State Significant Development
Russell Vale Underground Expansion
Wollongong City
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Wollongong Coal Limited is seeking approval to extend mining operations by means of first workings mining techniques and upgrade of associated surface facilities at the Russell Vale Colliery in the Southern Coalfield.
Modifications
Archive
Application (4)
DGRs (1)
EA (9)
Submissions (3)
Agency Submissions (18)
Public Hearing (11)
Response to Submissions (3)
Amendments (3)
Additional Information (10)
Recommendation (11)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (45)
Reports (2)
Independent Reviews and Audits (2)
Other Documents (6)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
Official Caution issued to Wollongong Coal Limited (MP09_0013) Wollongong LGA
On 14 June 2022, the department issued an Official Caution to Wollongong Coal Limited (Wollongong Coal) for failing to submit the Social Impact Management Plan to the Planning Secretary for approval within 6 months of the date of commencement of the development. Wollongong Coal has advised that the Social Impact Management Plan will be imminently submitted , following consultation with key stakeholders. The department will continue to monitor compliance with conditions of consent.
Penalty Notice issued to Wollongong Resources Pty Ltd (MP09_0013) Wollongong City LGA
On 29 November 2024, NSW Planning issued a $15,000 Penalty Notice to Wollongong Resources Pty Ltd (Wollongong Resources) for failing to undertake surface and groundwater monitoring during 2023 and early 2024 at Russell Vale Colliery as required by the approved Water Management and Extraction Plans. Wollongong Resources have engaged a consultant to undertake monitoring and have implemented measures to ensure compliance with their management plans.
Inspections
22/02/2021
18/11/2021
28/04/2022
21/07/2022
9/09/2024
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
George Broadfoot
Object
George Broadfoot
Message
. The issue of subsidence under the Cordeaux Dam is really alarming.
Entomology studies in the catchment have identified definite drying of
wetland swamps, critical to fill the catchment and maintain a health
ecosystem.
Please stop all mining under the catchment as we look to a sustainable
future in this time of climate crisis.
Mark Melek
Object
Mark Melek
Message
serving this community I don't think it is appropriate to have a coal
processing facility in this proximity to dense residential housing.
Vimala Colless
Object
Vimala Colless
Message
- the uncertainty of the impact ie possib lke destabilization of a
third coal seam under 2 existing seams
- the possible leaching of toxins into nearby water catchment
- the management of future water overflow from the future empty mine
- the significant greenhouse emissions
- the coal will not be used in local steelmaking, it will all go
overseas
- Jindal has a track record of not paying its local rates or any
company tax from previous years
- Increased truck movements on local suburban roads
Ola Daszkowska
Object
Ola Daszkowska
Message
Underground Expansion Project:
I object to the Wollongong Coal's Revised Preferred Project Report
(PPR) to the Russell Vale Underground Expansion Project 09-0013.
Some of the reasons for my objection are listed below.
Climate change and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions
Coal mining, whether for energy or steelmaking, produces the GHG
Emissions that are causing dangerous climate change. This project is
estimated to result in 11,624,000 tonnes of GHG emissions through the
mining and the burning of the coal.
A risk to Greater Sydney Water Catchment
The mining will take place in the Special Areas of the Greater Sydney
Water Catchment - areas that forbid public access because of their
sensitivity and strategic importance - and up to the shores of the
Cataract Reservoir.
Not only will the mining infrastructure, such as access roads and vent
shafts, disturb and damage the catchment, the proposal for Bord and
Pillar mining will result in up to 100 mm in subsidence.
The extraction for the Wonga Central Development Mains extends under
the Cataract Reservoir itself. Cataract is severely affected by
drought and is currently at only 29% of capacity. Mining should not be
permitted anywhere near Great Sydney water supply reservoirs.
Triple seam mining
The mining is particularly risky because a third seam of coal is being
mined beneath two previously mined seams. Triple seam mining has
little precedent and impacts are difficult to predict.
The proponent admits that instability in the overlaying old Bulli seam
workings may cause pillar collapse and subsequent subsidence of 1 to 2
metres. It is unacceptable of the NSW government to allow such risky
mining in the water catchment for 5 million people of Greater Sydney
in a time of drought.
The proponent is not fit and proper to hold a mining licence
Wollongong Coal and its parent company Jindal Steel and Power Ltd, are
currently the subject of an investigation by the NSW government's
Resources Regulator into whether or not they are a `fit and proper'
entity to hold a mining license. The company has a history of failing
to comply with conditions of approval. Even its auditors have
questioned its capacity to continue as a going concern; its current
liabilities exceed its current assets by nearly A$1 billion.
Wollongong Coal is not a `fit and proper' entity to operate a coal
mine in the water catchment of Australia's largest city.
Impacts on local community
The colliery site at Russell Vale is closer to dense residential areas
than any mine in Australia. Residential communities have suffered the
impacts from this mine over many years, including noise and
particulate pollution. In this day and age, Russell Vale is not a
suitable location for a colliery.
Wollongong Coal plans to build a coal processing plant at the Russell
Vale Colliery and process coal on site. The Russell Vale mine is the
closest mine to any built up residential area in Australia and is not
a suitable area for coal processing. Moreover, the proponent has been
unable or unwilling to comply with many conditions of past approvals
and the NSW government has proven to be unable or unwilling to enforce
compliance. Residents have no confidence in "conditions" or
"commitments" to operate the processing plant according to suitable
standards.
The proponent has a history of non-compliance with approval conditions
Previous applications and approvals promised numerous items to protect
the community and environment that have never been met by the
proponent. These include but are not limited to: truck loading
facilities, sound walls, covered conveyors, limited stockpiles, sealed
roadways and realignment of Bellambi Creek. Now in this new revised
project, Wollongong Coal is promising the same or similar things.
Wollongong Coal is currently operating right at this moment under
three non-compliances: the realignment of Bellambi Creek to protect it
from pollution and flooding (due Oct 2012); the removal of 200,000
tonnes of oversize coal that was illegally stockpiled on the adjoining
slag heap (due July 2019); and, the dedication of land to Council in a
1989 approval from Wollongong City Council (due 1990). All of these
obligations still have not been met.
A proponent with such a poor record of compliance should not be
considered for, let alone granted, approval to mine. The NSW
Department of Planning's inability or unwillingness to enforce
compliance (with the conditions that it itself has stipulated)
undermines confidence in the planning system.
We ask that you reject this application from Wollongong Coal and
commence a process to close the mine at Russell Vale permanently.
Thank you for considering this submission.
Yours sincerely,
Tracey Hales
Object
Tracey Hales
Message
Coal mining, whether for energy or steelmaking, produces the GHG
Emissions that are causing dangerous climate change. This project is
estimated to result in 11,624,000 tonnes of GHG emissions through the
mining and the burning of the coal.The extraction for the Wonga
Central Development Mains extends under the Cataract Reservoir itself.
Cataract is severely affected by drought and is currently at only 29%
of capacity. Mining should not be permitted anywhere near Great Sydney
water supply reservoirs.
Wollongong Coal and its parent company Jindal Steel and Power Ltd, are
currently the subject of an investigation by the NSW government's
Resources Regulator into whether or not they are a `fit and proper'
entity to hold a mining license. The company has a history of failing
to comply with conditions of approval. Even its auditors have
questioned its capacity to continue as a going concern; its current
liabilities exceed its current assets by nearly A$1 billion.
Wollongong Coal is not a `fit and proper' entity to operate a coal
mine in the water catchment of Australia's largest city.
Mala Elith
Object
Mala Elith
Message
My name is Mala Elith. I am an Australia citizen that lives in NSW. I
am not only disapproving but I am distraught about the decision of
expanding Russell Vale's for the third time!! This would pollute our
water and leave devastating aftereffects on our beautiful country.
I am only 14 years old and I am living in a world where every day
there is a headline about a new coal mine being implemented or a
forest burning down. This causes concern in me. I'm not sad, I am
angry. I am angry for my little sister, for parents, for my friends
and quite frankly; for myself. I am angry at the selfish people who
aren't forward thinking. The people in power, that instead of maybe
solving the problem at its root; watch and wait as the problems grow
and grow and grow.
This is not just about an expansion of a dud mine. This is not just
about the destruction of biodiversity and pollution of water. This is
about the largescale effects this has on the world. Will this just be
another foolish act of humankind, or can this land be saved? I know
what I would choose. But it's not the 15-year-old's choice, isn't that
right? It's your choice.
I hope you read this and understand the mistake all of you are making.
Isabella Gould
Object
Isabella Gould
Message
to the Russell Vale Underground Expansion Project 09-0013.
Some of the reasons for my objection are listed below.
Climate change and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions
Coal mining, whether for energy or steelmaking, produces the GHG
Emissions that are causing dangerous climate change. This project is
estimated to result in 11,624,000 tonnes of GHG emissions through the
mining and the burning of the coal.
A risk to Greater Sydney Water Catchment
The mining will take place in the Special Areas of the Greater Sydney
Water Catchment - areas that forbid public access because of their
sensitivity and strategic importance - and up to the shores of the
Cataract Reservoir.
Not only will the mining infrastructure, such as access roads and vent
shafts, disturb and damage the catchment, the proposal for Bord and
Pillar mining will result in up to 100 mm in subsidence.
The extraction for the Wonga Central Development Mains extends under
the Cataract Reservoir itself. Cataract is severely affected by
drought and is currently at only 29% of capacity. Mining should not be
permitted anywhere near Great Sydney water supply reservoirs.
Triple seam mining
The mining is particularly risky because a third seam of coal is being
mined beneath two previously mined seams. Triple seam mining has
little precedent and impacts are difficult to predict.
The proponent admits that instability in the overlaying old Bulli seam
workings may cause pillar collapse and subsequent subsidence of 1 to 2
metres. It is unacceptable of the NSW government to allow such risky
mining in the water catchment for 5 million people of Greater Sydney
in a time of drought.
The proponent is not fit and proper to hold a mining licence
Wollongong Coal and its parent company Jindal Steel and Power Ltd, are
currently the subject of an investigation by the NSW government's
Resources Regulator into whether or not they are a `fit and proper'
entity to hold a mining license. The company has a history of failing
to comply with conditions of approval. Even its auditors have
questioned its capacity to continue as a going concern; its current
liabilities exceed its current assets by nearly A$1 billion.
Wollongong Coal is not a `fit and proper' entity to operate a coal
mine in the water catchment of Australia's largest city.
Impacts on local community
The colliery site at Russell Vale is closer to dense residential areas
than any mine in Australia. Residential communities have suffered the
impacts from this mine over many years, including noise and
particulate pollution. In this day and age, Russell Vale is not a
suitable location for a colliery.
Wollongong Coal plans to build a coal processing plant at the Russell
Vale Colliery and process coal on site. The Russell Vale mine is the
closest mine to any built up residential area in Australia and is not
a suitable area for coal processing. Moreover, the proponent has been
unable or unwilling to comply with many conditions of past approvals
and the NSW government has proven to be unable or unwilling to enforce
compliance. Residents have no confidence in "conditions" or
"commitments" to operate the processing plant according to suitable
standards.
The proponent has a history of non-compliance with approval conditions
Previous applications and approvals promised numerous items to protect
the community and environment that have never been met by the
proponent. These include but are not limited to: truck loading
facilities, sound walls, covered conveyors, limited stockpiles, sealed
roadways and realignment of Bellambi Creek. Now in this new revised
project, Wollongong Coal is promising the same or similar things.
Wollongong Coal is currently operating right at this moment under
three non-compliances: the realignment of Bellambi Creek to protect it
from pollution and flooding (due Oct 2012); the removal of 200,000
tonnes of oversize coal that was illegally stockpiled on the adjoining
slag heap (due July 2019); and, the dedication of land to Council in a
1989 approval from Wollongong City Council (due 1990). All of these
obligations still have not been met.
A proponent with such a poor record of compliance should not be
considered for, let alone granted, approval to mine. The NSW
Department of Planning's inability or unwillingness to enforce
compliance (with the conditions that it itself has stipulated)
undermines confidence in the planning system.
We ask that you reject this application from Wollongong Coal and
commence a process to close the mine at Russell Vale permanently.
Thank you for considering this submission.
Yours sincerely,
Isabella
Patricia Kahler
Object
Patricia Kahler
Message
principal to refuse this proposal. Mining in our water catchments
should never be allowed to take place especially when you consider the
damage already done with subsidence and water loss
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Underground Expansion Project:
I object to the Wollongong Coal's Revised Preferred Project Report
(PPR) to the Russell Vale Underground Expansion Project 09-0013.
Some of the reasons for my objection are listed below.
Climate change and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions
Coal mining, whether for energy or steelmaking, produces the GHG
Emissions that are causing dangerous climate change. This project is
estimated to result in 11,624,000 tonnes of GHG emissions through the
mining and the burning of the coal.
A risk to Greater Sydney Water Catchment
The mining will take place in the Special Areas of the Greater Sydney
Water Catchment - areas that forbid public access because of their
sensitivity and strategic importance - and up to the shores of the
Cataract Reservoir.
Not only will the mining infrastructure, such as access roads and vent
shafts, disturb and damage the catchment, the proposal for Bord and
Pillar mining will result in up to 100 mm in subsidence.
The extraction for the Wonga Central Development Mains extends under
the Cataract Reservoir itself. Cataract is severely affected by
drought and is currently at only 29% of capacity. Mining should not be
permitted anywhere near Great Sydney water supply reservoirs.
Triple seam mining
The mining is particularly risky because a third seam of coal is being
mined beneath two previously mined seams. Triple seam mining has
little precedent and impacts are difficult to predict.
The proponent admits that instability in the overlaying old Bulli seam
workings may cause pillar collapse and subsequent subsidence of 1 to 2
metres. It is unacceptable of the NSW government to allow such risky
mining in the water catchment for 5 million people of Greater Sydney
in a time of drought.
The proponent is not fit and proper to hold a mining licence
Wollongong Coal and its parent company Jindal Steel and Power Ltd, are
currently the subject of an investigation by the NSW government's
Resources Regulator into whether or not they are a `fit and proper'
entity to hold a mining license. The company has a history of failing
to comply with conditions of approval. Even its auditors have
questioned its capacity to continue as a going concern; its current
liabilities exceed its current assets by nearly A$1 billion.
Wollongong Coal is not a `fit and proper' entity to operate a coal
mine in the water catchment of Australia's largest city.
Impacts on local community
The colliery site at Russell Vale is closer to dense residential areas
than any mine in Australia. Residential communities have suffered the
impacts from this mine over many years, including noise and
particulate pollution. In this day and age, Russell Vale is not a
suitable location for a colliery.
Wollongong Coal plans to build a coal processing plant at the Russell
Vale Colliery and process coal on site. The Russell Vale mine is the
closest mine to any built up residential area in Australia and is not
a suitable area for coal processing. Moreover, the proponent has been
unable or unwilling to comply with many conditions of past approvals
and the NSW government has proven to be unable or unwilling to enforce
compliance. Residents have no confidence in "conditions" or
"commitments" to operate the processing plant according to suitable
standards.
The proponent has a history of non-compliance with approval conditions
Previous applications and approvals promised numerous items to protect
the community and environment that have never been met by the
proponent. These include but are not limited to: truck loading
facilities, sound walls, covered conveyors, limited stockpiles, sealed
roadways and realignment of Bellambi Creek. Now in this new revised
project, Wollongong Coal is promising the same or similar things.
Wollongong Coal is currently operating right at this moment under
three non-compliances: the realignment of Bellambi Creek to protect it
from pollution and flooding (due Oct 2012); the removal of 200,000
tonnes of oversize coal that was illegally stockpiled on the adjoining
slag heap (due July 2019); and, the dedication of land to Council in a
1989 approval from Wollongong City Council (due 1990). All of these
obligations still have not been met.
A proponent with such a poor record of compliance should not be
considered for, let alone granted, approval to mine. The NSW
Department of Planning's inability or unwillingness to enforce
compliance (with the conditions that it itself has stipulated)
undermines confidence in the planning system.
We ask that you reject this application from Wollongong Coal and
commence a process to close the mine at Russell Vale permanently.
Thank you for considering this submission.
Yours sincerely,
Alison Smith
Object
Alison Smith
Message
Underground Expansion Project:
I object to the Wollongong Coal's Revised Preferred Project Report
(PPR) to the Russell Vale Underground Expansion Project 09-0013.
Wollongong Coal has a history of non-compliance with conditions of
approval, are currently the subject of an investigation by the NSW
government's Resources Regulator into whether or not they are a `fit
and proper' entity to hold a mining license, and its current
liabilities exceed its current assets by nearly A$1 billion.
We are currently in drought, and dams across New South Wales are at
low capacity. Our water catchment areas should be protected from
mining, especially the kind of mining proposed by Wollongong Coal.
At a time of climate crisis, there can be no justification for
approving further coal mining. We do not need new coal, it will add
nothing to our wellbeing, and it will by contrast do considerable
damage at a time when people all over the world are coming together to
act on the climate crisis.
John Spira
Object
John Spira
Message
* This coal is not used in local steel making.
* They have owed Wollongong Council (us rate payers) $400'000 for
years!!
* Paid no company income tax for many many years.
* Fair trading ruled against them for underpaying workers.
* ASIC has asked them prove economic viability. They are currently
still under three major non-compliances and suspended on the ASX
(WLC).
* Total CO2e emissions for the project, from mining up to and
including usage are approx. 11,147,000 tonnes co2. Equivalent to the
annual emissions of more than half a million Australians.
* Truck movements to the port and back using, Bellambi Lane are
estimated to be 32 per hour, or one truck every 112 seconds Mon->Sat.
Does not count trucks transporting waste.
* Water loss from our catchment is expected to blow out to 444 mega
litres a year from this coal mine. Currently the Sydney desalination
plant costs us $90/y per Illawarra household water bill.
* Mines leach higher than safe concentrations of toxins into ground
water for hundreds of years after they close and flood. This plan
requires them to maintain water quality measures for just 10 years!
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
which would
benefit the community and local businesses whilst sustaining a number
of employment opportunities.
Joanne Sheil
Support
Joanne Sheil
Message
which would
benefit the community and local businesses whilst sustaining a number
of employment opportunities.
cate doosey
Object
cate doosey
Message
and the water catchment.
Raylee Golding
Object
Raylee Golding
Message
Underground Expansion Project:
I object to the Wollongong Coal's Revised Preferred Project Report
(PPR) to the Russell Vale Underground Expansion Project 09-0013.
Some of the reasons for my objection are listed below.
Climate change and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions
Coal mining, whether for energy or steelmaking, produces the GHG
Emissions that are causing dangerous climate change. This project is
estimated to result in 11,624,000 tonnes of GHG emissions through the
mining and the burning of the coal.
A risk to Greater Sydney Water Catchment
The mining will take place in the Special Areas of the Greater Sydney
Water Catchment - areas that forbid public access because of their
sensitivity and strategic importance - and up to the shores of the
Cataract Reservoir.
Not only will the mining infrastructure, such as access roads and vent
shafts, disturb and damage the catchment, the proposal for Bord and
Pillar mining will result in up to 100 mm in subsidence.
The extraction for the Wonga Central Development Mains extends under
the Cataract Reservoir itself. Cataract is severely affected by
drought and is currently at only 29% of capacity. Mining should not be
permitted anywhere near Great Sydney water supply reservoirs.
Triple seam mining
The mining is particularly risky because a third seam of coal is being
mined beneath two previously mined seams. Triple seam mining has
little precedent and impacts are difficult to predict.
The proponent admits that instability in the overlaying old Bulli seam
workings may cause pillar collapse and subsequent subsidence of 1 to 2
metres. It is unacceptable of the NSW government to allow such risky
mining in the water catchment for 5 million people of Greater Sydney
in a time of drought.
The proponent is not fit and proper to hold a mining licence
Wollongong Coal and its parent company Jindal Steel and Power Ltd, are
currently the subject of an investigation by the NSW government's
Resources Regulator into whether or not they are a `fit and proper'
entity to hold a mining license. The company has a history of failing
to comply with conditions of approval. Even its auditors have
questioned its capacity to continue as a going concern; its current
liabilities exceed its current assets by nearly A$1 billion.
Wollongong Coal is not a `fit and proper' entity to operate a coal
mine in the water catchment of Australia's largest city.
Impacts on local community
The colliery site at Russell Vale is closer to dense residential areas
than any mine in Australia. Residential communities have suffered the
impacts from this mine over many years, including noise and
particulate pollution. In this day and age, Russell Vale is not a
suitable location for a colliery.
Wollongong Coal plans to build a coal processing plant at the Russell
Vale Colliery and process coal on site. The Russell Vale mine is the
closest mine to any built up residential area in Australia and is not
a suitable area for coal processing. Moreover, the proponent has been
unable or unwilling to comply with many conditions of past approvals
and the NSW government has proven to be unable or unwilling to enforce
compliance. Residents have no confidence in "conditions" or
"commitments" to operate the processing plant according to suitable
standards.
The proponent has a history of non-compliance with approval conditions
Previous applications and approvals promised numerous items to protect
the community and environment that have never been met by the
proponent. These include but are not limited to: truck loading
facilities, sound walls, covered conveyors, limited stockpiles, sealed
roadways and realignment of Bellambi Creek. Now in this new revised
project, Wollongong Coal is promising the same or similar things.
Wollongong Coal is currently operating right at this moment under
three non-compliances: the realignment of Bellambi Creek to protect it
from pollution and flooding (due Oct 2012); the removal of 200,000
tonnes of oversize coal that was illegally stockpiled on the adjoining
slag heap (due July 2019); and, the dedication of land to Council in a
1989 approval from Wollongong City Council (due 1990). All of these
obligations still have not been met.
A proponent with such a poor record of compliance should not be
considered for, let alone granted, approval to mine. The NSW
Department of Planning's inability or unwillingness to enforce
compliance (with the conditions that it itself has stipulated)
undermines confidence in the planning system.
We ask that you reject this application from Wollongong Coal and
commence a process to close the mine at Russell Vale permanently.
Thank you for considering this submission.
Yours sincerely,
Raylee Golding
Raylee Golding
Object
Raylee Golding
Message
Underground Expansion Project:
I object to the Wollongong Coal's Revised Preferred Project Report
(PPR) to the Russell Vale Underground Expansion Project 09-0013.
Some of the reasons for my objection are listed below.
Climate change and Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions
Coal mining, whether for energy or steelmaking, produces the GHG
Emissions that are causing dangerous climate change. This project is
estimated to result in 11,624,000 tonnes of GHG emissions through the
mining and the burning of the coal.
A risk to Greater Sydney Water Catchment
The mining will take place in the Special Areas of the Greater Sydney
Water Catchment - areas that forbid public access because of their
sensitivity and strategic importance - and up to the shores of the
Cataract Reservoir.
Not only will the mining infrastructure, such as access roads and vent
shafts, disturb and damage the catchment, the proposal for Bord and
Pillar mining will result in up to 100 mm in subsidence.
The extraction for the Wonga Central Development Mains extends under
the Cataract Reservoir itself. Cataract is severely affected by
drought and is currently at only 29% of capacity. Mining should not be
permitted anywhere near Great Sydney water supply reservoirs.
Triple seam mining
The mining is particularly risky because a third seam of coal is being
mined beneath two previously mined seams. Triple seam mining has
little precedent and impacts are difficult to predict.
The proponent admits that instability in the overlaying old Bulli seam
workings may cause pillar collapse and subsequent subsidence of 1 to 2
metres. It is unacceptable of the NSW government to allow such risky
mining in the water catchment for 5 million people of Greater Sydney
in a time of drought.
The proponent is not fit and proper to hold a mining licence
Wollongong Coal and its parent company Jindal Steel and Power Ltd, are
currently the subject of an investigation by the NSW government's
Resources Regulator into whether or not they are a `fit and proper'
entity to hold a mining license. The company has a history of failing
to comply with conditions of approval. Even its auditors have
questioned its capacity to continue as a going concern; its current
liabilities exceed its current assets by nearly A$1 billion.
Wollongong Coal is not a `fit and proper' entity to operate a coal
mine in the water catchment of Australia's largest city.
Impacts on local community
The colliery site at Russell Vale is closer to dense residential areas
than any mine in Australia. Residential communities have suffered the
impacts from this mine over many years, including noise and
particulate pollution. In this day and age, Russell Vale is not a
suitable location for a colliery.
Wollongong Coal plans to build a coal processing plant at the Russell
Vale Colliery and process coal on site. The Russell Vale mine is the
closest mine to any built up residential area in Australia and is not
a suitable area for coal processing. Moreover, the proponent has been
unable or unwilling to comply with many conditions of past approvals
and the NSW government has proven to be unable or unwilling to enforce
compliance. Residents have no confidence in "conditions" or
"commitments" to operate the processing plant according to suitable
standards.
The proponent has a history of non-compliance with approval conditions
Previous applications and approvals promised numerous items to protect
the community and environment that have never been met by the
proponent. These include but are not limited to: truck loading
facilities, sound walls, covered conveyors, limited stockpiles, sealed
roadways and realignment of Bellambi Creek. Now in this new revised
project, Wollongong Coal is promising the same or similar things.
Wollongong Coal is currently operating right at this moment under
three non-compliances: the realignment of Bellambi Creek to protect it
from pollution and flooding (due Oct 2012); the removal of 200,000
tonnes of oversize coal that was illegally stockpiled on the adjoining
slag heap (due July 2019); and, the dedication of land to Council in a
1989 approval from Wollongong City Council (due 1990). All of these
obligations still have not been met.
A proponent with such a poor record of compliance should not be
considered for, let alone granted, approval to mine. The NSW
Department of Planning's inability or unwillingness to enforce
compliance (with the conditions that it itself has stipulated)
undermines confidence in the planning system.
We ask that you reject this application from Wollongong Coal and
commence a process to close the mine at Russell Vale permanently.
Thank you for considering this submission.
Yours sincerely,
Raylee Golding
Peter Lamb
Object
Peter Lamb
Message
Russell Vale Underground Expansion Project 09-0013.
Reasons for my objection are listed below,
1. Risk to Sydney Water Catchments.
The mining will take place under Special Areas where public access is
prohibited because of their vital importance in protecting our
drinking water supplies.
This proposed mining intends mining a third coal seam underneath
previously mined seams.
This mining will undoubtedly cause some subsidence and with the added
risk from extra stress on previously mined areas could lead to pillar
collapse of in overlying areas with very significant subsidence.
The dams are already experiencing significant water loss due to
subsidence damage.
2.Triple seam mining
This is of particular risk because a third seam is to be mined below
seams already mined above. This proposal adds additional risk to those
already stated.
3. Proposed processing plant at Russell Vale Colliery site.
Processing coal on site close to a residential area, will lead to dust
and other pollution.in addition to that already experienced by
residents.
4. Green House Gases
Green House Gas emissions from mining the coal will be substantial and
will further contribute to global warming. I believe that this issue
must be given close scrutiny for every project.
5.Proponent unsuitable to hold mining licence.
Wollongong Coal and its parent company Jindal Steel and Power Ltd are
currently the subject of an investigation by the NSW Government
Resources Regulator. They have a track record of failing to comply
with conditions of approval. They also have a questionable financial
capacity.
I ask that you reject this application.
Yours sincerely
Peter Lamb
Anil Kumar Jain
Support
Anil Kumar Jain
Message
national economy and well being for the community and society.
Company has been generating employment in the vicinity which will
increase on start of the mine and contribute to the well being of the
society.
Company will contribute to the government by paying Royalty, taxes and
also in earning foreign exchange for the nation as the entire
production will be exported .
Current shareholders have made huge investment in the company and now
it is time that company starts production and earn profit.
Rudhresh Menon
Support
Rudhresh Menon
Message
minimises subsidence to very low levels with minimal impacts to
groundwater and the catchment area. The continued operation of the
Russell Vale Colliery will provide ongoing economic contribution for
the Illawarra and community. This will also secure employment for the
proposed workforce of 205 employees and will provide an additional 22
jobs during the construction phase of the project.
Brian Almeida
Support
Brian Almeida
Message
Government. Please approve the project.