State Significant Development
Maxwell Underground Coal Mine Project
Muswellbrook Shire
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Underground mining to produce high quality coals primarily for the steel industry using existing and proposed new infrastructure.
Consolidated Consent
Modifications
Archive
Request for SEARs (2)
EIS (48)
Response to Submissions (2)
Agency Advice (15)
Amendments (1)
Additional Information (25)
Recommendation (3)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (39)
Community Consultative Committees and Panels (2)
Reports (3)
Independent Reviews and Audits (2)
Notifications (4)
Other Documents (6)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
28/06/2022
8/09/2022
5/09/2023
12/03/2024
20/11/2024
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Friends of the Upper Hunter Inc
Object
Friends of the Upper Hunter Inc
Message
Based on our extensive consultation with our members and with the broader community throughout the course of this year we do not believe that the Upper Hunter (including the Singleton, Muswellbrook or Upper Hunter LGAs) has the capacity to safely support additional coal mines without seriously impacting the health, wellbeing and prosperity of local residents and future generations.
We have serious concerns regarding the environmental and social impacts of the Maxwell proposal – formerly known as Drayton South - many of which have been exhaustively articulated over a period of years and several hearings of the Independent Planning Commission. We are concerned that the community is expected to yet again waste its time and money in prosecuting these same arguments.
Despite our activity in the local community, Friends of the Upper Hunter was not consulted by the proponent and has not had the opportunity to provide input regarding the impacts of this proposal.
Our concerns include the impact on our overburdened airshed, the serious and detrimental impact on regional water quality, the impact on our region's economic diversity, the concerning and unmeasured impacts on the health of local residents, the limited consultation undertaken by the mining company, the contribution to climate change, the likely increase in DIDO workers, the impact to the social fabric of our communities and our quality of life, the overstated economic benefits of the project, the misleading language used throughout these very lengthy planning documents (no blasting??), concerns regarding rehabilitation, the potential impacts on existing sustainable industries and the impact on the availability of infrastructure, services and workers for local people and businesses.
Our office bearers are available to discuss our objection and to explore these specific issues further with the Department.
We appreciate the Department's serious consideration of these matters and the opportunity to share our concerns with you.
Sincerely
Kirsty O'Connell
Secretary
Friends of the Upper Hunter Inc
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
My generation will be forced to deal with the impacts of approving further fossil fuel projects when the science is already in. We cannot afford another coal mine anywhere and certainly not in the Hunter Valley, where we already struggle with the worst air quality in the State.
As the sixth generation of a farming family I want a future in this area. But for that to happen we need to invest in the industries that will provide sustainable, satisfying jobs for my generation without compromising the health of our environment our our communities.
Please reject this proposal.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
You just approved another 150 million tonnes of coal to be ripped out at Wambo... where does it stop? I don't mind anyone trying to make a living but we've got the worst air quality in NSW, asthma rates that are way too high and we just can't afford another coal mine.
Will we as taxpayers be expected to foot the bill when all the people suffering from asthma, other breathing disorders, cardiac problems etc from all of the mine-generated dust finally take a class action against the NSW Government and win? If the liability on Roundup is potentially billions what will the liability on coal dust be worth?
People are leaving this community because of the dust. People are investing elsewhere because of the dust. People are getting sick because of the dust.
Mr Stokes it's time that someone takes our concerns seriously and stops approving new mines and mine expansions until you get the EPA doing its job, deal with the air pollution from our current mines, work out what impact its having on our health and manage it.
The people who live here can't afford you taking any more chances on our behalf.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
As so many of us have said so many times - we already have too many mines in the area. We share our concerns with you people at the Planning Department but we rarely seem to have any impact..... it's just rip it up before the regulation catches up or the rest of the world shifts to solar and you can't sell any more coal.
To be a bit more specific - our air is too polluted, we don't have enough water, we need space for local families to live, we need space to produce food, we need space on our roads and our railway lines we need long term local families to stay in the area where they are known and loved - not to be bought out or pushed out because their quality of life has been destroyed.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
The community made it clear during all the rounds of Drayton South that we don't want a mine here. We went through an extremely divisive campaign fuelled, in my opinion, by the proponent, the Minerals Council and the CFMEU. We can't afford another campaign setting people in this community against each other - which is why I've chosen to keep my name confidential.
More than six generations of my family have lived and farmed around Denman, now the area is unrecognisable. The remaining riverflats and the area around Woodlands and Coolmore are some of the few exceptions. As well as seeing my ancestral home deteriorate to a sorry state, myself and my children have personally been displaced by mining at Muswellbrook. When will it stop? Will the Department just let everything be ripped up? Do you care about our communities or our history at all? Or for that matter about our future?
I'm concerned about the health impacts for my children and grandchildren, about whether any of them will be able to continue farming giving the double challenge of mining competing for staff, land and water and also contributing to the climate change that makes it almost impossible to plan for the future.
We need to start diversifying our local economy - not destroying the alternative industries that we will need in the future.
Please reject this mine.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
We don't need more uncertainty and more people and businesses in limbo while you thrash out Drayton South take 10!
What the state collects off these projects (less than $2B for the WHOLE industry and only a few hundred million off a mine like Maxwell) is nothing compared to the health impacts, the environmental impacts, the change to our community and the massive holes in the ground that you fail to deal with.
And we're supposed to believe that suddenly this project has gone from producing normal thermal coal for export to now producing coking coal? Seems odd that Anglo didn't realise that?
And apparently we're also supposed to believe that all the Aboriginal artefacts stop at the project boundary? I actually care about our indigenous heritage... would be nice if it got a proper look in in this assessment.
This is just another proposal from yet another greedy mining company looking to cash in before this industry dies a natural death... not because the Australian or NSW Government give a bugger about climate change... but because other countries do and they stop buying this toxic crap from us.
Lauren Browne
Support
Lauren Browne
Message
Myles Wylie
Support
Myles Wylie
Message
Attachments
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Malabar have addressed the common pitfalls and concerns that new coal projects generally attract. In contrast to open cut, mining underground doesn't have significant impacts on the local air quality. Malabar should be acknowledged for their commitment to and serious approach to rehabilitation of the land. They have wasted no time starting rehabilitation of the old Drayton open cut mining area, have opened up some of the land for cattle grazing and are investing in a solar farm on the rehabilitated land (pending approval).
Malabar have demonstrated it's commitment to co-existing with the community with a a win-win and common-sense approach. There is no reason I can fathom as to why the current submission should be rejected or prevented from going forward. I hope my input has assisted, even in a small way, in helping the submission for the project to be ultimately successful.