Skip to main content

State Significant Development

Determination

Narrabri Gas

Narrabri Shire

Current Status: Determination

Interact with the stages for their names

  1. SEARs
  2. Prepare EIS
  3. Exhibition
  4. Collate Submissions
  5. Response to Submissions
  6. Assessment
  7. Recommendation
  8. Determination

The project involves the progressive development of a coal seam gas field over 20 years with up to 850 gas wells and ancillary infrastructure, including gas processing and water treatment facilities.

Attachments & Resources

SEARs (3)

EIS (71)

Submissions (221)

Response to Submissions (18)

Agency Advice (46)

Additional Information (8)

Assessment (8)

Determination (3)

Approved Documents

Management Plans and Strategies (46)

Reports (4)

Independent Reviews and Audits (2)

Notifications (2)

Other Documents (1)

Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.

Complaints

Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?

Make a Complaint

Enforcements

There are no enforcements for this project.

Inspections

There are no inspections for this project.

Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.

Submissions

Filters
Showing 4061 - 4080 of 6108 submissions
Gael Sansom
Object
Thirlstane , Tasmania
Message
Good luck with it all,I really cant understand why people have to reuion land.There will be no land left for the young ones to grow up with and tressure
Name Withheld
Object
Coolum , Queensland
Message
When is enough destruction of OUR planet enough. Every time you turn around you hear of the destruction of somewhere all for the greed of a multinational. I cannot believe we have to keep fighting the fight to stop this, while our elected politicians don't just sit on their hands but invite this destruction.
Brenda Debenham
Object
BEROWRA , New South Wales
Message
I am concerned that there is not the required safety needed.


The Narrabri gasfield poses a real risk to our two most precious water resources: the Great Artesian Basin and the Murray-Darling Basin. The area of the Great Artesian Basin with the highest recharge rates is almost entirely contained within the Pilliga East forest. In a worst-case scenario, the water removed for CSG extraction could reduce water pressure in the recharge areas--potentially stopping the free flow of waters to the surface at springs and bores across the whole Great Artesian Basin.

Creeks in the Pilliga run into the Namoi River--a part of the Murray Darling Basin. This system is vulnerable to contamination from drilling fluid spills and the salty treated water produced from the proposed 850 wells.

Santos has no solution for disposing of the 17,000 and 42,000 tonnes of salt waste that could be produced each year. This industry if allowed will leave a toxic legacy in NSW.

Santos has already contaminated a freshwater aquifer in the Pilliga with uranium at levels 20 times higher than safe drinking water guidelines, as well as lead, aluminium, arsenic and barium². In addition, there have been over 20 reported spills and leaks of toxic CSG water from storage ponds, pipes and well heads. Santos cannot be trusted.

The Pilliga is prone to severe bushfires. Methane flare stacks up to 50m high would be running day and night, even on total fire ban days.The project would increase ignition sources as well as extracting, transporting and storing a highly flammable gas right within this extremely fire-prone forest.

The risks are too high!
SHEILA WALKER
Object
RYDE , New South Wales
Message
It disturbs me greatly when I read about big corporations trying to exploit our natural resources for their own profit. I abhor any government which supports these mindless, greedy endeavours
Name Withheld
Object
Sydney , New South Wales
Message
Please do not go ahead with the Narrabri gas Project in the Pilliga.

It is not worth risking our Great Artesian Basin (Australia's largest groundwater aquifer) , our threatened species and our largest inland forest in Eastern Australia.

The Pilliga is one of 15 nationallly listed biodiversity hotspots.

Gamilaraay Traditional Custodians oppose the project, as well as Farmers and the local community.

Narrabri Gas project has a history of spills and leaks of toxic CSG water -Santos cannot be trusted to manage the project safely.

CSG fuels climate change.

The Sliding springs astronomical observatory will be at risk from light and dust pollution.

The risk of fires from production will be a major hazard for the Pilliga.
Thousands of tons of salt waste will be produced from the project. This will leave a toxic legacy for NSW.

Despite the job opportunities created, the long and short term risks to the environment and human health are far greater - IT IS NOT WORTH IT.
Peta Page
Object
Mitchell Park , South Australia
Message
The negative social and environmental impacts of opening up new fossil fuel basins are too great to allow this project to go ahead.

The Gamilaraay Traditional Custodians and the local community have come out in opposition to this project, with some reports suggesting 95% of locals are opposed. The fact that Santos would continue to push the project despite such opposition from the communities it will affect show their disregard for these people, instead choosing profit over any sort of social license.

Australia has a very poor track record when it comes to land clearing, while each well may only have a small footprint the cumulative environmental degradation of connecting wells will undoubtedly impact biodiversity, putting further pressure on endangered species.

Australia has an opportunity to lead the world on renewable energy, the most recent evidence suggests that the once held belief that gas will be a transition fuel is now debunked and we can move straight from fossil fuel to renewables. Global warming is already happening and we must abandon all plans to add for carbon release into our already fragile atmosphere.
Shirley Goodbar
Object
Lisarow , New South Wales
Message
Sirs: I object strenuously to gas exploration/production anywhere in NSW, most especially where it impinges on water and native habitat. This is the driest continent on the earth. To even think of impinging on the great arterial basin is anathema. Our very survival as a people depends on water.
We are told that presently most of the gas produced in Australia is sent overseas at great profits to foreign companies while our own people face an artificially created "shortage". This, too, is unconscionable. I see it as public theft.
We can live without more gas--we cannot live without clean water.
Colin Sagar
Object
bermagui , New South Wales
Message
Dear Sirs,
This is an appalling development proposal.
Santos has released its Environmental Impact Study.

Santos plans include the construction of 850 coal seam gas wells in the Pilliga forest.

The project would extract over 35 billion litres of toxic groundwater and drill right through the recharge area of the Great Artesian Basin.

It would generate tens of thousands of tonnes of salt waste, for which Santos has still not offered any waste disposal plans.

This gasfield would fragment over 90,000 hectares of the Pilliga forest, industrialising the largest temperate woodland in eastern Australia.

CSG has been fraught with mishap and long term catastrophic consequences.

There is no way a sane Environment Department / Government Policy would permit this type of development.

Please reject this project in total.
Yours
Colin Sagar
Name Withheld
Object
LAKE MUNMORAH , New South Wales
Message
The local indigenous community and the wider community at large is opposed to this project.
Anything that threatens the Australian Artesian Water Basin is not worth considering. Loss or damage to this aquifer would be disastrous.
Local wildlife could be threatened and the risk of fire increased.
Gas emissions could add to global warming.
This is pristine Australian country.
Please don't risk our grandchildren's' heritage by allowing this project to go ahead.
Sheryl Edwards
Object
Birkenhead , South Australia
Message
I believe that this project is likely to damage the environment, particularly endangering the integrity of future water supply to this region.
freddie hill
Object
Eschol Park , New South Wales
Message
No gas mining anywhere in NSW. Period.

You heard what they said.
Madeleine marty
Object
Newrybar , New South Wales
Message
There is ample evidence and experience of the dire and devastating effects of CSG and fracking. Let us be wise. Let us at the least apply the precautionary princple. Let us use our energy for sustainable alternative fuels.
Name Withheld
Object
Elermore Vale , New South Wales
Message
I object to the Narrabri Gas Project on the basis that there is a risk to the environment. and health of Australians. Australia is already selling huge amounts of gas overseas with no benefit to Australians who have to buy it back at a price higher than overseas consumers pay. There is no benefit in this for Australian citizens.
Bryden Williams
Object
Little Hartley , New South Wales
Message
To whom it may concern.
I write in regards to Santos' proposal to create a CSG mining complex in the Pilliga area.

In reference to all existing research I to the effects of this particular project I wish for the proposal to be blocked and permission refused under the following reasons.

The project would extract over 35 billion litres of toxic groundwater and drill right through the recharge area of the Great Artesian Basin. It would generate tens of thousands of tonnes of salt waste, for which Santos has still not offered any waste disposal plans. This gasfield would fragment over 90,000 hectares of the Pilliga forest, industrialising the largest temperate woodland in eastern Australia.

These actions would strike long lasting and damaging effects I to the beautiful NSW landscape and the private industrialisation of this area would be at a detriment to the people, ecosystem, culture and longevity of places like the Great Arterial basin, causing a precedent for flogging off vast tracts of priceless environment for ultimately very little in return.

Please reconsider this application and do not approve Santos' application.

Yours truly,
Bryden Williams
Name Withheld
Object
Dundas , New South Wales
Message
The Pilliga is one of 15 nationally listed `biodiversity hotspots' and is vital to the survival of threatened species like the Koala, Spotted-tailed Quoll, Black-striped Wallaby, Eastern Pygmy-possum, Pilliga Mouse and South-eastern Long-eared Bat. The forest is home to over 200 bird species and is internationally recognised as an Important Bird Area. The Santos gasfield would fragment 95,000 hectares of the Pilliga with well pads, roads, and water and gas pipelines--damaging vital habitat and threatening the survival of endangered species.

The Narrabri gasfield poses a real risk to our two most precious water resources: the Great Artesian Basin and the Murray-Darling Basin.

Santos has already contaminated a freshwater aquifer in the Pilliga with uranium at levels 20 times higher than safe drinking water guidelines, as well as lead, aluminium, arsenic and barium. There have been over 20 reported spills and leaks of toxic CSG water from storage ponds, pipes and well heads. Santos cannot be trusted.

Please don't allow this to happen, send Santos away!!!!

Name Withheld
Object
Dubbo , New South Wales
Message
I most strongly oppose the Narrabri Gas Project, the results of which will cause irreversible damage to the natural environment of the Pilliga and surrounding natural landscape. Alternate energy sources are now available on a scale that will provide for our needs. These sources are also on the cusp of really taking off and advancing in efficiency, cost effectiveness and output, the result of which will ensure our future energy needs are met and the natural landscape, which is vital to our quality of life and that of the living environment of earth, will survive, increase and recover from damage already done.
Please refrain from pleasing the wealthy moguls at the expense of everyone and every living thing that have to live on this planet.
This destructive exploitation is not necessary, and will only achieve short term pleasing of, and ingratiating politicians with the moguls who want to hoard more of the common wealth for themselves.
Please work for the good of all, and a greener, cleaner Earth. It's where we all live.
Name Withheld
Support
Narrabri , New South Wales
Message
I live local at Narrabri and support the Narrabri Gas Project. Not only will it be beneficial to the economy, local children can study for a profession that will bring them back home to Narrabri and near family.
Gas is the least offensive of all fossil fuels, as a country we need fossil fuels to keep the nation moving it is that simple. Santos will not be here for a short period they are intending to be at Narrabri for many many years which will be great for the town and surrounding environs. The majority of Local farmers are not against the project as reported by others who do not live in the community. Farming and gas has co-existed for a very long time and will do far into the future.
Name Withheld
Support
Narrabri , New South Wales
Message
I believe the gas project will be a great asset for both the economy and people of Narrabri. I am a local, attended primary and high schools here and there has always been some form of energy company here.
Having worked on farms around the district for many I have not heard a high percentage of farmers complain about the Narrabri Gas Project at all , actually quite the opposite.
My dealings with Santos to date have only been positive they have supported the town, local sporting bodies and have all settled here, purchased homes and contribute the local economy. It an only be a positive outcome. After all we need some form of energy and gas is the least of all the fossil fuels.
Name Withheld
Support
Narrabri , New South Wales
Message
I would like to support the Narrabri Project as we moved here to Narrabri after moving from the coast. I am excited that I can go to university and come back home to live with my family after gaining a degree. My options will be further widened if Santos is here as I believe it will be a long term project that I could make my own home here. I have friends who are off the land and they do not believe that the gas project will be detrimental to their farms their parents are not worried at all, actually the opposite they are already co-existing with santos and run cattle, grow cotton and wheat. I play sport and Santos have been supporting our team since they have been here. I think it will be a good thing for the future.
Peter Hill
Object
Surry Hills , New South Wales
Message
1. The Narrabri Gas Project risks precious water sources, including the Great Australian Basin--Australia's largest groundwater aquifer
The Narrabri gasfield poses a real risk to our two most precious water resources: the Great Artesian Basin and the Murray-Darling Basin. The area of the Great Artesian Basin with the highest recharge rates is almost entirely contained within the Pilliga East forest. In a worst-case scenario, the water removed for CSG extraction could reduce water pressure in the recharge areas--potentially stopping the free flow of waters to the surface at springs and bores across the whole Great Artesian Basin.¹

Creeks in the Pilliga run into the Namoi River--a part of the Murray Darling Basin. This system is vulnerable to contamination from drilling fluid spills and the salty treated water produced from the proposed 850 wells.

2. The Gamilaraay Traditional Custodians are opposed
There are hundreds of cultural sites as well as songlines and stories connecting the Gamilaraay to the forest and to the groundwater beneath. Gamilaraay people are deeply involved in the battle against CSG, and have told Santos they do not want their country sacrificed for a coal seam gas field.

3. Farmers and other local community reject the project
Extensive community surveys have shown an average of 96% opposition to CSG. This stretches across a massive 3.2 million hectares of country surrounding the Pilliga forest, including 99 communities. Hundreds of farmers have participated in protest actions unlike any previously seen in the region.

4. The Narrabri Gas Project has a long history of spills and leaks of toxic CSG water--Santos cannot be trusted to manage the project safely
Santos has already contaminated a freshwater aquifer in the Pilliga with uranium at levels 20 times higher than safe drinking water guidelines, as well as lead, aluminium, arsenic and barium². In addition, there have been over 20 reported spills and leaks of toxic CSG water from storage ponds, pipes and well heads. Santos cannot be trusted.

5. The Pilliga is a haven for threatened wildlife
The Pilliga is one of 15 nationally listed `biodiversity hotspots' and is vital to the survival of threatened species like the Koala, Spotted-tailed Quoll, Black-striped Wallaby, Eastern Pygmy-possum, Pilliga Mouse and South-eastern Long-eared Bat. The forest is home to over 200 bird species and is internationally recognised as an Important Bird Area². The Santos gasfield would fragment 95,000 hectares of the Pilliga with well pads, roads, and water and gas pipelines--damaging vital habitat and threatening the survival of endangered species.

6. Coal seam gas fuels dangerous climate change
Methane is by far the major component of natural gas, and is a greenhouse gas 72 times more powerful than CO². CSG fields contribute to climate change through the leakage of methane during the production, transport, processing and use of coal seam gas.

7. Human health is compromised by coal seam gas
A range of hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds can be released into the air from coal seam gas operations, including flaring of gas wells. The effects of volatile organic compounds vary, but can cause eye, nose and airway irritation, headache, nausea, dizziness and loss of coordination⁴. These impacts have been documented in human populations nearby to existing gasfields in Queensland, Sydney and in America.

8. The nation's premier optical astronomical observatory is at risk
The Siding Springs Observatory, situated in the Warrumbungles and adjacent to the Pilliga, is under threat from the Narrabri Gas Project due to light and dust pollution⁵. The area has been internationally recognised as a `dark sky park'⁶ and the 50m high gas flares proposed by Santos threaten the viability of the facility.

9. Thousands of tonnes of salt waste will result from the project
Santos has no solution for disposing of the hundreds of thousands of tonnes of salt that will be produced. Between 17,000 and 42,000 tonnes of salt waste would be produced each year. This industry would leave a toxic legacy in NSW.

10. Risk of fires would increase throughout the Pilliga's tinder-box conditions
Methane flare stacks up to 50m high would be running day and night, even on total fire ban days. The Pilliga is prone to severe bushfires. The project would increase ignition sources as well as extracting, transporting and storing a highly flammable gas right within this extremely fire-prone forest.


¹SoilFutures Consulting 2014, Great Artesian Basin Recharge Systems and Extent of Petroleum and Gas Leases. http://www.gabpg.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/GAB-Report1.pdf
²http://www.smh.com.au/environment/santos-coal-seam-gas-project-contaminates-aquifer-20140307-34csb.html
³BirdLife International (2017) Important Bird Areas factsheet: Pilliga http://www.birdlife.org
⁴Marion Carey Doctors for the Environment Australia (DEA), Air pollution from coal seam gas may put public health at risk The Conversation, November 20, 2012
⁵https://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/oct/21/siding-spring-observatory-threat-coal-seam-gas-light-pollution
⁶http://darksky.org/first-dark-sky-park-in-australia-designated/
- See more at: https://www.wilderness.org.au/final-push-pilliga#sthash.AIQXIENM.dpuf

Pagination

Project Details

Application Number
SSD-6456
EPBC ID Number
2014/7376
Assessment Type
State Significant Development
Development Type
Petroleum Extraction
Local Government Areas
Narrabri Shire
Decision
Approved
Determination Date
Decider
IPC-N

Contact Planner

Name
Rose-Anne Hawkeswood