a stepping stone toward green steel manufacturing and will provide bluescope the opportunity to maintain the rich history of port Kembla ironmaking during this transition. If the alternative is to wait until technologies such as DRI are ready and PKSW is mothballed until then, I firmly believe that we will never see steel manufacturing in the region again.
When people who generally oppose primary manufacturing in Australia disagree, i think it is important to understand the role of steel in Australia, and the already limited capacity we have for its manufacture. We must ask ourselves, what do all of the current renewable energy sources have in common? The answer (among many others) is steel! We simply cannot manufacture a wind turbine, a solar panel or a hydroelectric pump without steel and to have a realistic vision that for a sustainable future, the continued production of steel in Australia is likely required.
I firmly believe that the government/EPA/community should demand nothing but the most stringent environmental controls of bluescope in all its operations. Its value to the country should not be an excuse for reckless decision making and environmental mismanagement.
My biggest hope is that everyone involved in the decision making process has a vision for our community and nation that’s greater than the next 5-10 years. Limiting ourselves by choosing the short term profit option has never paid off in the long term, it lines the pockets of those involved before they run off to the next industry to bury in the ground. If recent history of Australian decision making is used as the benchmark, long term goals do not seem likely, but I truly hope this can be an exception.
Sincerely,
Zac
CorrWear pty Ltd
Support
CorrWear pty Ltd
Message
Daniel McKinna
Support
Daniel McKinna
Message
As a father of 6 daughters, and soon to be grandfather I'm conscience of the legacy we leave behind for future generations. We simply cannot afford to lose our manufacturing base and the opportunities this provides for the future. A future that I hope will be built with Australian made steel.
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Nathan Bartolo
Support
Nathan Bartolo
Message
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Mick Grogan
Support
Mick Grogan
Message
Paul Martin
Support
Paul Martin
Message
Jason Mackinnon
Support
Jason Mackinnon
Message
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Sandhya Chavan
Support
Sandhya Chavan
Message
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Port Kembla Gateway
Comment
Port Kembla Gateway
Message
PKG is a close neighbour to the Bluescope steelworks and we have no reservations about fully supporting the development. We are confident from our experience of over 30 years in Port Kembla that there will be no detrimental effects on the environment from this proposal. Our facility borders the Bluescope steelworks on its southeast boundary, and we can support the proposed blast furnace reline with no reservations because our experience with our neighbour has always been good.
We anticipate many benefits to existing businesses and industries in the region. Bluescope Steel supports many local businesses through its purchases of materials and services. There will be a significant boost to employment in the region, both during construction and ongoing from the proposed blast furnace reline. As long-term stakeholders in the local community we have observed many environmental improvements made by Bluescope over the years, some of these include leading the way in industrial waste management, additional air monitoring in the community and the improvement in the water quality entering the Port Kembla harbour.
Bluescope is a good corporate citizen (committed to net zero carbon emissions by 2050) and has an outstanding record of proven benefits to Port Kembla and the region.
I am happy to discuss if you need additional information regarding our support for this proposal.
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
I would also have concerns about failing to reline Blast Furnace 6 and what that would mean to Australia's steel supply security. Relying on imported coil is risky for security of supply, and may be disrupted in event of future pandemics, wars, foreign relations etc.
Therefore I wholeheartedly support the project.