State Significant Development
Narrabri Gas
Narrabri Shire
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
The project involves the progressive development of a coal seam gas field over 20 years with up to 850 gas wells and ancillary infrastructure, including gas processing and water treatment facilities.
Attachments & Resources
SEARs (3)
EIS (71)
Submissions (221)
Response to Submissions (18)
Agency Advice (46)
Additional Information (8)
Assessment (8)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (46)
Reports (3)
Independent Reviews and Audits (2)
Notifications (2)
Other Documents (1)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
There are no inspections for this project.
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Sean Brewster
Object
Sean Brewster
Message
Elisabeth Medlin
Object
Elisabeth Medlin
Message
Kim Miller
Object
Kim Miller
Message
The lack of care by Santos to water management, including the huge amount of salt that will result from this plan which will affect ground surfaces and water nearby,
The high possibility of bushfires that could be caused by the process of extracting the gas where open flames are apparent,
The affects on the Pilliga Forest, it's ecology and it's bird and wildlife,
The probability of any damage to the Artesian Basin is enough to refuse this Santos proposal . The effects on agriculture, natural waterways and damage to the diversity of the surrounding land that will be an outcome of these gas wells,
Our reliance on coal and gas when other more environmentally safe resources are so available, eg solar, wind, makes proposals like these totally unnecessary and very undesirable.
It really is time we, as a country, move on from destroying our environment for the sake of adding to corporate profits and showed some understanding of the importance of maintaining a diverse ecologically sustainable land.
Kylie Phillips
Object
Kylie Phillips
Message
The overwhelming scientific and anecdotal evidence of the damage caused to farmland, water supplies and human and animal health in regions where this industry has been operating are testament to the dangers of expanding operations into the Pilliga and elsewhere.
An example of the lack of transparency around this issue is the description of the by product from CSG mining known as "Produced Water". This is a deceptive term that does not give the casual observer any indication of its actual content, which is, of course, a cocktail of highly toxic and carcinogenic ingredients that are impossible to dispose of in a safe manner.
I strongly urge our Department to reject this development proposal for the sake of our water supplies and the health and wellbeing of our citizens.
Gaye Burrows
Object
Gaye Burrows
Message
Liam Mcgeachie
Object
Liam Mcgeachie
Message
Mel Waters
Object
Mel Waters
Message
Why is the government considering allowing major mining companies the opportuntiy to ruin our country, damage our water table and displace our people?
Surely the government should be investing in companies who do not create a threat to our environment and the environment our children's children will inherit.
Say no to fracking. There are many more obvious choices to consider which will not impact on our world. Fracking has been banned in other countries for obvious reasons. Wake up Australia.
Andy Zakeli
Comment
Andy Zakeli
Message
Peter Roobins
Object
Peter Roobins
Message
Adriana Bauer
Object
Adriana Bauer
Message
I feel we should be investing more in renewable energy technologies such as solar and wind power and back-up battery units.
Bradley Tremelling
Object
Bradley Tremelling
Message
Australias gas is being shipped without customers at below world prices, it is not 'necessary' to produce more.
Lynn Wood
Object
Lynn Wood
Message
Government are empowered by the people to act for them not to disrespect their wishes - listen to your people 97% do not want gas mined in this beautiful natural space
Wayne Leviston
Object
Wayne Leviston
Message
Any environmental damage would be almost impossible to remediate. The disposal of salt water? No viable solutions. The radioactive and heavy elements brought to surface cannot be returned. Any contamination of the aquifers cannot be neutralised.
And as for the gas that is extracted? Sold to overseas buyers while our Politicians continue to spruik coal. Santos cannot, and will not commit to any and all gas remaining to local consumption, nor can they commit to any significant remediation works at all sites into the future.
I ask that the Application by Santos, and any future applications by Santos or other entities, for CSG Mining in NSW be rejected.
Anne Willsmore
Object
Anne Willsmore
Message
Zoe Wiliams
Object
Zoe Wiliams
Message
Matthew Norton
Object
Matthew Norton
Message
Elizabeth Conlan
Object
Elizabeth Conlan
Message
Karis Reay
Object
Karis Reay
Message
Tanya Beard
Object
Tanya Beard
Message
I cannot believe that this government is still contemplating mining for fossil fuels. We need to look to alternative cleaner energy sources in this day and age, not digging up ones which are disastrous for all creatures on this planet. Furthermore, we must stop mining in areas of natural beauty and wrecking forever what precious little there is left of the natural world. This is all about money and who can make it at the detriment of all else, it is pure greed and we have to start saying no and do the right thing. The NSW Government should NOT give permission for this devastating project to go ahead.