Mowbray Road, Lane Cove North, Affordable Housing

Re: Development Application SSD-71687208
618-624 Mowbray Rd & 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North

I strongly oppose the proposed development at 618-624 Mowbray Rd & 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North, for the following reasons:

Background and Strategic Context
The site is part of the Mowbray Precinct, rezoned in 2010 for high-density residential development. A 2011 rezoning review prepared by the NSW Department of Planning and Lane Cove Council endorsed the need for a larger neighbourhood centre in the precinct to support the increased population density. Despite housing 2,700 residents in 1,500 dwellings, the precinct lacks essential amenities and has actually lost retail space since rezoning.

This site represents the last opportunity to deliver the neighbourhood centre promised in the precinct masterplan. The NSW Housing Minister made an election commitment to provide shops and services at this location, which has been ignored in this proposal.

Key Concerns

1. Design and Urban Form
- The building's height and mass will overshadow the Mindarie Park playground
- The L-shaped design creates an unsafe, overshadowed dead-end space behind the building
- The development poorly addresses Mindarie Street, it's isolated from neighbouring properties, creates an unwelcome gap in the streetscape, poorly addresses the intersection of Mindarie and Hatfield Streets, and overshadows Mindarie Park
- The proposal lacks family-friendly features, including insufficient two and three-bedroom apartments and bathtubs

2. Infrastructure Deficiencies
- The precinct lacks adequate retail spaces, with only two small shops serving 2,700 residents
- Basic infrastructure remains incomplete, including:
* Bus shelters
* Completed shared paths
* Accessible ramps on the Epping Road pedestrian bridge
* Pedestrian safety improvements on Centennial Avenue

3. Social Impact
- Social housing provides a benefit to a small number of people at a significant cost to the community
- Existing social housing buildings in the area are poorly maintained
- Social housing has caused crime and antisocial behaviour in our community
- The area lacks "third places" for social interaction outside homes
- The development fails to make a positive contribution to the social infrastructure this community needs

4. Construction and School Safety
- The construction site is located directly opposite a primary school
- The Mowbray Road shared path is busy with children walking, cycling, and scooting to school
- For the safety of these children the Construction Traffic Management Plan should prohibit heavy vehicle movements during school drop off and pick up times

5. Process Concerns
- There is a clear conflict of interest as the NSW Government is both applicant and consent authority
- Community engagement has been late, inadequate, and dismissive
- The request for exemption from Section 7.11 contributions is unjustified given the infrastructure gaps

Recommendations
1. The application should be referred to the Independent Planning Commission
2. The development should incorporate the promised neighbourhood centre with retail spaces
3. Building design should be modified to eliminate overshadowing and unsafe spaces
4. Strata ownership should be required to ensure the building is well maintained
5. Section 7.11 contributions should be required to fund missing infrastructure
6. More family-suitable housing should be included in the mix

The current proposal fails to meet strategic planning objectives, ignores community needs, and misses a crucial opportunity to create a liveable, vibrant precinct. Without significant modifications to address these issues, this development should not be approved.

Subject: Objection to Development Application SSD-71687208
618-624 Mowbray Rd & 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed development at 618-624 Mowbray Rd and 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North, for the reasons outlined below:
This site lies within the Mowbray Precinct, rezoned in 2010 to allow high-density residential development. A 2011 review by the NSW Department of Planning and Lane Cove Council highlighted the need for a larger neighborhood centre to serve this growing community. However, despite the precinct now housing 2,700 residents in 1,500 dwellings, it still lacks essential amenities, and retail spaces have declined since rezoning.

This site offers the final chance to fulfill the neighbourhood centre outlined in the masterplan. Furthermore, the NSW Housing Minister pledged to provide retail and service facilities in this location, which this proposal fails to address.
1. Design and Urban Form
- The building's height and mass would cast shadows on the Mindarie Park playground.
- The L-shaped layout creates a dark, unsafe, dead-end space at the rear.
- The design poorly integrates with Mindarie Street, creating gaps in the streetscape and an isolated, unwelcome atmosphere at the intersection of Mindarie and Hatfield Streets, also overshadowing Mindarie Park.
- It lacks family-friendly amenities, including an adequate supply of two- and three-bedroom apartments and bathtubs.

2.
- Retail spaces are scarce, with only two small shops serving 2,700 residents.
- Essential infrastructure remains incomplete, including:
* Bus shelters
* Finished shared pathways
* Accessible ramps on the Epping Road pedestrian bridge
* Pedestrian safety improvements on Centennial Avenue

3.Negative Social Impact
- The addition of social housing benefits only a small group at the expense of the community's overall quality.
- Existing social housing in the area is poorly maintained and has led to crime and antisocial behavior.
- The area lacks “third places” where residents can socialize outside of home.
- The proposal does not contribute positively to the social infrastructure needed by this community.

4. Construction Concerns and School Safety
- The construction site is located across from a primary school.
- The Mowbray Road path is busy with children walking, cycling, and scooting to school.
- For the children’s safety, the Construction Traffic Management Plan should prohibit heavy vehicle movement during school drop-off and pick-up times.

5. Process and Community Engagement Issues
- There is a conflict of interest as the NSW Government serves as both applicant and consent authority.
- Community engagement has been late, inadequate, and dismissive.
- The request to waive Section 7.11 contributions is unjustified, given the local infrastructure needs.

Recommendations

1. Refer this application to the Independent Planning Commission for a fair review.
2. Modify the proposal to include the promised neighborhood centre with adequate retail spaces.
3. Redesign the building to prevent overshadowing and eliminate unsafe, isolated spaces.
4. Require strata ownership to ensure proper long-term building maintenance.
5. Enforce Section 7.11 contributions to fund the area’s infrastructure needs.
6. Include more family-friendly housing options to better serve the community.

The current proposal disregards the precinct's strategic objectives, overlooks community needs, and misses the chance to create a livable, vibrant neighborhood. Without substantial revisions to address these issues, this application should not be approved.

Re: Development Application SSD-71687208
618-624 Mowbray Rd & 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North

I strongly oppose the proposed development at 618-624 Mowbray Rd & 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North, for the following reasons:

Background and Strategic Context
The site is part of the Mowbray Precinct, rezoned in 2010 for high-density residential development. A 2011 rezoning review prepared by the NSW Department of Planning and Lane Cove Council endorsed the need for a larger neighbourhood centre in the precinct to support the increased population density. Despite housing 2,700 residents in 1,500 dwellings, the precinct lacks essential amenities and has actually lost retail space since rezoning.

This site represents the last opportunity to deliver the neighbourhood centre promised in the precinct masterplan. The NSW Housing Minister made an election commitment to provide shops and services at this location, which has been ignored in this proposal.

Key Concerns

1. Design and Urban Form
- The building's height and mass will overshadow the Mindarie Park playground
- The L-shaped design creates an unsafe, overshadowed dead-end space behind the building
- The development poorly addresses Mindarie Street, it's isolated from neighbouring properties, creates an unwelcome gap in the streetscape, poorly addresses the intersection of Mindarie and Hatfield Streets, and overshadows Mindarie Park
- The proposal lacks family-friendly features, including insufficient two and three-bedroom apartments and bathtubs

2. Infrastructure Deficiencies
- The precinct lacks adequate retail spaces, with only two small shops serving 2,700 residents
- Basic infrastructure remains incomplete, including:
* Bus shelters
* Completed shared paths
* Accessible ramps on the Epping Road pedestrian bridge
* Pedestrian safety improvements on Centennial Avenue

3. Social Impact
- Social housing provides a benefit to a small number of people at a significant cost to the community
- Existing social housing buildings in the area are poorly maintained
- Social housing has caused crime and antisocial behaviour in our community
- The area lacks "third places" for social interaction outside homes
- The development fails to make a positive contribution to the social infrastructure this community needs

4. Construction and School Safety
- The construction site is located directly opposite a primary school
- The Mowbray Road shared path is busy with children walking, cycling, and scooting to school
- For the safety of these children the Construction Traffic Management Plan should prohibit heavy vehicle movements during school drop off and pick up times

5. Process Concerns
- There is a clear conflict of interest as the NSW Government is both applicant and consent authority
- Community engagement has been late, inadequate, and dismissive
- The request for exemption from Section 7.11 contributions is unjustified given the infrastructure gaps

Recommendations
1. The application should be referred to the Independent Planning Commission
2. The development should incorporate the promised neighbourhood centre with retail spaces
3. Building design should be modified to eliminate overshadowing and unsafe spaces
4. Strata ownership should be required to ensure the building is well maintained
5. Section 7.11 contributions should be required to fund missing infrastructure
6. More family-suitable housing should be included in the mix

The current proposal fails to meet strategic planning objectives, ignores community needs, and misses a crucial opportunity to create a liveable, vibrant precinct. Without significant modifications to address these issues, this development should not be approved.

Re: Development Application SSD-71687208
618-624 Mowbray Rd & 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North

I strongly oppose the proposed development at 618-624 Mowbray Rd & 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North, for the following reasons:

Background and Strategic Context
The site is part of the Mowbray Precinct, rezoned in 2010 for high-density residential development. A 2011 rezoning review prepared by the NSW Department of Planning and Lane Cove Council endorsed the need for a larger neighbourhood centre in the precinct to support the increased population density. Despite housing 2,700 residents in 1,500 dwellings, the precinct lacks essential amenities and has actually lost retail space since rezoning.

This site represents the last opportunity to deliver the neighbourhood centre promised in the precinct masterplan. The NSW Housing Minister made an election commitment to provide shops and services at this location, which has been ignored in this proposal.

Key Concerns

1. Design and Urban Form
- The building's height and mass will overshadow the Mindarie Park playground
- The L-shaped design creates an unsafe, overshadowed dead-end space behind the building
- The development poorly addresses Mindarie Street, it's isolated from neighbouring properties, creates an unwelcome gap in the streetscape, poorly addresses the intersection of Mindarie and Hatfield Streets, and overshadows Mindarie Park
- The proposal lacks family-friendly features, including insufficient two and three-bedroom apartments and bathtubs

2. Infrastructure Deficiencies
- The precinct lacks adequate retail spaces, with only two small shops serving 2,700 residents
- Basic infrastructure remains incomplete, including:
* Bus shelters
* Completed shared paths
* Accessible ramps on the Epping Road pedestrian bridge
* Pedestrian safety improvements on Centennial Avenue

3. Social Impact
- Social housing provides a benefit to a small number of people at a significant cost to the community
- Existing social housing buildings in the area are poorly maintained
- Social housing has caused crime and antisocial behaviour in our community
- The area lacks "third places" for social interaction outside homes
- The development fails to make a positive contribution to the social infrastructure this community needs

4. Construction and School Safety
- The construction site is located directly opposite a primary school
- The Mowbray Road shared path is busy with children walking, cycling, and scooting to school
- For the safety of these children the Construction Traffic Management Plan should prohibit heavy vehicle movements during school drop off and pick up times

5. Process Concerns
- There is a clear conflict of interest as the NSW Government is both applicant and consent authority
- Community engagement has been late, inadequate, and dismissive
- The request for exemption from Section 7.11 contributions is unjustified given the infrastructure gaps

Recommendations
1. The application should be referred to the Independent Planning Commission
2. The development should incorporate the promised neighbourhood centre with retail spaces
3. Building design should be modified to eliminate overshadowing and unsafe spaces
4. Strata ownership should be required to ensure the building is well maintained
5. Section 7.11 contributions should be required to fund missing infrastructure
6. More family-suitable housing should be included in the mix

The current proposal fails to meet strategic planning objectives, ignores community needs, and misses a crucial opportunity to create a liveable, vibrant precinct. Without significant modifications to address these issues, this development should not be approved.

I am writing to convey my deep concerns regarding the proposed affordable housing development in Lane Cove. As it stands, this proposal overlooks significant issues raised by the current community, particularly with respect to safety, public amenities, and essential infrastructure.

The development plan appears to lack critical facilities necessary to accommodate the needs of both current and future residents. This project places an undue strain on an already resource-constrained community, which struggles with limited access to essential amenities. Rather than improving the quality of life, this proposal risks overwhelming already stretched community services and infrastructure, compromising the well-being of all residents.

Equally troubling is the lack of reliable public transportation options. The existing infrastructure cannot support additional demand, forcing residents to rely on inefficient transport options that fall short of daily needs. This gap in planning will only add to the existing challenges, making it more difficult for residents to commute and manage day-to-day life.

Perhaps most concerning is the apparent lack of meaningful community involvement in the development process. For a project of this scope, it is essential to engage and listen to current residents, ensuring that their needs and concerns are integral to the project’s planning. As it stands, this proposal risks undermining the cohesion and well-being of the Lane Cove community.

I respectfully urge you to reconsider this project. Please work closely with Lane Cove residents to develop a plan that truly addresses our community’s needs and supports a sustainable, inclusive future.

Subject: Strong Objection to Development Application SSD-71687208 – 618-624 Mowbray Rd & 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North

To Whom It May Concern,

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed development at 618-624 Mowbray Rd & 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North, for several reasons, detailed below:

Background and Strategic Context
The site is within the Mowbray Precinct, rezoned in 2010 to support high-density residential growth. A 2011 review by the NSW Department of Planning and Lane Cove Council recognized the need for a larger neighbourhood centre to accompany this densification. Despite the precinct now housing 2,700 residents across 1,500 dwellings, essential amenities are severely lacking, and retail spaces have diminished since rezoning.

This proposal disregards the NSW Housing Minister’s election commitment to establish retail and service facilities here, undermining the precinct's masterplan and its residents.

Key Concerns
1. Design and Urban Form
• The building’s excessive height and mass will overshadow the adjacent Mindarie Park playground.
• The L-shaped design creates an unsafe, shaded dead-end space behind the building.
• The structure poorly integrates with the streetscape, leaving an uninviting gap along Mindarie and Hatfield Streets and overshadowing Mindarie Park.
• The proposed mix is unsuitable for families, with limited two- and three-bedroom units and a lack of family-friendly features such as bathtubs.

2. Infrastructure Deficiencies
• The precinct is underserved by retail, with only two small shops for 2,700 residents.
• Significant infrastructure gaps remain unaddressed, including:
o Bus shelters
o Shared paths completion
o Accessible ramps for the Epping Road pedestrian bridge
o Pedestrian safety enhancements on Centennial Avenue

3. Social Impact
• Social housing provisions benefit a small group while imposing a heavy cost on the broader community.
• Existing social housing is poorly maintained, contributing to crime and antisocial behaviour.
• The development lacks essential social spaces, or "third places," for community interaction.
• This proposal misses the opportunity to positively contribute to the community’s social infrastructure needs.

4. Construction and School Safety
• The site is directly across from a primary school, posing significant safety risks.
• The Mowbray Road shared path is heavily used by children commuting to school by foot, bicycle, and scooter.
• The Construction Traffic Management Plan must prohibit heavy vehicle movement during school drop-off and pick-up times to ensure child safety.

5. Process Concerns
• The dual role of the NSW Government as applicant and consent authority presents a conflict of interest.
• Community engagement has been minimal, delayed, and dismissive of public concerns.
• The request for exemption from Section 7.11 contributions is unjustified, given the significant infrastructure shortfalls.

Recommendations
1. This application should be referred to the Independent Planning Commission for impartial assessment.
2. The development must include the promised neighbourhood centre with retail spaces.
3. The building design should be revised to eliminate overshadowing and unsafe areas.
4. Strata ownership should be mandated to ensure ongoing property maintenance.
5. Section 7.11 contributions should be required to fund essential infrastructure.
6. The housing mix should be adjusted to better meet family needs.

This proposal falls short of strategic planning objectives, overlooks the community’s needs, and forfeits a vital opportunity to build a liveable, vibrant neighbourhood. Without major modifications, this development should not be approved.

Thank you for considering these concerns.

Sincerely,

Dr David McNaughton
Unit 13, 2-4 Pinaroo Place, Lane Cove North NSW

Re: Development Application SSD-71687208
618-624 Mowbray Rd & 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North

I strongly oppose the proposed development at 618-624 Mowbray Rd & 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North, for the following reasons:

Background and Strategic Context
The site is part of the Mowbray Precinct, rezoned in 2010 for high-density residential development. A 2011 rezoning review prepared by the NSW Department of Planning and Lane Cove Council endorsed the need for a larger neighbourhood centre in the precinct to support the increased population density. Despite housing 2,700 residents in 1,500 dwellings, the precinct lacks essential amenities and has actually lost retail space since rezoning.

This site represents the last opportunity to deliver the neighbourhood centre promised in the precinct masterplan. The NSW Housing Minister made an election commitment to provide shops and services at this location, which has been ignored in this proposal.

Key Concerns

1. Design and Urban Form
- The building's height and mass will overshadow the Mindarie Park playground
- The L-shaped design creates an unsafe, overshadowed dead-end space behind the building
- The development poorly addresses Mindarie Street, it's isolated from neighbouring properties, creates an unwelcome gap in the streetscape, poorly addresses the intersection of Mindarie and Hatfield Streets, and overshadows Mindarie Park
- The proposal lacks family-friendly features, including insufficient two and three-bedroom apartments and bathtubs

2. Infrastructure Deficiencies
- The precinct lacks adequate retail spaces, with only two small shops serving 2,700 residents
- Basic infrastructure remains incomplete, including:
* Bus shelters
* Completed shared paths
* Accessible ramps on the Epping Road pedestrian bridge
* Pedestrian safety improvements on Centennial Avenue

3. Social Impact
- Social housing provides a benefit to a small number of people at a significant cost to the community
- Existing social housing buildings in the area are poorly maintained
- Social housing has caused crime and antisocial behaviour in our community
- The area lacks "third places" for social interaction outside homes
- The development fails to make a positive contribution to the social infrastructure this community needs

4. Construction and School Safety
- The construction site is located directly opposite a primary school
- The Mowbray Road shared path is busy with children walking, cycling, and scooting to school
- For the safety of these children the Construction Traffic Management Plan should prohibit heavy vehicle movements during school drop off and pick up times

5. Process Concerns
- There is a clear conflict of interest as the NSW Government is both applicant and consent authority
- Community engagement has been late, inadequate, and dismissive
- The request for exemption from Section 7.11 contributions is unjustified given the infrastructure gaps

Recommendations
1. The application should be referred to the Independent Planning Commission
2. The development should incorporate the promised neighbourhood centre with retail spaces
3. Building design should be modified to eliminate overshadowing and unsafe spaces
4. Strata ownership should be required to ensure the building is well maintained
5. Section 7.11 contributions should be required to fund missing infrastructure
6. More family-suitable housing should be included in the mix

The current proposal fails to meet strategic planning objectives, ignores community needs, and misses a crucial opportunity to create a liveable, vibrant precinct. Without significant modifications to address these issues, this development should not be approved.

I strongly object the project.Please see the attached file for reasons of objection.
Thank you

Re: Development Application SSD-71687208
618-624 Mowbray Rd & 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North

I strongly oppose the proposed development at 618-624 Mowbray Rd & 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North, for the following reasons:

Background and Strategic Context
The site is part of the Mowbray Precinct, rezoned in 2010 for high-density residential development. A 2011 rezoning review prepared by the NSW Department of Planning and Lane Cove Council endorsed the need for a larger neighbourhood centre in the precinct to support the increased population density. Despite housing 2,700 residents in 1,500 dwellings, the precinct lacks essential amenities and has actually lost retail space since rezoning.

This site represents the last opportunity to deliver the neighbourhood centre promised in the precinct masterplan. The NSW Housing Minister made an election commitment to provide shops and services at this location, which has been ignored in this proposal. We need a small commercial centre, not social housing.

Key Concerns

1. Design and Urban Form
- The building's height and mass will overshadow the Mindarie Park playground
- The L-shaped design creates an unsafe, overshadowed dead-end space behind the building
- The development poorly addresses Mindarie Street, it's isolated from neighbouring properties, creates an unwelcome gap in the streetscape, poorly addresses the intersection of Mindarie and Hatfield Streets, and overshadows Mindarie Park
- The proposal lacks family-friendly features, including insufficient two and three-bedroom apartments and bathtubs

2. Infrastructure Deficiencies
- The precinct lacks adequate retail spaces, with only two small shops serving 2,700 residents
- Basic infrastructure remains incomplete, including:
* Bus shelters
* Completed shared paths
* Accessible ramps on the Epping Road pedestrian bridge
* Pedestrian safety improvements on Centennial Avenue

3. Social Impact
- Social housing provides a benefit to a small number of people at a significant cost to the community
- Existing social housing buildings in the area are poorly maintained
- Social housing has caused crime and antisocial behaviour in our community
- The area lacks "third places" for social interaction outside homes
- The development fails to make a positive contribution to the social infrastructure this community needs

4. Construction and School Safety
- The construction site is located directly opposite a primary school
- The Mowbray Road shared path is busy with children walking, cycling, and scooting to school
- For the safety of these children the Construction Traffic Management Plan should prohibit heavy vehicle movements during school drop off and pick up times
- Social housing has direct correlation to crimes and this is not acceptable in any neighbourhood. Especially close to a public school.

5. Process Concerns
- There is a clear conflict of interest as the NSW Government is both applicant and consent authority
- Community engagement has been late, inadequate, and dismissive
- The request for exemption from Section 7.11 contributions is unjustified given the infrastructure gaps

Recommendations
1. The application should be referred to the Independent Planning Commission
2. The development should incorporate the promised neighbourhood centre with retail spaces
3. Building design should be modified to eliminate overshadowing and unsafe spaces
4. Strata ownership should be required to ensure the building is well maintained
5. Section 7.11 contributions should be required to fund missing infrastructure
6. More family-suitable housing should be included in the mix

The current proposal fails to meet strategic planning objectives, ignores community needs, and misses a crucial opportunity to create a liveable, vibrant precinct. Without significant modifications to address these issues, this development should not be approved.

I strongly oppose the proposed development at 618-624 Mowbray Road and 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North. The application is fundamentally inadequate, lacking crucial information about the planning context and failing to address the environmental and social impacts on the local community. Furthermore, the NSW Government is both the applicant and the consent authority, which presents an undeniable conflict of interest. This application must be referred to the Independent Planning Commission to ensure procedural fairness.

Overview of the Issue
In 2010, the NSW Department of Planning rezoned the Mowbray Precinct for high-density residential development, benefiting the NSW Government, which was the largest landowner. However, subsequent reviews by Lane Cove Council and the NSW Rural Fire Service highlighted significant issues, particularly the lack of adequate retail and community infrastructure to support the growing population.

Despite these concerns, no effective action has been taken to implement the recommendations of the rezoning review or masterplan. The demolition of retail spaces, such as at 536 Mowbray Road West, has led to a net loss of commercial facilities in the area. Furthermore, the proposed location for the neighbourhood centre at Willandra Street is unsuitable due to its distance, difficult terrain, and the incompatibility of zoning.

The most logical site for the centre is 25-29 Mindarie Street. Its central location, proximity to Mindarie Park, and R4 zoning make it ideal. Despite community support and election commitments from the NSW Housing Minister, Homes NSW has repeatedly ignored these calls.

Failure to Address Strategic Plans
The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) fails to address the original masterplan or the recommendations of the 2011 rezoning study, both of which were endorsed by the Department of Planning and Lane Cove Council. Without addressing these strategic plans, the development proposal is incomplete and inconsistent with the objectives of the Greater Sydney Region Plan and other relevant policies.

Design and Urban Form Issues
The proposed design poorly engages with Mindarie Street, the central avenue of the precinct, and the intersection with Hatfield Street. The building’s height and form disrupt the urban fabric, overshadowing Mindarie Park’s playground and creating an uninviting, underutilized space at the rear. The design is isolated, lacks architectural detail, and fails to activate the streetscape or integrate well with its surroundings.

A more cohesive design, such as the alternative U-shaped form, would reduce overshadowing, provide retail spaces, and better integrate with the surrounding environment. The current proposal, as it stands, does not meet the standards expected for this crucial site.

Impact on the Local Community
While social housing may benefit some, the development fails to address the broader social needs of the community. With 1,500 dwellings and 2,700 residents, the precinct lacks basic community infrastructure, including a neighbourhood centre. The absence of public spaces for social interaction creates division and mistrust among residents, particularly in a diverse community with a significant proportion of social housing tenants.

The proposed development overlooks the need for a vibrant public space, with retail options that could foster community connections. Contrary to the applicant's claim, retail inclusion would not compromise the housing quality but would support local employment, reduce vehicle traffic, and enhance the area's social cohesion.

Safety and Security Concerns
The poorly designed dead-end open space at the rear of the development is likely to attract antisocial behaviour, as evidenced in other social housing estates. This space, combined with the lack of community facilities, would negatively impact both safety and the broader amenity of the area. In contrast, well-integrated, mixed-use developments—such as those under the 'Communities Plus' model—have proven to be far more successful in creating a positive social environment.

Unmet Infrastructure Needs and Contribution Request
The proposal to exempt the development from Section 7.11 contributions is unjustified, given the significant infrastructure gaps in the precinct. The NSW Government has profited substantially from the rezoning, and it is only fair that a portion of those funds be directed toward addressing the ongoing infrastructure needs of the community, including transport upgrades, public domain improvements, and the essential neighbourhood centre.

Consultation and Community Engagement
The consultation process has been inadequate and dismissive. The lack of meaningful engagement and failure to address community concerns—especially regarding the neighbourhood centre—demonstrates a disregard for the needs of local residents. Good planning requires genuine consultation, not a mere formality.

Conclusion: A Missed Opportunity for the Community
The history of planning in the Mowbray Precinct is one of missed opportunities. With over 2,700 residents, the precinct lacks the necessary retail, public space, and social infrastructure. This proposal, using social housing as an excuse to bypass key planning principles, is simply unacceptable. Without the necessary commitment to deliver the promised neighbourhood centre and addressing community concerns, this application should be rejected.

I strongly object to the proposed project, as it shows a significant disregard for the needs of existing residents. The development lacks essential amenities that would support and enhance the quality of life for those who already live in the area, leaving current residents to bear the burden of inadequate facilities. Additionally, the lack of reliable public transportation is a serious oversight, forcing residents to rely on limited, inefficient options that do not meet their daily needs. This project, as it stands, will only exacerbate the struggles of the community rather than contribute to its growth and wellbeing. Furthermore I believe the location of the project across the road from a primary school there should be more 3 bedroom apartments to accommodate families, not more 1 bedrooms.

I strongly object to the proposed project, as it shows a significant disregard for the needs of existing residents. The development lacks consideration of parking and traffic flow in the area especially given within walking distance of the local primary school and the no right turns off Mowbray road onto neighbouring roads on the right of Mowbray rd when moving from Epping rd to pacific highway. The development also lacks essential amenities that would support and enhance the quality of life for those who already live in the area, leaving current residents to bear the burden of inadequate facilities. Additionally, the lack of reliable public transportation is a serious oversight, forcing residents to rely on limited, inefficient options that do not meet their daily needs. This project, as it stands, will only exacerbate the struggles of the community rather than contribute to its growth and wellbeing.

I am South African born and raised, and have seen the impact and consequences where social and affordable housing are not available to those in need. Because of this, I support social and affordable housing in general. I am also a citizen and tax payer of Australia and expect the Government to use its resources in an effective and efficient manner to benefit all residents of Australia.

I object to the SSD for “Mowbray Road, Lane Cove North, Affordable Housing” on the following basis:
1. The SSD and related EIS (35) including appendices contain misinformation and/or unsubstantiated assumptions
2. The development will neither benefit those that qualify for social and/or affordable housing, nor the existing residents of Lane Cove North
3. The development without inclusion of a neighborhood center are in contrast with:
o The Metropolitan Plan and guidance at the time of the precinct rezoning
o The recommendations of the 2011 Precinct Strategic Review
o The commitment to address these needs in the 2013 Section 94 plan review
o The stated objectives of the Community Strategic Plan and the Local Strategic Planning Statement.
o The issues raised by the community regarding the need for local shops and services and their overwhelming support for a neighborhood center at 25-29 Mindarie Street

Further details regarding the above:
1. The SSD and related EIS (35) including appendices contain misinformation and/or unsubstantiated assumptions
• Appendix P, Section 4.5, page 20 states “The low attendance rate (3% of households invited) demonstrated substantial community support, or impartiality, for the project.” This is a wild, unintelligent, self-serving assumption considering the number of submissions received, including a petition with over 250 signatures. I could make the assumption that since only 3% of invited households attended, households were not provided notice of the drop in session, or was not given adequate notice of the drop in session. I could also make the assumption that the invited households have children that they could not leave alone at home or find suitable childcare at night (in order to attend the drop in session). I could also make the assumption that households were required to be at work, or working more than 1 job to ensure they can navigate the cost of living crisis (rather than attend the drop in session).
• Appendix P, Section 4.6, page 22 states “It is important to note that of the 93 submissions, 77 community members specifically requested shops and amenities be included as part of the development. Of these, 46 submissions focused solely on this request, while 31 included additional feedback. This surge in submissions was driven by local councilors - one outgoing and two candidates in the upcoming election - who actively encouraged the community to submit their requests.” To state that the surge in submission were driven by local councilors is a unsubstantiated, offensive, self-serving assumption at best. At worst this is a misrepresentation of facts. The submissions were driven by local residents like myself that object to the project. It is as simple as that.
• Appendix P, Section4.6, page 22 “It is also important to note that one submission included a petition signed by 124 participants, many of whom also attended the Community Drop-In Session or submitted individual feedback. Issues raised in the petition are marked with asterisks in the table below.” The petition was signed by more than 250 local residents (not 124).
• Appendix P, Section 4.6 page 23 “Site would be better used for grocery shops, cafés, restaurants, pharmacy, health services, hairdresser, childcare center, or gym”. Appendix P implies that the petition stated that the site should not be used for social/affordable housing but for shops. The petition did not make any all or nothing requests – the petition requested the inclusion of amenities in the development plan
• Appendix P, Page 28 “The site is within walking distance to neighborhood shops which are located approximately 200m from the site, on the corner of Mowbray Road and Wilandra Street, which includes a café, specialty butcher and greengrocer servicing the day to day needs of local residents.” This is a blatant misrepresentation of facts. The specialty butcher, cafes and green grocer do not service the day to day needs of the community. The petition states that residents have to travel to the Canopy shopping precinct to buy the most basic day to day needs for instance milk and bread. The specialty butcher is extremely expensive and it is laughable that anyone, but in particular residents of social and/or affordable housing, would buy day to day groceries from there. I earn a salary that is within the top 3% of Sydney, and I can’t afford to shop there.
• EIS Report states “In response to the early consultation undertaken 93 submissions were received. Of the 93 submissions received, 77 community members specifically requested shops and amenities be included as part of the development. Of these, 46 submissions focused solely on this request, while 31 included additional feedback. This surge in submissions was driven by local councilors who actively encouraged the community to submit their requests. The EIS report omits the fact that a petition with more than 250 signatures were received.

2. The development will neither benefit those that qualify for social and/or affordable housing, nor the existing residents of Lane Cove North

Traffic
• There is heavy traffic at the intersection at Mowbray Road and Centennial Avenue – mostly due to lack of right turn signal at this intersection. The reason for heavy traffic in Lane Cove around that intersection, Epping and the Lane Cove canopy is because the Canopy is only area where residents are able to buy day to day necessities
• Busses running to the City are frequently cancelled or full. The number of busses available are not adequate for the area

Shops
• this is the last development site within the precinct where shops can be developed – not providing for this will have significant social impacts
• The existing two small shops only have a café and specialist deli, this does not provide “essential services” for the community as stated in the EIS. The specialty deli only has a very small selection of expensive specialty products, we can’t even buy milk and bread.

Target tenant
From the perspective social and affordable housing tenants, it is unclear who would find this development suitable:
• The development is not walking distance to shops for everyday necessities, meaning the tenants would have to either drive to shops (with a car they own) or spend money to take the bus to buy milk and bread
• The development is not well situated to healthcare facilities, for instance GP / hospital / specialists etc. – making it likely unsuitable to advanced age tenants
• Only 1 and 2 bedroom apartments are included, meaning that it will not be suitable for families – a strange decision considering the area is family friendly with a school and playground in very close proximity
• There are no businesses in the area, meaning there are no job opportunities for the tenants in the area where they live.
In contrast, St Leonards is extremely well located in terms of health care, transport, businesses that may provide work to tenants etc. The development comes across as an attempt to tick a box to be able to say housing was provided without actually applying due care about improving the lives of potential tenants.

The project does not take into consideration the needs of the existing residents in the area.
Lack of amenities that are essential for the current residents

Submission attached.

I am deeply concerned about the proposed project's negative impact on the lives of existing residents. The lack of essential amenities and reliable public transportation in the area will significantly diminish the quality of life in the area. I urge you to reconsider the project and prioritize the needs of the community.

I strongly object to the proposed project, as it shows a significant disregard for the needs of existing residents. The development lacks essential amenities that would support and enhance the quality of life for those who already live in the area, leaving current residents to bear the burden of inadequate facilities. Additionally, the lack of reliable public transportation is a serious oversight, forcing residents to rely on limited, inefficient options that do not meet their daily needs. This project, as it stands, will only exacerbate the struggles of the community rather than contribute to its growth and wellbeing.

I strongly object to the proposed project, as it shows a significant disregard for the needs of existing residents. The development lacks essential amenities that would support and enhance the quality of life for those who already live in the area, leaving current residents to bear the burden of inadequate facilities. Additionally, the lack of reliable public transportation is a serious oversight, forcing residents to rely on limited, inefficient options that do not meet their daily needs. This project, as it stands, will only exacerbate the struggles of the community rather than contribute to its growth and wellbeing.

It is unclear that there will be facilities to support the already dire need of the residents in the lane cove north precinct such as shops and child care.

Also of concern is the vetting of tenants and how their behaviour will be managed. It is well known that some, but not all, social housing tenants can act in a way that makes residents uncomfortable. There can be disturbances in the way they act amongst the residents and broader community. To have any sort of risk of having unpleasant tenants directly in front of a primary school and directly opposite a public park with children should seriously be considered for the welfare and safety of the already established community at Mindarie Street.

Council should be reassuring the community on how they will select, monitor, and if needed terminate the tenancy of individuals who do not act with the way the established community has been for years.

Furthermore, council should look to address the bottleneck traffic on Mowbray road in general. This project is opposite an already busy school drop off zone. The traffic is getting worse and again the safety of children at the school should be a priority to consider.

I strongly oppose the proposed project due to its significant disregard for the needs of current residents. The development lacks essential amenities that enhance the quality of life for those already in the area. Currently, residents must travel to the other side of Lane Cove, Chatswood, or Macquarie Centre for basic necessities like grocery stores, pharmacies, and medical services. This project risks exacerbating existing struggles rather than fostering community growth and well-being. Including shops in the redevelopment of the site at 25-29 Mindarie Street would go a long way to meet essential needs among residents, creating a sense of belonging and vibrancy in the neighbourhood.