State Significant Development
Narrabri Gas
Narrabri Shire
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
The project involves the progressive development of a coal seam gas field over 20 years with up to 850 gas wells and ancillary infrastructure, including gas processing and water treatment facilities.
Attachments & Resources
SEARs (3)
EIS (71)
Submissions (221)
Response to Submissions (18)
Agency Advice (46)
Additional Information (8)
Assessment (8)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (46)
Reports (4)
Independent Reviews and Audits (2)
Notifications (2)
Other Documents (1)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
There are no inspections for this project.
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Shannon Woodcock
Object
Shannon Woodcock
Message
John Graham
Object
John Graham
Message
The Pilliga makes up most of the area with the highest recharge rate for the Great Artesian Basin and to risk contaminating this irreplaceable asset is foolhardy at best and greed fueled insanity at its worst. Santos, who have already contaminated a fresh water aquifer and reported over 20 toxic spills are not worthy of the publics trust.
Not only the Gamilaraay Traditional Custodians are in opposition, but an average of 96% of people in the surrounding communities in the area are opposed to this project.
This development threatens endangered wildlife, will contribute to perilous climate change, and will adversely affect the health of those living in close proximity of the gas wells as we have seen and has been clearly documented in areas affected by this industry in Queensland.
The so called "benefits" to the economy and surrounding communities becomes a sick joke when compared to the potential catastrophes that could occur.
Again, I reiterate my strongest objection to this proposed project and hope that sanity and common sense will prevail and this industry will be banned, not just in NSW, but in the entirety of this most precious country.
Sincerely
John Graham
Rosemary Morrow
Object
Rosemary Morrow
Message
No mining of any type is good for the Pilliga.
So refuse fracking with its dangerous consequences and poor respect for people and land.
Iris Bergmann
Object
Iris Bergmann
Message
The Narrabri Gas Project threatens Australia's largest groundwater aquifer, the Great Australian Basin--Australia's largest, and other important water resources. Local communities are opposed to the project for fear of their future including the Gamilaraay Traditional Custodians, farmers and other local communities, all of whom depend on it directly or indirectly, culturally, economically, socially, and health-wise.
The company Santos who is seeking to exploit the gas resources has already contaminated a freshwater aquifer in the Pilliga with uranium at levels 20 times higher than safe drinking water guidelines, as well as lead, aluminium, arsenic and barium². In addition, there have been over 20 reported spills and leaks of toxic CSG water from storage ponds, pipes and well heads.
The Pilliga is one of 15 nationally listed biodiversity hotspots and is vital to the survival of threatened species like the Koala, Spotted-tailed Quoll, Black-striped Wallaby, Eastern Pygmy-possum, Pilliga Mouse and South-eastern Long-eared Bat. The forest is home to over 200 bird species and is internationally recognised as an Important Bird Area². The Santos gasfield would fragment 95,000 hectares of the Pilliga with well pads, roads, and water and gas pipelines--damaging vital habitat and threatening the survival of endangered species.
NSW needs to take its responsibilities seriously to contribute to the global effort to reduce climate altering gases. Methane is by far the major component of natural gas, and is a greenhouse gas 72 times more powerful than CO². CSG fields contribute to climate change through the leakage of methane during the production, transport, processing and use of coal seam gas.
A range of hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds can be released into the air from coal seam gas operations, including flaring of gas wells. The effects of volatile organic compounds vary, but can cause eye, nose and airway irritation, headache, nausea, dizziness and loss of coordination⁴. These impacts have been documented in human populations nearby to existing gasfields in Queensland, Sydney and in America.
Even the nation's premier optical astronomical observatory is at risk. The Siding Springs Observatory, situated in the Warrumbungles and adjacent to the Pilliga, is under threat from the Narrabri Gas Project due to light and dust pollution. The area has been internationally recognised as a `dark sky park' and the 50m high gas flares proposed by Santos threaten the viability of the facility.
Thousands of tonnes of salt waste will result from the project. Between 17,000 and 42,000 tonnes of salt waste would be produced each year, a toxic legacy in NSW far into the future, far beyond the lifetime of the industry planned there.
The Pilliga is prone to severe bushfires. If this development went ahead, there would also be much higher risks of fires would throughout the Pilliga's tinder-box conditions. Methane flare stacks up to 50m high would be running day and night, even on total fire ban days, highly flammable gas would be extracted, transported and stored right within this extremely fire-prone forest, a catastrophe waiting to happen.
All in all, the social, cultural, geophysical and also the long-term economic realities make it clear that the Narrabri Gas Project must be rejected.
Jaap Barendrecht
Object
Jaap Barendrecht
Message
Please consider the environment and all the farmers in the area who rely on a clean/water environment.
Water is a very precious commodity in Australia we can not risk to pollute any of it!
Here in Australia we have a very unique wildlife and all will be at risk by drilling in to a sensitive habitat.
We also have a cultural aboriginal background to respect!!
Margaret East
Object
Margaret East
Message
and I absolutely totally oppose the development of The Narrabri Gas Project.
Stop companies destroying our environment and contaminating our water resources for the sake of their short term profits.
We need to put our environment first always
We can't drink coal seam gas!
We can develop different forms of energy - ones that aren't destructive or rely on the contamination of our land air and water.
We can't replace or redevelop a natural system back to its original complex
Its really simple - protect the environment and its biodiversity first and foremost - its not just morally right to do so but we RELY on it for clean air, clean water and food production. Its so obvious and so so simple!
To go ahead with CSG mining is to commit a most destructive form of environmental vandalism upon OUR earth - you do not have the moral right to give companies the go ahead to do that.
David Whyte
Object
David Whyte
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Charles Morris
Object
Charles Morris
Message
The inherent problems associated with extracting coal seam gas are well known. To ignore these problems is morally and ethically wrong and leaves future generations of Australians the problem of a contaminated subterranean system.
I urge you to reject this proposal to mine coal seam gas.
Clive Riseam
Object
Clive Riseam
Message
Why is there a crisis - because the forward thinking of the inept pollies and public servants refuse to see alternatives. From massive land clearing for marginal farming, to the constant threat of polluting the water our dry country so desperately needs to survive, why aren't these taken into long term consideration.
I want to share my country with my grandchildren - not a dug-up polluted mess that the short-term visionaries have for us. So please REJECT this massive potential destruction of the Pilliga now, for all our sakes - even those greedy and unenlightened
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Many important decisions are made within large organisations such as governments that are poorly informed by lived experience. Facts, figures, statistics, reports, science are absolutely essential but can take us only so far. The "aha" moment, the realisation of what matters most, comes from the imagination, from lived experience and from our inherent ability to conceptualise based on these and upon science.
I submit my lived experience and my conceptualising as an aid for responsible decision-makers who may be less well-placed.
It is incredible to me that anyone would permit further difficulties to be introduced in managing the fragile and at
times exceedingly harsh area of land known as the Pilliga.
Anyone who has seen the Pilliga in drought knows the insult from csg mining will destroy any chance of the land being usefully productive and so destroy the rural community too.
The toll on biodiversity and those wild creatures we all view as Australia's own, will be devastating and irredeemable.
Australia does not need more csg for its own use. It needs investment in renewable energy and cost-effective hydro storage of renewable energy, as recently espoused by a professor at ANU.
It is patently wrong by ourselves as a nation and by our descendants to risk ruin of productive land for generations, in an effort to make foreign sales today.
Australia is already affected by climate change, placing biodiversity, food security and water security at risk. We cannot eat or drink coal seam gas.
Remediation, on the scale needed after csg mining, is very unlikely to be successful, particularly in such fragile and rugged country as the Pilliga. If full remediation costs were included in requirements for approval, no company would be interested in mining csg. It would not be cost-effective to mine.
Lost opportunities, during and following csg mining is another area of great loss that ought to be costed and allocated to the activity.
Allowing csg mining is allowing miners to take all the value and leave the damage for others to pay in lost opportunities and actual clean up costs.
There are sites all over Australia where the legacy of earlier generations of miners has destroyed rural communities and the prospect of later generations using that land productively again. Remediation is either not possible or so costly as to make any scheme to fix it unviable. Such structural ruin of Australia's rural areas cannot continue as we will need all arable land to feed a future larger population, in an ever harsher climate.
Respect is necessary for the people of the Pilliga; for their knowledge, skill and effort in working difficult land productively and in caring for it so the next generation can do the same.
I object most strenuously and passionately to the harms old-world mining in the form of csg mining, poses to the Pilliga.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
John Swainston
Object
John Swainston
Message
Over population and Increasing acidification of our rain and oceans add to the rising incidences of flooding, fires and wild weather.
When will we acknowledge the harm being done in 2040, 2060, 2080 or never?
I can't see any way of going back.
The sooner and more strenuously we act the better it will be for the global population in 2100.
Simone Hamlyn
Object
Simone Hamlyn
Message
Kristian Susanj
Object
Kristian Susanj
Message
Scott Shade
Object
Scott Shade
Message
I wish to lodge my objection to this project on the basis of the following points:
1. The Pilliga Forest is the largest intact woodland in eastern Australia, stretching across half a million hectares in north-western New South Wales, and the sandstone below is a recharge zone for the Great Artesian Basin. In such a place how is an industrial scale 850 well CSG project justifiable?
CSG has never been proven to have no effect on aquifers and once they are poisoned by the toxins released by CSG wells, no amount of human intervention will rectify it.
2. The ground water and creeks in the Pillga area also feed the Murray-Darling Basin. So any toxic effects from CSG that occur in the Pillga will not only affect the environment and agriculture in this area but will have disastrous flow on effects downstream.
3. The Gamilaraay Traditional Custodians are opposed as there are hundreds of cultural sites as well as songlines and stories connecting the Gamilaraay to the forest and to the groundwater beneath. Gamilaraay people are deeply involved in the battle against CSG, and have told Santos they do not want their country sacrificed for a coal seam gas field.
4. Farmers and local communities are strongly opposed, in fact surveys show that an average 96% of the local population is against the project. Hundreds of farmers have participated in protest actions unlike any previously seen in the region.
5. Santos cannot be trusted to manage the project safely due to a long history of spills and toxic leaks of CSG water. They have already contaminated a freshwater aquifer in the Pilliga with uranium at levels 20 times higher than safe drinking water guidelines, as well as lead, aluminium, arsenic and barium². In addition, there have been over 20 reported spills and leaks of toxic CSG water from storage ponds, pipes and well heads.
6. The Pilliga is a known haven for native Flora & Fauna. It is one of 15 nationally listed `biodiversity hotspots' and is vital to the survival of threatened species like the Koala, Spotted-tailed Quoll, Black-striped Wallaby, Eastern Pygmy-possum, Pilliga Mouse and South-eastern Long-eared Bat. The forest is home to over 200 bird species and is internationally recognised as an Important Bird Area. The Santos gasfield would fragment 95,000 hectares of the Pilliga with well pads, roads, and water and gas pipelines--damaging vital habitat and threatening the survival of endangered species.
7. CSG fields contribute to climate change through the leakage of methane during the production, transport, processing and use of coal seam gas. Methane is by far the major component of natural gas, and is a greenhouse gas 72 times more powerful than CO².
8. The health of the local communities will also be affected. A range of hydrocarbons and volatile organic compounds can be released into the air from coal seam gas operations, including flaring of gas wells. The effects of volatile organic compounds vary, but can cause eye, nose and airway irritation, headache, nausea, dizziness and loss of coordination. These impacts have been documented in human populations nearby to existing gasfields in Queensland, Sydney and in America. Releases of these substances can never be eliminated by CSG operators.
9. The viability of Australia's premier optical astronomical observatory is at risk from light and dust pollution. The Siding Springs Observatory, situated in the Warrumbungles and adjacent to the Pilliga will be affected by the 50m high gas flares proposed by Santos.
10. Santos has no solution for disposing of the hundreds of thousands of tonnes of salt that will be produced. Between 17,000 and 42,000 tonnes of salt waste would be produced each year. This industry would leave a toxic legacy in NSW.
11. The Pillga area is prone to severe bushfires and even on total fire ban days the 50m high methane flare stacks will run day and night. The project would increase ignition sources as well as extracting, transporting and storing a highly flammable gas right within this extremely fire-prone forest.
This proposed gasfield from Santos is now the last CSG project in NSW and quite plainly Santos does not have a social licence to proceed. It is time to put a to stop this unjustifiable project once and for all.
Kind regards,
Scott Shade
Birgit Graefner
Object
Birgit Graefner
Message
Look at the USA and their pollution problems.
Look at Germany, where CSG Fracking was forbidden because the devastation it causes.
Just because our continent is larger and our population is not nearly as dense in country areas, DOES NOT GIVE ANYBODY THE RIGHT TO GO AND DESTRUCT OUR LAND - BE IT PRECIOUS FARMLAND, NOT SO FERTILE FARMLAND OR PRESTINE NATURAL AREAS LIKE THE PILLIGA !
HANDS OFF.
SANTOS HAS DONE MORE DAMAGE IN THE PILLIGA THAN IT SHOULD EVER HAVE BEEN ALLOWED TO DO !!!
I'VE SEEN MUCH OF IT MYSELF ALREADY.
To see that Water Treatment is on the agenda !
That is sheer sarcasm !
I've seen the toxic mess - free accessible to all forms of wildlife that might be thirsty enough to have a taste.
YOUR SCHEME IS A NATIONAL , NO - INTERNATIONAL DISGRACE.
WE ALL DEPEND ON OUR ALTESIAN BASIN !!!
PLEASE - Don't allow any more of this utter destruction!!
Elizabeth Stewart
Object
Elizabeth Stewart
Message
The sandstone under the Pilliga is a vital recharge area for the Great Artesian Basin, and creeks that flow through the Pilliga provide clean water into the Murray Darling Basin. These water sources are the lifeblood of farming communities throughout the southeast and inland Australia.
I visited the Piliga Forest while on holiday last year and enjoyed the bush and evidence of aboriginal use of sandstone caves. I do not want the area damaged by any fracking with the use of damaging chemicals injected into the ground, and 850 wells is a mind boggling number. The damage would be irrreversible. We need some wilderness.
-
Felicity Grace
Object
Felicity Grace
Message
I understand that In a worst-case scenario, this project could end the free flow of waters to the surface at springs and bores across the whole Great Artesian Basin and negatively impact the Murray Darling Basin.
Second Key community stakeholders are not re-assured that this project is safe. Many Farmers, Members of The Gamilaraay Traditional Custodians and Locals are opposed they do not want their country and water sacrificed for a coal seam gas field. There is evidence that the Narrabri Gas Project has a long history of spills and leaks of toxic CSG water--Santos cannot be trusted to manage the project safely or address problems.
Third our Pilliga is a haven for threatened wildlife
The Pilliga is one of 15 nationally listed `biodiversity hotspots'.The Santos gasfield would fragment 95,000 hectares of the Pilliga with well pads, roads, and water and gas pipelines--damaging vital habitat and threatening the survival of endangered species. To add to this impact coal seam gas fuels dangerous climate change and costs more that cleaner renewable alternatives. Human lives can also be harmed by exposure to coal seam gas waste. Thousands of tonnes of unmanaged salt waste will result from this project. Alarmingly the risk of fires would increase throughout the Pilliga's tinder-box conditions already prone to fire extraction and transport of highly flammable gas could spark fires outside of natural events.
Fourth, I have just learned that the nation's premier optical astronomical observatory is at risk due to light and dust pollution - unintended and unmanageable impacts are significant and read together these impacts are too great to continue with this project.