State Significant Infrastructure
Blast Furnace 6 Reline
Wollongong City
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Reline, commission and operate blast furnace no. 6 at the Port Kembla Steelworks
Consolidated Approval
Modifications
Archive
Notice of Exhibition (2)
Application (2)
SEARs (3)
EIS (11)
Response to Submissions (2)
Agency Advice (12)
Additional Information (1)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (18)
Independent Reviews and Audits (1)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
There are no inspections for this project.
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Keven O'Sullivan
Support
Keven O'Sullivan
Message
The reline of a Blast furnace is critical to the longevity of the steelworks and manufacturing in Australia.
The less reliant we are on other countries for steel products the better placed Australia is for the future. Bluescope steel produces the highet quality steel in the world which is in high demand world wide.
Rebecca Roberts
Support
Rebecca Roberts
Message
In addition there will be a number of upgrades and new equipment built into the BF reline that will improve the environmental impact.
Not allowing the BF 6 reline project will have terrible consequences for employees, suppliers, contractors, the wider Wollongong community and NSW given the economic impact of not being able to continue to manufacture steel locally.
I respectfully request that the BF6 proposal is supported.
Thank you
Chris Hughes
Support
Chris Hughes
Message
Bridge Project Solutions pty ltd
Support
Bridge Project Solutions pty ltd
Message
The execution of this project will deliver world class, blast furnace iron making capability, and provide a socially responsible and significant economic boost to local, regional and Australian based businesses. We at BPS strongly endorse this project to a speedy planning approval.
Regards
David Bridge (CEO)
Lee Casaru
Support
Lee Casaru
Message
1. Additional Jobs
2. New technologies towards cleaner steal
3. Domestic production of Steel products is critical to Australia manufacturing
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Manuel Rodriguez
Support
Manuel Rodriguez
Message
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Lara De Oliveira
Support
Lara De Oliveira
Message
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Integral to the security of steel manufacture within Australia.
Jonathon Quinten
Support
Jonathon Quinten
Message
We can't see steelmaking capability leave Australia.
Nick Di giorgio
Support
Nick Di giorgio
Message
This is for a number of reasons. In its first campaign (1996 -2011), number 6 blast furnace operated at high productivity and low fuel rate (meaning relatively low greenhouse intensity), in fact it operated at higher productivity and lower fuel rate than the current number 5 blast furnace has achieved since 2011 - and 5 furnace is no slouch!
In addition, the relined number 6 furnace will have newer technology that will enable innovations crucial to zero steelmaking - like the use of hydrogen - to be tested, optimised, understood & implemented to progress the transition to zero emissions.
If the project were not to go ahead, not only would there be loss of jobs associated with construction, but it is likely that the steelworks would cease to be viable within a short time. This in turn would curtail the ability to transition to zero carbon steelmaking. It would also needlessly see steelmaking operations move offshore to locations whose greenhouse performance is inferior.
It makes more sense to convert Australian iron ore to steel in Australia than anywhere else on the planet. This is true from an economics/comparative advantage point of view, in an Australia that has the worlds cheapest energy and will have the worlds cheapest renewable energy. This is also true in the global context of pursuing zero greenhouse emissions: it makes environmental as well as economic sense.
The development of the Technology is not only about the technology itself, but about the "human capital" that develops it, enables it, implements it and keeps it running.
That takes years to develop, nurture and hand on to a younger generation, in steelmaking processes whose operating lives are measured in decades. As a Metallurgical Engineer who has proudly worked most of his professional life at the Port Kembla plant, and had the privilege of helping commission, and then operate, number 6 furnace I can speak from personal as well as professional experience. The "human capital" aspect also extends to the training and development of younger Engineers who often start as Cadets, and whose presence at the Port Kembla plant ensures the ongoing safe and improving operation of the plant, which secures thousands of jobs in the area. It also serves to underpin the research and Academic capability at the University of Wollongong. All of this would essentially cease if the 6-furnace reline project were not to go ahead.
Lastly I would add that from the point of view of being a crucial step on the path to zero emissions steelmaking, number 6 blast furnace is not only a state significant project, but a nationally significant project.
Leong Zhen Lim
Support
Leong Zhen Lim
Message
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Jayden McInally-Rixon
Support
Jayden McInally-Rixon
Message
I also believe Bluescope is committed to ongoing improvements to reduce its environmental impact, setting targets inline with or above the international steelmaking industries averages. This is inclusive of assessing the potential construction, execution and operational impacts the 6 Blast Furnace may have on the environment.
The planned upgrades to the 6BF furnace outlined in the EIS document also demonstrate Bluescope's committment to feasible improvement of process in the short term, whilst maintaining the capability to adopt emerging GHG reduction technologies.
This project is key to maintaining Australia's steelmaking sovereignty.
Regional Development Australia (RDA) Illawarra
Support
Regional Development Australia (RDA) Illawarra
Message
Attachments
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
the steel making process is the processing of iron bearing ores into iron via the blast furnace process. Currently there are few reliable methods of ironmaking apart from the blast furnace process. The intention of this reline is to make the ironmaking process even cleaner and greener than it is now at Port Kembla. So if the public and private sectors do not support this project they can source their clean and green steel elsewhere? Or not?
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Rory McNeill
Support
Rory McNeill
Message
In recent times, with the advent of COVID-19, the increasing influence of China and the war in Ukraine, the realisation of the importance of sovereign capability has been reinforced. Being the only primary flat products and plate producer in the country, there is national strategic value maintaining this significant steel making capability in this country, for defense alone (plate particularly) but also infrastructure and green energy projects. The reality is that there is no practical proven substitution for producing iron, except through utilisation of modern blast furnace technology. The currently operating No.5 Blast Furnace on the BlueScope Port Kembla plant will reach the end of it's operating life in the next 5 -8 years. There is little or no possibility that a viable low carbon ironmaking alternative will be available in this time. Therefore there is no alternative to relining a blast furnace to enable manufacturing to continue on this site for the next 20 years.
It is important to understand that, with this constraint in mind, BlueScope is implementing numerous carbon reduction processes with the relining and upgrade of the 6BF. In parallel BSL is investing money into pursuing "green steel" technologies that will likely replace blast furnaces during the second campaign lifetime of 6BF (following the completion of this project). The BSL engineers also need to solve the challenge of obtaining the required electricity supply and upgrading electricity infrastructure to provide possibly 14 times it's current usage, on top of production and storage of significant volumes of hydrogen. All this will take time and is only enabled by "green steel" technologies being proven viable and commercially competitive. My understanding is that only a total 100T of "green steel" has been produced to date, in the context that BSL current produces about 8,000T of steel every day at Port Kembla from iron sourced from a blast furnace.
In closing this is a vital project, not only for those of us who's careers and livelihood have and continue to be dependent, but also for the sovereign defense of the country. It will bring great benefit to the region. I wholeheartedly support the project and ask that it be approved without delay..