State Significant Development
Powerhouse Parramatta
City of Parramatta
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Site preparation works including demolition of all structures and tree removal, construction, operation and use of the Powerhouse Parramatta, public domain works and use, vehicular access, infrastructure works and signage zones
Consolidated Consent
Modifications
Archive
Early Consultation (1)
Request for SEARs (4)
SEARs (1)
EIS (37)
Response to Submissions (24)
Agency Advice (10)
Additional Information (22)
Determination (8)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (35)
Reports (1)
Independent Reviews and Audits (1)
Notifications (4)
Other Documents (7)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
29/03/2021
28/04/2021
25/05/2022
31/05/2022
18/04/2023
19/08/2024
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Lee Greenaway
Object
Lee Greenaway
Message
Cathy Johnson
Object
Cathy Johnson
Message
Our heritage buildings cannot be moved and still retain their historical significance. Parramatta, the place of the first land grant Australia in 1789, needs to maintain any remaining integrity with our heritage listed buildings and our history.
This beautiful 140 year old Victorian building needs to stay where it is, at 34 Phillip Street Parramatta.
Ron YUEN
Object
Ron YUEN
Message
I support the idea that Parramatta should have a large, cultural institution, but the old DJs site may not be the most appropriate site (being subject to flooding);
May overseas museums (and some Australian sites) have incorporated the existing building context within their new building fabric; this takes time and some considerable expertise but it is worthwhile - for the immediate benefit of Parramatta and the legacy of NSW Planning;
Jean McGregor
Object
Jean McGregor
Message
Far too many have gone already
Jean McGregor
Donald Mills
Object
Donald Mills
Message
Robyn Dyball
Object
Robyn Dyball
Message
To remove this important historic building, brick by brick, and try to rebuild it in another location is beyond belief. This is not a building constructed of large sandstone blocks that can easily be removed with little damage. This may have been done with churches in the past in Parramatta, but this technique cannot be applied to Willow Grove. The plastered walls and rendered bricks are much more delicate and would be totally ruined by moving. Aside from this the disrespect for the site itself being shown by this State Government is incredible!
The property is significant for the Parramatta Local Government Area for ‘historical and aesthetic reasons’ and serves as an example of the type of building constructed during an early wave of development in the area.
The building’s state heritage listing notes that it is “a good example of a Victorian Italianate two-storey villa, readily identifiable as part of historic building stock and strongly contributing to the streetscape in spite of its large setback, partly through its notable fence.”
The listing states that Willow Grove is of significance for historical, aesthetic and representative reasons.
Willow Grove must remain in situ. To try to rebuild it would be disrespectful to the history and significance of the building itself and the site that it occupies.
I have been a resident of the Parramatta district for over 40 years, and a volunteer in an historic building in the centre of Parramatta for more than 10 years. During this time I have been devoting my efforts to the preservation of our history, providing tours for local residents and tourists from all over Australia and the world. An appreciation of the significance of the history of the city is always expressed by visitors. Consultation with residents and visitors seems to be ignored on all fronts recently with the destruction of so much of our history and heritage.
Leave Willow Grove where it is - promote it as a piece of history. Show respect for its heritage value.
Melinda Sedmak
Object
Melinda Sedmak
Message
Willowgrove is an important piece of history & is very highly regarded with the people of Parramatta & surrounding suburbs. Future generations will be robbed if we move the location.
Please find another location for the proposed Powehouse Museum.
John Head
Object
John Head
Message
I wish to lodge a strong objection to the State Government proposal to demolish the heritage listed Willow Grove in Parramatta.
As someone who grew up in the Parramatta and Hills districts, I find it incomprehensible that our representatives would so blithely destroy a fine Victorian building.
The project as proposed is an appalling decision which, if carried out, would destroy an important piece of our architectural and historic heritage.
Already in Australia and especially in NSW our built heritage is just a tiny fraction of what it was fifty years ago. Perhaps the unenlightened attitudes of the mid-20th Century, where ‘modernisation and progress’ were all-important, in some way excuses some of this loss, but we have absolutely no excuse now for such destruction.
Architecture and engineering provide solutions for almost any obstacle in an elective project.
To demolish this wonderful old building would be an act of spite against the community, which overwhelmingly supports its retention.
Rebecca Churchill
Object
Rebecca Churchill
Message
Please save this building. There are so many other suitable sites for the museum, why is the State Government intent on destroying this significant part of history? This really is ridiculous. The destruction of the Cumberland Hospital site is an absolute crime, do not let Willow Gove become a memory. The people of NSW deserve better.
Kind Regards
Rebecca Churchill
Margaret Helman
Object
Margaret Helman
Message
The built environment is as sacred as an ochre painting in a far flung place that located the dwelling place of an indigenous peoples over 60,000 years ago. Such places give us all a ‘sense of place’ and assist us to understand ‘from whence we came’ and define the lives lived by our forefathers - indigenous and contemporary.
No government has been given the approval by the Australian community to remove these milestone markers in our lives. The deep problem we face having Gladys Berejeklian as our premier is that she has no historical association with ‘a sense of place’ in Australia and her advisers have been exposed to be extremely limited in their anthropological, heritage and historical education on ‘what is a sense of place’.
Those citizens who understand the value of living in a civil society must stand with the community and be outraged by the NSW government’s lack of philosophical knowledge - lack of sensitivity to take professional advice and crudity in judgement and demand that Willow Grove must remain where it is placed and also be registered to become a centre of historical relevance for now and into the future of our society.
Raymond & Judith Thornley
Object
Raymond & Judith Thornley
Message
Please leave Willow Grove as it is, where it is. It is no good saying it can be moved. It cannot be moved and still retain its historical value. We sincerely hope that sanity prevails and the site is not interfered with any further.
Yana Taylor
Object
Yana Taylor
Message
There is at least one other site in the district for a museum, a place that could really benefit from the placement of a museum - a contemporary one. This site will be connected to the downtown CBD and rail.
yours faithfully
Susan and Glen Armstrong
Object
Susan and Glen Armstrong
Message
The Powerhouse Parramatta Addendum Statement of Heritage Impact states in Section 2.2:
The Burra Charter (Australia ICOMOS, 2013) is considered to be an industry accepted publication which provides a best practice standard for managing cultural heritage places in Australia. The relocation of a heritage item is described in ‘Article 9. Location’ as follows: “9.1 The physical location of a place is part of its cultural significance. A building, work or other element of a place should remain in its historical location. Relocation is generally unacceptable unless this is the sole practical means of ensuring its survival.”
I believe this paragraph clearly states why the Government should not be planning to move Willow Grove. I think it is difficult to argue that moving it is “the sole practical means of ensuring its survival”. I am sure there must be ways that Willow Grove can be sympathetically incorporated into a new museum. If not, an alternative site for the museum needs to be found.
If Willow Grove is relocated there will inevitably be damage to the historic fabric of the building itself. It will need to be pulled apart. Even with the utmost care, original timber, brick work, ceilings etc would be damaged in the process. It will be more of a replica of Willow Grove that is reconstructed at a new site, not the original building.
Peter Wotton
Object
Peter Wotton
Message
Peter Gibson
Object
Peter Gibson
Message
--
Thanks,
Peter
Paul Taffa
Object
Paul Taffa
Message
The destruction of yet another heritage building is a utter disgrace and shows the LNP to be a bunch of vandals destroying history to line developers pockets.
How much more are you going to destroy?
Anzac Pde trees
The Royal OAk, a convict built building from 1813.
The destruction of the Sydney Speedway, to be replaced by a smaller, less accessible, venue.
So much more.
THIS MUST STOP NOW.
ENOUGH.
NO MORE HERITAGE BEING DESTROYED.
Victoria Carroll
Object
Victoria Carroll
Message
This exceptional Villa and its social history must remain in Phillip Street where it was built for Annie & Thomas Gallagher and their four children 140 years ago.
Beside the history which must be maintained as it is, I believe this is an absolute waste of tax payer money and must not go ahead.
#SaveWillowGrove