Skip to main content
Back to Main Project

SSD Modifications

Response to Submissions

MOD 6 Chlorine Liquefaction Plant

Bayside

Current Status: Response to Submissions

Interact with the stages for their names

  1. SEARs
  2. Prepare Mod Report
  3. Exhibition
  4. Collate Submissions
  5. Response to Submissions
  6. Assessment
  7. Recommendation
  8. Determination

Construction and operation of a chlorine liquefaction plant in the Botany Industrial Park, with a maximum production capacity of 50 tonnes per day.

Attachments & Resources

Early Consultation (1)

Notice of Exhibition (1)

SEARs (3)

Modification Application (17)

Response to Submissions (1)

Agency Advice (14)

Submissions

Filters
Showing 1 - 20 of 35 submissions
Power and Water Corporation
Support
Darwin , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
Suez Water Pty Ltd
Comment
Rhodes , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
Water Corporation
Support
Leederville , Western Australia
Message
Attachments
Kogarah Bay Progress Association
Object
CARSS PARK , New South Wales
Message
Letter of objection from our association, the Kogarah Bay Progress Association, is attached. Thank you.
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
BEVERLEY PARK , New South Wales
Message
To Whom It May Concern
Dear Sir/Madam,

I strongly object to the proposed modification of DA 35/98 for the chlorine plant in the Botany Industrial Park. The original approval in 1998 did not properly assess transport risks, so the consent was flawed.

Chlorine is highly toxic and transported daily along Denison Street, Wentworth Avenue and Bunnerong Road, putting local residents, shoppers and road users at risk.

A 2019 risk assessment showed unacceptable fatality risks, but further studies recommended by independent experts were never conducted.

Unlike similar chlorine plants in Victoria, there are no buffer zones or safeguards to protect residents here.

In the interest of public safety, the plant should not be expanded or modified — it should be relocated away from residential areas.

I urge you to refuse this modification and act to protect the safety of our community.

Yours faithfully,
Name Withheld.
Name Withheld
Object
Hillsdale , New South Wales
Message
I am a resident of Hillsdale and I strongly object to the proposed modification of D/A 35/98 for the chlorine plant in the Botany Industrial Park.
The original approval in 1998 did not properly assess transport risks, so the consent was flawed.
Chlorine is highly toxic and transported daily along Denison Street, Wentworth Avenue and Bunnerong Road, putting local residents, shoppers and road users at risk.
A 2019 risk assessment showed unacceptable fatality risks, but further studies recommended by independent experts were never done.
Unlike similar chlorine plants in Victoria, there are no buffer zones or safeguards to protect residents here. With a growing population and large scale developments in the area it is no longer feasible that this development takes place in close proximity to residential areas.
In the public interest, the plant should not be expanded or modified — it should be relocated away from residential areas.
I urge you to refuse this modification and act to protect the safety of our community.
Yours sincerely,

Simon Berckelman
Name Withheld
Object
HILLSDALE , New South Wales
Message
Objection to D/A 35/98 – Chlorine Plant Modification
I am a resident of Hillsdale and I strongly object to the proposed modification of D/A 35/98 for the chlorine plant in the Botany Industrial Park.
• The original approval in 1998 did not properly assess transport risks, so the consent was flawed.
• Chlorine is highly toxic and transported daily along Denison Street, Wentworth Avenue and Bunnerong Road, putting local residents, shoppers and road users at risk.
• A 2019 risk assessment showed unacceptable fatality risks, but further studies recommended by independent experts were never done.
• Unlike similar chlorine plants in Victoria, there are no buffer zones or safeguards to protect residents here.
• In the public interest, the plant should not be expanded or modified — it should be relocated away from residential areas.
Hillsdale is a small but strong community of mostly families. We deserve to live in a safe and environmentally friendly area. With the growing population in Hillsdale and surrounding suburbs we can no longer have these industrial developments taking precedence.
I urge you to refuse this modification and act to protect the safety of our community.
Yours sincerely,
Erin McBean
yvonne Stelianidis
Object
Sydney , New South Wales
Message
Bayside council and NSW Planning have failed to provide reports on the risk to local residents, sports participants at the ATHLETICS FIELD children and shoppers at Westfields Eastgardens shopping centre. We demand local residents and users of surrounding facilities are protected from TOXIC gas releases by NOT approving Chlorine Tkr and storage. Regards Y.Kikiras
Name Withheld
Object
Hillsdale , New South Wales
Message
I am a resident of Hillsdale and I strongly object to the proposed modification of D/A 35/98 for the chlorine plant in the Botany Industrial Park.
The original approval in 1998 did not properly assess transport risks, so the consent was flawed.
Chlorine is highly toxic and transported daily along Denison Street, Wentworth Avenue and Bunnerong Road, putting local residents, shoppers and road users at risk.
A 2019 risk assessment showed unacceptable fatality risks, but further studies recommended by independent experts were never done.
Unlike similar chlorine plants in Victoria, there are no buffer zones or safeguards to protect residents here.
In the public interest, the plant should not be expanded or modified — it should be relocated away from residential areas.
I urge you to refuse this modification and act to protect the safety of our community.

Reagards,
Mohammad B. Ghasemian
22-24 Rhodes St Hillsdale
Department of Industry, Science and Resources
Comment
Canberra , Australian Capital Territory
Message
Attachments
TasWater
Support
Moonah , Tasmania
Message
Please see supporting documentation from General Manager Operations - Brendan Windmeyer at TasWater (Tasmanian Water and Sewerage Corporation Pty Ltd.

I, Teagan Booth are making this submission on his behalf.
Attachments
Water Services Association of Australia
Comment
Docklands , Victoria
Message
Please refer to attached submission letter.
Attachments
Melbourne Water
Support
Docklands , Victoria
Message
Australian Water Authorities depend on the production and distribution of liquefied chlorine gas to ensure the safe disinfection of potable water for residents across the country.
Currently, there is only one domestic producer of liquefied chlorine gas (located in Laverton, Victoria), resulting in limited supply resilience for this essential resource—particularly for Melbourne Water.
In light of this, Melbourne Water supports initiatives that diversify and strengthen the national production capacity of liquefied chlorine gas.
The proposed modification and operation of the ChlorAlkali Plant in Sydney as an additional manufacturing source directly contributes to this objective.
It enhances supply security and mitigates sovereign risk by reducing reliance on a single production site, thereby safeguarding against potential domestic supply disruptions.
Sydney Trains
Comment
Burwood , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
Veolia (incl. Veolia Water Operations and Veolia Water Technologies 2)
Support
Pyrmont , New South Wales
Message
Please find a letter of support attached.
Attachments
Sydney Water
Support
POTTS HILL , New South Wales
Message
See attached submission from Sydney Water
Attachments
Steve Haigh
Object
Brighton-Le-Sand , New South Wales
Message
Please refer to attachments.
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Hillsdale , New South Wales
Message
I am a resident of hillsdale and I strongly object to the proposed modification of D/A 35/98 for the chlorine plant in the Botany Industrial Park.


The original approval in 1998 did not properly assess transport risks, so the consent was flawed.


Chlorine is highly toxic and transported daily along Denison Street, Wentworth Avenue and Bunnerong Road, putting local residents, shoppers and road users at risk.


A 2019 risk assessment showed unacceptable fatality risks, but further studies recommended by independent experts were never done.


Unlike similar chlorine plants in Victoria, there are no buffer zones or safeguards to protect residents here.


In the public interest, the plant should not be expanded or modified — it should be relocated away from residential areas.


I urge you to refuse this modification and act to protect the safety of our community.

Yours sincerely,

Local resident in grace Campbell Crescent hillsdale
Airservices Australia
Comment
Sydney , New South Wales
Message
Attachments
Fire and Rescue NSW
Comment
Greenacre , South Australia
Message
Attachments

Pagination

Project Details

Application Number
DA35/98-Mod-6
Main Project
DA35/98
Assessment Type
SSD Modifications
Development Type
Chemical Manufacturing
Local Government Areas
Bayside

Contact Planner

Name
Deana Burn