Trinity Point Mixed Use Development

I would like to object to the above proposal at Trinity Point. Firstly, the infrastructure and roads in the area are not coping already with the additional traffic that we are experiencing from additional population and recent developments. There is only one road through to Bonnells Bay where I live and only one road used to access Trinity Point and that is Fishery Point Road. It is already congested and will become much worse once something of this size and magnitude is built. There is only one small bridge that we drive across from Morisset and this is currently the only way we can access these areas when you are driving from Morisset. As a result, Morisset currently "bottlenecks" on the main road and it is extremely difficult to get through esp at peak times or when there is an accident or a breakdown of any sort. I would like Lake Macquarie council to build a bypass from Morisset that travels directly to Trinity Point or Bonnells Bay or some double lane roads through here FIRST BEFORE ANY MORE DEVELOPMENTS are built in the area at all and especially this development. Once Lake Mac Council provides the correct infrastructure, then I would be more than happy to have this development and others go ahead.
Secondly, building something of this size, does destroy the peacefulness and tranquilty of the area and alot of this will be ruined with this development. Why not build in the old Morisset hospital area instead? But only if infrastructure is provided.

1. We are very concerned about the impact on local traffic, in particular Fishery Point Road. We have read the TFNSW comments, and disagree with their conclusions.In fact TFNSW seem to dismiss the community concern about impact on traffic. In particular, Fishery Point road is already busy at certain times of the day and poorly maintained. This would need much closer attention than has been given.
2. Environmental Issues on completion: impacts of lighting, shadowing and noise on existing residences and on wildlife. This appears to have not been adequately considered.
3. Environmental issues during construction: We are concerned about the potential amount of rubbish, spillage and run-off into Lake Macquarie during construction. We have been resident on the foreshore for 7 years and were very disappointed with the lack of controls on construction material and dirt run-off into the Lake during the initial site development.
4. 'Un-named Bay' is a prolific fishery breeding ground for many species. We have not read any assessment by Govt fishery experts on the impact that this proposal has on Lake Macquarie fisheries, in particular the vulnerable 'Un-Named' Bay.
5. We have not been able to track down a map or a concept description of the proposed Trinity Point Drive consolidated community Space in Lots 49, 81 and 85. That would be most beneficial for us

Lake Macquarie City Council only allow maximum building height of 16 metres and this proposal is 42 metres. After the modification of this concept on six occasions and it is now time to listen to all the residents who will be affected by this current change. The concept proposal is completely out of sinc with this area and a constant moving feast with the changes regularly being approved .NSW Govt Major Projects Dept need to listen to those who will be greatly affected by this further change. Trinity Point is enjoyed by many people and is an asset as is, but further changes to height and increased residents/tourists is just an impost on the residents and those who use the area currently. There are a number of safety concerns accessing the area such as one road in and one road out of this area which goes past Bonnells Bay Public School.

Postal submissions attached

Postal submission attached

Postal submission attached

Firstly the developer has cynically used the busiest time of the year to make this application, knowing it will restrict the number of negative responses to this proposal. It would be a pity if the true response of the residents in the district was thwarted by such a move. The public response time needs to be extended another month to allow people time to consider the proposal.
The developer has divided the subject land into area 1 consisting of the hotel development and area 2 consisting of residential apartments. My objection refers to the location and size of buildings in area 2
The buildings are excessive in size for the location. The height exceeds the current council height restrictions of 12m at the waterfront side to 16m at rear (close to the road) The proposal is for buildings to 42m on the whole site.
The LEP states there must be visible connection between the public road, including buildings on the opposite of the road, and the lake. This will not be possible because of the height of the buildings and the curved nature of the buildings which allow them to overlap each other. The only place where any visibility is possible is between buildings C and D and between E and F. However as the buildings are planned to run across the site, the depth of the buildings will prevent all but the tiniest window of view and air movement from behind.
The alignment across the site means half the apartments will be facing away from the lake and focused on the houses and backyards of all nearby residences. This is not acceptable in a low rise residential area.
The 4 buildings on this site are designated as apartments. Apartments in Tourist zonings are frequently bought by investors for time share or B&B use. A 3 bedroom B&B rental could house up 7 or more holidayers. Such a large number of apartments could bring a transient population of over 1000 people in the busy times. This is not appropriate across the road from the residential housing.
All access to the 4 residential buildings and 2 hotel buildings will be through 1 small roundabout at the North end of Trinity Point Drive. The road from that roundabout to the main access road, Morisset Park Rd is not suitable for such heavy traffic as it goes through narrow suburban streets where kids ride bikes and people walk dogs. While there is a second access at the southern end of Trinity Point Drive, the developer has funnelled all vehicular access away from this route.

I object to the planning proposal and SSD on the following:
1. Height of building - Ref LEP 7.6.3b. Given the building is against the backdrop of 30-35m high hills with only a very small part to 40m, the proposal to increase the height from the original 12-15m to a maximum of 42m would make the buildings stand out , being highly visible. The claim of this being the basis of "architectural merit" is rubbish, simply because the form adopted is not a classic rectilinear box as any development that towers over the landscape in such an imposing manner, so highly visible from many places totally fails to achieve said Architectural Merit.
2. Light pollution & Environmental Impact - REF LEP 7.6.3.c.ii. Nightime impact of the light pollution will be dramatic, significantly affecting the environment. I note there is no reference to any study undertaken. The is critical in the acceleration of a decline in fish activity in recent years.
3. Sustainability (Solar Panels). Solar panels need to be aligned North, at approx 33 deg inclination for maximum efficiency but given the proposed curved roof form, this is impossible. Visual effect of large numbers of linear panels sticking out above the roof would destroy the building form and simply wrapping the panels onto the curved roofs aligned as proposed would negate the efficiency. i.e. the suggestion that the building form and orientation can adopt solar panels for efficiency is significantly flawed. There is zero clarification of the achievable performance to be developed and no chance anything could be economically and aesthetically included.
4. Development viability - Claims of a lack of viability are unproven. Zero evidence is presented as to why they require such a significant and totally dominating increase. The developer makes zero commitment to maintain any aesthetically based form and actually makes the statement that the submission os "loose fit" that may be modified through design. Conflicts LEP 7.16.2.a, b, c, e, 7.16.3.a, c, d, e, g. The areas natural beauty should not be allowed too be spoilt by developer greed asking for such dramatic increases in development areas and heights.
5. Further issues of concern are based on the fact that ANY increase in development approvals for extra tourist accomodation, in the form of hotel and/or serviced apartment are likely to generate increased demand for helicopter tours and similar, creating a dramatic increase in the noise pollution that will occur from these joy flights and potentially even commuting traffic. Effects on recreational uses for the lake and surrounding areas has not been addressed and appears to conflict with LEP 7.6.3.d and e.

I strongly object to this SDD on the following grounds:
1. Height of buildings
2. Light pollution
3. Sustainability - relating to solar panels and water, and
4. Lack of developer commitment.
As detailed in the attached document

See my attached submission.

Yes

see attached re Trinity Point development

I am fully supportive of the proposed due to the rduction of buildings to only 6, improvement of all ability access to the lake and foreshore.
8@ Trinity is a huge success and the popularity proves the potential of a high quality venue. I am excited about the boost to the local economy through job growth and no doubt the local businesses will be supported and thrive.
With the closure of the power station local employment, during construction and then staff for the hotel, restaurant and leisure activities will benefit the community substantially.
My family and friends would like to be able to stay in the area and the extra accommodation will allow them to stay longer than a day trip.
The open space and revitalizing the sea bath would allow for activities that everyone can enjoy.

I write in support of the planning proposal for Trinity Point at Morisset Park. The existing marina and restaurant has demonstrated the need for such facilities in the Lake Macquarie area that locals and visitors are utilising very well. These facilities need to be further supported by on site accommodation - with a balance of tourist and residential options. The revised concept design is a more aesthetically pleasing design within the local landscape, and will deliver a world class facility to the local region.

I wish to lodge my objection to the recent Planning Proposal for Trinity point for the following reasons:
- The development is completely out of character with the area which is a residential precinct.
- The proposal to amend planning controls is not in keeping with Lake Macquarie lifestyle, this not the Gold Coast or Sydney.
- The additional height is unacceptable and just a grab by the developer to build more apartments.
- The sheer mass of the buildings was never imagined for the peninsular and would be a complete eye sore.
- There is no harmony between the design and the background of the Watagans, no amount of architect speak can justify grass clad concrete edifices as being a solution.
- The volume of traffic that the development envisages will overwhelm the only access being Fishery Point road and create a dangerous and unacceptable hazard to students/parents of Bonnells Bay Primary along with the residents who live on the peninsular.
- Helicopter traffic will shatter the concept of quiet Lake side living which has been clearly admitted by the developer.
- The environmental impact to the local wildlife and marine life is unacceptable.
- The ongoing planning amendments by this developer is appalling with no respect for locals or the environment.

It would be great for the local community

I support this project because it will provide a much needed boost to tourism and recreation to the area. The project will create 100's of jobs in the construction and ongoing operation. The proposal is of a very high quality which will boost the value of the local and surrounding areas.
The proposal also shows a good consideration for the local community with respect to views, public access and environmental impacts.

I would like to show support for the project as it will continue the growth of the south western side of Lake Macquarie. It will bring new jobs to the area and will provide a world class facility that will attract people to the area so the greater area as a whole will benefit.

I support the development. It is a great initiative for the area, it will enhance the area and will be a great improvement to what is currently available.

I think the project is a fantastic opportunity to further develop and bring life to the growing area, creating hundreds of meaningful jobs in the local area.