Nicholson Street Build-to-Rent

After the settlement of Landmark and Christie Rd 88 project. I found that the car traffic are getting heavy along Nicholson St. and Oxley St. even though Christie Rd 88 Business Tower are not in operations (nearly whole tower are vacant). If you take into account the future settlement of New Land and Landmark Quarter, I am worrying about the situation will be even worser. Hence, the recommendation of reducing the size of maximum GF area will be necessary and crucial. How much it could be reduced without affecting its financial viability is the job of Council to judge.

Objection points:
It goes well beyond the Lane Cove local planning requirements. Landmark and St Leonards Square are also extremely concerned by the significant loss of sunlight and shadowing. The proposed building covers the entire site.
Christie Street & Nicholson & Oxley Streets are already congested and cannot cope with the additional projected traffic.
Currently during peak hours, it takes me more than 25min drive from Pacific High Way to Christie Street ( which is about 300 meters) if I am driving from Chatswood direction.
The data used in the traffic study is from 2013 and is out of date, not taking into account the 4 latest developments on the Lane Cove side of St Leonards, of The Jackson (Units-311, residents-650), William Tower (Units-242, residents-480), Landmark (units-432, Residents-1030) and 88 Christie St (units-637, Residents-1,710). That is an additional 3,870 residents using the vehicular access in Nicholson St since the 2013 traffic study was completed. All these buildings only have Oxley St for vehicular access out of the area. The additional vehicular congestion this development will bring to the area during construction and on completion will cause further delays to all existing residents.
I am also concerned at the St Leonards major construction congestion once these developments all commence, any road closures (inChristie and Nicholson St's) during construction along with construction noise and dust issues.

This proposed development will lead to overcrowding of the St Leonards area, and cause disruption to the nearby existing apartment buildings including:
- Loss of natural light
- Lack of space between buildings causing lack of privacy
- Disruption of the local traffic
- Overcrowding of the area leading to lack of services
- Obstructing the views of the existing buildings

Subject: Objection to development application - SSD-56527976

Dear Sir/ Madam , 

We are owners /residents of 88B Christie Street, and am writing to oppose the subject application regarding  the 31-stories build to rent development application due to the following reasons: 
1. Currently there are already 3 high rise and/high density development undergoing surrounding  the 88 A & B Christie Street Compound, there are construction noises commencing early in morning till end of the day and already giving a lot of noises and dust pollution to the environment surrounding our compound. The 31 stories large construction site facing the another side of our unit will worsen the current pollution situation. 
2. In this area and nearly developed compounds there are limited parkings to owners and residents, we were told that there were restrictions in parking space provided and on street parking are very scarce, the completion of the 31 stories high density residence will definitely worsen the current parking situations in the area for residents and regular visitors. Although one may say to use public transportation, however, there are a lot of individuals who require private transportation, such as night shift workers, elderly and family with young children … etc . In reality , we observed even tourists rent cars for ease of travel in their visits.  Thus, the approval of this high density population property will significantly worsen the traffic conditions in these streets areas, as well as directly affecting the traffic flow to Pacific Highway in this area. 
3. The streets surrounding the current compounds and the proposed development are narrow streets, No through roads and one way streets, the upcoming developments that already undergoing would already add on to the increasing heavy traffics, and worsen the congestions, not to imagine how the additional 31 stories building will get the situation worsen if the streets infrastructure remain same. 
4. Nature of proposed development is for build to rent. Currently there are AirBnB in our compound, hotel near by,  there is doubt if such a high mobility of residents to be considered in relatively owner residential area is really necessary. 
5. Currently there is a early child care center just opposite the proposed construction site, construction safety could post potential issues not to say the close noise and air pollution impact to it. 
6. The SSD-56527976 development has not included any greening / leisure strolling environments for their additional high residential population nor their neigborhood, but add on to the loading of the current available facilities. 
7. Other than the noise and dust pollution mentioned above, due to the height of this proposed development (31 stories), it will block sunlight directly coming from the East side of the building and block, full or in part,  the current available scenic views to all the buildings  behind it.
As owner and family based residents living in close vicinity of the proposed high density development, we are asking the Department to listen to our objection pleads when considering the application.
 
Thank you

Subject: Objection to development application - SSD-56527976

Dear Sir/ Madam , 

We are owners /residents of 88B Christie Street, and am writing to oppose the subject application regarding  the 31-stories build to rent development application due to the following reasons: 
1. Currently there are already 3 high rise and/high density development undergoing surrounding  the 88 A & B Christie Street Compound, there are construction noises commencing early in morning till end of the day and already giving a lot of noises and dust pollution to the environment surrounding our compound. The 31 stories large construction site facing the another side of our unit will worsen the current pollution situation. 
2. In this area and nearly developed compounds there are limited parkings to owners and residents, we were told that there were restrictions in parking space provided and on street parking are very scarce, the completion of the 31 stories high density residence will definitely worsen the current parking situations in the area for residents and regular visitors. Although one may say to use public transportation, however, there are a lot of individuals who require private transportation, such as night shift workers, elderly and family with young children … etc . In reality , we observed even tourists rent cars for ease of travel in their visits.  Thus, the approval of this high density population property will significantly worsen the traffic conditions in these streets areas, as well as directly affecting the traffic flow to Pacific Highway in this area. 
3. The streets surrounding the current compounds and the proposed development are narrow streets, No through roads and one way streets, the upcoming developments that already undergoing would already add on to the increasing heavy traffics, and worsen the congestions, not to imagine how the additional 31 stories building will get the situation worsen if the streets infrastructure remain same. 
4. Nature of proposed development is for build to rent. Currently there are AirBnB in our compound, hotel near by,  there is doubt if such a high mobility of residents to be considered in relatively owner residential area is really necessary. 
5. Currently there is a early child care center just opposite the proposed construction site, construction safety could post potential issues not to say the close noise and air pollution impact to it. 
6. The SSD-56527976 development has not included any greening / leisure strolling environments for their additional high residential population nor their neigborhood, but add on to the loading of the current available facilities. 
7. Other than the noise and dust pollution mentioned above, due to the height of this proposed development (31 stories), it will block sunlight directly coming from the East side of the building and block, full or in part,  the current available scenic views to all the buildings  behind it.
As owner and family based residents living in close vicinity of the proposed high density development, we are asking the Department to listen to our objection pleads when considering the application.
 
Thank you

The area has become overcrowded with too much traffic already unless we have new roads, which is quite unlikely.

St. Leonards is a quiet living area for mature residents who cannot drive long distances but still hope to live near the city to get a share of cultural and social lives. I’m a retired person located in the residential building opposite the proposed development. The original office building was only 4-5 storeys high. I got an apartment facing the west just to get some sun. The proposed development means that I’ll need to draw my curtains all day or I’ll be watched by the offices. This will disrupt my physical and mental health.
High rises were only approved along pacific highway to block off the noises from the traffic. This is working totally against the expectation of the existing residents in the area. I strongly oppose tall building construction extended to the quiet back streets. The approval of this project would create a lot of uncertainty in regards to development of suburban areas.

The project on Nicholson street is going to be adding to the over development and will change the character of the place. The view from a lot of buildings will be obstructed, including ours. The population and environmental impact is going to be affected. The traffic in the St leonards area is going to be affected. So I strongly oppose this development

overcrowd and high density

The proposed building height and density are excessive and will result in substantial overshadowing of our property and loss of cherished views. This will not only degrade our living experience but also adversely affect the mental well-being of residents who have long valued these aspects of their homes.

The construction phase, likely to be prolonged, will introduce significant noise, causing disruption to our daily lives. Additionally, the increased density could lead to ongoing noise concerns and reduced privacy, altering the tranquil nature of our neighborhood.

1. The Built to rent on Nicholson street will have an inevitable, severe harm on housing market by causing property values reduction.
2. Worries about the potential disruption and changes to the character of existing neighbourhoods and communities.
3. Environmental impact of large-scale construction projects, energy consumption and sustainability practices.
4. Public resources around not enough to support the incremental on booming renters.
5.Bring severe infrastructure strain such as roads, public transportation, schools, and healthcare facilities due to a sudden influx of residents.

1 Heavy traffic congestion in Christie Street, Nicholson Street, Oxley Street and Pacific Highway during peak hours

2 There is wind tunnel effect experiencing in The Landmark and around the area

3 Building a high-rise building at 46-52 Nicholson Street and 59-67 Christie Street will enclose the units of The Landmark facing the southwest side. It will prohibit direct sunlight and ambient light going into these units, especially the lower floors. These units will be walled off and resulted in a permanently darkened living for residents.

4 Poor air ventilation for densely-built high-rise buildings. Health issue may arise.

5 It invades the residents’ privacy as the bedrooms are directly facing the new building.

6 The new building will block the view of the units of The Landmark facing the southwest side, especially the lower floors.

7 There are a number of new residential developments to be completed near the area very soon, eg. Elation, The Newlands, The Landmark Quarter, Audrey and other off the plan & developments. So, there is adequate supply of residential units.

8 There is an oversupply of commercial office spaces, as evident by high vacancy rate.
9 The original development was turned down by the Lane Cove Council, so now they have amended the project as “Build to Rent apartments” and are putting a State Significant Development Application (SSDA) to the NSW State Government to by-pass Council. Council decision should be well respected and heard.

I am writing to express my vehement opposition to the proposed Nicholson Street Build-to-rent. The design of this project completely obstructs sunlight and scenic views for our apartment, resulting in an overall dim environment that blatantly contradicts Australian building regulations.

This action not only adversely affects our living conditions but also poses a potential threat to our mental and physical well-being. Access to ample natural sunlight is a crucial factor in maintaining residents' health and overall happiness, and this design clearly goes against this fundamental principle.

I implore the review committee to reconsider and reject the approval of this project to safeguard the rights and quality of life for us residents. Thank you for your understanding and support.In addition, the approval of this project would contribute to an unmanageable increase in population density, exceeding the government-mandated volumetric ratio. This potential overcrowding raises concerns about the strain on local resources, infrastructure, and community services.

The government regulations regarding population density and volumetric ratios are in place to ensure sustainable urban development and the well-being of residents. Approving a project that surpasses these limits not only jeopardizes the livability of the area but also places an undue burden on existing amenities and services.

I urge the committee to carefully consider the long-term implications of such high population density and volumetric excess and to prioritize the well-being and sustainability of our community. Your thoughtful evaluation and decision are crucial in maintaining a harmonious and livable urban environment.

This project completely blocks the light and scenery of my apartment, which will make my apartment dark and without any light, which is not in accordance with the Australian construction law. If the project is approved, it will cause great harm to the mental and physical health of our entire apartment residents.

I support the project at 46-52 Nicholson st, St Leonards. However the road intersections of Pacific Hwy and Christie st as well as Christie St and Nicholson st and also the intersection of Oxley st and Nicholson st already have severe congestion during morning and evening peaks. Therefore I make the following suggestion.
1. The southern end of Christie st which is currently one way from Pacific Hwy should be made into a 2 way street. This would allow cars to exit Nicholson and Christie st onto the Pacific Hwy to join northbound traffic lanes. Currently the only exit from Christie/Nicholson st is via Oxley st onto the Pacific Hwy. Oxley is already congested with traffic in the morning peak hour. More unit development will jam up Nicholsen & Oxley st.
2. In addition please factor in the opening of the Crowsnest metro station on corner of Oxley & Pacific Hwy. There will be a large increase in pedestrian traffic crossing the Oxley st/Pacific Hwy intersection further slowing down traffic exiting Christie/Nicholson via Oxley. Therefore to lessen the bottleneck of Oxley/Pacific Hwy intersection, make Christie st 2 way and cars can then also exit onto Pacific Hwy via Christie st.
3. With large scale development currently underway in St Leonards I also urge that a left turn lane be established on Christie st to the immediate north of Pacific Hwy. Christie st (north) & Pacific hwy intersection already jams up during the afternoon as there isn't a designated lane for traffic to drive from Christie st (north), across Pacific Hwy into the one way section of Christie st adjacent to the 88 building/recent development. So cars can't cross Pacific Hwy efficiently. They are held back if a car is turning left onto Pacific hwy.
4. Therefore in summary make Christie st (south) a 2 way street allowing cars to turn left onto Pacific Hwy heading in northerly direction. And add a left turn lane onto Christie st (north) at the Christie St/Pacific hwy intersection.

With these adjustments made to the local road network I fully support this development. Thanks

Roads are completely inadequate to support more dense development, Oxley St/Pacific Highway intersection is already struggling with current capacity and all outbound traffic will still be bottlenecked through that single exit which will make it even worse.