State Significant Development
Response to Submissions
HVO South Open Cut Coal Continuation Project
Singleton Shire
Current Status: Response to Submissions
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Want to stay updated on this project?
Continuation of mining at the HVO South open cut mining complex until 2045, including a reduction in maximum extraction rate (from 20 Mtpa to 18 Mtpa)
Attachments & Resources
Notice of Exhibition (3)
Request for SEARs (1)
SEARs (3)
EIS (30)
Response to Submissions (17)
Agency Advice (41)
Amendments (16)
Additional Information (33)
Submissions
Showing 941 - 960 of 1310 submissions
Tracey Hall
Support
Tracey Hall
Support
HUNTERVIEW
,
New South Wales
Message
It will be a great thing for the community. So many are employed by HVO in the local area.
Peggy Towns
Support
Peggy Towns
Support
SINGLETON
,
New South Wales
Message
Continuing the project at HVO allows locals to stay in jobs and live amongst the community. HVO contributes to many local organisations and with out this continued project these opportunities wouldn’t be available for growth with in the community.
Graeme Batterbury
Object
Graeme Batterbury
Object
LILLIAN ROCK
,
New South Wales
Message
Climate change costs not properly considered, legal precedent ignored
The recent decision by the NSW Court of Appeal on the Mt Pleasant coal mine expansion found that the full contribution of downstream emissions (Scope 3) to climate change from a coal mine must be assessed, even if the fuel is burnt overseas.
They found that the full environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change on a locality must be considered in making a decision on a project. This should include costs like rising insurance premiums and increasing costs of repairing roads and infrastructure after extreme weather.
But the Hunter Valley Operations revised assessment specifically EXCLUDES consideration of downstream emissions in its economic assessment, and as a result it drastically underestimates the negative economic impacts of the project.
The revised assessment should be withdrawn and the full assessment required by the Court of Appeal must be undertaken for the project - and it should then be placed back on public exhibition.
Scale of project, greenhouse gas emissions and climate targets
This is the biggest coal mine project ever considered in NSW. In total it proposed to mine 429 million tonnes of coal and extend the operation of this huge mining complex to 2045.
Overall, this coal mine expansion would add 803 million tonnes of lifecycle greenhouse gas pollution to the atmosphere between now and 2045. That equates to 7 times the total annual emissions from all sources in New South Wales.
Even the direct emissions from the project, caused by releasing methane from the coal seam and from diesel used in operating the mine, will make a huge contribution to NSW emissions and make it even more difficult for NSW to meet climate targets.
The NSW Large Emitters Guide states that coal mines should be on the same emissions reduction trajectory as NSW - to reduce emissions by 50% by 2030 and 70% by 2035.
But this expansion does the direct opposite - it will result in massive increases in direct emissions by expanding the project. The expansion will actually double methane emissions compared to the existing mine (as at FY24) and then they will remain at elevated levels until 2042.
Impacts to land and water
The proposed mine expansion will have devastating impacts on land and water in the Hunter Valley.
The HVO mine complex straddles the Hunter River and the expansion intends to mine directly into strategic agricultural land and the River’s alluvial aquifer.
Mining for the Continuation Project will worsen groundwater drawdown already affecting the Hunter River’s alluvial aquifer by half a metre.
Cumulative drawdown of Wollombi Brook alluvium will be up to 2 metres and this impact will extend long after mining ceases.
Recent monitoring has identified that groundwater in the alluvium and other affected areas is exceeding water quality triggers in the HVO area. A large tailings storage dam adjacent to the river was found six years ago to be seeping into groundwater.
Instead of expanding the mine, Glencore and Yancoal should be cleaning up the huge HVO site and investing in long-term environmental remediation of it.
The recent decision by the NSW Court of Appeal on the Mt Pleasant coal mine expansion found that the full contribution of downstream emissions (Scope 3) to climate change from a coal mine must be assessed, even if the fuel is burnt overseas.
They found that the full environmental, social and economic impacts of climate change on a locality must be considered in making a decision on a project. This should include costs like rising insurance premiums and increasing costs of repairing roads and infrastructure after extreme weather.
But the Hunter Valley Operations revised assessment specifically EXCLUDES consideration of downstream emissions in its economic assessment, and as a result it drastically underestimates the negative economic impacts of the project.
The revised assessment should be withdrawn and the full assessment required by the Court of Appeal must be undertaken for the project - and it should then be placed back on public exhibition.
Scale of project, greenhouse gas emissions and climate targets
This is the biggest coal mine project ever considered in NSW. In total it proposed to mine 429 million tonnes of coal and extend the operation of this huge mining complex to 2045.
Overall, this coal mine expansion would add 803 million tonnes of lifecycle greenhouse gas pollution to the atmosphere between now and 2045. That equates to 7 times the total annual emissions from all sources in New South Wales.
Even the direct emissions from the project, caused by releasing methane from the coal seam and from diesel used in operating the mine, will make a huge contribution to NSW emissions and make it even more difficult for NSW to meet climate targets.
The NSW Large Emitters Guide states that coal mines should be on the same emissions reduction trajectory as NSW - to reduce emissions by 50% by 2030 and 70% by 2035.
But this expansion does the direct opposite - it will result in massive increases in direct emissions by expanding the project. The expansion will actually double methane emissions compared to the existing mine (as at FY24) and then they will remain at elevated levels until 2042.
Impacts to land and water
The proposed mine expansion will have devastating impacts on land and water in the Hunter Valley.
The HVO mine complex straddles the Hunter River and the expansion intends to mine directly into strategic agricultural land and the River’s alluvial aquifer.
Mining for the Continuation Project will worsen groundwater drawdown already affecting the Hunter River’s alluvial aquifer by half a metre.
Cumulative drawdown of Wollombi Brook alluvium will be up to 2 metres and this impact will extend long after mining ceases.
Recent monitoring has identified that groundwater in the alluvium and other affected areas is exceeding water quality triggers in the HVO area. A large tailings storage dam adjacent to the river was found six years ago to be seeping into groundwater.
Instead of expanding the mine, Glencore and Yancoal should be cleaning up the huge HVO site and investing in long-term environmental remediation of it.
Hunter Wright
Support
Hunter Wright
Support
CAMERON PARK
,
New South Wales
Message
My dad works there and I would like him to continue to provide for my family and community
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Support
RUTHERFORD
,
New South Wales
Message
HVO provides support to many local families and the community as well as the larger economy.
Kenneth Wright
Support
Kenneth Wright
Support
CAMERON PARK
,
New South Wales
Message
I work here and I would like to continue working here and supporting my family and community
Kenneth Wright
Support
Kenneth Wright
Support
CAMERON PARK
,
New South Wales
Message
I work here and support my family and community
Bree Wilson
Support
Bree Wilson
Support
CAMERON PARK
,
New South Wales
Message
My husband supports my family and community
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Support
NORTH ROTHBURY
,
New South Wales
Message
I support the extension of HVO as my family relies on it and without it, the upper hunter will suffer due to lack of jobs
Brendan Sheppard
Support
Brendan Sheppard
Support
SINGLETON HEIGHTS
,
New South Wales
Message
HVO is a very supportive towards the hunter Valley and employees a big number of people from the hunter Valley
And also has a big focus on looking after the environment in their operations HVO approval is a must to be approved as a lot of the community would benefit from and our oncoming children and community
Cheers Brendan
And also has a big focus on looking after the environment in their operations HVO approval is a must to be approved as a lot of the community would benefit from and our oncoming children and community
Cheers Brendan
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Support
LAKE TABOURIE
,
New South Wales
Message
I support this
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Support
Glandore
,
South Australia
Message
I am writing to oppose the proposed closure of the Hunger valley operations coal mine. While I recognise the importance of transitioning towards renewable energy in the long term, shutting down this operation prematurely would have serious economic and social consequences for our community, as well as national energy security.
Jacqueline Matthews
Support
Jacqueline Matthews
Support
Hunterview
,
New South Wales
Message
The proposed represents an opportunity to deliver lasting benefits to small communities, families, and the regional economy. By creating jobs, strengthening local businesses, and investing in community wellbeing, the project will play a vital role in supporting regional growth while adhering to environmental and safety obligations.
Mark Winter
Support
Mark Winter
Support
SINGLETON HEIGHTS
,
New South Wales
Message
Glencore injects millions into the National budget, assists many local business and charities and with 1800 staff on-site at HVO making a great benefit to many lives. Project is stringently governed by the EPO and government bodies to ensure all emissions(noise/dust/gases etc) are in-check. Nothing new, as this mine has been operating over 20 years, and with no changes should be allowed to run another 20 years.
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Support
SINGLETON
,
New South Wales
Message
I support the project
For job security and for the local towns it needs mine workers .
For job security and for the local towns it needs mine workers .
Daniel Knight
Support
Daniel Knight
Support
SEDGEFIELD
,
New South Wales
Message
I am writing to express my strong support for the HVO South Open Cut Coal Continuation Project. Having worked at HVO for the past 20 years, I have witnessed first-hand the positive impact this mine has had on our community and the generations that have called the Hunter region home. For 70 years, HVO has provided stable employment opportunities, allowing families to thrive and grow in an area renowned for its quality of life.
While my perspective may seem biased due to my long association with HVO, my experiences have shown me the resilience of this operation through various economic cycles. The HVO mine has endured the tests of time, demonstrating its capacity to adapt and contribute to the local economy.
The continuation of mining within the established footprint is not only a responsible approach but a chance to complete what was initiated 70 years ago. It allows us to maximize the resources we have while minimizing our environmental impact. I wholeheartedly believe that this project will provide ongoing benefits to our community and ensure a sustainable future for HVO and its employees.
While my perspective may seem biased due to my long association with HVO, my experiences have shown me the resilience of this operation through various economic cycles. The HVO mine has endured the tests of time, demonstrating its capacity to adapt and contribute to the local economy.
The continuation of mining within the established footprint is not only a responsible approach but a chance to complete what was initiated 70 years ago. It allows us to maximize the resources we have while minimizing our environmental impact. I wholeheartedly believe that this project will provide ongoing benefits to our community and ensure a sustainable future for HVO and its employees.
Emily Edwards
Object
Emily Edwards
Object
WAVERLEY
,
New South Wales
Message
I am the sixth generation of a farming family from Merriwa, in the Upper Hunter. Through my lifetime, I have witnessed the vital, fertile lands of the Hunter destroyed by mining, our mighty Hunter River, reduced to a trickle, and our farming communities reduced to a diaspora. This is all before I come to the HVO proposal itself.
The costs and benefits of the HVO proposal don't stack up from a current and projected economic perspective, and certainly through the lens of carbon emissions and costs. Even with the now reduced project size, the HVO Continuation Project represents almost 40% of emissions in the NSW Government’s coal project approval pipeline. With existing coal mining projects already straining the ability of NSW to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets, if HVO is approved, it will further strain the state’s ability to meet its targets and shift the burden onto other sectors to make deeper emissions reductions. A detailed cost benefit analysis produced by ACCR (https://www.accr.org.au/research/more-cost-less-benefit-for-nsw-the-flawed-rationale-for-the-hunter-valley-coal-mine-expansion/) provides reliable evidence that the financial benefit does not justify the cost.
I note the analysis of Geoscience Australia on the impact of the proposal on already scarce ground and surface. This is at the expense of the food that we all rely upon for survival. Where is the benefit in further diminishing our capacity to feed the nation? I further note the impact on threatened species and habitats, specifically, those listed in the Protected Matters Search Tool report (PMST), dated 20 November 2023, which identified 66 listed threatened species and communities that are likely or known to occur within 10 km of the proposed action. Based on the location of the proposed action, the likely habitat present in the area of the proposed action, and the nature of the proposed action, that impacts arose in relation to the following Part 3 protected matters:
(i) Central Hunter Valley Eucalypt Forest and Woodland (CHVEFW) – Critically endangered – listed ecological community,
(ii) Warkworth Sands Woodland of the Hunter Valley – Critically endangered – listed ecological community, and
(iii) Striped Legless Lizard (Delma impar) – Vulnerable – listed threatened species.
In my view, the mitigation and management proposals do not meaningfully address the threat to these habitats and species, amongst others.
Whilst lifecycle emissions are not a component of the project assessment, it is the giant elephant in the room. How can these projects be considered when the impacts are so catastrophic? Project documents show the intended additional coal mined is 429 million tonnes, producing over 15 million tonnes of Scope 1 and 2 emissions and more than 793 million tonnes of Scope 3 CO2e emissions, which is equivalent to almost seven times NSW’s total annual emissions from all sources. This is insanity. Insurance premiums are becoming impossible to afford, reconstruction costs after the ever more intense and frequent floods and fires are skyrocketing, and many smaller farmers like my family are simply giving up. The multinationals may make a fortune while the state starves - you can't eat coal. We need to protect our precious nature and the farming land and waters needed to produce food for the nation.
The costs and benefits of the HVO proposal don't stack up from a current and projected economic perspective, and certainly through the lens of carbon emissions and costs. Even with the now reduced project size, the HVO Continuation Project represents almost 40% of emissions in the NSW Government’s coal project approval pipeline. With existing coal mining projects already straining the ability of NSW to meet its legislated emissions reduction targets, if HVO is approved, it will further strain the state’s ability to meet its targets and shift the burden onto other sectors to make deeper emissions reductions. A detailed cost benefit analysis produced by ACCR (https://www.accr.org.au/research/more-cost-less-benefit-for-nsw-the-flawed-rationale-for-the-hunter-valley-coal-mine-expansion/) provides reliable evidence that the financial benefit does not justify the cost.
I note the analysis of Geoscience Australia on the impact of the proposal on already scarce ground and surface. This is at the expense of the food that we all rely upon for survival. Where is the benefit in further diminishing our capacity to feed the nation? I further note the impact on threatened species and habitats, specifically, those listed in the Protected Matters Search Tool report (PMST), dated 20 November 2023, which identified 66 listed threatened species and communities that are likely or known to occur within 10 km of the proposed action. Based on the location of the proposed action, the likely habitat present in the area of the proposed action, and the nature of the proposed action, that impacts arose in relation to the following Part 3 protected matters:
(i) Central Hunter Valley Eucalypt Forest and Woodland (CHVEFW) – Critically endangered – listed ecological community,
(ii) Warkworth Sands Woodland of the Hunter Valley – Critically endangered – listed ecological community, and
(iii) Striped Legless Lizard (Delma impar) – Vulnerable – listed threatened species.
In my view, the mitigation and management proposals do not meaningfully address the threat to these habitats and species, amongst others.
Whilst lifecycle emissions are not a component of the project assessment, it is the giant elephant in the room. How can these projects be considered when the impacts are so catastrophic? Project documents show the intended additional coal mined is 429 million tonnes, producing over 15 million tonnes of Scope 1 and 2 emissions and more than 793 million tonnes of Scope 3 CO2e emissions, which is equivalent to almost seven times NSW’s total annual emissions from all sources. This is insanity. Insurance premiums are becoming impossible to afford, reconstruction costs after the ever more intense and frequent floods and fires are skyrocketing, and many smaller farmers like my family are simply giving up. The multinationals may make a fortune while the state starves - you can't eat coal. We need to protect our precious nature and the farming land and waters needed to produce food for the nation.
karl modra
Support
karl modra
Support
BELMONT
,
New South Wales
Message
I am an employee with hvo and have been there for 15yrs now as a contractor and permanent employee, and plan to be there till I retire, hvo has provided for me and my family and hopefully will continue
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Support
LOUTH PARK
,
New South Wales
Message
i support the project, for our jobs, our communities and our future in the Hunter
Hamish Jackosn
Support
Hamish Jackosn
Support
GILLIESTON HEIGHTS
,
New South Wales
Message
This project provides myself and all my colleges with an income to support their families. The company also puts a lot of funding and support into the local community.
Pagination
Project Details
Application Number
SSD-11826621
Assessment Type
State Significant Development
Development Type
Coal Mining
Local Government Areas
Singleton Shire
Related Projects
SVC-12575722
Determination
Site Verification Certificate
HVO North Open Cut Coal Continuation Project
Lemington Road, Lemington Nsw
SVC-12713046
Withdrawn
Site Verification Certificate
HVO South Open Cut Coal Continuation Project
Lemington Road, Lemington Nsw