Good Earth Green Hydrogen and Ammonia Project

This project should not go ahead. It is wrong on so many levels. It is environmentally irresponsible.

Large-scale fencing and site security will displace wildlife.
What are your commitments to restoring wildlife corridors post-construction?

The green ammonia process is water-intensive in a drought-prone area.
How much groundwater or surface water will your ammonia production process consume annually?

The so-called Good Earth Green Hydrogen and Ammonia Project is a deeply misguided and wasteful venture—an emblem of “fake green” posturing rather than genuine environmental or economic stewardship.
Far from being a solution, this project squanders vast quantities of precious water and funnels obscene amounts of public subsidy money into an overhyped and underperforming technology that delivers neither meaningful emissions reduction nor economic viability.

Proponents claim it’s a step toward agricultural decarbonisation, but in truth, it sets a dangerous precedent: promoting expensive, inefficient greenwashing under the guise of progress.
Electrolysis is notoriously resource-intensive—requiring massive amounts of clean water and electricity to produce minuscule returns of hydrogen, which must then be further processed into ammonia.
In drought-prone Australia, such recklessness with water is unconscionable.

This plan is built on techno-utopian lies and green PR spin, not science or sound economics.
It diverts crucial funds from more sensible strategies, such as leveraging Australia’s abundant and efficient fossil fuel resources to secure national supply chains while investing in realistic, scalable ammonia and urea production.

Worse still, this initiative risks becoming a template for further money hungry swindles - inviting a flood of similar “green” vanity projects that offer big headlines but no accountability.

If Australia is serious about energy security and agricultural resilience, it must reject these delusional Hydrogen and RenewaBULL distractions reliant on dodgy slogans, delusional fantasies and the CCP’s unethical, Toxic contaminating Industrialised Solar Junk and pursue pragmatic, results-based, far superior and secure, reliable, affordable and plentiful, 24/7 Australian Energy producing Ammonia & Urea solutions.

The project risks long-term rural environmental damage.
What remediation timeline is guaranteed, and who is financially liable if the company dissolves?

Farming relies on clean water, from this project chemical leaching threatens that.
What groundwater monitoring systems will be installed, and what are the trigger thresholds for intervention?

Permanent loss of arable farmland is possible.
What studies have you conducted to confirm soil fertility will return within five years post-removal?

Massive earthmoving equipment compacts soil beyond recovery.
What is your protocol for topsoil decompaction and restoration after project decommissioning?

The LPA (Livestock Production Assurance) program may be compromised by contamination.
How will you guarantee LPA accreditation for livestock producers operating within 5 km of the site?

The approval process has been rushed and lacks transparency.
Will you release all environmental risk assessments and peer reviews to the public prior to construction?

There is no binding plan for full land rehabilitation.
Will you commit to a legally enforceable post-project soil rehabilitation bond tied to restoration depth?

This project is based on lies.
“Net Zero” is a false promise that causes real suffering—energy austerity, inflation, and job losses—without real climate benefit.

This fake green boondoggle adds red tape and overhead to regional industry without any gain in agricultural output.

This disingenuous plan is all about experimental propaganda - wasting our money on inferior production of essential Agricultural Inputs.
We need ALL AUSTRALIAN POWER & COMPONENTS

Hydrogen facilities are inherently hazardous—with high risk of leaks, fires, or explosions near farms and communities.

Hydrogen = impractical hype & a huge waste of water.
Hydrogen is dangerous, hard to store, inefficient to transport, and utterly unfit as a real fuel source for agriculture or transport.
Fossil Fuels are far superior for Australian ammonia & urea production.

Topsoil removal during civil works is likely to exceed 100 mm.
What methods will you use to confirm and cap topsoil disturbance at or below 100 mm during excavation?

China-based component manufacturing uses forced labour.
Can you provide a third-party, independent supply chain audit proving no modern slavery in your materials?

This plan won’t ever work on demand as Solar energy is intermittent and unreliable, placing pressure on the grid without contributing to base-load reliability.

This is part of the larger ‘renewables’ Ponzi scheme that jacks up electricity prices, drives energy poverty, and enriches vested interests.