State Significant Development
Powerhouse Parramatta
City of Parramatta
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Site preparation works including demolition of all structures and tree removal, construction, operation and use of the Powerhouse Parramatta, public domain works and use, vehicular access, infrastructure works and signage zones
Consolidated Consent
Modifications
Archive
Early Consultation (1)
Request for SEARs (4)
SEARs (1)
EIS (37)
Response to Submissions (24)
Agency Advice (10)
Additional Information (22)
Determination (8)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (35)
Reports (1)
Independent Reviews and Audits (1)
Notifications (4)
Other Documents (7)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
29/03/2021
28/04/2021
25/05/2022
31/05/2022
18/04/2023
19/08/2024
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Radoslaw Tomasz Strzelecki
Object
Radoslaw Tomasz Strzelecki
Message
Kim Riley
Object
Kim Riley
Message
Attachments
Roger Dunk
Object
Roger Dunk
Message
Cost: The original cost to "relocate" the museum to Parramatta was announced by then NSW Premier Mike Baird to be in the order of $100-200M. The projected costs are now closer to $2B, and likely to be far greater knowing the present government's track record in delivering projects within budget. Proceeds of sale of the Ultimo site will not come close to the "relocation" costs, and patronage at the museum in Parramatta would certainly be less than the existing Ultimo site. From a financial point of the view, the museum relocation is a gigantic stinker -- and a massive slap in the face to NSW taxpayers.
Planning: There could not possibly be a worse site for a museum than the proposed site. It is a flood prone riverbank which has flooded as recently as earlier this year. The proposed museum is therefore effectively designed on "stilts", making it near impossible to move large exhibits into the museum. The latest is that $500,000 would have to spent on a crane, just to lift the train into the museum! The present museum had a railway running right up the museum! There is not even a single parking spaces nor a loading zone at the proposed museum. What a joke!
Space: The proposed museum will be substantially smaller than the present museum. Recent analysis by Museum Expert Kylie Winkworth suggests that climate controlled exhibition space at the proposed Parramtta museum will be 86% less than at the current Ultimo site. In short, the proposed museum was never going to be a museum at all, but rather, it's all about cafes and bars, apartments, commercial hire space for conferences, concerts and events, a cinema, and almost anything else you can imagine EXCEPT a museum!
Ellie Breakspear
Object
Ellie Breakspear
Message
Chris Jones
Object
Chris Jones
Message
I'm a designer and I do not believe for one minute that this is not possible or even achievable. Find a better architect or simply make it a mandatory requirement to keep these buildings.
Greatness isn't achieved by doing something because it is easier, on the contrary it is achieved by accomplishing something through hard endeavour. An architectural icon isn't achieved through conception alone, it achieved through the endeavor of design.
Demolishing our heritage buildings must stop here and now! Get out of the way and do the right thing not the easy thing.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Flood prone and not hermetically suitable for fragile objects.
The demolition of the award winning buildings in Ultimo is universally abhorred. our world respected Museum destroyed for a government land grab is unthinkable. The cost of the move at B$1.4 a despicable waste.
Mike Stanley
Object
Mike Stanley
Message
To much destruction has already been done to this City . I OBJECT IN THE STRONGEST TERMS to the destruction of Willowgrove House and St George’s Terraces tri facilitate this proposed building.
My little poem expresses my sentiments.
Farewell Parramatta .......
It’s almost lost, this famous town,
The place where the eels lie down.
Skyscrapers scream into the air,
Cars, noise, and people, everywhere.
Our first ten Governors lived in this town,
The laws for all, here, were written down.
The place, so central to our Nation,
Is now Units, Shops, and a huge Railway Station.
Lennox’s Bridge is hard to find,
dear St John’s is, well just never mind,
The town hall is lost in a spiralling maze,
Church Street disappears, into a noisy haze.
I see another Sydney rearing its head,
Rushing and writhing, Oh lord I do dread.
The old rivers course is reduced and directed,
By outsiders I feel, whose minds are infected.
I hope all these units, developers are adding,
Conform to “rules,” especially the cladding .
So I’ll go to St Johns, then offer a prayer,
To the Dharug spirits, and First Settlers there.
I understand progress, and all it entails,
Yes I understand greed, and it usually fails.
Opinions are mine
I don’t really matter,
But it’s the end of the beginning....of my Parramatta.
M G Stanley 2019.
And now we have the Powerhouse debacle to add to all this..... where is the humanity?
Nina Ardill
Object
Nina Ardill
Message
The current Powerhouse at Ultimo is a great facility and has more significant items on display than the new museum will have. It seems ridiculous to me that the government would spend taxpayers' money to build a new museum that displays fewer significant items than the current museum.
The cost of moving the displays and the risk of damaging such historic items as Locomotive No. 1 is completely unacceptable.
Also completely unacceptable is the demolition of two heritage sites - Willow Grove and St George's Terrace - to make way for the new facility. Why do we have to destroy our heritage buildings to make way for new ones?
I think it would be great to have a world-class facility in Parramatta, but the Powerhouse is not it and the proposed location is not where it should be.
Please reject this project.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Please do not demolish our history with a bulldozer. The government should respect and take our history seriously.
I have no personal connection but only a love to the history of this beautiful building. It's important for us all & future generations to understand & have an insight to our history & to be able to visit these places.
After all a museum is a building in which objects of historical, scientific, artistic or cultural interest are stored and exhibited.
A musuem should not be built by deliberately destroying the history it will be placed on.
Alison Billing
Object
Alison Billing
Message
The Parramatta CBD has already suffered a great loss of heritage buildings and so every effort should be made to keep and value what is left.
Parramatta has the potential for a new and unique museum precinct in the Fleet Street site. The heritage buildings and their stories combined with indigenous history and culture would attract Australian and overseas tourists in far greater numbers than the relocated Powerhouse. Museums explore people’s sense of place, spark interest in the generations of people who have gone before us. The Powerhouse at Ultimo is there because the area was Sydney’s industrial heartland. Parramatta needs and deserves a museum that enriches our knowledge of the place, the people, their work and social context. There are no other sites left that can tell the indigenous and colonial story of NSW as well as the Fleet Street area and this opportunity should not be ignored in favour of a project that destroys our heritage.
Understanding our history is crucial for social well-being and learning through material culture often makes more of an impact than reading alone. Instead of spending money trying to ameliorate a flood prone site and destroying the last remaining buildings of their styles, funding should go to a Museum of NSW at the Fleet Street site.
Bob Madell
Object
Bob Madell
Message
Certain of my objections include the facts that the mentioned buildings are HERITAGE & significant to the reality of Parramatta as the earliest base of power in NSW; the area currently occupied by the former DJ’s carpark is a flood zone (witnessed by myself on more than one occasion,) & this is unlikely to change, even though not a regular event; & the whole of Parramatta is a lack of parking nightmare, and has huge, poor traffic flow issues, which are clearly not going to improve as our population continues to grow with more & more high rise residential accommodation, & the introduction of the light rail/tramway may well add to the current, ongoing traffic & parking issues.
The proposed project, clearly will NOT allow even reasonable displays of “Museum” items, as shown in the available papers.
The “Powerhouse” needs to stay where it is in the short term, & if a move is essential, ANY new site needs to be elsewhere other than in a FLOOD ZONE & well away from an already heavily compromised Parramatta CBD.
Regards, BobM. (cc).
Melissa Sedgwick
Object
Melissa Sedgwick
Message
The museum should be further developed on site in Ultimo as it is a great location for all visitors to access
I object to the plans for the new museum as it will not provide sufficient space for the display of the current collection
I object to the plans for the new museum as the risk to the collection being damaged in the process of being moved to the site is too high
I object to the plans for the new museum on the grounds that its a flood zone and housing a museum of priceless artefacts in this location is too high risk
I object to the plans for the new museum as they currently involve the destruction of two important local heritage buildings - Willow Grove and St Georges Terrace should be saved for future generations.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Gillian Kirby
Object
Gillian Kirby
Graeme Wiffen
Object
Graeme Wiffen
Message
Discussion of the storage facility at Castle Hill is also misleading. Why Ultimo has to close to extend Castle Hill is not clear. In addition reports are that the storage facility at Castle Hill is difficult for the public to reach and will not be effective if that is where the collections from Ultimo are to end up.
Other objections:
The Parramatta site is flood prone and not suitable for whatever cultural objects are to be shown there.
The Parramatta site has heritage buildings that will be lost in the new construction.
The original proposal was rushed and misconceived. It is developing in a way very different from the original proposal.
Michael Houlahan
Object
Michael Houlahan
Message
Attachments
Lauren Rountree
Support
Lauren Rountree
Message
I am writing in support of the move of the Powerhouse Museum to Parramatta.
As a resident of Parramatta, I am excited about the redevelopment that has been occurring in Parramatta over the last few years, which has shifted the view of many on their perception of Parramatta as a city.
Growing up in Sydney’s east, Parramatta had seemed almost foreign to me and I must say it was a big move for me to buy a property in Parramatta in 2015, but I did this because I could see the potential. It was obvious to me that Parramatta was a booming city and will become the central city of Sydney.
For this reason alone, our Central City deserves its own museum!
We deserve more than only 1% of Commonwealth arts program funding.
Art should not be centralised to one region, it should be widely accessible to all and to further this point, if any art is going to be of relevance to Western Sydney it will be art of popular culture, which the Powerhouse Museum has featured through its exhibitions over the years, including those of Harry Potter 2012, Star Wars 2019 and Kylie Minogue 2006 etc.
As noted by Jennifer Sanders “It is unknown if the population of the region will be a major source of visitors to a relocated Powerhouse”. While, this project will cause doubt in many minds, the population of Western Sydney continues to grow, we represent 1 in 10 Australians, we have the population to make this a viable success and while Western Sydney continues to grow as a tourism destination, this will only encourage domestic and international travellers to choose Western Sydney as the place to be.
There is no time more crucial than right now to boost tourism domestically, we need to change the thought pattern of our country and encourage our people to spend their money within Australia. COVID-19 has closed our international borders, there is no time better than now to build Western Sydney’s profile as a tourism destination for the future. The Powerhouse Museum will be a game-changer for other Western Sydney tourism destinations such as Sydney Zoo and Sydney Coliseum Theatre West HQ and together they can build Western Sydney to be a world class Central City.
Parramatta and Western Sydney need this project to proceed for so many reasons, we are speaking up because we are proud to live in Western Sydney, Sydney city has been the central district for art for too long now and we as a state need to move with the times, we need to evolve and most importantly we need to grow!
Kind regards,
Lauren Rountree
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
I wish to voice my dismay at the closing of Sydney's Powerhouse Museum in Ultimo.
I object to the Powerhouse Parramatta project on several
levels and request the whole project to be re-assessed.
I find it disgraceful that the Power House Museum at Ultimo will close
next week, when no final decision has been announced on the proposed
replacement building. We (the public) are being sent mixed messages as
to the final draft of the replacement building in Parramatta, and what
will or won’t be demolished to accommodate it. I understand that Willowgrove
and St Georges Terrace will be demolished in order to accommodate a new 'token' museum.
There has been no public consultation on this matter and I (one of
many), am furious that our heritage will be sacrificed to accommodate
the ill-thought-out proposal to move the iconic Powerhouse Museum from
its present site to a flood prone, inadequate piece of land.
I do not understand the logic and timing of the closure and removal of the
Powerhouse Museum from Ultimo to Parramatta. I can only see greed as
the driving force for this ridiculous project. When first proposed, we
were told the move would make the museum more accessible to the
people. How will moving this world standard museum to Parramatta, make
it more accessible to residents of Hornsby, Sutherland, Eastern
Suburbs and those in between? The result will be fewer visitors and
less revenue. The obscene expense and great risk of damage to these
iconic artefacts when moving, makes the whole project illogical. I understand
that a portal for the steam engine has not been allowed in
the proposed building. Did the architects look at the collect before
designing the building?
Why are exhibits closing now, when it will be years before the new
building will be ready to receive the artefacts? The museum has been
closed for months due to the virus, has just reopened to restricted
access and time limit, and the main exhibit is closing four days
before school holidays. Is there a plan to partial demolition of the building
is intended in order to ensure the project is irreversible – as was
done with the stadium? I would like an explanation as to why this
exhibit must close now, years before the artifacts will be required in
the new site, and what will happen to artefact on display in the
meantime. The timing of the decision is illogical and lacks explanation.
The Australian Museum is currently closed to prepare for a major new exhibit.
From next Tuesday, the main exhibit in the Powerhouse will also be
closed for no apparent good reason. Where does this leave schools
wanting to organise educational STEM excursions for their pupils?
The present museum site and building are perfect for a technical
museum. The building was born in the steam age as are so many of the
displayed items and it is within the precinct of the first Museum of
Applied Arts and Sciences. Why not leave it where it is, respect the
few remaining heritage items in Parramatta and develop a new
multipurpose museum/exhibit space on the Parramatta site.
Please use your influence to have this decision urgently reviewed.
Pamela Coleman
Object
Pamela Coleman
Message
These are significant historical buildings that reflect the early times of Parramatta. They provide an insight into life of the times, peoples way of life, how they were occupied and by whom they builds up an appreciation of a world before a technological society. Knowing our history helps to know where we have come from. They are gracious and stylish, contrasting with the dominance of high rise.
The proposed relocation will not give a true Museum. The location is flood prone and will require a huge cost to overcome this problem. The entire cost of the project and inability to display the working steam engine and other significant itemsis another objection to the proposal going ahead.