Mixed-use development with in-fill affordable housing, 2-4 Burleigh Street and 20-24 Railway Parade, Burwood

This development must be approved to help alleviate Sydney's housing crisis. We need to provide more housing at every opportunity. Higher density developments like this one help support local business, improve environmental outcomes, supporting more vibrant communities and encouraging social interaction, and utilises existing transport infrastructure at the nearby Burwood station.

By providing a combination of housing, commercial, hotel space, this project will help further activate the area, continuing to transform Burwood into a destination, and not simply a place to live.

The amount of parking proposed is excessive for an area with such excellent public transport links and proximity to local shops and services, and should be decreased by providing more bike parking or storage space for residents.

I support the addition of housing and businesses in such a well connected location. Providing jobs and housing next to good public transport should be a top priority.

I encourage a reduction in on-site parking. With the station so close by, many residents and visitors will not need a car. Reducing parking will reduce traffic and make the project more affordable.

We are the landowners of 26 Railway Parade, Burwood (heritage-listed church and publicly accessible courtyards) and 5 Burleigh Street Burwood (community facilities and courtyard). We are writing in response to the public exhibition of the proposed development by NSW Housing Corporation at 2–4 Burleigh Street and 20–24 Railway Parade, Burwood.

Our Parish and Community acknowledges the intent to increase housing and community outcomes in the area; however, we wish to raise a number of critical concerns in relation to this development, specifically relating to building separation, visual privacy, development interface and traffic impacts, particularly in relation to our adjoining properties.

Our detailed objections and concerns are outlined in the attached letter.

As a general matter, this development must be supported. Sydney, NSW, and Australia are experiencing an extended housing crisis. This means we need to provide more housing at every opportunity. We need to prioritise the provision of more housing, which benefits everyone in the community. Ultimately, more intense housing provision, at higher densities supports better environmental outcomes. It also supports more vibrant communities, and makes active and public transport more viable. Everyone in Sydney benefits from provision of more housing and hotel accommodation, as it reduces systematic pressure on these markets.

Burwood has done a fantastic job of densifying the local area to date, and there’s no reason to stop now. This project is high quality, and will further enhance the local area. Burwood has excellent public and active transport links, and a local character that is going from strength to strength as the area become home to more people.

By providing a mixture of housing, commercial and hotel space, this should continue the process of further activating the area. Hotel space is at a premium in Sydney, and the provision of it helps reduce the prevalence of short term holiday rentals.

The quantity of parking being provided seems excessive for an area with such excellent public transport links, but this should not be seen as a reason to reject the proposal. Instead, the proponent should be permitted to find alternative uses for this space, such as additional bicycle parking or residential storage spaces.

Everyone in Sydney benefits from provision of more housing and hotel accommodation, as it reduces systematic pressure on these markets.

Burwood is already overdeveloped suburb without the necessary infrastructure to support further development with an unnecessary 39 storey building. The trains are already crowded with the limited rush hour trains and high population density. Further development will exacerbate these issues. The proposed parking within the new 39 storey building will also be insufficient causing overflow onto the streets where there is already an issue with illegal parking because of the lack of available parking for residents and visitors.
Building a 39 storey building will also not be in keeping with the character of burwood which should try and maintain its older buildings and remaining history.
This website and need for creation of a login and the multiple steps necessary to authenticate email and then complete profile is an unnecessarily difficult interface which prevents people from making submissions. I can speak for numerous older generation individuals and chinese residents of burwood in which English is a second language have not been able to make submissions because of the difficulty. It appears that it is an intentional decision to limit people's ability to make their opinion known by the government to push across their agenda. The website is not mobile friendly as unable to see/easily find the
login button due to large banner on the main page. The submissions need to be more user friendly and more easily accessible. Also only a limited number of burwood residents were informed about this large 39 storey project when all burwood residents will be inevitably impacted also seems a deliberate omission to limit objections.

I strongly object to the project for the below 3 reasons:

1. Design - Even if the planners have no looked at Burwood the Architectural plans show a massive 39 story building it clearly does not fit into surburban Burwood NSW. Look at the height of the surrounding building 20ish floor, this one doubles them. Have a look at the poor church that does not fit into that design and why leave a old red brick unit to make it look even worse. Also it is glass the glare that Circa residential will receive from that building will have a serious environmental effect on the residents. Why does a "boutique" hotel need to be 39 story and why suburban Burwood. 5 level of underground car spots is not enough for 39 levels. Circa has 5 sub levels of parking. This building sticks out like an appendage, this is not Sydney CBD , it should not belong in a suburb and if redevelopment is a concern the 2 old buildings right next to the highrise should also be taken into consideration.

2. Affordable housing - There is a clear correlation and research that affordable housing is related to increase in crime rate. Especially in terms of assaults, have a look in the news paper for the recent gang attack on people of asian decent in Eastgardens. Putting affordable housing in the middle of burwood chinatown is not a good idea. Have a look the apartments on the corner of clarence street and Burwood road, they have a wall of letter theft, looks like FBI most wanted. Not sure why the option to put affordable housing next to a polce station and court house. One stop shop. Get arrested bailed to go home and go to court the next day all within walking distance?

3. Traffic - Railway parade cannot accomodate more people without major upgrades. One side of the road near the railway can only fit one pedestrian at a time and the other side can only fit 2, there is 3 high rises aleady. The crossing at Burwood road to the station is getting to the point of dangerous. there is so many people waiting to cross during peak hour an accident is waiting to happen.

1. Lack of cohesiveness to surrounding
The development appears significantly taller and bulkier than surrounding buildings, making it incompatible with the existing streetscape, not to mention the potential overshadowing and loss of natural light to nearby dwellings and public areas. No, Burwood being a RESIDENTIAL suburb DOES NOT need another hotel. There is already a hotel and a number of short-term accommodation solutions available to cater for this purpose. No, Burwood DOES NOT another ridiculously high-rise building, there are already tons in the pipeline.
2. Heritage Impact
The proximity and scale of the development could diminish the visual prominence and historical character of the heritage church. The modern design might conflict with heritage conservation goals and is not a cultural fit for the area.
3. Significant impact to amenities and residents
There is already excessive crowding around the stations area, this building will simply put more pressure on the existing amenities in place which is already at tipping point due to the current population and influx of visitors from other areas. The current infrastructure simply can’t support this type of development until there is major upgrade implemented. Has anyone from the NSW government and Council considered how this potential inflow of people will impact the schools, hospital/medical support, transport and current facilities in the area???
4. Noise, Traffic and Congestion
A mixed-use tower could dramatically increase vehicular and foot traffic, potentially leading to parking pressures and safety concerns around the church’s access routes. This is already a major concern in the area given the current infrastructure setup and approved developments. NSW government and council needs to send a team to observe the current appalling situation of the traffic conditions at Burwood Rd, Railway Parade and Shaftsbury Rd.

1. Lack of cohesiveness to surrounding
The development appears significantly taller and bulkier than surrounding buildings, making it incompatible with the existing streetscape, not to mention the potential overshadowing and loss of natural light to nearby dwellings and public areas. No, Burwood being a RESIDENTIAL suburb DOES NOT need another hotel. There is already a hotel and a number of short-term accommodation solutions available to cater for this purpose. No, Burwood DOES NOT another ridiculously high rise building, there is already tons in the pipeline.
2. Heritage Impact
The proximity and scale of the development could diminish the visual prominence and historical character of the heritage church. The modern design might conflict with heritage conservation goals and is not a cultural fit for the area.
3. Significant impact to amenities and residents
There is already excessive crowding around the stations area, this building will simply put more pressure on the existing amenities in place which is already at tipping point due to the current population and influx of visitors from other areas. The current infrastructure simply can’t support this type of development until there is major upgrade implemented. Has anyone from the NSW government and Council considered how this potential inflow of people will impact the schools, hospital/medical support, transport and current facilities in the area???
4. Noise, Traffic and Congestion
A mixed-use tower could dramatically increase vehicular and foot traffic, potentially leading to parking pressures and safety concerns around the church’s access routes. This is already a major concern in the area given the current infrastructure setup and approved developments. NSW government and council needs to send a team to observe the current appalling situation of the traffic conditions at Burwood Rd, Railway Parade and Shaftsbury Rd.

See attached submission

As a resident of Burwood, I strongly support the proposed development and believe it will bring positive change to our growing community. Burwood has experienced significant demand for updated infrastructure, housing, and improved amenities, and projects like this are essential to meeting those needs.

This development represents an opportunity to enhance the local area with thoughtful design, modern living, and a stronger local economy. It will contribute to the vibrancy of our suburb and help address the ongoing need for quality housing and well-planned growth.

I welcome progress that benefits both current and future residents, and I believe this proposal is a step in the right direction for Burwood.

This project will help the current housing crisis within Australia as well as increase the area growth

Re: Submission in Support of the Proposed 39-Storey Mixed-Use Development at 2-4 Burleigh Street and 20-24 Railway Parade, Burwood

I am writing to express my full support for the proposed 39-storey mixed-use development at 2-4 Burleigh Street and 20-24 Railway Parade, Burwood . This development promises to provide a range of community, economic, and environmental benefits, making it an invaluable addition to the urban landscape. The mixed-use nature of the proposal—including dual-key affordable housing, a hotel, commercial office spaces, and ample public and residential amenities—offers a balanced approach to urban living that aligns with modern needs and future growth objectives.

1. Affordable Housing and Residential Inclusivity
The inclusion of 48 dual-key apartments, of which 18 are designated as affordable housing, is a key highlight of this development. In a time when housing affordability is a critical issue for many communities, this project addresses the need for well-designed, cost-effective housing options for low- and moderate-income families. By providing 18 affordable housing units within a larger, high-quality residential development, the project encourages greater social integration, making affordable housing accessible within a desirable urban setting. This initiative will assist in mitigating housing shortages and reduce the economic disparities often seen in more exclusive developments.

2. Contribution to Local Economy
The development of a hotel with 120 rooms and extensive ancillary facilities—including a restaurant, café, gym, and function rooms—will stimulate the local economy. The hotel will not only provide much-needed accommodation options for visitors but will also generate employment opportunities in hospitality, retail, and tourism. The inclusion of a commercial office space is equally significant. It supports local businesses by offering modern, flexible office environments in close proximity to major transportation links and urban amenities. The project will encourage job creation, economic activity, and a revitalization of the surrounding area.

3. Sustainability and Environmental Considerations
The design of the building includes sustainable building practices, and the integration of residential communal open spaces at both the second and rooftop levels enhances the quality of life for residents. These green spaces offer both a social and environmental benefit by reducing the heat island effect, improving air quality, and encouraging outdoor interaction. Furthermore, the project’s design includes stormwater management solutions, which will help mitigate flooding risks and ensure responsible water use, aligning with Burwood Councils policy & goals.

4. Enhanced Public Amenities and Infrastructure
The proposed five-level basement for car parking, which provides 138 spaces, is a significant contribution to local transportation infrastructure. It will reduce the pressure on street-level parking, enhancing overall traffic flow and minimizing congestion in the surrounding area. In addition, the landscaping and associated infrastructure works will improve the streetscape, providing a more pleasant and pedestrian-friendly environment. The outdoor spaces, including cafes and function areas, will promote social interaction and create a community hub, enhancing the area's vibrancy.

5. Alignment with Urban Planning Objectives
The proposed development is aligned with Burwood city’s broader goals of promoting mixed-use urban environments, encouraging higher-density residential developments, and fostering more walkable and sustainable communities. The project adheres to key planning principles that promote smart growth, efficient land use, and the reduction of urban sprawl. The integration of residential, commercial, and hotel uses within a single development offers an innovative solution to urban living, where individuals can live, work, and play within close proximity.

6. Traffic and Access Considerations
We recognize that the development will likely lead to increased foot and vehicle traffic in the area. However, the project has been designed to mitigate these impacts through the inclusion of ample car parking spaces and pedestrian-friendly access points. Furthermore, the mixed-use nature of the building reduces the need for long commutes, which can help alleviate traffic congestion and reduce carbon emissions in the long term.

Conclusion
In conclusion, the proposed 39-storey mixed-use development at 2-4 Burleigh Street and 20-24 Railway Parade, Burwood represents a forward-thinking, sustainable approach to urban development. The integration of affordable housing, commercial office spaces, hotel accommodations, and extensive public amenities will not only enhance the local economy but also provide a dynamic, inclusive environment for residents and visitors alike. The development aligns with the city’s goals for sustainable growth, increased housing availability, and economic vibrancy, making it a welcome addition to the area.

I strongly urge the Department of Planning to approve this project, as it will contribute to the continued development and success of the community. I trust that the benefits of this proposal will be clear in the long term, both for current residents and future generations.

Thank you for considering this submission made from a Burwood Local that is passionate about our vibrant and growing Burwood city.

I strongly support his proposal and have some commentary to provide.

1. I support this proposal as it is close to public transportation and shops. We need more housing supply as we are in a housing crisis.
2. It isn't clearly clear to me if there is a mix of fossil fuel sources for heating or not for the residential portion. It might be that in the basix document where it has "Central heating system (No. 1) fan coil + heater water Energy source: gas boiler" this is meant for heating water for either a pool or for a non-residential portion. Regardless I suggest that as gas is a fossil fuel, as there are more efficient and less costly to the environment and for people who will live in the building, its use should be reconsidered. If gas is to be used for hot water (boosting) & in general for heating water, then those living in the building will likely be forced to pay for a separate daily connection fee for hot water they will be paying an estimated additional $479 a year (https://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/how-sydneysiders-could-save-730-a-year-by-ditching-gas-20240325-p5feyf.html). You can find evidence to show that hot water heat pumps are more efficient than gas hot water heating.

We have been notified that the subject building proposal recently and like to make the following comments:-

1. In the past ten years we can see there is a lot of new and huge construction around the Burwood area. During daily peak hours there is a lot of pedestrians and motor vehicles and all these should be considered prior the planning period. It happened that the pedestrians and the motor vehicles are struggling to use the roads.
2. It is also noted that a lot of building projects still processing currently.
3. The proposed building is including affordable housing and general residential apartments. This type of project may cause human contradiction in future.
4. Excessive development will cause many problems if there is not enough preparation.

I hope the future plannings may have the aforesaid consideration. I believe many Burwoodsiders have the same thoughts as mine and wish Burwood is a better and safer city.

Regards
Tuyet Lieu

1. Overshadowing and Loss of Natural Light
• The proposed high-rise could cast significant shadows over the heritage property, reducing natural light into the building and surrounding public areas, especially if it’s used for community, educational, or religious purposes.
2. Heritage Impact
• The proximity and scale of the development could diminish the visual prominence and historical character of the heritage church.
• The design might conflict with heritage conservation goals, especially if the church is listed on the local or state heritage register.
3. Incompatible Built Form and Scale
• The development appears significantly taller and bulkier than surrounding buildings, making it incompatible with the existing streetscape and fine-grain urban fabric.
4. Noise, Traffic and Congestion
• A mixed-use tower could dramatically increase vehicular and foot traffic, potentially leading to parking pressures and safety concerns around the church’s access routes.
5. Loss of Amenity
• Increased noise, reduced privacy, and higher density could lead to a deterioration in the amenity of the church and nearby properties, especially during construction.
6. Construction Impacts
• Vibration and excavation works could physically impact the integrity of the heritage building, particularly if foundations are shallow or fragile.

1. Overshadowing and Loss of Natural Light
• The proposed high-rise could cast significant shadows over the heritage property, reducing natural light into the building and surrounding public areas, especially if it’s used for community, educational, or religious purposes.

2. Heritage Impact
• The proximity and scale of the development could diminish the visual prominence and historical character of the heritage church.
• The design might conflict with heritage conservation goals, especially if the church is listed on the local or state heritage register.

3. Incompatible Built Form and Scale
• The development appears significantly taller and bulkier than surrounding buildings, making it incompatible with the existing streetscape and fine-grain urban fabric.

4. Noise, Traffic and Congestion
• A mixed-use tower could dramatically increase vehicular and foot traffic, potentially leading to parking pressures and safety concerns around the church’s access routes.

5. Loss of Amenity
• Increased noise, reduced privacy, and higher density could lead to a deterioration in the amenity of the church and nearby properties, especially during construction.

6. Construction Impacts
• Vibration and excavation works could physically impact the integrity of the heritage building, particularly if foundations are shallow or fragile.

1. Overshadowing and Loss of Natural Light
• The proposed high-rise could cast significant shadows over the heritage property, reducing natural light into the building and surrounding public areas, especially if it’s used for community, educational, or religious purposes.

2. Heritage Impact
• The proximity and scale of the development could diminish the visual prominence and historical character of the heritage church.
• The design might conflict with heritage conservation goals, especially if the church is listed on the local or state heritage register.

3. Incompatible Built Form and Scale
• The development appears significantly taller and bulkier than surrounding buildings, making it incompatible with the existing streetscape and fine-grain urban fabric.

4. Noise, Traffic and Congestion
• A mixed-use tower could dramatically increase vehicular and foot traffic, potentially leading to parking pressures and safety concerns around the church’s access routes.

5. Loss of Amenity
• Increased noise, reduced privacy, and higher density could lead to a deterioration in the amenity of the church and nearby properties, especially during construction.

6. Construction Impacts
• Vibration and excavation works could physically impact the integrity of the heritage building, particularly if foundations are shallow or fragile.

In summary, this block of land is far too small to accommodate a 39-story complex that includes hotel rooms, commercial offices, residential units, and government-supported affordable housing. The proposed density of this development raises significant concerns about overcrowding, strain on existing infrastructure, and the long-term quality of life for future occupants. The construction of a mixed-use tower on such a limited site would not only increase both vehicular and pedestrian traffic, but it would also exacerbate parking shortages and create safety hazards—particularly around the church’s access points. Additionally, the planned U-turn bay near the Burleigh Road exit poses a direct risk of traffic congestion and could further increase the likelihood of accidents in an already congested area.The development’s scale is disproportionate to its surroundings, appearing significantly taller and bulkier than nearby buildings, which would disrupt the existing streetscape and clash with the area’s fine-grain urban fabric. Moreover, the higher density could lead to increased noise, diminished privacy, and a general decline in the amenity of the church and nearby properties, particularly during construction. Vibration from excavation works poses an additional risk, potentially compromising the structural integrity of the heritage church, especially if its foundations are shallow or fragile. Given these numerous concerns, the proposed development would have far-reaching negative consequences on the local community, infrastructure, and heritage value.

1. Overshadowing and Loss of Natural Light
• The proposed high-rise could cast significant shadows over the heritage property, reducing natural light into the building and surrounding public areas, especially if it’s used for community, educational, or religious purposes.

2. Heritage Impact
• The proximity and scale of the development could diminish the visual prominence and historical character of the heritage church.
• The design might conflict with heritage conservation goals, especially if the church is listed on the local or state heritage register.

3. Incompatible Built Form and Scale
• The development appears significantly taller and bulkier than surrounding buildings, making it incompatible with the existing streetscape and fine-grain urban fabric.

4. Noise, Traffic and Congestion
• A mixed-use tower could dramatically increase vehicular and foot traffic, potentially leading to parking pressures and safety concerns around the church’s access routes.

5. Loss of Amenity
• Increased noise, reduced privacy, and higher density could lead to a deterioration in the amenity of the church and nearby properties, especially during construction.

6. Construction Impacts
• Vibration and excavation works could physically impact the integrity of the heritage building, particularly if foundations are shallow or fragile.

1. Overshadowing and Loss of Natural Light
• The proposed high-rise could cast significant shadows over the heritage property, reducing natural light into the building and surrounding public areas, especially if it’s used for community, educational, or religious purposes.

2. Heritage Impact
• The proximity and scale of the development could diminish the visual prominence and historical character of the heritage church.
• The design might conflict with heritage conservation goals, especially if the church is listed on the local or state heritage register.

3. Incompatible Built Form and Scale
• The development appears significantly taller and bulkier than surrounding buildings, making it incompatible with the existing streetscape and fine-grain urban fabric.

4. Noise, Traffic and Congestion
• A mixed-use tower could dramatically increase vehicular and foot traffic, potentially leading to parking pressures and safety concerns around the church’s access routes.

5. Loss of Amenity
• Increased noise, reduced privacy, and higher density could lead to a deterioration in the amenity of the church and nearby properties, especially during construction.

6. Construction Impacts
• Vibration and excavation works could physically impact the integrity of the heritage building, particularly if foundations are shallow or fragile.