Skip to main content

State Significant Development

Determination

Moorebank Intermodal Precinct West - Concept & Stage 1

Liverpool City

Current Status: Determination

Interact with the stages for their names

  1. SEARs
  2. Prepare EIS
  3. Exhibition
  4. Collate Submissions
  5. Response to Submissions
  6. Assessment
  7. Recommendation
  8. Determination

Moorebank Intermodal Precinct West - Concept & Stage 1

Consolidated Consent

MPW Concept_consolidated consent

Archive

Application (1)

DGRs (3)

EIS (86)

Submissions (2)

Response to Submissions (73)

Recommendation (3)

Determination (3)

Approved Documents

Management Plans and Strategies (10)

Independent Reviews and Audits (2)

Notifications (1)

Other Documents (5)

Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.

Complaints

Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?

Make a Complaint

Enforcements

There are no enforcements for this project.

Inspections

25/06/2020

9/07/2020

11/11/2020

11/11/2020

11/07/2024

27/02/2024

Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.

Submissions

Filters
Showing 321 - 340 of 375 submissions
Name Withheld
Object
HOLSWORTHY , New South Wales
Message
SEE ATTACHMENT
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
holsworthy , New South Wales
Message
see attachment
Attachments
Rajan Sriram
Object
Voyager Point , New South Wales
Message
I strongly object to the Intermodal at Moorebank, for the reasons outlined in the attached document.

There will be a significant impact on the quality of life for the entire community in this area.
Attachments
Eric Rakowski
Object
Wattle Grove , New South Wales
Message
So many aspects of this and the sister proposal have been shoehorned to fit 'standised' mapping for health and environment, even where there are no safe levels of exposure.

These issues go ignored, or rather get mitigated, in many cases by the word itself not an actual plan to mitigate.

However the fiscal business case is not sufficient and it cannot be ignored. The location of the Commonwealth land is its undoing, as too much public investment would be necessary to make it possible, with no prospect of a reasonable return for the taxpayer as there is no guarantee the private tenderer will succeed, despite massive government sponsorship.

As was the case with CEO Ian Hunt's previous failed PPProjects: Lane Cove Tunnel and Cross City Tunnel. Each pushed through with massaged metrics only to fizzle causing more public money to be used to bail out the private companies that new it would fail and planned for it all along.

This is the future for MICL

Most especially if the man behind the MUA debacle Chris Corrigan and the company pushing to carve out the Great Barrier Reef; Aurizon get there hands on the site. Together they have no regard for the Community or the Country.

Good governance is about bang for buck.
This project is not.

Good governance is about doing the best for the most.
Giving it to SIMTA does is the antithesis.

The projects should be suspended until true feasibility studies of Eastern Creek and Badgery's Creek are produced.

Attachments
Melanie Gibbons
Object
Hammondville , New South Wales
Message
See attachment.
Attachments
NSW Ports
Support
Botany , New South Wales
Message
See attached.
Attachments
Office of Environment & Heritage
Comment
Parramatta , New South Wales
Message
See attached.
Attachments
Environment Protection Authority
Comment
Parramatta , New South Wales
Message
See attached
Attachments
Transport for NSW
Comment
Haymarket , New South Wales
Message
See attached
Attachments
Fire & Rescue NSW
Comment
Greenacre , New South Wales
Message
See attached.
Attachments
Campbelltown City Council
Object
Campbelltown , New South Wales
Message
See attached.
Attachments
Dara Bonic
Object
Casula , New South Wales
Message
See attached.
Attachments
NSW Rural Fire Service
Comment
Granville , New South Wales
Message
See attached.
Attachments
Department of Primary Industries
Comment
Sydney , New South Wales
Message
See attached.
Attachments
Sydney Catchment Authority
Comment
Penrith , New South Wales
Message
See attached.
Attachments
Ned Ticic
Object
Casula , New South Wales
Message
See attached.
Attachments
Donna Babczyszyn
Object
Wattle Grove , New South Wales
Message
See attached.
Attachments
Ian Bailey
Object
Liverpool , New South Wales
Message
See attached.
Attachments
Christine Czintos
Object
Wattle Grove , New South Wales
Message
See attached.
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
cronulla , New South Wales
Message
See attached.
Attachments

Pagination

Project Details

Application Number
SSD-5066
Assessment Type
State Significant Development
Development Type
Rail transport facilities
Local Government Areas
Liverpool City
Decision
Approved
Determination Date
Decider
IPC-N
Last Modified By
SSD-5066-Mod-2
Last Modified On
24/12/2020

Contact Planner

Name
Andrew Beattie