State Significant Development
Warkworth Coal Mine Continuation
Singleton Shire
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Consolidated Consent
Modifications
Archive
Application (1)
Request for SEARs (1)
SEARS (1)
EIS (18)
Agency Submissions (10)
Public Hearing (6)
Response to Submissions (2)
Assessment (11)
Recommendation (10)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (52)
Agreements (2)
Reports (31)
Independent Reviews and Audits (3)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
On 22 June 2023, NSW Planning issued an Official Caution to Warkworth Mining Ltd (WML) for exceeded noise impact assessment criteria at three noise monitoring locations for the Warkworth Continuation Project on 20 July 2022. WML had failed to implement their approved Noise Management Plan on the night of 20 July 2022 in the lead up to the exceedances. WML have since implemented measures to ensure compliance with their management plan and NSW Planningcontinues to monitor WML's noise reporting data and implementation of the NMP.
Inspections
14/12/2021
18/08/2022
27/09/2022
22/11/2022
27/04/2023
18/05/2023
26/10/2023
22/02/2024
2/09/2024
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Leslie Crosby
Support
Leslie Crosby
Message
Matthew Dodd
Support
Matthew Dodd
Message
Troy Rowsell
Support
Troy Rowsell
Message
Brett Pike
Support
Brett Pike
Message
Wayne Hughes
Support
Wayne Hughes
Message
Angus Dent
Support
Angus Dent
Message
Kane Watkins
Support
Kane Watkins
Message
Stop Coal Seam Gas Blue Mountains
Object
Stop Coal Seam Gas Blue Mountains
Message
The NSW Land and Environment Court ruled in April 2013 that expanding the Warkworth coal mine would do the NSW public more harm than good. Judge Preston found that the information used by Rio Tinto and NSW Planning in support of the project was wrong, and he overturned the approval.
When Rio Tinto and the NSW Government appealed that decision to the NSW Supreme Court (Court of Appeal), they lost. Two superior NSW courts have now ruled that Rio's plan to expand the Warkworth coal mine fails on merit.
The Bulga people and their many supporters justly assumed that this would be the end of the project. Instead, Rio Tinto have simply resubmitted their mining application. It has been split in two, and the name updated, but these two projects (SSD 6464 and SSD 6465) are effectively the same project that has been rejected by two NSW courts (MP 09_0202).
That the Planning Department has even accepted Rio Tinto's application is a failure of procedural fairness, and makes a farce of the very process you are now asking us, the public, to participate in. We are being asked to make submissions on a project that has already been through this very same assessment process and failed - only to be resubmitted. We are being asked to submit to a process overseen by a Department that is clearly working closely with the proponent to get the project approved, and which got the decision wrong the first time around. There can be no faith in this process.
The Department must respect the decisions of the NSW Land and Environment Court, and the NSW Supreme Court (Court of Appeal), and reject these applications.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
Sincerely,
Janis O'Leary
for Stop Coal Seam Gas Blue Mountains
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Andrew Paine
Support
Andrew Paine
Message
My concerns would be if this extension at Warkworth is not granted, the effects on employment and economy of the area.
Ryan Wright
Support
Ryan Wright
Message
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
I have been living in Singleton for the last 5 years and find Singleton a wonderful place to live. I have lived in some of Australia's largest cities and some of its smallest mining towns. All have some benefits and all some drawbacks. Brisbane was a lovely city to live in but the traffic & queues can become exhausting. Not to mention the constant noise from the roads & airport. On the other hand the smallest towns in Western Australia whilst quiet can be a little short on services, especially schooling. I share these experiences because Singleton represents a lovely balance between the two extremes and I live with a couple of coal mines only a few km's from my home.
The impact of the mines and the coal railing in the area is minimal when I consider the lifestyle we have. Good access to services, close to the coast and career opportunities most other city or country areas would die for! When considering the benefit the combined coal mining industry brings to the Hunter Valley & Newcastle region I can't imagine why we wouldn't support it. My home was noisier in Brisbane even though I lived on a quiet cul-de-sac, not to mention travel everyday was a nightmare. Singleton is a good place to live.
My children are both in school here, one at Singleton Public School (Hunter Street) and the other at Singleton High School. I don't take these for granted because there are a lot of country areas in Australia where education services struggle (low school rolls and lack of resources). The economic benefits of this region give our children a chance a lot of other country areas don't get.
The community benefits are also obvious to me. The grants given out in this area by mining company's means we have excellent facilities. From pools to sports grounds that a lot of other communities would struggle to fund.
I have lived & worked all around Australia and have seen some wonderful sites and consider myself lucky to be working & living in Singleton. Coal mining is an enormous benefit to the region and the impact not as great as some would say when you consider the choices & options it gives us.
I guess I have one final point in support of the Mount Thorley Warkworth extension. I have seen some good friends struggle with mine closures in the region over the last year. I also remember seeing the trauma the car industry workers were going through in Victoria and South Australia as the car industry was brought to its knees. Bail-out packages costing the country a small fortune were all designed to keep people employed and maintain those families & communities. The loss of an operation the size of Mount Thorley Warkworth and the devastation on all of the employees & their families will be enormous. Why would we bring that kind of damage to our friends & neighbours from a business & industry that does so much to support us?
Mount Thorley Warkworth represents tremendous value to this community and the mine extension should be supported.
Sincerely
Darryl Messenger
Lee Cooper
Support
Lee Cooper
Message
If it doesn't, and further cut backs are experienced, the hunter valley will cease to exist as we know it.
Thousands of people directly and indirectly will be adversely affected.
The local communities will directly suffer, as the jobs are lost and people move away. Taking their support for local business's and vital infrastructure with them.
Our children's future and opportunities as well as quality of life will also be diminished.
Lost revenue for the government and commonwealth will also be experienced if the expansion doesn't go ahead.
I believe the RTCA environmental management practices can reduce and manage the impact on the areas surrounding the proposed expansion area to a better than acceptable level as well.
I am a father myself, recently relocating to singleton to gain experience within the mining industry, taking a lot of pride in working for RTCA and grateful to be able to currently open future opportunities and increase the quality of life for my family.
We have already lost Holden, Ford and Toyota recently.
Mining is the backbone of Australias industry.
Now more than ever we need it to continue to grow if our country is to progress forward in a forever changing and competitive financial environment.
Morgan Creagh
Support
Morgan Creagh
Message
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
lincoln shade
Support
lincoln shade
Message
coal & allied (or previous owners) have had the mineral rights here for decades, and they own all the land.
they are not pushing they're way into new area's, or going to green field sites, Coal & Allied own all the land.
i cant see any reason not to continue,
Mark Briggs
Support
Mark Briggs
Message
Please approve this application for the future of so many families
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
I am most concerned that a legal process was followed by those objecting to this mine project, but this appears not to be respected by the other parties. I think this issue goes to the heart of proper accountability in public policy making in NSW.
The NSW Land and Environment Court ruled in April 2013 that expanding the Warkworth coal mine would do the NSW public more harm than good. Judge Preston found that the information used by Rio Tinto and NSW Planning in support of the project was wrong, and he overturned the approval.
When Rio Tinto and the NSW Government appealed that decision to the NSW Supreme Court (Court of Appeal), they lost. Two superior NSW courts have now ruled that Rio's plan to expand the Warkworth coal mine fails on merit.
The Bulga people and their many supporters justly assumed that this would be the end of the project. Instead, Rio Tinto have simply resubmitted their mining application. It has been split in two, and the name updated, but these two projects (SSD 6464 and SSD 6465) are effectively the same project that has been rejected by two NSW courts (MP 09_0202).
That the Planning Department has even accepted Rio Tinto's application is a failure of procedural fairness, and makes a farce of the very process you are now asking us, the public, to participate in. We are being asked to make submissions on a project that has already been through this very same assessment process and failed - only to be resubmitted. We are being asked to submit to a process overseen by a Department that is clearly working closely with the proponent to get the project approved, and which got the decision wrong the first time around. There can be no faith in this process.
The Department must respect the decisions of the NSW Land and Environment Court, and the NSW Supreme Court (Court of Appeal), and reject these applications.