State Significant Development
Wilpinjong Coal Mine Extension
Mid-Western Regional
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Consolidated Consent
Modifications
Archive
Request for SEARs (1)
Application (1)
SEARS (4)
EIS (22)
Public Hearing (12)
Response to Submissions (1)
Recommendation (5)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (32)
Reports (44)
Independent Reviews and Audits (1)
Other Documents (7)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
23/06/2020
17/03/2022
7/05/2024
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
The ongoing impacts on groundwater and surface water systems will be greater than predicted.
The predicted job numbers are overstated compared, with the current workforce extracting the same volume of coal.
Peabody Energy is in deep financial distress and may not be fit to meet all its obligations.
The contract to supply AGL's Bayswater Power Station can be met by the current approval.
The proposal to continue extracting low quality coal while causing irreversible environmental and social damage cannot be justified.
The mine will produce an additional 20 million tonnes of greenhouse gasses a year, exacerbating the impacts of climate change. This is at odds with Australia's commitments under the Paris Accord.
The area has significant Aboriginal cultural heritage values that have not been assessed in a regional context.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
The extension of Wilpinjong Mine will make the village of Wollar unlivable.
The cumulative social impact of loss of population through mining projects from Ulan to Bylong has not been considered.
The noise assessment, monitoring and mitigation measures are totally inadequate.
Air quality has not been assessed against the new standards adopted in December 2015.
The extension will remove 354 hectares of remnant native vegetation and have an impact on 24 threatened species and ecological communities - more than the current approval. The biodiversity offsets will not provide sufficient habitat for the critically endangered Regent Honeyeater.
The cumulative impacts on biodiversity, Aboriginal cultural heritage, water sources, greenhouse gas emissions, community and rural industry have not been rigorously assessed.
The mine will produce an additional 20 million tonnes of greenhouse gasses a year, exacerbating the impacts of climate change. This is at odds with Australia's commitments under the Paris Accord.
The area has significant Aboriginal cultural heritage values that have not been assessed in a regional context.
The extension removes existing buffer zones for the Munghorn Gap Nature Reserve.
The extension will leave three final voids that will permanently scar the landscape and harm waterways for hundreds of years.
The ongoing impacts on groundwater and surface water systems will be greater than predicted.
The predicted job numbers are overstated compared, with the current workforce extracting the same volume of coal.
Peabody Energy is in deep financial distress and may not be fit to meet all its obligations.
The contract to supply AGL's Bayswater Power Station can be met by the current approval.
The proposal to continue extracting low quality coal while causing irreversible environmental and social damage cannot be justified.
Phillip Divisek
Object
Phillip Divisek
Message
Carl Booy
Support
Carl Booy
Message
Rosie Toth
Object
Rosie Toth
Message
Paul Morgan
Support
Paul Morgan
Message
I THINK THAT THE FUTURE OF THIS MINE AND ITS EXTENSION WILL NOT ONLY PROVIDE MY FAMLY A RELABLE FUTRE BUT ALSO SO MANY OTHER FAMILIES THAT RELY ON THIS MINE TO OPERATE.
Darryl Boorer
Support
Darryl Boorer
Message
The extension will also be able to give them the opportunity to get to university.
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
DANIEL PIKE
Support
DANIEL PIKE
Message
I believe that mining fills a need in rural areas, providing valued employment and careers otherwise often absent.
Beverley Atkinson
Object
Beverley Atkinson
Message
The business case is not there, taking in the employment, environmental and Tourism aspects long term.
Job numbers are exaggerated. Irrespective of this, the statistics ignore the trades and useful, harmless and healthy jobs lost to the community all around the district, when people desert them for mining. Public health, and equitable spending power are declining all around this area due to mines, already.
Remaining small towns like Wollar are essential for the future recovery of the country economies after mining has done its best to devastate the sustainable and nourishing agricultural occupations.
What is left of the habitat and wildlie around this Wilpinjong mine is already critically threatened. Its retention is essential for the recovery of Tourism and biodiversity after the mines die.
What should be happening now is the preservation of all the small towns including Wollar. It is there that people will live who can care for the scarred land, revitalise it and use what water is left to carry on sustainable use of this once clean, fertile and productive valley floor.
There is no need for the coal, the powerstations have enough.
Wollar is a future centre for renewable energy workers and their families. Peabody should be looking to set up research and testing of renewable resources within its lands, not further ruining the earth and banishing its people.
I totally object to expanding Wilpinjong any further.
Susie Russell
Object
Susie Russell
Message
The offsets proposed to not meet the 'like for like' criteria. That is, Regent Honeyeater habitat would need to be offset by Regent Honeyeater habitat of the same quality... but really, Regent Honeyeater habitat shouldn't be cleared at all. Lest they go the way of the Black-throated finch, recently declared extinct in NSW.
It is clear that this is another cut, in the death of a 1000 cuts, that sees mine extension after mine extension considered in isolation, rather than an assessment of the cumulative impacts, on both the communities and the environment.
Inadequate assessment of noise and dust is situation normal. The assessment process is really more a rubber stamp for an industry that is leading to the asphyxiation of our planet.
Jolyon Bromley
Object
Jolyon Bromley
Message
One obvious scenario is they expand the mine then go under leaving the devastation behind.
There is a massive oversupply of coal in the world. The price is low, so it is unviable before it begins.
Please prevent this destruction of the environment based on a lost cause. Coal is the past; encourage clean energy.
Sue Abbott
Object
Sue Abbott
Message
Coal is history, and we must look to the post coal economy to find new horizons in terms of employment and viability of NSW's towns, villages, rural and outback communities.
Everything is wrong with Peabody's request to destroy Wollar. We all understand that they are a company with significant financial problems, and that in a bid to appease their fleeing share-holders they will do what it takes. Black lung among many other detrimental health conditions acquired as a result of living and or working near mining projects has taken hold in our communities and has hit the airwaves - there is no denying the dire medical impacts of mining in terms of miners and the communities that surround mines any longer. So why should an extension that we all know will make people sick be permitted?
This mining company is questionably 'solvent' ... are they? ... and we have to wonder could they actually afford the costs of any catastrophic impact that their work might have on the surrounding environment. Look at BHP and Samarco and Vale and the shocking devastation that they created, one could say wifully, at the end of last year in Brazil.
This proposal from Peabody must be rejected. The evidence and empirical data is in on coal mines, and it is dire - no-one is prepared to be deluded any longer. Just as the salvage companies back in the 18th and 19th centuries objected to shipping forecasts being implemented because they were bad for business as they saved sailors' lives, so the mining companies wil squeal and object to their business and business practices being rejected and mothballed.
It is wrong wrong wrong, and you as the government are the trustees of our money and our state, and consequently you do not have my permission to grant this extension to this polluting, fossil fuel, community destroying company.
Shame on you, New South Wales Government, for even wasting our time with this submission process.
Michael Green
Object
Michael Green
Message
Australia doesn't need this foul, dying industry. It's days are done. there are too many reasons not to approve the application and too few to approve it.
Jane Boots
Object
Jane Boots
Message
Simon Leven
Support
Simon Leven
Message
I choose to support the Wilpinjong extension, my reason is that it will bring positive effects to the local economy.
The environmental issues are of no concern to me due to the location of the extension, it will have marginal impacts to the human and the rural movements.
MICHAEL JONES
Comment
MICHAEL JONES
Message
regards
Michael Jones
Dave Thompson
Object
Dave Thompson
Message
The proposal to continue extracting low quality coal while causing irreversible environmental and social damage cannot be justified
.*The extension will leave three final voids that will permanently scar the landscape and harm waterways for hundreds of years.
Linda Howard
Support
Linda Howard
Message
I will retire well before 2033 however being a person born and bred around Gulgong I know coal mining is essential for its survival .
So for all business and employment of our community we need this extension approved.
James Grant
Support
James Grant
Message
I currently work for the wilpinjong coal mine. This provides a income for my family, with this i live in the mudgee area.My family helps around mudgee and plays sport with in the community.
My income from the mine supports a lot of busniesses in mudgee and the surrounding areas.
The mine helps in so mean ways around this area and state. It would be get if wilpinjong coal mine gets this increase to mine life.
Thanks