State Significant Development
Moorebank Intermodal Precinct West - Concept & Stage 1
Liverpool City
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Moorebank Intermodal Precinct West - Concept & Stage 1
Consolidated Consent
Modifications
Archive
Application (1)
DGRs (3)
EIS (86)
Submissions (2)
Response to Submissions (73)
Recommendation (3)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (10)
Independent Reviews and Audits (2)
Notifications (1)
Other Documents (5)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
25/06/2020
9/07/2020
11/11/2020
11/11/2020
11/07/2024
27/02/2024
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Rajan Sriram
Object
Rajan Sriram
Message
There will be a significant impact on the quality of life for the entire community in this area.
Attachments
Eric Rakowski
Object
Eric Rakowski
Message
These issues go ignored, or rather get mitigated, in many cases by the word itself not an actual plan to mitigate.
However the fiscal business case is not sufficient and it cannot be ignored. The location of the Commonwealth land is its undoing, as too much public investment would be necessary to make it possible, with no prospect of a reasonable return for the taxpayer as there is no guarantee the private tenderer will succeed, despite massive government sponsorship.
As was the case with CEO Ian Hunt's previous failed PPProjects: Lane Cove Tunnel and Cross City Tunnel. Each pushed through with massaged metrics only to fizzle causing more public money to be used to bail out the private companies that new it would fail and planned for it all along.
This is the future for MICL
Most especially if the man behind the MUA debacle Chris Corrigan and the company pushing to carve out the Great Barrier Reef; Aurizon get there hands on the site. Together they have no regard for the Community or the Country.
Good governance is about bang for buck.
This project is not.
Good governance is about doing the best for the most.
Giving it to SIMTA does is the antithesis.
The projects should be suspended until true feasibility studies of Eastern Creek and Badgery's Creek are produced.