State Significant Development
Narrabri Gas
Narrabri Shire
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
The project involves the progressive development of a coal seam gas field over 20 years with up to 850 gas wells and ancillary infrastructure, including gas processing and water treatment facilities.
Attachments & Resources
SEARs (3)
EIS (71)
Submissions (221)
Response to Submissions (18)
Agency Advice (46)
Additional Information (8)
Assessment (8)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (46)
Reports (4)
Independent Reviews and Audits (2)
Notifications (2)
Other Documents (1)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
There are no inspections for this project.
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Denis Wood
Object
Denis Wood
Message
Mark Albrecht
Object
Mark Albrecht
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Estelle Schmitt
Object
Estelle Schmitt
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Jo Lockwood
Object
Jo Lockwood
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Julie Dolan
Object
Julie Dolan
Message
This has the potential for complete environmental devastation.
John Hannam
Object
John Hannam
Message
Nathan Kaye
Object
Nathan Kaye
Message
96% of the people in local communities, including hundreds of farmers, oppose this CSG project.
Santos has a bad history will leaks and spillages, so they cannot be trusted with this gas project.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
1. This project puts at risk two of our most precious water resources. that of the Great Artesian Basin and the Murray-Darling Basin. These risks relate to reduction in water pressure, preventing surface water flowing to springs and bores, across the whole Great Artesian Basin, plus the risk of contamination from drilling fluid spills and salty treated water, flowing into the Namoi River.
2. The Traditional custodians , the Gamilaraay, are opposed, with sites and traditions imbedded in their culture. They have told Santos they do not want their country sacrificed for a coal seam gas field.
3. Farmers and other local community reject the project. Surveys across 99 communities, across 3.2 million hectares of country, show an average 96% opposing this project.
4. Santos cannot be trusted to manage this project safely, with a long history of spills and leaks of toxic CSG water. They have shown little regard for dangerous human, animal and wider environmental consequences , with their past contamination of water and environment with high levels of uranium, lead, aluminium, arsenic and barium.
5. The Pilliga is one of the 15 nationally listed "biodiversity hotspots" and is vital to the survival of many threatened species. The proposed gasfield would damage vital habitat. We need to protect our wildlife.
6. Coal seam gas fuels dangerous climate change, with methane being the major component of natural gas, and is a greenhouse gas 72% more powerful than CO2. Methane is leaked during the production, transport, processing and use of coal seam gas. If we are to prevent a future environmental disaster we need to minimise how we contribute, by reducing greenhouse gases now.
7. Human health is compromised by the release of a range of hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds into the air from coal seam gas operations. Negative health effects have been documented in human populations nearby to exiting gas fields in Queensland, Sydney, and in America.
8. The Siding Springs Observatory, the nation's premier optical astronomical observatory, situated in the Warrumbungles and adjacent to the Pilliga, will have its viability threatened by the 50m high gas flares by Santos.
9.The Nation/State will be left with a toxic legacy of up to 42,000 tonnes of salt water waste which will be produced each year, for which Santos has no solution for disposal. The nation will be left with both the devastating environmental effects plus the bill for clean up .
10. The Pillar is prone to severe bush fires, with potentially devastating effects on the residents, both human and animal. The project, with 50m high methane flare stacks running day and night, increases this risk.
For all these reasons, please reject this development.
Susannah Handran-Smith
Object
Susannah Handran-Smith
Message
In a country blessed with more sun and natural resources it is madness to destroy our water table in the name of a quick profit selling our shoal gas overseas.
Please stop this lunacy now. For our children and their children.
Regards,
Susannah Handran-Smith
Tony Cole
Object
Tony Cole
Message
Don't you consider the health of your Grandchildren and Great Grandchildren more important than the profit of your Company and your overpriced salaries with no thought for Australias future as a country and then the world.
The Chinese are doing more than Australia per head of population in trying to reduce emissions.
I call on the share holders to bring pressure on the Board to stop this project, attack the share price, get out sell them off .
This type of product is on the decline with massive moves of toward sustainable energy, INVEST in this , the future not shares that are going backward , with Investment Bankers moving there money elsewhere.
Elyse Adams
Object
Elyse Adams
Message
Karena Williams
Object
Karena Williams
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Malcolm Armstrong
Object
Malcolm Armstrong
Message
Have we not seen what fracking does overseas? Pollution, its been also linked to earthquakes. It doesnt bring local employment they will be FIFO. The locals dont want it, how about respecting their wishes. I thought that was what politicians were suppose to do.
I am totally against fracking and will be fighting against it here in WA as well.
Time for the people to stand up.
jenny balson
Object
jenny balson
Message
As a concerned citizen i wish to put forward an objection to plans for to CSG in the Pilliga...as i feel it is an environmental disaster waiting to happen. I do not trust claims of safety as human error is always a factor,and this area is too sensitive to risk. Water contamination is a very real risk, and i am opposed to anything which will impact on such a natural area and such an important water run off area. I do not trust ANY giant fossil fuel mining company, and i object because i feel local aboriginal land holders and farmers are united in opposing this risky venture.
Elissa Nash
Object
Elissa Nash
Message
James La Greca
Object
James La Greca
Message
As a high school student, I will be the one who faces the impacts of a neglegant government. As a prosperous and wealthy country, we should be leading the world in innovative ways to become environmentally friendly, not looking to simply benefit coal companies so our government can get a little bit more money annually.
I want our government to make the ethically correct decision into not supporting the proposed gas project, and look further into investing our money into energy that is renewable and environmentally friendly. It is time to start making crucial descions that ultimately will impact our earth in a greener light.