State Significant Development
Narrabri Gas
Narrabri Shire
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
The project involves the progressive development of a coal seam gas field over 20 years with up to 850 gas wells and ancillary infrastructure, including gas processing and water treatment facilities.
Attachments & Resources
SEARs (3)
EIS (71)
Submissions (221)
Response to Submissions (18)
Agency Advice (46)
Additional Information (8)
Assessment (8)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (46)
Reports (4)
Independent Reviews and Audits (2)
Notifications (2)
Other Documents (1)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
There are no inspections for this project.
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Laura Richards
Object
Laura Richards
Message
B Lee
Object
B Lee
Message
Amanda Blades
Object
Amanda Blades
Message
Lisa Seddon
Object
Lisa Seddon
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Deanna Wilson
Object
Deanna Wilson
Message
Kristin Beard
Object
Kristin Beard
Message
I say NO to CSG in the Pilliga.
John Martin
Object
John Martin
Message
Kate Redford
Object
Kate Redford
Message
Paula Jorgensen
Object
Paula Jorgensen
Message
I urge you to not grant permission to drill in The Pilaga, in the Great Artesian Basin or anywhere in Australia, ever.
Instead I urge you to only support energy projects that can prove no harm to living things and water.
Thank you.
Stephan Gard
Object
Stephan Gard
Message
Alex Doyle
Object
Alex Doyle
Message
Your economic justification for the CSG shortage has been disproven and the community consultation is clearly against it based on the high risks of pollution scares, including groundwater contamination, waste spills, and continuing leaks from evaporation ponds.
It is our democratic right to say no and it is your sworn position that requires you to now act on this. Listen to your constituency and now stop CSG in the Piliga.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Bradley Seaborne
Comment
Bradley Seaborne
Message
Spencer Larkey
Object
Spencer Larkey
Message
Byron Smith
Object
Byron Smith
Message
As a resident of NSW, I find the serious risks to ecosystems and water supplies required by a project of this scale to be unacceptable.
As a Christian minister, I am wary of how the profits of an operation like this get concentrated in the hands of a few while the risks are spread across all, including especially those least able to afford them.
As an academic ethicist (with a PhD in theological ethics that has passed oral examination and merely requiring final corrections), I object to the consistent pattern of undue influence wielded by major energy companies over public policy.
As an Australian, I am deeply concerned that any major project would go ahead against the objections of the traditional custodians, in this case the Gamilaraay people.
As a parent, I passionately desire to pass on to my children a planet that bears some resemblance to the one my parents received from their parents. We cannot afford yet another major fossil fuel project destabilising the climate, destroying ecosystems, displacing people, undermining food security and reducing the habitability of our common home here on Earth.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
The Narrabri gasfield poses a real risk to our two most precious water resources: the Great Artesian Basin and the Murray-Darling Basin. The area of the Great Artesian Basin with the highest recharge rates is almost entirely contained within the Pilliga East forest. In a worst-case scenario, the water removed for CSG extraction could reduce water pressure in the recharge areas--potentially stopping the free flow of waters to the surface at springs and bores across the whole Great Artesian Basin.¹
I don't think that necessary attention has been given to the protection of culturally significant sites in this area.
I believe it is important to listen to the local community. If they are rejecting the proposal and they are living and working in the area then surely they should be heard.
Does Santos have a proven track record for looking after or damaging the environment?
As one of 15 nationally listed 'biodiversity hotspots this area should be protected to ensure the survival of threatened species like the Koala, Spotted-tailed Quoll, Black-striped Wallaby, Eastern Pygmy-possum, Pilliga Mouse and South-eastern Long-eared Bat. The forest is home to over 200 bird species and is internationally recognised as an Important Bird Area². The Santos gasfield would fragment 95,000 hectares of the Pilliga with well pads, roads, and water and gas pipelines--damaging vital habitat and threatening the survival of endangered species.
Coal seam gas operations have proven negative effects on the environment and human health.
These impacts have been documented in human populations nearby to existing gasfields in Queensland, Sydney and in America.
The nation's premier optical astronomical observatory is at risk
The Siding Springs Observatory, situated in the Warrumbungles and adjacent to the Pilliga, is under threat from the Narrabri Gas Project due to light and dust pollution. The area has been internationally recognised as a `dark sky park' and the 50m high gas flares proposed by Santos threaten the viability of the facility.
What consideration has been given to how the salt waste would be handled and how the ongoing legacy of this waste will affect future generations? There is a need to consider this project from a long term point of view not just short term monetary gain. I believe that there are too many negatives for this project to be allowed to happen.
Patricia White
Object
Patricia White
Message
Using valuable food-growing land and essential water sources to put in gas wells, is backward-looking and destructive.
The dangers of coal seam gas mining are well-documented by many scientists, the main one being the danger of destroying water sources which cannot be duplicated or rehabilitated once destroyed.
We also need land to grow food for ourselves and export. I don't want to get to the stage where all our food is imported.
I would like the NSW government to seriously reconsider the plan to mine for CSG in the Pillega Region of NSW. The risks are far too many and only for a temporary financial gain to a large company.
sincerely,
Patricia White