State Significant Development
Narrabri Gas
Narrabri Shire
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
The project involves the progressive development of a coal seam gas field over 20 years with up to 850 gas wells and ancillary infrastructure, including gas processing and water treatment facilities.
Attachments & Resources
SEARs (3)
EIS (71)
Submissions (221)
Response to Submissions (18)
Agency Advice (46)
Additional Information (8)
Assessment (8)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (46)
Reports (4)
Independent Reviews and Audits (2)
Notifications (2)
Other Documents (1)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
There are no inspections for this project.
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Jennifer Shipston
Object
Jennifer Shipston
Message
Karen Bernabo
Object
Karen Bernabo
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Zaneta Kosiba-Vargas
Object
Zaneta Kosiba-Vargas
Message
Emily Mountfort
Object
Emily Mountfort
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Ryan Boulter-Polanski
Object
Ryan Boulter-Polanski
Message
Coal seem gas would devistste this area, contaminate the water table, threaten native animals and would also be on ancestral land. There's a strong community that say no, they don't want this around, they should be heard!
This can't happen!
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
BECAUSE:
1. The Narrabri Gas Project risks precious water sources, including the Great Australian Basin--Australia's largest groundwater aquifer
The Narrabri gasfield poses a real risk to our two most precious water resources: the Great Artesian Basin and the Murray-Darling Basin. The area of the Great Artesian Basin with the highest recharge rates is almost entirely contained within the Pilliga East forest. In a worst-case scenario, the water removed for CSG extraction could reduce water pressure in the recharge areas--potentially stopping the free flow of waters to the surface at springs and bores across the whole Great Artesian Basin.¹
Creeks in the Pilliga run into the Namoi River--a part of the Murray Darling Basin. This system is vulnerable to contamination from drilling fluid spills and the salty treated water produced from the proposed 850 wells.
2. The Gamilaraay Traditional Custodians are opposed
There are hundreds of cultural sites as well as songlines and stories connecting the Gamilaraay to the forest and to the groundwater beneath. Gamilaraay people are deeply involved in the battle against CSG, and have told Santos they do not want their country sacrificed for a coal seam gas field.
3. Farmers and other local community reject the project
Extensive community surveys have shown an average of 96% opposition to CSG. This stretches across a massive 3.2 million hectares of country surrounding the Pilliga forest, including 99 communities. Hundreds of farmers have participated in protest actions unlike any previously seen in the region.
4. The Narrabri Gas Project has a long history of spills and leaks of toxic CSG water--Santos cannot be trusted to manage the project safely
Santos has already contaminated a freshwater aquifer in the Pilliga with uranium at levels 20 times higher than safe drinking water guidelines, as well as lead, aluminium, arsenic and barium². In addition, there have been over 20 reported spills and leaks of toxic CSG water from storage ponds, pipes and well heads. Santos cannot be trusted.
5. The Pilliga is a haven for threatened wildlife
The Pilliga is one of 15 nationally listed `biodiversity hotspots' and is vital to the survival of threatened species like the Koala, Spotted-tailed Quoll, Black-striped Wallaby, Eastern Pygmy-possum, Pilliga Mouse and South-eastern Long-eared Bat. The forest is home to over 200 bird species and is internationally recognised as an Important Bird Area². The Santos gasfield would fragment 95,000 hectares of the Pilliga with well pads, roads, and water and gas pipelines--damaging vital habitat and threatening the survival of endangered species.
6. Coal seam gas fuels dangerous climate change
Methane is by far the major component of natural gas, and is a greenhouse gas 72 times more powerful than CO². CSG fields contribute to climate change through the leakage of methane during the production, transport, processing and use of coal seam gas.
7. Human health is compromised by coal seam gas
A range of hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds can be released into the air from coal seam gas operations, including flaring of gas wells. The effects of volatile organic compounds vary, but can cause eye, nose and airway irritation, headache, nausea, dizziness and loss of coordination⁴. These impacts have been documented in human populations nearby to existing gasfields in Queensland, Sydney and in America.
8. The nation's premier optical astronomical observatory is at risk
The Siding Springs Observatory, situated in the Warrumbungles and adjacent to the Pilliga, is under threat from the Narrabri Gas Project due to light and dust pollution⁵. The area has been internationally recognised as a `dark sky park'⁶ and the 50m high gas flares proposed by Santos threaten the viability of the facility.
9. Thousands of tonnes of salt waste will result from the project
Santos has no solution for disposing of the hundreds of thousands of tonnes of salt that will be produced. Between 17,000 and 42,000 tonnes of salt waste would be produced each year. This industry would leave a toxic legacy in NSW.
10. Risk of fires would increase throughout the Pilliga's tinder-box conditions
Methane flare stacks up to 50m high would be running day and night, even on total fire ban days. The Pilliga is prone to severe bushfires. The project would increase ignition sources as well as extracting, transporting and storing a highly flammable gas right within this extremely fire-prone forest.
- See more at: https://www.wilderness.org.au/final-push-pilliga#sthash.uKDyV1js.dpuf
Brad Watson
Object
Brad Watson
Message
CSG needs to stop.
Olivia Brewster
Object
Olivia Brewster
Message
Human greed is destroying the planet, when will it end? Let us not pillage the Piliga with the alleged intent to help Australia's economy when really it's for the sake of lining pockets. Let us keep the Piliga scared. Ultimately, we need to ask ourselves what legacy do we want to leave for the future? I know what I want it to be. What about you? We can do so much better than this! Let's choose the choice which will allow biodiversity to continue to flourish & Australia to remain scared. I object to the pillaging of the Piliga.
Karen Sparks
Object
Karen Sparks
Message
Christine Downs
Object
Christine Downs
Message
No to any and all Coal Seam Gas projects in Australia!
Only fools put any sort of risk to the water in the driest inhabited country on the planet.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
The government should stop supporting archaic methods of energy creation and instead help funding the future of energy production through renewables and importantly battery storage. Whilst it is important to maintain energy security especially through ensuring base loads, the NSW government has an ethical and legal obligation to protect the future generations who ultimately will have to pay the price for the destruction of delicate ecosystems.
Rather than support CSG projects, the government should help incentivise businesses to migrate to the future of energy production in the renewables realm.
Carmen Nemet
Object
Carmen Nemet
Message
M Robinson
Object
M Robinson
Message
Choose the Renewable option and demonstrate good judgement.
Mark Ovens
Object
Mark Ovens
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Primary among these is that the Gamilaraay Traditional Custodians are opposed. Approval of this application would further the long history of injustices done to the First Peoples of this land due to resource extraction. This is unjustifiable, especially given the following reasons.
Coal seam gas is a fossil fuel, and methane is the major component of the gas. Methane is an incredibly strong greenhouse gas, and it has long been a well established fact that climate change, caused by human emission of such gases, is causing serious damage in areas of biodiversity, ecological sustainability, agriculture and food security, extreme weather events, forced migration, and many others. It has been shown that renewable sources of energy are far cheaper than fossil fuels, especially when considering the externalities. To approve of this project would be to contribute to the destruction of lives and the planet on which we depend.
Local residents are in clear opposition. Surveys have shown that 96% of the communities in the region are opposed to CSG. Unprecedented protest actions have been conducted by hundreds.
Santos has already contaminated a freshwater aquifer in the Pilliga with uranium at levels 20 times higher than safe drinking water guidelines, as well as lead, aluminium, arsenic and barium. In addition, there have been over 20 reported spills and leaks of toxic CSG water from storage ponds, pipes and well heads. Santos cannot be trusted.
Between 17,000 and 42,000 tonnes of salt waste would be produced each year, and Santos has no solution for its disposal. This waste poses a threat to the water and the land.
Methane stacks burning permanently, even on total fire ban days in catastrophic bush fire conditions, is simply untenable to any reasonable person. The potential loss of life and of the natural environment cannot be ignored, especially in a region prone to fires.