State Significant Development
Narrabri Gas
Narrabri Shire
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
The project involves the progressive development of a coal seam gas field over 20 years with up to 850 gas wells and ancillary infrastructure, including gas processing and water treatment facilities.
Attachments & Resources
SEARs (3)
EIS (71)
Submissions (221)
Response to Submissions (18)
Agency Advice (46)
Additional Information (8)
Assessment (8)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (46)
Reports (4)
Independent Reviews and Audits (2)
Notifications (2)
Other Documents (1)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
There are no inspections for this project.
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Chris Roach
Object
Chris Roach
Message
1. The Narrabri Gas Project risks precious water sources, including the Great Australian BasinÂ--AustraliaÂ's largest groundwater aquifer
The Narrabri gasfield poses a real risk to our two most precious water resources: the Great Artesian Basin and the Murray-Darling Basin. The area of the Great Artesian Basin with the highest recharge rates is almost entirely contained within the Pilliga East forest. In a worst-case scenario, the water removed for CSG extraction could reduce water pressure in the recharge areasÂ--potentially stopping the free flow of waters to the surface at springs and bores across the whole Great Artesian Basin.
Creeks in the Pilliga run into the Namoi RiverÂ--a part of the Murray Darling Basin. This system is vulnerable to contamination from drilling fluid spills and the salty treated water produced from the proposed 850 wells.
2. The Gamilaraay Traditional Custodians are opposed
There are hundreds of cultural sites as well as songlines and stories connecting the Gamilaraay to the forest and to the groundwater beneath. Gamilaraay people are deeply involved in the battle against CSG, and have told Santos they do not want their country sacrificed for a coal seam gas field.
3. Farmers and other local community reject the project
Extensive community surveys have shown an average of 96% opposition to CSG. This stretches across a massive 3.2 million hectares of country surrounding the Pilliga forest, including 99 communities. Hundreds of farmers have participated in protest actions unlike any previously seen in the region.
4. The Narrabri Gas Project has a long history of spills and leaks of toxic CSG waterÂ--Santos cannot be trusted to manage the project safely
Santos has already contaminated a freshwater aquifer in the Pilliga with uranium at levels 20 times higher than safe drinking water guidelines, as well as lead, aluminium, arsenic and barium². In addition, there have been over 20 reported spills and leaks of toxic CSG water from storage ponds, pipes and well heads. Santos cannot be trusted.
5. The Pilliga is a haven for threatened wildlife
The Pilliga is one of 15 nationally listed Â`biodiversity hotspotsÂ' and is vital to the survival of threatened species like the Koala, Spotted-tailed Quoll, Black-striped Wallaby, Eastern Pygmy-possum, Pilliga Mouse and South-eastern Long-eared Bat. The forest is home to over 200 bird species and is internationally recognised as an Important Bird Area². The Santos gasfield would fragment 95,000 hectares of the Pilliga with well pads, roads, and water and gas pipelinesÂ--damaging vital habitat and threatening the survival of endangered species.
6. Coal seam gas fuels dangerous climate change
Methane is by far the major component of natural gas, and is a greenhouse gas 72 times more powerful than CO². CSG fields contribute to climate change through the leakage of methane during the production, transport, processing and use of coal seam gas.
7. Human health is compromised by coal seam gas
A range of hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds can be released into the air from coal seam gas operations, including flaring of gas wells. The effects of volatile organic compounds vary, but can cause eye, nose and airway irritation, headache, nausea, dizziness and loss of coordination⁴. These impacts have been documented in human populations nearby to existing gasfields in Queensland, Sydney and in America.
8. The nationÂ's premier optical astronomical observatory is at risk
The Siding Springs Observatory, situated in the Warrumbungles and adjacent to the Pilliga, is under threat from the Narrabri Gas Project due to light and dust pollution⁵. The area has been internationally recognised as a Â`dark sky parkÂ'⁶ and the 50m high gas flares proposed by Santos threaten the viability of the facility.
9. Thousands of tonnes of salt waste will result from the project
Santos has no solution for disposing of the hundreds of thousands of tonnes of salt that will be produced. Between 17,000 and 42,000 tonnes of salt waste would be produced each year. This industry would leave a toxic legacy in NSW.
10. Risk of fires would increase throughout the PilligaÂ's tinder-box conditions
Methane flare stacks up to 50m high would be running day and night, even on total fire ban days. The Pilliga is prone to severe bushfires. The project would increase ignition sources as well as extracting, transporting and storing a highly flammable gas right within this extremely fire-prone forest.
11. There are no long term studies to prove that CSG technology is safe.
No CSG project has been assessed for the long term impacts of rehabilitation. This is still a technology in its infancy with serious doubts about whether a fracked site can be full rehabilitated.
12. There is no benefit to the state.
The net benefit to the state in terms of economic, environmental and social will be negligible of the 20 year life span of the project. Funding for fossil fuels is drying up. The switch to renewable energies is surging. There is no shortage of domestic gas - it's being exported! Environmentally this project will add to the climate burden of future generations. Nobody outside of Santos wants this project. The state can do better!
Regards, Chris Roach.
Tracey McManus
Object
Tracey McManus
Message
The Narrabri gasfield poses a real risk to our two most precious water resources: the Great Artesian Basin and the Murray-Darling Basin. The area of the Great Artesian Basin with the highest recharge rates is almost entirely contained within the Pilliga East forest. In a worst-case scenario, the water removed for CSG extraction could reduce water pressure in the recharge areas--potentially stopping the free flow of waters to the surface at springs and bores across the whole Great Artesian Basin.
Creeks in the Pilliga run into the Namoi River--a part of the Murray Darling Basin. This system is vulnerable to contamination from drilling fluid spills and the salty treated water produced from the proposed 850 wells.
2. The Gamilaraay Traditional Custodians are opposed
There are hundreds of cultural sites as well as songlines and stories connecting the Gamilaraay to the forest and to the groundwater beneath. Gamilaraay people are deeply involved in the battle against CSG, and have told Santos they do not want their country sacrificed for a coal seam gas field.
3. Farmers and other local community reject the project
Extensive community surveys have shown an average of 96% opposition to CSG. This stretches across a massive 3.2 million hectares of country surrounding the Pilliga forest, including 99 communities. Hundreds of farmers have participated in protest actions unlike any previously seen in the region.
4. The Narrabri Gas Project has a long history of spills and leaks of toxic CSG water--Santos cannot be trusted to manage the project safely
Santos has already contaminated a freshwater aquifer in the Pilliga with uranium at levels 20 times higher than safe drinking water guidelines, as well as lead, aluminium, arsenic and barium². In addition, there have been over 20 reported spills and leaks of toxic CSG water from storage ponds, pipes and well heads. Santos cannot be trusted.
5. The Pilliga is a haven for threatened wildlife
The Pilliga is one of 15 nationally listed `biodiversity hotspots' and is vital to the survival of threatened species like the Koala, Spotted-tailed Quoll, Black-striped Wallaby, Eastern Pygmy-possum, Pilliga Mouse and South-eastern Long-eared Bat. The forest is home to over 200 bird species and is internationally recognised as an Important Bird Area². The Santos gasfield would fragment 95,000 hectares of the Pilliga with well pads, roads, and water and gas pipelines--damaging vital habitat and threatening the survival of endangered species.
6. Coal seam gas fuels dangerous climate change
Methane is by far the major component of natural gas, and is a greenhouse gas 72 times more powerful than CO². CSG fields contribute to climate change through the leakage of methane during the production, transport, processing and use of coal seam gas.
7. Human health is compromised by coal seam gas
A range of hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds can be released into the air from coal seam gas operations, including flaring of gas wells. The effects of volatile organic compounds vary, but can cause eye, nose and airway irritation, headache, nausea, dizziness and loss of coordination⁴. These impacts have been documented in human populations nearby to existing gasfields in Queensland, Sydney and in America.
8. The nation's premier optical astronomical observatory is at risk
The Siding Springs Observatory, situated in the Warrumbungles and adjacent to the Pilliga, is under threat from the Narrabri Gas Project due to light and dust pollution⁵. The area has been internationally recognised as a `dark sky park'⁶ and the 50m high gas flares proposed by Santos threaten the viability of the facility.
9. Thousands of tonnes of salt waste will result from the project
Santos has no solution for disposing of the hundreds of thousands of tonnes of salt that will be produced. Between 17,000 and 42,000 tonnes of salt waste would be produced each year. This industry would leave a toxic legacy in NSW.
10. Risk of fires would increase throughout the Pilliga's tinder-box conditions
Methane flare stacks up to 50m high would be running day and night, even on total fire ban days. The Pilliga is prone to severe bushfires. The project would increase ignition sources as well as extracting, transporting and storing a highly flammable gas right within this extremely fire-prone forest.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Geoff Welham
Object
Geoff Welham
Message
I call on the government to come to its senses, and stop CSG mining before any more long lasting damage is done.
I have taken my part in protesting CSG mining in my locality, and would not hesitate to join any action that was necesary to halt this project.
Annie Heckrath
Object
Annie Heckrath
Message
Abundant evidence both from research and anecdotal sources proves beyond doubt that the mining of CSG has a disastrous effect on the environment, both above ground, water sources, the atmosphere and subterranean water supplies.
Mining also affects human communities, in particular the farming sector, with disruption of farming practices, taking over prime farm land, causing health problems from air and water contamination and fracturing farming communities.
Apart from the above, CSG is still contributing to global warming and is particularly dangerous in the amount of methane leaked to the atmosphere.
I am TOTALLY OPPOSED to CSG mining, selling and use - the Australian Government and all State Governments MUST CEASE supporting CSG mining and SUPPORT RENEWABLE ENERGY development!
Patricia Humphries
Object
Patricia Humphries
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Gas has been extracted from below the ocean floor for many decades to supply Australia's needs. It is only lately that the encroaching greed of the industry is coming up against stiff and determined objection. And fair enough! This is a democracy!
NU4YU WHOLE BODY HEALTH
Support
NU4YU WHOLE BODY HEALTH
Message
Charles Curnow
Comment
Charles Curnow
Message
jayne whitehouse
Comment
jayne whitehouse
Message
We are making so little out of gas and yet we will be left with the barren wasteland after all of the profits have been taken out of our country; poor air quality; destroyed eco systems and poisoned water tables etc. Forget it. It's not worth it and people are slowly waking up to it. It has to stop. We need our land for food production; we need what little water our thirsty country has for ourselves and we need an environment that is stable and clean.
Greg O'Regan
Object
Greg O'Regan
Message
The environmental damage alone is reason enough to stop.. threatened species, poisoned water, bush fires, deforestation ..
Economically there is almost nothing in it for Australia, unless you're a corrupt politician of course.
Most, if not all, of the gas will be sent offshore and the royalties are nil. No reward for maximum damage. If it does not make you angry you're already dead.
The impact of this ridiculous idea is far reaching and negative and I strongly oppose it.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
The water in Artesian Basin is precious and is at threat of contamination. Farming to provide food for the population is more important.
Molly Coburn
Object
Molly Coburn
Message
Margaret Smith
Object
Margaret Smith
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
One of the most important is the risk to the Great Artesian Basin and the Murray-Darling Basin, which needs to be protected from damage and contamination. CSG causes byproducts which not only cause irreversible damage to the environment, it also has adverse affects on the health of the communities living in the area.
This project is opposed by both Gamilaraay people, the traditional custodians of the land, as well as local community. Projects like this fuel climate change and are incredibly short-sighted if we want to protect the future of our families, our communities and our land.
Our governments need to stop making short-term decisions which reflect a financial interest and start making long-term decisions in the best interests of the people and the land they represent.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
When are we going to look at the evidence that Coal Seam Gas is a disastrous way of garnering energy, and realise that we need to put our focus on renewable energy? The USA is having to deal with the serious health effects of coal seam gas and it's time that we stop following the US and learn from their mistakes. Say no, for your children and your children's children.
Coal seam gas:
It will extract over 35 billion litres of toxic groundwater, much of it in the first five years. This water will be treated and in the early years will generate tens of thousands of tonnes of salt, for which there is no safe disposal plan.
It will clear close to 1,000 hectares of the Pilliga Forest, fragmenting the largest temperate woodland in New South Wales, home to unique wildlife.
It will cause significant diversion of water from a recharge aquifer of the Great Artesian Basin, which is a water resource relied upon by rural communities across western NSW.
It will lead to large deliberate and fugitive emissions of methane, adding to climate change.
It will cause more trauma to the regional Aboriginal community because the area of impact is crucially important to the spiritual, cultural and social life of Gamilaraay people.
It is not justified: SantosÃ,Â' own Coal Seam Gas export activities in Queensland have caused gas prices to rise and supply to become unpredictable. NSW should respond to this by investing in more reliable and ultimately cheaper renewable energy, not by letting Santos inflict more environmental, social and economic harm.
It will cause economic upheaval in Narrabri and put agricultural industries at risk, as well as causing light pollution that will ruin the dark night sky needed by the internationally renowned Siding Spring Observatory.
Coal Seam Gas is harmful to health. Neither the NSW Government nor Santos have investigated or dealt with the serious health effects of coal seam gas now appearing in peer-reviewed research in the United States.
Regards,
Lorene Barin
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Sabena Lund
Object
Sabena Lund
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
We must consider the children and grandchildren who will inherit this poisonous polluted water and soil. As David Suzuki once said; human beings are the only species who destroy the home they live in.
Why would we want to pollute our soil and our water?
What will we eat and drink?
Gas ?