State Significant Development
Narrabri Gas
Narrabri Shire
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
The project involves the progressive development of a coal seam gas field over 20 years with up to 850 gas wells and ancillary infrastructure, including gas processing and water treatment facilities.
Attachments & Resources
SEARs (3)
EIS (71)
Submissions (221)
Response to Submissions (18)
Agency Advice (46)
Additional Information (8)
Assessment (8)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (46)
Reports (3)
Independent Reviews and Audits (2)
Notifications (2)
Other Documents (1)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
There are no inspections for this project.
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Tim Lassig
Object
Tim Lassig
Message
Mining is a one off money grab with a very small group of people profiting from the destruction this mining causes. However protecting our incredible ecosystems, flora and fauna for future generations is a far greater profit exercise as the same environment can be fruitful for ongoing industries such as tourism and farming which benefit a far greater number of people. Also the oxygen and cleansing nature of protecting our great wilderness has a far reaching effect of helping combat climate change, which will be the greatest threat our race has ever had to try and overcome.
We are doing too little to protect our great Country and environment and with mining companies not rehabilitating their sites and lying about the impacts on the environment I am horrified to think of what impact this mining will have on the people, wildlife and the water table in this amazing area.
I strongly object to mining of any form in sensitive ecosystems.
Thank you for considering my submission.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Sean O'Shannessy
Object
Sean O'Shannessy
Message
1. The Piliga forest is a nationally significant & irreplaceable woodland ecology that would suffer severe damage from clearing, roading and fire as a result of this proposal. Rare, threatened and endangered flora and fauna would be driven closer toward extinction by converting this forest to a gasfield. This is completely unacceptable for a project that is likely to become a stranded asset and return little or no net economic benefit to Australia
2. The artesian basin and all local water catchments would be severely compromised with over exploitation and pollution. Fossil fuel exploitation has been proven to be extremely damaging to water supplies where ever it is tolerated. On the driest inhabited continent on earth we must prioritise our long term water supplies over short term marginal projects like this proposal.
3. Our planet's climate is clearly in chaos due largely to fossil fuel exploitation. When all fugitive emissions are consideredl gas mining is only marginally less destructive than coal (or indeed worse). It is incumbant upon all of us to only make decisions and permit actions that will as quickly as possible our economy toward a zero carbon state. This proposal will acheive the opposite and so must be opposed.
4. Local farmers and traditional owners are opposed to this proposal for all the reasons listed above as well as the health impacts on humans and livestock that gas mining would impose on them. Also there would be significant cultural impacts on the local community if this proposal were approved. Across NSW citizens have made it overwhelmingly clear that fossil fuel development has no social license.
5. Santos has proven itself incapable of managing this project without severe impact on the environment and community. They have presided over an intolerable system of water wastage and contamination. Over 20 spills and leaks from their preliminary activities have lead to the uncontrolled release of Uranium, lead, arsenic and other heavy metals, salts and chemicals into our water supply. This is intolerable and should on its own constitute grounds for refusing this application.
This is a 19th century project proposed for the 21st century. The time for licensing fossil fuel exploitation has passed. A stable climate, sustainable water supplies, ecological, human and farm produce health and cultural heritage are of significantly greater short medium and long term value to NSW than this extremely marginal short term project.
For all these reasons I implore you to refuse this proposal.
Kyle Johnson
Object
Kyle Johnson
Message
Come on guys, the impact that this will have on this biodiversity hot spot area is simply not worth it. Not to mention the impacts we've seen with coal seem gas in relation to water quality in already developed areas.
This project makes no sense and I urge you to get your head out of your arses and stop this one dead in its tracks.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Leanne Craswell
Comment
Leanne Craswell
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Leif Wilson
Object
Leif Wilson
Message
In the VERY near future our need for available sources of unpolluted water and arrible farm land will be the most important issues our country faces. Also any potential damage to existing farmland and environmental areas for short term gain are usually done to the detriment of those who have existing and future interests in the land and lead to future neglect of those areas.
Please consider our future stability with the earth as an asset that should not be for sale to feather your own pockets you selfish p#%cks because all politicians are really interested in are returns that fall within the stretch of your own pathetic careers instead of the good of all our futures. I know you don't even realise what you are doing half the time. "Creating wealth now for future generations" only holds up for exponential expansion against unlimited resources. This is a fallacy that is obviously flawed.
A good start to reclaiming your ebbing morality would be to deny mining and fracking in the Artisian basin.
Next you might turn your rhetoric to helping people appreciate moral choices too.
Thank you.
L
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Natalie Tremain
Object
Natalie Tremain
Message
1. We, the Australian people, are responsible to look after our Great Australian Basin--Australia's largest groundwater aquifer and the Narrabri gasfield poses a real risk to our two most precious water resources: the Great Artesian Basin and the Murray-Darling Basin.PLEASE LISTEN TO YOUR PEOPLE
2. The Gamilaraay Traditional Custodians are objecting this happening to their land. PLEASE LISTEN TO THE TRADITIONAL CUSTODIANS
3. Farmers and other local community reject the project. Don't ignore the local surveys of 96% of objections. PLEASE LISTEN TO THE LOCAL COMMUNITY
4. The Narrabri Gas Project has a long history of spills and leaks of toxic CSG water--Santos cannot be trusted to manage the project. PLEASE LISTEN TO THE HIGH RISK FACTS & HISTORY OF SANTOS
5. The Pilliga is a haven for threatened wildlife
The Pilliga is one of 15 nationally listed `biodiversity hotspots' and is vital to the survival of many threatened species. PLEASE LISTEN TO THE ANIMALS
6. Coal seam gas fuels dangerous climate change. PLEASE LISTEN TO CLIMATE CHANGE EXPERTS
7. Human health is compromised by coal seam gas. PLEASE LISTEN TO HEALTH REPORTS
8. The nation's premier optical astronomical observatory is at risk. PLEASE LISTEN TO THE ASTRONOMERS
9. Thousands of tonnes of salt waste will result from the project. PLEASE LISTEN TO SANTOS INABILITY TO DISPOSE OF SALT
Peter Lamb
Comment
Peter Lamb
Message
I therefore implore you to follow Victoria's example an refrain altogether from this abhorrent act, before the basin and environment in this area becomes ruined.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Silvia Dumpmanis
Object
Silvia Dumpmanis
Message
Emma Boland
Object
Emma Boland
Message
Meredith Dennis
Object
Meredith Dennis
Message
Margaret Hinchey
Object
Margaret Hinchey
Message
I completely reject this attack on a most significant part of Australia's environment. Our water resource is crucial and Santos has no right to place it in jeopardy.
I call on the NSW Government to intervene to stop this vandalism.
Pepe Clarke
Object
Pepe Clarke
Message
I am strongly opposed to Santos' proposal to develop a large scale gas field in the Pilliga region.
Construction of 850 gas wells and associated infrastructure will have an unacceptable impact on native fauna and flora, fragmenting vital habitat in a region that has already experienced high levels of historical land clearing.
The overwhelming majority of local residents are opposed to the development, due to risks to essential groundwater resources.
I urge you to reject this ill-conceived proposal.
Your sincerely
Pepe Clarke