State Significant Development
Determination
60-78 Regent Street Redevelopment
City of Sydney
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Archive
Request for DGRS (3)
Application (1)
DGRs (5)
EIS (31)
Submissions (12)
Response to Submissions (20)
Recommendation (3)
Determination (2)
Approved Documents
There are no post approval documents available
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
28/09/2022
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Showing 101 - 106 of 106 submissions
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
REDFERN
,
New South Wales
Message
I strongly object to the proposed Regent st development.
There is a range of issues that have not been considered and it is distressing the way this is being pushed through at a state level with no community consultation.
The main objections with this development are:
The proximity to 157 Redfern st, and 7-9 Gibbons st. The new development will be well within the minimum separation distances allowed from inhabited space. Worsening this will be the design which includes 50 + windows directly facing residents living rooms and bed rooms, with desks positioned facing out. So students would spend the majority of time directly looking out their windows into the private homes of existing residents.
Continuing with this point the new building will have major privacy and solar issues affecting the surrounding buildings (157 Redfern st and 7-9 Gibbons st). Sunlight will be all but cut off for all units 17 stories or below - having actually experienced living on the east side of 157 Redfern st, I find the proposals included solar maps completely understated and misleading.
No adequate wind tunnel tests were carried out by the DA. Wind on Redfern st is already a massive issue, and southerly's that already batter the two existing developments will render the balconies un-useable once funnelled further by this new development
The new building will have to be placed directly on Regent st. Violating the 2 story set back, outlined by the Redfern-Waterloo master plan destroying the street frontage.
There was next to no community consultation prior to this DA, after an apparent 300 post card letter drop only 8 residents attended. As i'm sure will be demonstrated by the vast number of objections this development will receive, there are plenty of motivated residents who were not informed - This raises many questions about the closed door nature of this development. It is clear as they have not purchased all properties along the proposed development that they themselves are aware of the dubious nature of their application
This development will significantly destroy existing views of Redfern and the heritage listed post office clock tower. I have attached photos demonstrating the dramatic effect this will have. As you can imagine liveability and house value will be severely impacted.
The access lane to 157 Redfern st carpark is a small one way road off Marion st. The new development has inadequate loading dock facilities to allow students to move in and out (that will occur frequently due to the nature of student housing) which will undoubtedly lead to the lane becoming blocked and a danger to pedestrians. More so a walk way will be created through to that back lane encouraging an increase of foot traffic around an already busy lane way, majorly impacting access to Redfern Club parking and resident parking.
Redfern has no need for this style of over priced student housing. This caters for one type of student only as not many actual students could afford $350++ per week to share a 6 bedroom apartment. This will introduce a host of transient people to the area ruining the family nature and culturally historic aspects.
I expect to provide a more extensive objection put together by a town planer that will clarify the above issues.
There is a range of issues that have not been considered and it is distressing the way this is being pushed through at a state level with no community consultation.
The main objections with this development are:
The proximity to 157 Redfern st, and 7-9 Gibbons st. The new development will be well within the minimum separation distances allowed from inhabited space. Worsening this will be the design which includes 50 + windows directly facing residents living rooms and bed rooms, with desks positioned facing out. So students would spend the majority of time directly looking out their windows into the private homes of existing residents.
Continuing with this point the new building will have major privacy and solar issues affecting the surrounding buildings (157 Redfern st and 7-9 Gibbons st). Sunlight will be all but cut off for all units 17 stories or below - having actually experienced living on the east side of 157 Redfern st, I find the proposals included solar maps completely understated and misleading.
No adequate wind tunnel tests were carried out by the DA. Wind on Redfern st is already a massive issue, and southerly's that already batter the two existing developments will render the balconies un-useable once funnelled further by this new development
The new building will have to be placed directly on Regent st. Violating the 2 story set back, outlined by the Redfern-Waterloo master plan destroying the street frontage.
There was next to no community consultation prior to this DA, after an apparent 300 post card letter drop only 8 residents attended. As i'm sure will be demonstrated by the vast number of objections this development will receive, there are plenty of motivated residents who were not informed - This raises many questions about the closed door nature of this development. It is clear as they have not purchased all properties along the proposed development that they themselves are aware of the dubious nature of their application
This development will significantly destroy existing views of Redfern and the heritage listed post office clock tower. I have attached photos demonstrating the dramatic effect this will have. As you can imagine liveability and house value will be severely impacted.
The access lane to 157 Redfern st carpark is a small one way road off Marion st. The new development has inadequate loading dock facilities to allow students to move in and out (that will occur frequently due to the nature of student housing) which will undoubtedly lead to the lane becoming blocked and a danger to pedestrians. More so a walk way will be created through to that back lane encouraging an increase of foot traffic around an already busy lane way, majorly impacting access to Redfern Club parking and resident parking.
Redfern has no need for this style of over priced student housing. This caters for one type of student only as not many actual students could afford $350++ per week to share a 6 bedroom apartment. This will introduce a host of transient people to the area ruining the family nature and culturally historic aspects.
I expect to provide a more extensive objection put together by a town planer that will clarify the above issues.
Attachments
LPDS
Object
LPDS
Object
Redfern
,
New South Wales
Message
Detailed submission attached on behalf of the owners of Unit 506 at 157 Redfern St, Redfern - the building located to the site's west
Attachments
Timothy Laurence
Object
Timothy Laurence
Object
Darlington
,
New South Wales
Message
I object to the devlopment, my objection is detailed in my written submission
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Redfern NSW
,
New South Wales
Message
Objection is attached in PDF format
Attachments
Linda Scott
Comment
Linda Scott
Comment
Sydney
,
New South Wales
Message
Please see attached document in PDF format.
Attachments
Tyson Donnelly
Object
Tyson Donnelly
Object
Pagination
Project Details
Application Number
SSD-6724
Assessment Type
State Significant Development
Development Type
Residential & Commercial
Local Government Areas
City of Sydney
Decision
Approved
Determination Date
Decider
IPC-N
Last Modified By
SSD-6724-MOD-3
Last Modified On
29/03/2018
Contact Planner
Name
Simon
Truong
Related Projects
SSD-6724-MOD-1
Determination
SSD Modifications
Mod 1
60-78 Regent Street Redfern New South Wales Australia 2016
SSD-6724-MOD-2
Determination
SSD Modifications
Mod 2
60-78 Regent Street Redfern New South Wales Australia 2016
SSD-6724-MOD-3
Determination
SSD Modifications
Mod 3
60-78 Regent Street Redfern New South Wales Australia 2016