Skip to main content

State Significant Development

Determination

Narrabri Gas

Narrabri Shire

Current Status: Determination

Interact with the stages for their names

  1. SEARs
  2. Prepare EIS
  3. Exhibition
  4. Collate Submissions
  5. Response to Submissions
  6. Assessment
  7. Recommendation
  8. Determination

The project involves the progressive development of a coal seam gas field over 20 years with up to 850 gas wells and ancillary infrastructure, including gas processing and water treatment facilities.

Attachments & Resources

SEARs (3)

EIS (71)

Submissions (221)

Response to Submissions (18)

Agency Advice (46)

Additional Information (8)

Assessment (8)

Determination (3)

Approved Documents

Management Plans and Strategies (46)

Reports (4)

Independent Reviews and Audits (2)

Notifications (2)

Other Documents (1)

Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.

Complaints

Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?

Make a Complaint

Enforcements

There are no enforcements for this project.

Inspections

There are no inspections for this project.

Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.

Submissions

Filters
Showing 2141 - 2160 of 6108 submissions
Gilly Dempsey
Object
Marrickville , New South Wales
Message
I am writing to object to the proposed Narrabri Gas Project. As the department is aware the project will be located in the Pilliga, one of the largest temperate woodland left in the whole of Eastern Australia.

The Pilliga is one of 15 nationally listed `biodiversity hotspots' and is vital to the survival of threatened species like the koala, spotted-tailed quoll, black-striped wallaby, eastern pygmy-possum, pilliga mouse and south-eastern long-eared Bat. This must en protected.

Another critical reason to reject the proposed project is the serious contribution that coal seam gas has on accelerating climate change. Methane is by far the major component of natural gas, and is a greenhouse gas 72 times more powerful than CO². CSG fields contribute to climate change through the leakage of methane during the production, transport, processing and use of coal seam gas.

Of equal concern is the proposed gasfield project poses a real risk to our two most precious water resources: the Great Artesian Basin and the Murray-Darling Basin. The area of the Great Artesian Basin with the highest recharge rates is almost entirely contained within the Pilliga East forest.

I hope these concerns are taken seriously and fully investigate to ensure the safety of people and the environment and to ensure there is no long term and irreversible damage project should not go ahead.
Karin Hannah
Object
Murwillumbah , New South Wales
Message
The Narrabri Gas Project risks precious water sources, including the Great Australian Basin--Australia's largest groundwater aquifer:

To begin with, the Narrabri gasfield poses a real risk to our two most precious water resources: the Great Artesian Basin and the Murray-Darling Basin. The area of the Great Artesian Basin with the highest recharge rates is almost entirely contained within the Pilliga East forest. In a worst-case scenario, the water removed for CSG extraction could reduce water pressure in the recharge areas--potentially stopping the free flow of waters to the surface at springs and bores across the whole Great Artesian Basin.¹

All creeks in the Pilliga run into the Namoi River--a part of the Murray Darling Basin. This system is vulnerable to contamination from drilling fluid spills and the salty treated water produced from the proposed 850 wells.

Importantly, the Gamilaraay Traditional Custodians are also opposed to Santos' proposed Gas Project. Their reasons are, that there are hundreds of cultural sites as well as songlines and stories connecting the Gamilaraay to the forest and to the groundwater beneath. Gamilaraay people are deeply involved in the battle against CSG, and have told Santos they do not want their country sacrificed for a coal seam gas field.

And added to the opposition of the Traditional Owners, there are also farmers and other local communities who reject the project. As extensive community surveys have shown an average of 96% opposition to CSG. This stretches across a massive 3.2 million hectares of country surrounding the Pilliga forest, including 99 communities. Hundreds of farmers have participated in protest actions unlike any previously seen in the region.

Indeed, the Narrabri Gas Project has a long history of spills and leaks of toxic CSG water--Santos cannot be trusted to manage the project safely. They have already contaminated a freshwater aquifer in the Pilliga with uranium at levels 20 times higher than safe drinking water guidelines, as well as lead, aluminium, arsenic and barium². In addition, there have been over 20 reported spills and leaks of toxic CSG water from storage ponds, pipes and well heads.

Again, Santos cannot be trusted.

The Pilliga is a haven for threatened wildlife, being one of 15 nationally listed `biodiversity hotspots' is vital to the survival of threatened species like the Koala, Spotted-tailed Quoll, Black-striped Wallaby, Eastern Pygmy-possum, Pilliga Mouse and South-eastern Long-eared Bat. The forest is home to over 200 bird species and is internationally recognised as an Important Bird Area². The Santos gasfield would fragment 95,000 hectares of the Pilliga with well pads, roads, and water and gas pipelines--damaging vital habitat and threatening the survival of endangered species.

Coal seam gas fuels dangerous climate change. Methane is by far the major component of natural gas, and is a greenhouse gas 72 times more powerful than CO². CSG fields contribute to climate change through the leakage of methane during the production, transport, processing and use of coal seam gas.

Human health is also compromised by coal seam gas, as a range of hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds can be released into the air from coal seam gas operations, including flaring of gas wells. The effects of volatile organic compounds vary, but can cause eye, nose and airway irritation, headache, nausea, dizziness and loss of coordination⁴. These impacts have been documented in human populations nearby to existing gasfields in Queensland, Sydney and in America.

The nation's premier optical astronomical observatory is also at risk. The Siding Springs Observatory, situated in the Warrumbungles and adjacent to the Pilliga, is under threat from the Narrabri Gas Project due to light and dust pollution⁵. The area has been internationally recognised as a `dark sky park'⁶ and the 50m high gas flares proposed by Santos threaten the viability of the facility.

Thousands of tonnes of salt waste will result from the project and Santos has no solution for disposing of the hundreds of thousands of tonnes of salt that will be produced. Between 17,000 and 42,000 tonnes of salt waste would be produced each year. This industry would leave a toxic legacy in NSW.

To make matters far more dangerous, risk of fires would increase throughout the Pilliga's tinder-box conditions. Methane flare stacks up to 50m high would be running day and night, even on total fire ban days. The Pilliga is prone to severe bushfires. The project would increase ignition sources as well as extracting, transporting and storing a highly flammable gas right within this extremely fire-prone forest.

Phillip Graham
Object
Garden Suburb , New South Wales
Message
The choice of renewable energy generating systems deserve maximum investment.
There are indisputable and long term harmful effects from gas extraction techniques.
The lion's share of the gas extracted is sold to overseas markets for rude profits.
The Pilliga, an environmentally fascinating and unique area, MUST be left alone especially when considering the part the region plays in aquifer regeneration.
A determined and sustained social, government (local, state and federal) and industry 'push' for renewable energy systems is paramount for the 21st century and beyond.

Phil Graham

barbara johnston
Object
Grays Point , New South Wales
Message
none
Name Withheld
Object
Belligegn , New South Wales
Message
The Narrabri gasfield poses a real risk to our two most precious water resources: the Great Artesian Basin and the Murray-Darling Basin. The area of the Great Artesian Basin with the highest recharge rates is almost entirely contained within the Pilliga East forest. In a worst-case scenario, the water removed for CSG extraction could reduce water pressure in the recharge areas--potentially stopping the free flow of waters to the surface at springs and bores across the whole Great Artesian Basin.

Creeks in the Pilliga run into the Namoi River--a part of the Murray Darling Basin. This system is vulnerable to contamination from drilling fluid spills and the salty treated water produced from the proposed 850 wells.

The Gamilaraay Traditional Custodians are opposed to this project.
There are hundreds of cultural sites as well as songlines and stories connecting the Gamilaraay to the forest and to the groundwater beneath. They do not want their country sacrificed for a coal seam gas field.

Farmers and other local community reject the project
Extensive community surveys have shown an average of 96% opposition to CSG. This stretches across a massive 3.2 million hectares of country surrounding the Pilliga forest, including 99 communities. Hundreds of farmers have participated in protest actions unlike any previously seen in the region.

The Narrabri Gas Project has a long history of spills and leaks of toxic CSG water--Santos cannot be trusted to manage the project safely.
Santos has already contaminated a freshwater aquifer in the Pilliga with uranium at levels 20 times higher than safe drinking water guidelines, as well as lead, aluminium, arsenic and barium². In addition, there have been over 20 reported spills and leaks of toxic CSG water from storage ponds, pipes and well heads. Santos cannot be trusted.

The Pilliga is one of 15 nationally listed `biodiversity hotspots' and is vital to the survival of threatened species like the Koala, Spotted-tailed Quoll, Black-striped Wallaby, Eastern Pygmy-possum, Pilliga Mouse and South-eastern Long-eared Bat. The forest is home to over 200 bird species and is internationally recognised as an Important Bird Area. The Santos gasfield would fragment 95,000 hectares of the Pilliga with well pads, roads, and water and gas pipelines--damaging vital habitat and threatening the survival of endangered species.

Coal seam gas fuels dangerous climate change.
Methane is by far the major component of natural gas, and is a greenhouse gas 72 times more powerful than CO². CSG fields contribute to climate change through the leakage of methane during the production, transport, processing and use of coal seam gas.

Human health is compromised by coal seam gas.
A range of hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds can be released into the air from coal seam gas operations, including flaring of gas wells. The effects of volatile organic compounds vary, but can cause eye, nose and airway irritation, headache, nausea, dizziness and loss of coordination. These impacts have been documented in human populations nearby to existing gasfields in Queensland, Sydney and in America.

The nation's premier optical astronomical observatory is at risk
The Siding Springs Observatory, situated in the Warrumbungles and adjacent to the Pilliga, is under threat from the Narrabri Gas Project due to light and dust pollution. The area has been internationally recognised as a `dark sky park' and the 50m high gas flares proposed by Santos threaten the viability of the facility.

Thousands of tonnes of salt waste will result from the project
Santos has no solution for disposing of the hundreds of thousands of tonnes of salt that will be produced. Between 17,000 and 42,000 tonnes of salt waste would be produced each year. This industry would leave a toxic legacy in NSW.

Risk of fires would increase throughout the Pilliga's tinder-box conditions.
Methane flare stacks up to 50m high would be running day and night, even on total fire ban days. The Pilliga is prone to severe bushfires. The project would increase ignition sources as well as extracting, transporting and storing a highly flammable gas right within this extremely fire-prone forest.

I emphatically oppose the Narrabri Gas Project.
Nadine wantz
Object
Sunrise beach , Queensland
Message
HI,
I am writing to you to urge you to reject Santos' plans for 850 coal seam gas wells in the Pilliga forest. To allow this project to go ahead would result in a terrible environment disaster.
The project would extract over 35 billion litres of toxic groundwater and drill right through the recharge area of the Great Artesian Basin. It would generate tens of thousands of tonnes of salt waste for which Santos has still not offered any waste disposal plans. This gasfield would fragment over 90,000 hectares of the Pilliga forest, industrialising the largest temperate woodland in eastern Australia.
Why is Australian government so hostile in developing renewable and sustainable energies like so many other countries do and instead prefer to continue flogging the dead horse of coal mining?
It s time to wake up, to become responsible of our actions and to live in the future.
peter warburton
Object
dundurabin , New South Wales
Message
stop selling our gas overseas & look after our australia
Anne Collins
Object
THORNTON , New South Wales
Message
1. The Narrabri Gas Project risks precious water sources, including the Great Australian Basin--Australia's largest groundwater aquifer
The Narrabri gasfield poses a real risk to our two most precious water resources: the Great Artesian Basin and the Murray-Darling Basin. The area of the Great Artesian Basin with the highest recharge rates is almost entirely contained within the Pilliga East forest. In a worst-case scenario, the water removed for CSG extraction could reduce water pressure in the recharge areas--potentially stopping the free flow of waters to the surface at springs and bores across the whole Great Artesian Basin.¹

Creeks in the Pilliga run into the Namoi River--a part of the Murray Darling Basin. This system is vulnerable to contamination from drilling fluid spills and the salty treated water produced from the proposed 850 wells.

2. The Gamilaraay Traditional Custodians are opposed
There are hundreds of cultural sites as well as songlines and stories connecting the Gamilaraay to the forest and to the groundwater beneath. Gamilaraay people are deeply involved in the battle against CSG, and have told Santos they do not want their country sacrificed for a coal seam gas field.

3. Farmers and other local community reject the project
Extensive community surveys have shown an average of 96% opposition to CSG. This stretches across a massive 3.2 million hectares of country surrounding the Pilliga forest, including 99 communities. Hundreds of farmers have participated in protest actions unlike any previously seen in the region.

4. The Narrabri Gas Project has a long history of spills and leaks of toxic CSG water--Santos cannot be trusted to manage the project safely
Santos has already contaminated a freshwater aquifer in the Pilliga with uranium at levels 20 times higher than safe drinking water guidelines, as well as lead, aluminium, arsenic and barium². In addition, there have been over 20 reported spills and leaks of toxic CSG water from storage ponds, pipes and well heads. Santos cannot be trusted.

5. The Pilliga is a haven for threatened wildlife
The Pilliga is one of 15 nationally listed `biodiversity hotspots' and is vital to the survival of threatened species like the Koala, Spotted-tailed Quoll, Black-striped Wallaby, Eastern Pygmy-possum, Pilliga Mouse and South-eastern Long-eared Bat. The forest is home to over 200 bird species and is internationally recognised as an Important Bird Area². The Santos gasfield would fragment 95,000 hectares of the Pilliga with well pads, roads, and water and gas pipelines--damaging vital habitat and threatening the survival of endangered species.

6. Coal seam gas fuels dangerous climate change
Methane is by far the major component of natural gas, and is a greenhouse gas 72 times more powerful than CO². CSG fields contribute to climate change through the leakage of methane during the production, transport, processing and use of coal seam gas.

7. Human health is compromised by coal seam gas
A range of hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds can be released into the air from coal seam gas operations, including flaring of gas wells. The effects of volatile organic compounds vary, but can cause eye, nose and airway irritation, headache, nausea, dizziness and loss of coordination⁴. These impacts have been documented in human populations nearby to existing gasfields in Queensland, Sydney and in America.

8. The nation's premier optical astronomical observatory is at risk
The Siding Springs Observatory, situated in the Warrumbungles and adjacent to the Pilliga, is under threat from the Narrabri Gas Project due to light and dust pollution⁵. The area has been internationally recognised as a `dark sky park'⁶ and the 50m high gas flares proposed by Santos threaten the viability of the facility.

9. Thousands of tonnes of salt waste will result from the project
Santos has no solution for disposing of the hundreds of thousands of tonnes of salt that will be produced. Between 17,000 and 42,000 tonnes of salt waste would be produced each year. This industry would leave a toxic legacy in NSW.

10. Risk of fires would increase throughout the Pilliga's tinder-box conditions
Methane flare stacks up to 50m high would be running day and night, even on total fire ban days. The Pilliga is prone to severe bushfires. The project would increase ignition sources as well as extracting, transporting and storing a highly flammable gas right within this extremely fire-prone forest.
- See more at: https://www.wilderness.org.au/final-push-pilliga#sthash.8LKIhTpW.dpuf
Robert Wolcott
Object
South West Rocks , New South Wales
Message
The proposal to develop up to 850 coal seam gas wells in the Pilliga is almost unbelievable. Only because it's already happening is it possible to accept that gas companies and the NSW government want yet more of it. If this evil partnership can't understand that the air, water and land and all that depend on it aren't a higher priority than extracting and cashing the gas under it, then it's high time they were replaced by people who do. My wife and I left the National Party over their support for CSG. So have many others. For God's sake, our children's sake and for the future of this wonderful country, do not let this happen.
Petra Cram
Object
Weston , New South Wales
Message
I object to CSG mining on the basis that it is entirely driven by the false Sacred Money and Sacred Markets narrative, bolstering the already obscene profits of Santos, whilst wreaking significant damage or destroying a living ecosystem and vital water aquifer. Let Santos propose a venture which fosters and enhances Life on Earth.
Janina Price
Object
Tamworth , New South Wales
Message
STOP this madness drilling thru the artisian basin is a death sentance to the land & the future...
Robert Bingley-Pullin
Object
23 Goodchap St, Surry Hills , New South Wales
Message
I strongly object
Sally Kingsland
Object
Hughes , Australian Capital Territory
Message
I strenuously object to further environmental degradation and threats to wildlife which is what this proposal will do. I exhort the NSW government to, instead, foster renewable energy sources. This development is unnessary and damaging.

Water is our most precious resource and this project risks critical water supplies.

I also stand with farmers and the traditional custodians, the Gamilaraay, in their opposition.

Please do not endorse this proposal I any way.
Sharyn Proctor
Object
Dunoon , New South Wales
Message
The fire risk in a Eucalyptus Forest is far too risky in our dry and combustible climate.

I also object to the possibility of air pollution, water contamination and high water dependency of this practice, along with the disturbance of native vegetation and wildlife.
Name Withheld
Object
Tamworth , New South Wales
Message
The science of fracking is still unclear. CSG is having a signal fi ant impact on climate change.
The implications to the groundwater are clear. Once damaged or depleted if can not be repaired. The implications are widespread through the Great Artesian Basin. It is not worth risking the impacts on agriculture.
The potential for pollution have been shown in the test drills. Santos has shown it does not have the capacity to manage the risks of pollution.
The environmental impacts are unacceptable. The Pilliga Scrub ecosystem is unique and must be protected and preserved.
The social benefit to the local community are questionable.
The return to the taxpayer is minimal.
There are other options for gas supply as Australia is soon to be the largest exporter of gas in the world. This project is not necessary.
The traditional owners are strongly opposed to the project going ahead and so too are the local farming communities.
This project should be rejected as an unacceptable risk to the environment, the ground water and to the community. The Planning and Environment Department must stop this project
Sally Pound
Object
KENSINGTON , New South Wales
Message
1. The Narrabri Gas Project risks precious water sources, including the Great Australian Basin--Australia's largest groundwater aquifer
The Narrabri gasfield poses a real risk to our two most precious water resources: the Great Artesian Basin and the Murray-Darling Basin. The area of the Great Artesian Basin with the highest recharge rates is almost entirely contained within the Pilliga East forest. In a worst-case scenario, the water removed for CSG extraction could reduce water pressure in the recharge areas--potentially stopping the free flow of waters to the surface at springs and bores across the whole Great Artesian Basin.¹

Creeks in the Pilliga run into the Namoi River--a part of the Murray Darling Basin. This system is vulnerable to contamination from drilling fluid spills and the salty treated water produced from the proposed 850 wells.

2. The Gamilaraay Traditional Custodians are opposed
There are hundreds of cultural sites as well as songlines and stories connecting the Gamilaraay to the forest and to the groundwater beneath. Gamilaraay people are deeply involved in the battle against CSG, and have told Santos they do not want their country sacrificed for a coal seam gas field.

3. Farmers and other local community reject the project
Extensive community surveys have shown an average of 96% opposition to CSG. This stretches across a massive 3.2 million hectares of country surrounding the Pilliga forest, including 99 communities. Hundreds of farmers have participated in protest actions unlike any previously seen in the region.

4. The Narrabri Gas Project has a long history of spills and leaks of toxic CSG water--Santos cannot be trusted to manage the project safely
Santos has already contaminated a freshwater aquifer in the Pilliga with uranium at levels 20 times higher than safe drinking water guidelines, as well as lead, aluminium, arsenic and barium². In addition, there have been over 20 reported spills and leaks of toxic CSG water from storage ponds, pipes and well heads. Santos cannot be trusted.

5. The Pilliga is a haven for threatened wildlife
The Pilliga is one of 15 nationally listed `biodiversity hotspots' and is vital to the survival of threatened species like the Koala, Spotted-tailed Quoll, Black-striped Wallaby, Eastern Pygmy-possum, Pilliga Mouse and South-eastern Long-eared Bat. The forest is home to over 200 bird species and is internationally recognised as an Important Bird Area². The Santos gasfield would fragment 95,000 hectares of the Pilliga with well pads, roads, and water and gas pipelines--damaging vital habitat and threatening the survival of endangered species.

6. Coal seam gas fuels dangerous climate change
Methane is by far the major component of natural gas, and is a greenhouse gas 72 times more powerful than CO². CSG fields contribute to climate change through the leakage of methane during the production, transport, processing and use of coal seam gas.

7. Human health is compromised by coal seam gas
A range of hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds can be released into the air from coal seam gas operations, including flaring of gas wells. The effects of volatile organic compounds vary, but can cause eye, nose and airway irritation, headache, nausea, dizziness and loss of coordination⁴. These impacts have been documented in human populations nearby to existing gasfields in Queensland, Sydney and in America.

8. The nation's premier optical astronomical observatory is at risk
The Siding Springs Observatory, situated in the Warrumbungles and adjacent to the Pilliga, is under threat from the Narrabri Gas Project due to light and dust pollution⁵. The area has been internationally recognised as a `dark sky park'⁶ and the 50m high gas flares proposed by Santos threaten the viability of the facility.

9. Thousands of tonnes of salt waste will result from the project
Santos has no solution for disposing of the hundreds of thousands of tonnes of salt that will be produced. Between 17,000 and 42,000 tonnes of salt waste would be produced each year. This industry would leave a toxic legacy in NSW.

10. Risk of fires would increase throughout the Pilliga's tinder-box conditions
Methane flare stacks up to 50m high would be running day and night, even on total fire ban days. The Pilliga is prone to severe bushfires. The project would increase ignition sources as well as extracting, transporting and storing a highly flammable gas right within this extremely fire-prone forest.
Linda Groom
Object
Deakin , Australian Capital Territory
Message
I am deeply concerned at the environmental effects of this proposal. I understand this project plans to drill into the recharge area of the Great Artesian Basin and would generate tens of thousands of tonnes of salt waste for which Santos has not offered any waste disposal plans. The Pilliga forest temperate woodland deserves protection.

While I understand that Australia is facing a shortage of gas energy in the next few years, the long-term environmental damage of this project far outweighs the short-term benefit to energy security.
Sylvia Egan
Object
Manning point , New South Wales
Message
As Inhabitants of this planet Earth we're all responsible for any pollution and destruction of the world we live in.

Therefore I strongly object to the Santos Narrabri Gas Project in the Pilliga going ahead

Such a project can only:

1 destroy forever hundreds of cultural sites of the Gamilaraay people
2 destroy habitat of already threatened wildlife
3 threaten human health and increase climate change with methane gas leakage
4 produce thousand of tonnes of saltwater left to pollute the area
David Dickman
Object
St.Peter's , New South Wales
Message
The methods of extracting coal seam gas create irreversible pollution and environmental destruction the cost of which as a result of the long term effect will far outweigh any financial benefit to Australia. A government which adopts short term policy such as this proposal must be held accountable for the long term harm caused. The proposal is similar to the nuclear dilemma what to do with the waste. Coal Seam gas problems will be what to do with the polluted water, the dead forest, arable land now rendered useless,water salinity raised so as to be useless. Mining has already degraded many areas of Australia companies world wide are proven to have no concern for the natural environment. The Hunter Valley NSW a large mining area has suffered severe increases in respiratory illness and other affects on humans and animals from mining. The Pilliga region must not suffer the same fate.
Trevor Ockenden
Object
Terrey Hills , New South Wales
Message
CSG exploration and extraction is simply too dangerous to attempt given the possible consequences now and into the future. We do not release drugs onto the market until extremely rigorous test are carried out, often taking many years and even decades so how on earth can such a process as CSG be inflicted upon our lands and potentially destroy lives now and well into the future.
It is not good enough to say it cannot be proved that it is harmful. If we took that approach to medicines we would have dire consequences for all.

Pagination

Project Details

Application Number
SSD-6456
EPBC ID Number
2014/7376
Assessment Type
State Significant Development
Development Type
Petroleum Extraction
Local Government Areas
Narrabri Shire
Decision
Approved
Determination Date
Decider
IPC-N

Contact Planner

Name
Rose-Anne Hawkeswood