State Significant Development
Culcairn Solar Farm
Greater Hume Shire
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
350 megawatt solar farm with energy storage and associated infrastructure.
Consolidated Consent
Modifications
Archive
Request for SEARs (1)
SEARs (1)
EIS (21)
Response to Submissions (2)
Agency Advice (24)
Amendments (8)
Additional Information (8)
Recommendation (3)
Determination (3)
Post-determination Notices (1)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (38)
Reports (2)
Independent Reviews and Audits (1)
Notifications (1)
Other Documents (7)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
3/05/2024
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AUTHORITY
Comment
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AUTHORITY
Message
On this basis the EPA has no comment to make in relation to the Environmental Impact Statement and requires no further consultation on this proposal. If you have any further enquiries about this matter please contact Craig Bretherton by telephoning 02 6969 0700 or by electronic mail at [email protected].
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
However the argument is more to do with neibours not wishing to have the Solar farm next door.
Roseworthy farm, the site proposed for the solar farm is not good cropping country, it is grazing country, which in recent years has been cropped. The addition of the solar panels does not negate the running of livestock, in fact they are needed for weed control under the panels. In my opinion that 'loss' of agricultural land is mute.
My second point is that the solar infrastructure is removeable once the farm runs its natural life and the land will still be there regardless of what is being run or grown on it and it can be resown for grazing once the panels are removed. My understanding is that the panel columns are driven, not concreted in, so there will be no lasting, or difficult remedial action required at the end of the project. Rural Austraila, Culacirn in this instance will benefit from jobs, both in construction and ongoing operations and that surely is sorely needed.
Regardless of ones personal beliefs regarding climate change, fossil fuels are finite. Renewable energy is needed and its a fact of life. We had best all get used to this reality and someone is always going to be unhappy if its built next door.
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
You are all aware to a large percentage of this country is desert right? why not place the solar farm there instead of right in the middle of Australia's food production area?
Darrell Butler
Object
Darrell Butler
Message
There must be more suitable areas away from towns, wetlands and on land that is not suitable for farming.
Name Withheld
Comment
Name Withheld
Message
- based on the assumption of improving community sustainability, climate change and continuing community demand for power (electricity) , all levels of government MUST work to allow the efficient development of solar power generation.
- the proposed Culcairn solar farm will have some impact on visual amenity - all development does. Broadacre farming has changed the landscape in the last 150 years. However the impact is much overstated by those opposing this development. The negative impact from a distance will not be what is claimed. Notwithstanding, any approval (if given) must take into account strategies to minimize impact as is reasonably possible.
- The development will have positive impacts ion terms of employment and economic activity, and for this reason will be a benefit to the broader community.
- I feel that the decision needs to be made with reference to the arguments being made supported by reasonable facts, however must ignore all of the emotional debate which is, in many cases, cannot be supported by facts.
- widespread adoption of solar is occurring around the world and needs to be accepted. Governments must step up and make decisions about developments based on the good of the community and meeting the whole range of community expectations.b
max wyatt
Object
max wyatt
Message
Nicole Matthews
Object
Nicole Matthews
Message
Julia Muller
Object
Julia Muller
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
high risk of fire
damage the environment
the visual impact of the prime country
the local roads and traffic will not handle this project
Heidi Cockburn
Support
Heidi Cockburn
Message
Declan Watson
Support
Declan Watson
Message
To let any other reason get in the way of the project would be incoherent and narrow minded.
Helen Lieschke
Object
Helen Lieschke
Message
Graham Yensch
Support
Graham Yensch
Message
it,s distance from where the electricity will be used is going to make it more reliable e.g. recent fires and storms have caused outages in large areas
it has an important feature in that it will be grazed by sheep etc.
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Mel Armstrong
Support
Mel Armstrong
Message
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
When i was growing up our town had a range of businesses including supermarket, cafe, clothes shops, baker, butchers 3 mechanic shops, 2 car dealerships plus many others, in our sporting organisations we were able to field 3 senior and 3 junior cricket teams,a golf club, 4 football teams as well as netball and tennis teams now we struggle to fill 2 cricket teams and no juniors our football teams are no more after having to merge with others just to have a game, our butcher and bakery clothes shops have gone as well as other businesses. The primary school which had enrolment of about 120 students is hovering at about 40 pupils. Farming in this area has like most agricultural areas and has undertaken a lot of change with smaller family farms been taken over and merged with neighbours meaning less population to service the towns. We have many projects in the town to be completed including the walking track to Gum Swamp, the sports ground pavilion needs funding to be completed, the swimming pool needs to be upgraded, the kids of the town are campaigning for a skate park, a new committee has been formed to get the grain silo's painted, i would like to see the former railway track upgraded to a bike and walking track and with little revenue to complete them competition for grant money is very competitive and difficult to come by given we live in a safe LNP seat.
The energy landscape is changing as rapidly as our climate is, coal fired powered stations need to be shutdown and we need to embrace new clean renewable energy and we need it now. Our town is a great little community but it is need of a economic boost to get things moving again the drought is biting very hard and the town is in need of revival, we need people to move to our town and join our clubs and send their kids to our schools.
I do feel for those who adjoin the solar farm with the landscape changing but given the mitigations that will be put in place through the vegetation buffer zones i think this will only be temporary thing for the next few year while the vegetation grows, these buffer zones will bring untold benefits to our local wildlife providing wonderful and much needed habitat especially on that site where there is none. Also i struggle to see how this project can impact on the neighbours ability to breed sheep, cattle and grow grain.Thanks for yur time and good luck.
Roger Clancy
Object
Roger Clancy
Message
I am property holder in the vicinity of the proposed Culcairn Solar Farm in the Greater Hume Shire of New South Wales. My concerns regarding the proposed development follow. The concerns are not listed in order of importance as I believe all are of major significance.
• The use of valuable, productive and fertile farming land. The food production of the land is of major importance as the climatic changes occurring in this country reduce the ability of widespread agriculture in other areas, both crops and livestock, to provide for the future supply of food. Drought conditions in regional areas make productive farming land an invaluable asset to the national economy.
• The removal of any natural vegetation directly impacts the biodiversity of the region.
• The heat generated by the Solar Farm creates an increased cost to farmers affecting their livestock, such as water requirements, as well as drying the surrounding environment.
• The risk of fire which may be uncontrollable due to the structures in place supporting the panels is a danger to the region as access would be limited.
• The visual impact on the rural environment affects land values in the immediate area.
• My property is a ‘lifestyle block’ of two hundred and fifty acres which is located at the intersection of Benambra Road and Weeamera Road in the Greater Hume Shire. The proposed Solar Farm will reduce the value and salability of the property.
• My property is a source of income and the Solar Farm adversely affects future financial plans for my family.
• Initially I was not consulted about the proposed development as other property holders were as there is not a dwelling on the site at present. Consideration for consultation was given to properties with dwellings but I consider the production value of any surrounding land to be of equal importance to farm residences. That value may be from agricultural activities or businesses which also rely on income generated from the land.
• The area under consideration for the development of a Solar Farm lies on a main connecting road between two rural towns and caters for large numbers of traffic both farming and services.
• The companies developing such sites will earn significant profits over time but appear to do so with little expenditure on their part in relation to long term income. Unproductive land is available in outlying areas where companies will have to spend more to establish the projects. The income generated by renewable energy sites away from productive agricultural areas will still earn the profits they desire in the future.
• Farming communities and companies rely on agriculture as their livelihood which has a flow on effect for the food production of this country. Rural towns rely on the farming sector, retail, government services and education for example, and will be affected by the proposed development. It is extremely rare that this area does not produce significant amounts of grain and other produce annually.
Matt Hicks
Support
Matt Hicks
Message
The benefits of this project locally are significant. At a local level it is going to drive the struggling economy of the greater hume shire during the build phase as well as the operational life of the project. This will occur through direct employment as well as the community benefits and the VPA that has been outlined in the EIS. Along with still being able to turn off some agricultural produce through the grazing of sheep there will still be some money spent in the agricultural sector of the shire. The two towns in close proximity of the development will undoubtedly get a boost from the project. They are in need of some economic stimulus to combat the drought and other negative factors in the area.
Further to the economics of the proposal the environmental benefits will in my mind have just as much impact locally. The growing of vegetation screening and the improvement to wildlife habitat and the reduction in chemical use can only be seen as an absolute positive by anyone that cares for the environment.
Also the importance of reducing carbon emmisions and the reliance on coal cannot be understated. Having been involved first hand with the terrible fires that have occurred throughout the country over a long and protracted period it is hard to deny something is changing.
Interestingly the tactics which have been adopted by the people who are against the project has been nothing short of disgraceful. I have been subjected to being called names and had my character brought into question on numerous occasions and also accused of using my position on council for my own benefit . I was also asked to resign by the company i work for as some of the opposition threatened to no longer deal with the company if i was still employed by them.
In closing I believe that this project has covered all of the requirements of the development application and environmental assessment that are required and in most instances surpassed them. Further to that it is my land and I firmly believe that I should be able to do anything on that land which is legal and fits in with the planning framework. I hope that this application will be assessed with common sense, science and economics in mind rather than all of the emotional and non fact based arguments against the projects.