Mowbray Road, Lane Cove North, Affordable Housing

Concerns
1. There is minimal parking currently available for Mindarie Park and on Mindarie St. with 42 spaces for 86 dwellings will out further pressure on an already strained area.
2. Design and Urban Form
- The building's height and mass will overshadow the Mindarie Park playground
- The development poorly addresses the intersection of Mindarie and Hatfield Streets, and overshadows Mindarie Park
- The proposal lacks family-friendly features, including insufficient two and three-bedroom apartments and bathtubs

3. Infrastructure Deficiencies
- The precinct lacks adequate retail spaces, with only two small shops serving 2,700 residents
- Basic infrastructure remains incomplete, including:
* Bus shelters
* Completed shared paths
* Accessible ramps on the Epping Road pedestrian bridge
* Pedestrian safety improvements on Centennial Avenue

Re: Development Application SSD-71687208
618-624 Mowbray Rd & 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North

I strongly oppose the proposed development at 618-624 Mowbray Rd & 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North, for the following reasons:

Background and Strategic Context
The site is part of the Mowbray Precinct, rezoned in 2010 for high-density residential development. A 2011 rezoning review prepared by the NSW Department of Planning and Lane Cove Council endorsed the need for a larger neighbourhood centre in the precinct to support the increased population density. Despite housing 2,700 residents in 1,500 dwellings, the precinct lacks essential amenities and has actually lost retail space since rezoning.

This site represents the last opportunity to deliver the neighbourhood centre promised in the precinct masterplan. The NSW Housing Minister made an election commitment to provide shops and services at this location, which has been ignored in this proposal.

Key Concerns

1. Design and Urban Form
- The building's height and mass will overshadow the Mindarie Park playground
- The L-shaped design creates an unsafe, overshadowed dead-end space behind the building
- The development poorly addresses Mindarie Street, it's isolated from neighbouring properties, creates an unwelcome gap in the streetscape, poorly addresses the intersection of Mindarie and Hatfield Streets, and overshadows Mindarie Park
- The proposal lacks family-friendly features, including insufficient two and three-bedroom apartments and bathtubs

2. Infrastructure Deficiencies
- The precinct lacks adequate retail spaces, with only two small shops serving 2,700 residents
- Basic infrastructure remains incomplete, including:
* Bus shelters
* Completed shared paths
* Accessible ramps on the Epping Road pedestrian bridge
* Pedestrian safety improvements on Centennial Avenue

3. Social Impact
- Social housing provides a benefit to a small number of people at a significant cost to the community
- Existing social housing buildings in the area are poorly maintained
- Social housing has caused crime and antisocial behaviour in our community
- The area lacks "third places" for social interaction outside homes
- The development fails to make a positive contribution to the social infrastructure this community needs

4. Construction and School Safety
- The construction site is located directly opposite a primary school
- The Mowbray Road shared path is busy with children walking, cycling, and scooting to school
- For the safety of these children the Construction Traffic Management Plan should prohibit heavy vehicle movements during school drop off and pick up times

5. Process Concerns
- There is a clear conflict of interest as the NSW Government is both applicant and consent authority
- Community engagement has been late, inadequate, and dismissive
- The request for exemption from Section 7.11 contributions is unjustified given the infrastructure gaps

Recommendations
1. The application should be referred to the Independent Planning Commission
2. The development should incorporate the promised neighbourhood centre with retail spaces
3. Building design should be modified to eliminate overshadowing and unsafe spaces
4. Strata ownership should be required to ensure the building is well maintained
5. Section 7.11 contributions should be required to fund missing infrastructure
6. More family-suitable housing should be included in the mix

The current proposal fails to meet strategic planning objectives, ignores community needs, and misses a crucial opportunity to create a liveable, vibrant precinct. Without significant modifications to address these issues, this development should not be approved.

Objecting to the proposed development. The area is already well developed with dense housing. Another apartment block will further strain the existing limited street parking and add to the traffic noise and congestion on Mowbray road. It would also strain services such as electricity and water access which are often interrupted in Lane Cove.

I object to the project as described for the following reasons, and propose alternative solutions:
1. There is no allowance for retail and commercial space. - Please include grocery, medical and commercial space in the design.
The nearest medical and grocery facilities require a 40 minute walk or 20 minute bus. The existing 30 minute wait (for what would otherwise be a 10 minute drive) for vehicles at the right turn bay on Epping Road into Longueville Road is an indicator of insufficient community facilities for the population density we have in Lane Cove, Lane Cove North, Chatswood West, and Lane Cove West.
This issue of insufficient community, medical and retail facilities has been an ongoing topic for the past decade (see local government records and local news articles) and the proposed site is one of the last undeveloped site in the area. If we do not act now to include retail spaces, the residents; including public, affordable and disability housing residents, would suffer in the long run from higher transport costs, congestion and access to medical facilities. Place-making considerations should be a priority here especially where social, NDIS and affordable residents are already in high proportion in the area.
2. The design creates shadowing and is an imposing design. Please redesign to a tiered design on Hatfield Street side.
The current design is an imposing rectangular block that is visually unpleasant from Hatfield St, Mindarie St and Kullah Parade. It also blocks solar access to c.90% of daylight hours to a majority of apartments on 9 Hatfield Street and to the houses on the corner of Mindarie St and Kullah Parade. Solar access and visual impact could be resolved with a redesign.
3. Social housing and affordable density at 100% is unprecedented and too high. Please include a proportion of NDIS and private housing.
The most recent State public housing projects, including Social and Affordable Housing Fund and Communities Plus Programs, have redeveloped sites at c.30% social housing and typically includes a mix of affordable, private and NDIS. Using the latest model for community cohesion would prevent the "ghettos" that were typical of older style public housing. The site is in close proximity to parks and primary schools and would thus benefit from a diversified mix across the all community groups.

Please see attached document outlining a few of my concerns and reasons for objecting to this project.

Please read this document in conjunction with Lane Cove Council’s submission dated 19th
November 2024.
Should the Consent Authority choose to support the proposal, it is further recommended that
the following draft conditions of consent be imposed for inclusion and guidance.

Sincere Regards
Chris Shortt
Senior Town Planner

Re: Development Application SSD-71687208
618-624 Mowbray Rd & 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North

I strongly object to the proposed development at 618-624 Mowbray Rd & 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North, for the following reasons:

The site is situated in the Mowbray Precinct, rezoned in 2010 to accommodate high-density residential development. A rezoning review conducted in 2011 by the NSW Department of Planning and Lane Cove Council emphasized the necessity of a larger neighborhood center to support the anticipated population growth. Despite accommodating 2,700 residents in 1,500 dwellings, the precinct lacks essential amenities and has seen a reduction in retail space since the rezoning.

This development site is the last opportunity to deliver the promised neighborhood center as outlined in the precinct’s masterplan. The NSW Housing Minister made an election commitment to establish shops and services at this location, a commitment not reflected in this proposal.

Key Concerns

1. Design and Urban Form

The proposed building’s height and mass will overshadow the Mindarie Park playground.

The L-shaped design creates a dark, unsafe dead-end space behind the building.

The development is poorly integrated with Mindarie Street, resulting in an isolated structure, an unwelcome streetscape gap, and overshadowing of Mindarie Park.

The design fails to provide family-friendly features, such as adequate two- and three-bedroom apartments or bathtubs.


2. Infrastructure Deficiencies

The precinct is under-served by infrastructure, with only two small retail shops catering to its 2,700 residents. Essential infrastructure remains incomplete, including:

Bus shelters.

Shared paths.

Accessible ramps for the Epping Road pedestrian bridge.

Pedestrian safety enhancements on Centennial Avenue.


3. Social Impact

While social housing benefits a limited number of people, it imposes significant costs on the broader community.

Existing social housing developments in the area are poorly maintained.

These developments have contributed to crime and antisocial behavior in the community.

The precinct lacks “third places” where residents can gather and socialize outside their homes.

The current proposal fails to address the social infrastructure required for a thriving community.


4. Construction and School Safety

The site is directly across from a primary school.

The Mowbray Road shared path is heavily used by children walking, cycling, and scooting to school.

To protect children’s safety, heavy vehicle movements should be restricted during school drop-off and pick-up times as part of the Construction Traffic Management Plan.


5. Process Concerns

The NSW Government, acting as both the applicant and consent authority, presents a clear conflict of interest.

Community engagement has been insufficient, delayed, and dismissive of local concerns.

The request for an exemption from Section 7.11 contributions is unjustifiable, given the significant infrastructure gaps in the area.

I object to the proposal for a social housing project in 618-624 Mowbray Rd due to potential safety and atmosphere impact of the neighborhood. Given that the location is directly across from a school, it's imperative to consider the safety and comfort of the children attending, as they may not feel secure with a housing commission nearby. The project may also cause decline in value of apartments in surrounding areas which I feel is unfair.

We need grocery stores, chemist stores considering growing dwellings in Lane Cove North.

I am writing to express my significant concerns regarding the proposed development at 618-624 Mowbray Rd / 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North. I would like to acknowledge my understanding of the crucial need for social and affordable housing with today’s shortfall of housing, and the current commitments by the federal and state government to rectify this. My concerns lie with the considerations that have been taken to ensure the proposed site has been designed in line with the existing community and the community of the residents of the proposed development.
The Mindarie, Mowbray and Pinaroo Community:
Whilst my letter seeks to outline the concerns I hold for the project in its current form, I wanted to initially contextualise my letter with a characterisation of the community surrounding the proposed site:
My community is characterised by:
• Young Families: The street surrounding the proposed site is made up of a community of young families and young couples looking to start a family (such as myself and my partner). I purchased my apartment next to the Mindarie Park with the intention of having a safe, family-friendly neighbourhood my future children could grow up in. The various neighbour I have met have kids under the age of 5 and/or are expecting children imminently.
• Mindarie Park and Mowbray Public School: The front of the proposed site will be opposite a children’s park “Mindarie Park” and the back of the site will be opposite a children’s daycare centre “Cubbyhouse Childcare” and primary school “Mowbray Public School”. At any given day, you will see children walking to school, children from all multicultural backgrounds playing in the park, families kicking a soccer ball on the multi-use court, families walking their dogs and children birthday parties being set up in the bbq areas. It is vibrant, inclusive and a place that epitomises the concept of “family friendly”. It is the primary draw card that drew us to purchasing a property in this area.
• Young Professionals: Given the significant cost to enter the Sydney housing market and noting the community of Lane Cove North generally being newer residents without significant family backing, my community is predominantly made up of young professionals from backgrounds such as accounting, banking, engineering, healthcare, marketing, architecture and management, with a focus on both partners working.
In outlining my community I want to express concerns of the project to ensure it suits this community, with the request the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure can acknowledge my concerns and consider updating its approach to ensure the project and its subsequent residents are in line with my community.
Concerns surrounding the project
I want to express my concerns regarding how the project aligns with the soul of my community. I was fortunate to attend the Community Drop-In Session on Tuesday the 27th of August hosted by Housing NSW to meet the project team. Information provided in the Drop-In Session raises concerns about the projects viability and the extent to which the project has been adequately planned. Namely:
Concerns on the projects current form:
• Social Residents: I have been told by Housing NSW in the Drop-In session that the social residents on the waiting list in Lane Cove are predominately made up of older women (noting older women over the age of 60 make up the highest population of those on the waiting list) and young single people. This is of concern for the site proposed, given its drawcard of proximity to younger family amenities (the school and park). Additionally, the ability for the residents to integrate with the community, given the different life circumstances an older woman vs. a younger working family. I raise concerns of social residents being isolated in the community as a result. Additionally, the contrast from the initial submission from Housing NSW to that of the current exhibition suggests that 50% of the residents will be 20-40 years old. This draws questions as to the transparency of information now being provided to the community for consultation?
• 1 and 2 bed units: The large designation of 1-bedroom units is of concern. 1-bedroom units does not lend itself to a family situation (noting the strong family influence of my community) and is restrictive to 1 or 2 residents. With the proximity of the site to the school and park, this appears to be in contradiction to the limited amenities that the location that the site provides.
• Funding: the viability of the project appears to be contingent on the success of Homes NSW’s HAFF application. I was advised that NSW Homes inputted 5 applications for sites to be funded under the HAFF. Given the $10bn commitment under the HAFF and the size of the shortage of NSW housing, 5 applications for the entirety of NSW was of high concern. I question why a broader plan was not in place to include sites across all suburbs? Was the site in Lane Cove North only put forth given its neglect and lack of decision about its use (noting other neighbouring residents have confirmed there was previous communications about putting amenities at the proposed site, such as a grocery store)?
• Feasibility studies: For every question I had on impact to the community such as local infrastructure and traffic impacts, I was advised the project had completed a feasibility study. Information provided by neighbouring residents suggests the feasibility studies are not current, with the traffic study more than 10 years old and not accounting for the significant development.
Broader concerns on the impact on the community for the project include:
• Natural Light Impact: I would like a daylight assessment to ensure the proposed building will not significantly reduce natural light to neighbouring properties, specifically the Parkside residences that face Mindarie Street (such as my own ground floor apartment).
• Traffic Management Plan: A comprehensive traffic management plan is needed, including strategies to ensure that the car park exit on Mindarie Street for the Parkside residence remains clear and how pedestrian traffic will be managed around the construction site.
• Traffic and Parking: The addition of 86 new homes will exacerbate existing traffic congestion and strain on already limited street parking. I note there is only ~43 car parks provided in the buildings plan – whilst I understand not all residents will have a car, is this sufficient and is this backed up with research to ensure on street parking won’t be further exacerbated?
• Public Transport: Current public transport services are insufficient for the additional residents. With current public transport (bus only) services insufficient to meet current demand (often buses are full and you have to wait for the next one or two buses at peak time) noting there are an additional 4 projects to be completed in Mindarie St over the next 1-8 months that will only add strain to this. An additional apartment building for the proposed for residents that are more likely to rely on public transport than others, will cause additional strain. Additionally, the public exhibition outlines the site it on the doorstep of Artarmon train stop. Given this is a 45-minute walk, I raise a question as to the feasibility of 60+ year olds making this walk twice a day to access services?
• Amenities: The proposal does not address the need for local commercial amenities such as a medical centre, convenience store or pharmacy. At present, the only way to obtain essential food ingredients or medical supplies is to walk 30 minutes to Lane Cove Village or catch public transport (which as outlined above, is lacking in serviceability). I note the exhibition outlines the availability of amenities. I question the feasibility of a 60+ woman walking 30 minutes in order to reach the medical centre or grocery store to get basic human essentials (especially when she is unwell)?
• Property Value Impact: I am concerned that there has been no consideration for potential reductions in surrounding property values. Previous studies have shown significant impacts, and I are keen to understand the strategy to address this, given I have had to significantly overreach my budget to get access to my apartment in the current housing crisis.
• Accessibility of the site to residents: In looking at the design, the building’s entrance appears to face Mindarie St. To obtain public transport and subsequent access to Lane Cove amenities, residents will have to walk up the steep hill of Hatfield Street to get to Mowbray Road. I question the feasibility of social residents (particularly as was raised, older women over the age of 75) being able to access this, further isolating them.
Safety and Security Concerns
The proposed ratio of 50% social housing, which is higher than the typical 70:30 private to social housing ratio, raises concerns about potential increases in antisocial behaviour and security issues, especially given the proximity to a public school, childcare centre and park. Whilst as noted above, majority of residents are proposed to be older women, the second group raised as needing social housing was young single people. I raise concern given the existing social housing within my community and the rise in crime that has been associated with this population (such as mail stolen from my apartment and intruders in car parks). Considerations to a higher proportion of affordable and market housing is requested to keep the community safe and ensure it maintains its family friendly and safe neighbourhood status.
In conclusion, I urge the Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure to consider my concerns and address such items and inconsistencies of information provided with a response.
Kind regards,
Madeleine

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing to object to the proposed affordable housing development on Mowbray Road, Lane Cove North. The site is unsuitable due to its lack of services, limited public transportation, and poor alignment with the existing community context.

1. Inadequate Consultation time

The community consultation process was rushed, with short notice (about 2.5 weeks) given for the drop-in session, making attendance difficult. The project design was presented as a “mature” concept, leaving little room for meaningful community input. Additionally, despite attempts to contact the project team, the 1800 hotline was unresponsive, and the final FAQ did not address specific concerns. The claim that low turnout indicates community support is not accurate due to constrained mentioned, as well as evidenced by a petition signed by 120 residents.

Moreover, Homes NSW's claims that the project addresses the needs of older age groups, domestic violence victims, and individuals with medical needs, who represent a significant portion of the waiting list, do not seem supported by the Social Impact Assessment for this proposal. The assessment indicates that only 21% of the projected residents will be over the age of 55.

2. Unsuitability of the Site

The Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) fails to justify why this site was chosen for social housing, overlooking the lack of key amenities like a supermarket, pharmacy, and healthcare services. Additionally, the area lacks sufficient public transportation for non-car owners and has limited job opportunities for low-income groups.

Residents have raised concerns about crime and antisocial behavior linked to the existing public housing, but the EIS does not adequately address these issues. The site’s location between a school and playground, and the absence of crime mitigation strategies, further highlight the project's shortcomings.

3. Inadequate Design Response to the Site Context

The proposed design does not consider the site’s topography, resulting in a visual "wall" effect that impacts the park and surrounding area sufficiently. The landscape is overshadowed, creating an unpleasant, dark environment. Moreover, the design does not adequately address crime prevention through environmental design, with limited consideration for sightlines and passive surveillance.

4. Transportation and Parking Issues

The site’s reliance on already strained bus routes and lack of on-site parking will worsen transportation and parking problems in the area. The location of the parking entry on Hartfield Street is suboptimal, potentially increasing traffic congestion.

5. 50% Mixed Tenure

The development proposes an unusually high concentration of social units (50%), with many single-unit dwellings, which is inconsistent with the more appropiate social/private mix in nearby developments. This approach is unsuitable given the project’s location near a school and playground that are family driven.

6. Recommendation for Relocation

It is suggested relocating the project to a site with better access to public transportation, such as near the newly completed metro stations. This would improve accessibility for residents and ensure the project better meets the needs of low-income groups. If the project must proceed, increasing the proportion of affordable housing should be considered.

Thank you for your consideration.

Department of Planning, Housing and Infrastructure
Application No: SSD-71687208
Location: 618-624 Mowbray Road West and 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North (Lots 17-20 and 64-66 in DP 35865)

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing to formally express my concerns regarding the proposed development at the above-mentioned location.

Our community is a family-oriented area, where the majority of existing housing consists of low-density homes, with limited single-bedroom units. The proposed addition of 86 new homes is likely to have significant impacts on the local infrastructure and quality of life for current residents.

Traffic and Parking Concerns
The local road network is already congested, and the introduction of 86 new homes with only 42 designated car parking spaces will exacerbate the strain on an already overstretched street parking system. Public transport options in the area are limited, with only three daytime bus routes along Mowbray Road. These routes are often overcrowded during peak hours and are already at capacity, which raises concerns about the adequacy of public transport for the proposed development.

Lack of Local Amenities
Additionally, there has been no consideration for incorporating essential commercial facilities within the development, such as a medical centre, pharmacy, convenience store, or coffee shops. These services are much needed in our area, as highlighted by the recent motion passed by the Lane Cove Council. Without these amenities, residents of the proposed development would face significant difficulties in accessing everyday services, as the nearest facilities are at least 25 minutes’ walk away.

Inconsistencies in Demographic Data
Homes NSW has stated that the majority of demand for housing comes from women, particularly those over the age of 50. However, the Social Impact Assessment (SIA), Table 5.2.2, reports that 50% of demand is from individuals aged 20-45, which is inconsistent with Homes NSW’s public communications during the consultation process. This discrepancy raises questions about the accuracy and reliability of the data used to justify the development.

Impact on Community Safety and Social Cohesion
One of the most pressing concerns is the proposed 50% allocation of social housing, which is significantly higher than the typical 70:30 ratio between private and social housing. This raises concerns about potential increases in antisocial behaviour and security issues, especially considering the development’s proximity to a public school, childcare centres, tennis courts, Mindarie Park, and a residential aged care facility.

Exceeding Social Housing Targets
It is our understanding that Lane Cove Council has already met its social housing targets, and there is limited justification for adding additional social housing in an area that is in dire need of other amenities and services. Homes NSW’s claim that the project will provide affordable housing for vulnerable groups, such as elderly single women, is undermined by the proposed location, which is poorly served by public transport and far from essential services.

Management and Maintenance Concerns
There are also concerns regarding the ongoing management and maintenance of social housing in the area. The current state of social housing buildings, such as those on Willandra and Mowbray Roads, reflects inadequate management, and residents are compiling photographic evidence to demonstrate the poor condition of these buildings. This raises doubts about Homes NSW’s ability to effectively manage and maintain additional developments in the area, especially when existing social housing in the vicinity remains under-resourced and poorly maintained.

Community Opposition
Our community has voiced strong opposition to this development, with more than 250 local residents signing a petition that has been circulated to the local council, politicians, and the Minister for Housing. We urge you to reconsider the proposed location of this development and to take into account the concerns raised by the community during the consultation process.

In conclusion, I would like to express my opposition to this development. The primary concern is the safety and wellbeing of our community, particularly the children who live and attend school in this area. Lane Cove North is a family-friendly suburb where residents have chosen to settle to provide the best possible environment for their children. Approval of this project would have a lasting negative impact on our community and could lead to families reconsidering their long-term commitment to the area.

I trust that you will give due consideration to these concerns in your review of this proposal.

Sincerely.

I would like to object to the proposal for the state owned social housing development proposed at 618-624 Mowbray Road. The planned residence is done with little regard to the election promises made to develop shops and services in the area. It is grossly under the required parking for the scale of the building comprising only 42 parking spots for residents and 2 for visitors for 86 apartments. The local area is already overcrowded with on street parking, this development will only cause more congestion on the street in an already dangerous environment for transiting up and down Mindarie St.
The design does not fit the current landscape and is of poor use of the land.
This needs to be reviewed by an independent authority as having the NSW government as both the applicant and consent authority on this project is a major conflict of interest.

Re: Development Application SSD-71687208
618-624 Mowbray Rd & 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North

I object to the current development proposal for 618-624 Mowbray Rd & 25-29 Mindarie Street, Lane Cove North, for the following reasons:

1. Infrastructure Deficiencies

- Lane Cove North and Mowbray precinct have been adding new housing far exceeding other suburbs
- Mowbray Rd congestion during morning and evening hours is a source of frustration - bus pullouts have been omitted on Mowbray Rd causing traffic jams at bus stops
- It remains unsafe to cross Centennial Avenue near bus stops
- There is insufficient street parking, even without the proposed development which lacks adequate internal parking
- The precinct lacks adequate retail spaces

2. Design and Urban Form

- The building's height and mass will overshadow the Mindarie Park playground
- The L-shaped design creates an overshadowed, potentially unsafe dead-end space behind the building overlooking the playground at Mindarie Park
- The proposal lacks family-friendly features, including insufficient two and three-bedroom apartments and bathtubs

3. Social Impact

- Existing social housing buildings in the area are poorly maintained
- Social housing has caused crime and antisocial behaviour in our community - this is of particular concern as the development is situated opposite the local public primary school and playground at Mindarie Park
- The area lacks "third places" for social interaction outside homes
- The development fails to make a positive contribution to the social infrastructure this community needs

4. Construction and School Safety

- The construction site is located directly opposite a primary school and playground at Mindarie Park
- The Mowbray Rd shared path is busy with children walking, cycling, and scooting to school
- The Construction Traffic Management Plan should prohibit heavy vehicle movements during school drop off and pick up times

5. Process Concerns

- Community engagement has been late, inadequate, and dismissive - previous communication from residents have been ignored in this proposal
- The request for exemption from Section 7.11 contributions seems unjustified given the infrastructure gaps

Recommendations

1. The application should be referred to the Independent Planning Commission
2. The development should incorporate the previously promised neighbourhood centre with retail spaces
3. Building design should be modified to eliminate overshadowing and unsafe spaces
4. Strata ownership should be required to ensure the building is well maintained
5. Section 7.11 contributions should be required to fund missing infrastructure
6. More family-suitable housing should be included in the mix

The current proposal fails to meet strategic planning objectives, ignores community needs, and misses a crucial opportunity to create a liveable, vibrant precinct. Without significant modifications to address these issues, this development should not be approved.

I object to the project due to the following reasons:
- Overdevelopment in the area and insufficient public transport to support the extra residents.
- The proposed housing and its occupants poses additional security and safety risks for the neighbourhood. This is far from ideal given close proximity to a primary school.

I object to the project in its current form, as there is a lack of places to buy groceries etc in Lane Cove North. There are a lot of apartments that have been built in this area, however there is a lack of shops to support the population, that now reside in Lane Cove North. The shops in Lane Cove are quite a distance away and have become very busy.

1- Mindarie street and Mowbray could not accommodate this much extra population. This development means there will be 40 units without carpark who will seek street carpark and this street and streets around do not have the capacity. This will result in accidents illegal carparks and potentially parking in the limited space on adjacent streets leaving the actual residence of those streets with no street car park.
2- overshadows the park infront of it and the only playing ground for kids in this area
3-creates a gap in the neighbourhood streetscape
4- there are not enough shops and facilities compare to the dense population that is getting built in this area. It was promised in 2010 that government will make sure there are shops and facilities in this area but all we see is more DA's for apartments with not enough infrastructure to support the population.
5- there are already two other affordable housing in this area one on Mowbray and one Mindarie street.
6- This affordable housing is against all election promises that current housing minister provided, we were promised that there will more shops and services developed in this street.
7- no clear indication on how this is ring-fenced because NSW authority is both the applicant and authority to provide approvals

In this area that is already highly developed, it will pose additional pressure on services (there are often water issues within the suburb and near to this development site) and street parking, to name a few.

It has the potential to reduce value of the properties in the area and financially impact many.

This will ruin the mindarie park for families which is a large demographic of the area

Negative impact to my local area, reduced shops, less surburban and more busy, less parking space will be available, will impact quality of life in my area and feelings of comfort as a quiet family friendly area. Re-consider raising children in the area.