State Significant Infrastructure
Central-West Orana REZ Transmission
Warrumbungle Shire
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Development of new twin double circuit 500 kV transmission lines between Wollar and the proposed substations at Merotherie and Elong Elong, and connections from these lines to renewable energy generation and storage projects in the CWO REZ
Consolidated Approval
Modifications
Archive
Notice of Exhibition (1)
Application (1)
SEARs (18)
EIS (28)
Response to Submissions (2)
Agency Advice (31)
Amendments (18)
Additional Information (4)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (6)
Notifications (1)
Other Documents (12)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
There are no inspections for this project.
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
There are lots of other reasons why I object to this project, but considering I put in an objection in Nov 2022 and it took 11 months to get the opportunity to read the EIS and then the community were given 3 weeks to read the document and submit further discussion on why or why not this project should go ahead. This small community is getting thrown information from so many different companies about different projects all within a 50km radius and the information is mind-boggling. The government should be ashamed of how they are bombarding so many small communities just to meet a deadline that is impossible to beat.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
This is being forced upon hard working families that choose to live and work in peace and enjoy the countryside. We do not choose to live in a industrial zone.
Attachments
Annie Brown
Object
Annie Brown
Message
Katherine Bowman
Object
Katherine Bowman
Message
I am a single mother of 2 very young children who are 7th generation on our property “Merotherie”. With the development of this project My family property and our livelihoods are going to be destroyed. My children will be unable to grow up with the independence and freedom that both myself, and the previous generations of my family had. By the time both my father and I were six years old, we were moving cattle and sheep around the property on our own riding our ponies. This will be impossible for my children to experience due to the infrastructure, traffic and amount of unknown people inundating our quite little oasis.
There is a proposed 1200+ man camp to be built not even 5km from my home – this is twice the population of the closest town (Dunedoo) to me which is 20km away. I do not want 1200 unknown, the majority I expect will be men, living on my doorstep. This will make me feel uncomfortable and unsafe in my own home.
This so called satellite town has been given the name of “Merotherie Hub” – which is the name of my family property – we were not consulted about the use of our property name and this has caused great confusion within our community as people believe we are on board with this development and we are completely against it and have been from the 1st consultation with Energy Co.
There is discussion that the Merotherie Road is going to be the major access route to the Merotherie Hub. This road crosses the Talbragar River and there is 1.7km of flood plain that the road currently crosses. Currently when the river floods, this 1.7km is impassable for up to 3 days at a time. There is discussion to build this road up to make it weather proof. Man made materials such as culverts will cause significant erosion, artificial water courses and new drainage lines. This will be detrimental to the flow of the river and completely change the flow of the river both up and down stream. This will disturb the water table, which will in turn affect all the water resources on my property and surrounding properties. Not to mention further down the river system such as the Macquarie Marshes. Human intervention will never beat nature and it shouldn’t even be being considered to disrupt nature.
There is no way this project should go ahead, there are far to many families and communities that will be torn apart.
There are many other reasons why this shouldn’t go ahead
• Where is the water going to come from to supply these satellite towns?
• How will the waste be disposed of?
• What will happen to all the infrastructure once the solar and wind turbines become obsolete? Only have a 20-30yr lifespan?
• Biosecurity – There is going to be so much traffic coming and going through multiple properties, which will cause very high risk of contamination.
• The visual impact will be horrible. At the moment there is very little infrastructure seen on every vista, if this project goes ahead we will see wind turbines to the north and east, the transmission line to the south-east, and solar panels to the west. Our whole property is going to be surrounded by eyesores. This pristine agricultural land that has been producing prime beef, exceptional wool and lamb and grows some of the best crops in the district will become an industrial area. Where do you intend to feed the country from if you take over all this prime agricultural land?
glenn courtney
Object
glenn courtney
Message
They provide no benefit to the residents of areas they traverse & in fact destroy the amenity of those areas.
Areas which will be subject to accidents or storm damage should these lines malfunction increases the risks of bushfire dramatically while at the same time increasing our inability to fight those fires both on the ground & from the air.
Easements through farming land are wide & inhibit the land use for agricultural purposes.
The whole REZ idea is destroying our world to allegedly 'save the planet'
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Mudgee, Gulgong and other areas of the Mid-western region thrive on tourism - with visitors flocking to our area to enjoy the beautiful countryside views. These solar and wind farms are an ugly, unsightly blight on the land of our beautiful region and should not be permitted.
I also object to the fact that farmers and property owners in this region have no say in the use of their land, that their hard work in owning, managing and running properties gives them no right to say "no thanks" because the government will take their land anyway. I have friends who OWN beautiful views on their hard earned and work properties that are going to have massive big power lines running right through the middle of their view - it's heart breaking.
No one wants to look out a window and see massive power poles and lines, or solar farms reflecting at them, or wind turbines.
Find somewhere else that does not impinge on peoples livelihoods or turn a tourism area into an unsightly disappointment.
There are better places.....
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
I strongly object to this project.
Annie Kraefft
Comment
Annie Kraefft
Message
Linden Ewin
Object
Linden Ewin
Message
Carol Richard
Object
Carol Richard
Message
At one Transgrid "Consultation" meeting I was rudely asked by one of your employees "Don't you want electricity?" I could have just as rudely countered with "Don't you want to eat?"
Soils and Contamination Heading - I expected to read about how our prime farming land was going to be contaminated - BUT NO - you are worried about some pollution from mining operations fouling up your job.
Where is the carbon equation? Windfarms, solar farms - all manufactured overseas, transported across the world and across Australia. Do we have any capacity to source the steel for transmission towers/lines in Australia now or the power to run steel plants, having shut down clean coal plants and now waiting for renewable to power up?
All so city people can run their aircons full bore and pretend they are saving the planet by being green.
Have you read the attachment? only 98 pages- shouldn't be any trouble for you.
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
I opject to the CWO REZ Transmission project (Energy Co) and don't want the district covered in high voltage transmission lines and towers and don't want the area to be turned into an industrial landscape of wind turbines on the hills, fields of solar panels and the associated environmental costs that may be associated with this.
Karen Hartas
Object
Karen Hartas
Message
Kind regards
Karen Hartas
I reserve the right to add to this submission at anytime in the future.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
and towers over our family properties on which we live and work daily. Some have been in my family
since 1967, and are all productive farms, which will be negatively affected by the
proposed powerlines and towers.
I also don't don't want to live opposite a workers camp for 4 years that will operate 24/7 and cause
disturbance at my home from light, noise and increased traffic.
I also don't like being under threat from Energy Co for compulsory acquisition.
All of this because some seriously ill-informed, delusional and likely bribed bureaucrats, think that this transmission line
and wind and solar will save the planet.
Stop pushing this delusional, expensive, wasteful, harmful, unreasonable & illogical project, and grow a couple braincells to rub together.
Situations like this are exactly why the public trust and confidence in the government is at an all time low.
At this rate, the current governing body is on the 'fast-track' to being deposed.
You don't even need a big fancy complicated 30yr solution... just "Stop Doing Stupid Shit", and we will be on the fast-track to being the happiest & most successful country in the world.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Sigmund Taubert
Object
Sigmund Taubert
Message
The project is environmentally destructive and the payback period after economic life cycle factors are included, the project is not viable.
There a several solutions to the energy needs of the state and wind farms are not one of them.
In addition, this technology will not provide dependable power. It’s time to consider small scale modern nuclear power plants.
Now that’s zero emissions!
Sîgmund Taubert
Darren Hartas
Object
Darren Hartas
Message
Sam Piper
Object
Sam Piper
Message
Attachments
Orange Compass
Comment
Orange Compass
Message
Many Thanks,
Allison Mudford
[email protected]
Attachments
Marianne Deutscher
Object
Marianne Deutscher
Message
We live at 1100 Birriwa Bus Route North. Our dwelling is identified in the EIS as Sensitive Receiver 965.
The EIS does not adequately address the impacts of the project on us as neighbours to the Merotherie Energy Hub and Workforce Accommodation Camp.
We wish to raise the following concerns:
1. The proposed Merotherie Energy Hub is across the road from our boundary and a couple of hundred metres from our house. We understand the Accommodation Camp is intended for use by workers from multiple projects within the CWO REZ and will likely continue operation for many years.
a) The EIS has identified construction noise will be clearly audible at our dwelling. We anticipate we will experience clearly audible noise both during construction of the Accommodation Camp and Energy Hub, and at all times when the Accommodation Camp is operational.
b) Security is of paramount concern with over 1000 unknown workers living in such close proximity with little monitoring. Our gates are not currently lockable nor are our machinery sheds. We are genuinely concerned about our safety and security with this number of people, it would be impossible to thoroughly screen each worker as well as monitor their movements whilst at the camp and the substation.
c) The wind will cause dust to be blown in our direction, it is a windy area so this will be a daily occurrence. There is no way to prevent this.
d) Noise will be an obvious issue for us during construction considering our proximity to the camp as well as the substation. The daily easterly breeze will amplify this noise. We do not believe there is a solution to this issue.
e) Our fire risk will be increased given our proximity to the substation and we do not believe there are adequate measures in place to contain a fire nor prevent one from occurring. How will this additional risk affect our insurance premiums?
f) Emissions from the substation have not been measured for health implications, how can you allow residents to permanently reside this close to such a potential health hazard without compensation or remediation?
g) We strongly believe that the value of our land will be negatively affected now that we have a substation of this size and a worker’s camp across the road. We are confident our proximity to the hub would be a deterrent to a potential buyer. Not only will the highly desirable, scenic and quiet location be decimated, the ability of an owner to use the roads will be negatively impacted. There has been absolutely no recognition from Energy Co. of this fact and we believe it needs addressing and adequate compensation to be provided.
2. Predicted traffic along Birriwa Bus Routes
a) Safety is of high concern. The road is a school bus route, a stock route and used by families for bike riding, motorbike riding, stock movements and it is also part of the Central West Cycling Trail. Will the proposed speed limit take into consideration the current types of usage of these roads by residents? It is currently set at 100km/hr however this will not be appropriate for the number and size of vehicles that will use the road network.
b) Impact on stock movements. We currently use the South and North Birriwa Bus Routes to move stock on a regular basis. We are concerned this will be impossible with the heavy use of these roads. Internal laneway networks will need to be built throughout our property which we do not believe we should be financially responsible for. Our children ride their motorbikes and horses along these roads with us and we are concerned about the number of vehicles using the roads and the potential lack of concern for locals and their families using the roads. Despite the best attempts by Energy Co. at encouraging safe driving by their workers, it is not possible to monitor all vehicles at all times. Our method of moving stock around the property has been affected and we will potentially not be able use the sides of the roads to feed stock as we do during dry periods when feed is scarce.
c) The predicted number of vehicles using the roads is a vast increase to the current numbers and the road barely withstands its current usage. The road use will create a huge amount of noise and dust, especially from the heavy vehicles and this will add to the issue we will experience with noise & dust from construction.
Because we are neighbours and not host-landowners, we have not been offered any compensation or mitigation for the impacts the project will have on our land, home, business, and way of life. We are disappointed by the lack of communication from Energy Co and a willingness to understand the unique predicament we have been placed into. Considering the small number of residents Energy Co. claim will be affected, we had hoped as the most highly impacted residing residents, we would have been able to negotiate a better outcome for us and our family who have lived and farmed here for four generations.
We firmly believe we will not be able to continue living in our current home once construction of the project commences due to the impacts identified above.
We request the Proponent be directed to provide us with adequate compensation and mitigation for the impacts of the project on our land, home, business, and way of life.
SM & C NOTT
Object
SM & C NOTT
Message
We wish to object to the Central-West Orana REZ Transmission project.
We do not want the district covered in high voltage transmission lines and towers.
The landscape (currently aesthetically pleasing to the eye) will be turned into an industrial landscape littered with wind turbines, solar panels, and high-voltage power lines. This is not what our parents anticipated when they purchased the land on which we currently reside and make a living off.
The visual amenity of the property will be ruined - we have attached an extract from the EIS which provides a preview of how the view of the landscape will be changed – it is covered in wires and towers.
If the project goes ahead, the utility of the property will be significantly diminished – no-one will want to live in a house with powerlines and towers in such close proximity, not to mention the impact on our mental health.
Furthermore, the removal of shade trees is also of great concern to us – trees are a valuable resource for shade and stock protection. The removal of trees for the erection of transmission line towers will significantly affect our operation. Regardless of whether trees are replaced or compensation is provided for the trees removed, it will be decades until any replaced trees will reach the size and height of removed trees.
We specifically wish to query the route that the transmission lines will take near our property, noting the significant dogleg in the path that the powerlines will take. Despite our previous discussions with EnergyCo, we are yet to receive a satisfactory response as to why the original route was amended to alter the path of the powerlines which now directly impacts our property.
We look forward to your response.
Michael, Craig & Hugh Nott