State Significant Development
Assessment
Bullawah Wind Farm
Hay Shire
Current Status: More Information Required
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Want to stay updated on this project?
Construction and operation of a wind farm with up to 143 wind turbines and associated infrastructure.
EPBC
This project is a controlled action under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 and will be assessed under the bilateral agreement between the NSW and Commonwealth Governments, or an accredited assessment process. For more information, refer to the Australian Government's website.
Attachments & Resources
Notice of Exhibition (1)
Request for SEARs (1)
SEARs (19)
EIS (20)
Response to Submissions (14)
Agency Advice (18)
Amendments (17)
Additional Information (1)
Submissions
Showing 21 - 40 of 87 submissions
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Moulamein
,
New South Wales
Message
What is the company doing about that feral pig population. These animal can cause a lot a destruction. Hunting in the area will be very difficult with obstacles in the way.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Gannawarra
,
Victoria
Message
How is this project going to be connected?
How is it not going to ruin the biodiversity of the area?
Where are all the animals to live?
How is it not going to ruin the biodiversity of the area?
Where are all the animals to live?
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Gannawarra
,
Victoria
Message
I object to this junk being put EVERYWHERE. It is the younger generation that will be left to foot the bill !!!
I support the investigation of nuclear !
I support the investigation of nuclear !
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Romsay
,
Victoria
Message
Im a concered electricty user. The industrailisation of Ag is very concerning, as I think it threatens our food security.
Will we have reliable consistant power for Australian. the weather is not a relable source. sometime the wind blows and sometime the sun shine BUT not all the time.
How can the company give assurance to Australia's that this will generation power?
Will we have reliable consistant power for Australian. the weather is not a relable source. sometime the wind blows and sometime the sun shine BUT not all the time.
How can the company give assurance to Australia's that this will generation power?
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Moulamein
,
New South Wales
Message
As a young person having grown up in the area, I'm also looking to come home to the family from as a farmer. The industrialisation of agriculture will have no land for the young to manage. Ag land needs to be left to grow food for the generations of people to come. Please reconsider this project.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
BARHAM
,
New South Wales
Message
I have been involve with WISE for many years.
Endangered species like the Plains-wanderer and the Swift parrot are already struggling. This project could push them to extinction.
Endangered species like the Plains-wanderer and the Swift parrot are already struggling. This project could push them to extinction.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Moulamein
,
New South Wales
Message
I am concerned for the people that will live near these installation. The info sound has been studied by Nasa in the last 1990 NASA studies showed infrasound to have definite health implication to human, disruption of sleep and a constant low frequency noise disturbing their lives.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Moulamein
,
New South Wales
Message
Who will be responsible for the maintaining the installation?
Chris Minis in new budget estimates said "the landowner is solely responsible for decommissioning and that the state government will legally pursuer them to pay for and conduct the decommissioning"
When the decommissioning sends farms broke because they cannot afford it. The encomberment will then fall to local government. Then ultimately the ratepayers will pay!
Chris Minis in new budget estimates said "the landowner is solely responsible for decommissioning and that the state government will legally pursuer them to pay for and conduct the decommissioning"
When the decommissioning sends farms broke because they cannot afford it. The encomberment will then fall to local government. Then ultimately the ratepayers will pay!
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Coolah
,
New South Wales
Message
What an environmental disaster!
Yet another unreliable energy project, promising the world but only delivering agricultural and environmental devastation.
The landowner will be left to cover the decommissioning costs and highly likely the subsidies will run out and the development owner will not be found when this whole nightmare comes crashing down.
How many projects are in this area? How much contamination from the BPA released into the environment by leading edge erosion from turbine blades will pollute land and water ways? Where is the dump for the unrecyclable turbine blades?
Stop polluting our environment and destroying habitat for native flora and fauna.
Yet another unreliable energy project, promising the world but only delivering agricultural and environmental devastation.
The landowner will be left to cover the decommissioning costs and highly likely the subsidies will run out and the development owner will not be found when this whole nightmare comes crashing down.
How many projects are in this area? How much contamination from the BPA released into the environment by leading edge erosion from turbine blades will pollute land and water ways? Where is the dump for the unrecyclable turbine blades?
Stop polluting our environment and destroying habitat for native flora and fauna.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Còolah
,
New South Wales
Message
This is yet more environmental vandalism, renewables are a disaster for regional Australia.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Coolah
,
New South Wales
Message
The Bullawah Wind 'Farm' Factory like all renewables will contribute to the ever expanding destruction of Australia's natural and rural landscapes, and extensive environmental destruction.
Renewable projects such as this proposal also contribute to a massive increase in open cut mining in order to supply the critical minerals required to build them, as well as associated infrastructure. Industry experts cite an estimated increase in open cut mining in the order of 5000% to achieve net zero policies.
The combined destruction of these endeavors is incalculable. The resulting electricity from projects such as Bullawah only amounts to around 2 days a week. Battery backup can only feasibly add a full day of power per week, so all up 3 days a week.
This will end in disaster for all Australians. The capital costs of this project should instead be channeled into reliable baseload.
The Bullawah wind project should not be built.
Renewable projects such as this proposal also contribute to a massive increase in open cut mining in order to supply the critical minerals required to build them, as well as associated infrastructure. Industry experts cite an estimated increase in open cut mining in the order of 5000% to achieve net zero policies.
The combined destruction of these endeavors is incalculable. The resulting electricity from projects such as Bullawah only amounts to around 2 days a week. Battery backup can only feasibly add a full day of power per week, so all up 3 days a week.
This will end in disaster for all Australians. The capital costs of this project should instead be channeled into reliable baseload.
The Bullawah wind project should not be built.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Moulamein
,
New South Wales
Message
How is the company going to put protections in place to protect the public against pollution? The EPA has a ACT in place to protect the general environmental duty, GED. The Act is in place to minimise the risk of harm to humans health from pollution.
How is the Bisphonal A threat to humans, their food chain and the environment going to be treated?
What measures will be put inlace to capture this chemical?
How is the Bisphonal A threat to humans, their food chain and the environment going to be treated?
What measures will be put inlace to capture this chemical?
Amber Pedersen
Object
Amber Pedersen
Object
YARRABIN
,
New South Wales
Message
Submission to Object to Bullawah Wind Electricity Generating Works + BESS Proposal (143 Turbines)
EPBC Controlled Action
Bullawah Wind Farm Pty Ltd - BayWa r.e.
Jerilderie Rd, 36 km SE of Hay, NSW
Hay Shire, Murrumbidgee & Edward River
I am writing to formally object to the Bullawah Wind Electricity Generating Works proposal on the basis of substantial cumulative environmental, agricultural, community, and health concerns associated with the development.
Cumulative Environmental Impacts
The proposed development of 143 wind turbines across this expansive rural site represents a significant industrial footprint with potential to disrupt local ecosystems and agricultural activities. Given the surrounding environment's sensitivity and importance, the cumulative effects of such a large-scale industrial development are deeply concerning. These effects include:
Wildlife and Habitat Disruption: Avian populations, particularly migratory and local bird species, are at risk due to potential collisions with turbines. The introduction of such infrastructure could disrupt existing habitats and migration patterns. In addition, the noise and light pollution associated with turbine operations might sterilise vast areas of surrounding land, affecting native species reliant on undisturbed habitats.
Impact on Land Use: The large footprint of the proposed wind farm and associated infrastructure could alter local land use patterns, affecting farming, grazing, and conservation efforts. This development also risks exacerbating conflicts between energy projects and sustainable agricultural practices, with long-term implications for the local economy and food production.
Potential Pollution from Turbine Blade Materials
One critical issue insufficiently addressed in the proposal is the potential for environmental pollution from the degradation of turbine blade materials. Specifically, the use of bisphenol A (BPA) in the epoxy resins of turbine blades is alarming. Over time, the wear and tear on blades can result in the shedding of BPA nanoparticles into the surrounding environment.
Contamination Risk: BPA is a known endocrine disruptor, linked to various health issues such as reproductive problems and developmental defects. The risk of BPA contaminating rivers, water catchments, and agricultural soils through rainwater runoff is of great concern. This would have profound effects on local food chains, water supplies, and soil health, potentially turning into a "next PFAS disaster."
Health and Safety Concerns
The health impacts associated with BPA exposure, particularly long-term, even at low levels, should not be understated. Potential health issues include hormonal disruption and an increased risk of cancer, posing significant risks to nearby communities.
The cumulative shedding of BPA nanoparticles, alongside other industrial emissions, could create a hazardous living environment for residents, farmers, and wildlife. Immediate steps need to be taken to mitigate these health risks, such as stringent monitoring of emissions and the use of BPA-free materials.
Request for Condition of Consent
If the project is approved, I request that this be contingent on the following conditions:
BPA-Free Materials: To avoid potential health and environmental risks, all turbine blades must be manufactured using BPA-free materials, ensuring alignment with modern safety standards.
Comprehensive Decommissioning Plan: The project should be legally required to establish an upfront, government-managed decommissioning fund. This ensures the responsible removal of the turbines at the end of their lifecycle without burdening host landowners or local governments. Such provisions must be clearly outlined in the conditions of consent to provide transparency and protection to surrounding landowners.
Wildlife Concerns: Low-Frequency Noise and Electromagnetic Fields (EMF)
The potential impact of low-frequency noise and electromagnetic fields (EMF) emitted by turbines on native fauna has not been adequately studied. For example:
Koalas: These animals communicate via low-frequency mating calls that travel over large distances in the Australian bush. The introduction of turbines emitting low-frequency noise could interfere with their communication, reproduction, and ability to maintain healthy populations.
Bats and Other Fauna: Bats, which navigate using echolocation, could also be affected by turbine noise emissions. This issue is not limited to bats and koalas but applies to other species within a 10-20km radius of the proposed turbines. It is crucial that these effects be rigorously studied before any approvals are granted, and mitigation strategies must be implemented.
Conclusion
While renewable energy development is essential, it should not proceed at the expense of environmental sustainability, public health, or community well-being. The proposed Bullawah Wind Electricity Generating Works, driven by a foreign-owned multinational, presents significant risks to the local environment, agriculture, and residents. These concerns must be addressed thoroughly before any project approval.
Thank you for considering objection.
EPBC Controlled Action
Bullawah Wind Farm Pty Ltd - BayWa r.e.
Jerilderie Rd, 36 km SE of Hay, NSW
Hay Shire, Murrumbidgee & Edward River
I am writing to formally object to the Bullawah Wind Electricity Generating Works proposal on the basis of substantial cumulative environmental, agricultural, community, and health concerns associated with the development.
Cumulative Environmental Impacts
The proposed development of 143 wind turbines across this expansive rural site represents a significant industrial footprint with potential to disrupt local ecosystems and agricultural activities. Given the surrounding environment's sensitivity and importance, the cumulative effects of such a large-scale industrial development are deeply concerning. These effects include:
Wildlife and Habitat Disruption: Avian populations, particularly migratory and local bird species, are at risk due to potential collisions with turbines. The introduction of such infrastructure could disrupt existing habitats and migration patterns. In addition, the noise and light pollution associated with turbine operations might sterilise vast areas of surrounding land, affecting native species reliant on undisturbed habitats.
Impact on Land Use: The large footprint of the proposed wind farm and associated infrastructure could alter local land use patterns, affecting farming, grazing, and conservation efforts. This development also risks exacerbating conflicts between energy projects and sustainable agricultural practices, with long-term implications for the local economy and food production.
Potential Pollution from Turbine Blade Materials
One critical issue insufficiently addressed in the proposal is the potential for environmental pollution from the degradation of turbine blade materials. Specifically, the use of bisphenol A (BPA) in the epoxy resins of turbine blades is alarming. Over time, the wear and tear on blades can result in the shedding of BPA nanoparticles into the surrounding environment.
Contamination Risk: BPA is a known endocrine disruptor, linked to various health issues such as reproductive problems and developmental defects. The risk of BPA contaminating rivers, water catchments, and agricultural soils through rainwater runoff is of great concern. This would have profound effects on local food chains, water supplies, and soil health, potentially turning into a "next PFAS disaster."
Health and Safety Concerns
The health impacts associated with BPA exposure, particularly long-term, even at low levels, should not be understated. Potential health issues include hormonal disruption and an increased risk of cancer, posing significant risks to nearby communities.
The cumulative shedding of BPA nanoparticles, alongside other industrial emissions, could create a hazardous living environment for residents, farmers, and wildlife. Immediate steps need to be taken to mitigate these health risks, such as stringent monitoring of emissions and the use of BPA-free materials.
Request for Condition of Consent
If the project is approved, I request that this be contingent on the following conditions:
BPA-Free Materials: To avoid potential health and environmental risks, all turbine blades must be manufactured using BPA-free materials, ensuring alignment with modern safety standards.
Comprehensive Decommissioning Plan: The project should be legally required to establish an upfront, government-managed decommissioning fund. This ensures the responsible removal of the turbines at the end of their lifecycle without burdening host landowners or local governments. Such provisions must be clearly outlined in the conditions of consent to provide transparency and protection to surrounding landowners.
Wildlife Concerns: Low-Frequency Noise and Electromagnetic Fields (EMF)
The potential impact of low-frequency noise and electromagnetic fields (EMF) emitted by turbines on native fauna has not been adequately studied. For example:
Koalas: These animals communicate via low-frequency mating calls that travel over large distances in the Australian bush. The introduction of turbines emitting low-frequency noise could interfere with their communication, reproduction, and ability to maintain healthy populations.
Bats and Other Fauna: Bats, which navigate using echolocation, could also be affected by turbine noise emissions. This issue is not limited to bats and koalas but applies to other species within a 10-20km radius of the proposed turbines. It is crucial that these effects be rigorously studied before any approvals are granted, and mitigation strategies must be implemented.
Conclusion
While renewable energy development is essential, it should not proceed at the expense of environmental sustainability, public health, or community well-being. The proposed Bullawah Wind Electricity Generating Works, driven by a foreign-owned multinational, presents significant risks to the local environment, agriculture, and residents. These concerns must be addressed thoroughly before any project approval.
Thank you for considering objection.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Koyuga
,
Victoria
Message
I believe that this is an inappropriate location for a project of this size and calibre. Stop ruining our agricultural land with products that are far from renewable!
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Jerilderie
,
New South Wales
Message
The cumulative impact of these projects is going to be devastating to our landscape and the unique environment in which we live.
Despite the promises of supporting local employment this is very much over stated .
The local road net work is not suitable for the increased volumes of traffic.
The financial benefit to neighbours is unsatisfactory.
The benefits to local towns is overstated in that the community benefits are contributing to what I would see as the shortfall of Government core responsibilities.
Despite the promises of supporting local employment this is very much over stated .
The local road net work is not suitable for the increased volumes of traffic.
The financial benefit to neighbours is unsatisfactory.
The benefits to local towns is overstated in that the community benefits are contributing to what I would see as the shortfall of Government core responsibilities.
Ian McDonald
Object
Ian McDonald
Object
WALCHA
,
New South Wales
Message
I object to this project as outlined in my attached submission.
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
GUYRA
,
New South Wales
Message
Cease and Desist Immediately Now Bullawah Wind Farm SSD-50505215, est cost $2.5 BLN - What!
What Are you Doing for NO Reason to the Australian Food Bowl, DPE, did you know State Significant, and More so than Any renewables project.
Hay Shire Protect Immediately as a State Significant Region Murray Darling Basin Food Bowl Region, unfortunately Without Protection from NSW DPE, DPI, but ? NSW DPI have at least offered a Different view to state government, Ignoring, Yes Ignoring the State Significant Murray Darling Basin Food Bowl – Australia’s Food Bowl Are You Aware!
143 or 170 ? 3-Bladed NB wind turbines and associated infrastructure. Maximum blade-tip height of 300m above the ground. God Help Our Threatened Species that are Forgotten and Ignored WHY ?!
The claim “clean green renewable energy to power 500,000 homes” I Vehemently Object to. Vehemently ! You Cannot say this because it is not right you see. It is Very Wrong, this claim of “clean green “ . Very. You are getting away with a Crime Against Murray Darling Basin Food Bowl Region, Hay, and add the Unprotected yet Endangered More than Ever Wildlife, Without Protection in Australia and Across the World WHY ?!
https://majorprojects.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/prweb/PRRestService/mp/01/getContent?AttachRef=SSD-50505215%2120221207T005026.050%20GMT
The above document states that the site is “located within the Lower Murrumbidgee River Catchment on an alluvial floodplain between the Murrumbidgee River and Billabong Creek….Numerous ephemeral creek channels cross the project site .."
Catchments flow from high to low.
Cease and Desist Bullawah Wind project Immediately Now.
Add “…DPI and NPWS have reviewed .. SSD 50505215 on the Major Projects Portal...Given the location of the proposal in relation to the S-W REZ, the cumulative impact of electricity generation in the surrounding region should be assessed through application of the Cumulative Impact Assessment Guidelines for State Significant Projects….”
The Idiocy in government Must Cease Immediately Now. You are a Threat to Next 8 Generations futures and Are.
I Demand Cessation of yet another wind farm proposal on Hay Shire Murray Darling Basin Food Bowl catchments – absolutely State Significant and needing Protection Immediately. Immediately.
Add….". Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 (BC Act) sections 6.2(d) and s6.4(1) set out the requirement to apply the ‘avoid, minimise, offset’ hierarchy for development approvals. The proposal must demonstrate that impacts to threatened biodiversity have, in the first instance, been avoided. Currently the proposal shows turbines and ancillary infrastructure such as access tracks within native vegetation, this fails to demonstrate the requirement in the BAM to initially avoid biodiversity impact…….The Scoping Report has identified numerous threatened species and threatened ecological communities as present within the footprint and likely to be impacted by the proposed development. The threatened fauna listed in Table 3.6 includes numerous birds that have been found to be particularly susceptible to collision with wind turbines, including raptors such as the Black Falcon….”
Add, adjacent to a National Park, a National Park. I Have to have a Royal Commission into DPE Immediately. Threat to Endangered Species reasons.
Cease and Desist attempts to endanger Endangered Wildlife and Ecological communities. Ban 3 Bladed wind turbines Immediately Now.
Use Rooftops Only for All Renewables Now from Now, and Do So, and the Benefits will be to All On Country, FINALLY Under Protection as they Should be.
How Dare You, DPE, Add further Threat to State Significant MDB Food Bowl catchments, waterways yes, and our Endangered Wildlife, Still Without Protection, BUT WHY ?!
God Be Present and Assist Our Wildlife Be Under Protection Please God Please God Please God Please.
My own experience is this:
Drought following wind farm implementation.
https://majorprojects.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/prweb/PRRestService/mp/01/getContent?AttachRef=SSD-50505215%2120221207T005027.123%20GMT
DPI - Agriculture Department of Regional NSW - “…NSW DPI notes that the areas are pastoral lands of the Hay Plains considered Land and Soil Capability Class 4 and 6…”
Nonsense are gov.au – a Threat to State Significant MDB Food Bowl catchments.
Continuing…”This land is zoned RU1 Primary Production Land use…conflict is highly likely with siting the workforce accommodation camp on RU1 Primary Production zoned land. Although the DPI Landuse Conflict Risk Assessment has been referenced, specific land use conflicts must be identified and considered for this component of the project..”
You have NO right to be in charge of MDB Food Bowl, DPE, None at All, and this is Correct.
A Threat to Our Australian Food Bowl is DPIE I Demand be under Investigation for obvious reason.
Adding….”DPI Ag does not support the development of extra dwellings on RU1 Primary Production zoned lands remote from towns or villages due to the potential for land use conflicts..”
For Gods Sake this is a Disgusting project, is.
Is.
Is.
Cease and Desist the project Immediately Now. You, DPE, will not Restore this farmland State Significant you see. Industrial Waste will contaminate this region, State Significant.
How do you get away with it, DPE?
How??
“…..Biosecurity management issues during and post construction must be assessed in relation to potential agricultural impacts (pests, weeds, and emergency animal diseases such as Japanese Encephalitis and Foot and Mouth Disease) including a risk assessment outlining the likely plant, animal, and community risks…” have NOT included Contamination of State Significant MDB catchments.
I Demand MDB Food Bowl, Australia’s Food Bowl, be a State Significant Region, and be Under Protection from Paris Agreement, and why isn’t it ???
Paris Agreement Article 2, Section 1(b) 2015 states:
“(b) Increasing the ability to adapt to the adverse impacts of climate change and foster climate resilience and low greenhouse gas emissions development IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT THREATEN FOOD PRODUCTION.”
How Do you get away with it DPE, NSW Government?
I Demand DPE be under a Royal Commission and also Minister Bowen who has been unable to offer PROTECTION to Our Australian Food Bowl – the Murray Darling Food Bowl under Threat from the Renewables Agenda I Demand be in a Royal Commission Immediately Now.
In my personal opinion the personnel currently operating NSW are in need of Investigation re Threat to Australia’s Food Bowl, Correct.
You people Must Be Held Responsible to the time a New Way enters Awareness where you Will Be Able to Accept Full Responsibilty for Threat to Australia’s Food Bowl, Ours, not yours, to Harm and Cause Loss to.
I will continue trying to get a Royal Commission into :-
- Net Zero, the Greatest Scam so far offered by gov.au-multinationals-global.
- Wind Farms with 3 Blades not yet Bladeless, yet Increasing in height and width and impacting Life Planetary, Unprotected Still, WHY ???
One day you will all feel a Shame you will live with for your days upon Earth for what you have done, done, done, to MDB FARMLANDS in a land named Australia, prone to Drought, yes, and Unprotected WHY ???
God Help Us Please Cease and Desist 3 Bladed Wind Turbines Immediately Now in Australia and across the World.
https://www.baywa-re.com.au/en/wind/projects/bullawah-wind-farm
"BayWa r.e is working with residents of Hay, Deniliquin, Coleambally, Darlington Point and surrounds throughout the development stage. They
have supported a range of community initiatives since 2022 and supported an additional 13 organisations through the 2023 Community Grants Program. BayWa will continue….contribute to community benefit sharing schemes throughout the development and construction process.
BayWa r.e. is pleased to announce the second round of the Bullawah Wind Farm Community Grants Program. This follows the successful completion of our 2023 program which shared almost $35,000 to community and not-for-profit groups in Hay, Murrumbidgee and Edward River regions."
I see this as bribery. I need a Comment, and I do. Money Talks doesn’t it in this World of Multinational Control of My Nation Without Protection.
God Be Offering Awareness to those Unaware of the Threat wind farms are to Farmlands in Australia and worldwide.
Be Able to cease this Project, Bullawah Wind Farm, Hay shire Immediately Now, and Never allow another wind farm upon Australia – The Driest Continent On Earth, and Is.
Protect MDB Hay Shire Region from renewables outright, and especially 3 Bladed wind turbines/farms, a Threat to All On Country.
How do you get away with it DPE?
I Demand to know.
I Demand a Royal Commission into DPE, DCCEEW, and Minister Bowen and Minister Plibersek and I need one Immediately because I understand Catchments you see, and I feel our government has No idea how they Flow from High to Low continually.
Cease and Desist Immediately Now Bullawah Wind Farm proposal.
God. Offer the Right Way Forward being Cessation of renewables On Country On Farmland In Wilderness In Oceans, and Offer Land Care Instead.
“At BayWa r.e we r.e.think energy - how it is produced, stored and can be best used to enable the global renewable energy transition that is essential to the future of our planet.” Um……………Hey You in nsw.gov.au. Are you Listening to Elders On Country Planet Earth? No. No. No.
Gone are these:
- Respect For All on Country Planet Earth.
I Demand this company have No rights to a Dry Continent our government will Not Protect, and WHY? Why why why? What’s happening All over Earth? It’s Burning you see.
Burning.
Joke, Not.
Stop This Nonsense about climate change, and Cease and Desist All renewables Immediately Now, Immediately Now and have a very good look at Earth and Cease the Harm Caused to Her FOR NO REASON NO REASON NO REASON.
In my Way I learn Care for Country Care To The All On Country.
I do wonder How on Earth Elders support Renewables.
What Are you Doing for NO Reason to the Australian Food Bowl, DPE, did you know State Significant, and More so than Any renewables project.
Hay Shire Protect Immediately as a State Significant Region Murray Darling Basin Food Bowl Region, unfortunately Without Protection from NSW DPE, DPI, but ? NSW DPI have at least offered a Different view to state government, Ignoring, Yes Ignoring the State Significant Murray Darling Basin Food Bowl – Australia’s Food Bowl Are You Aware!
143 or 170 ? 3-Bladed NB wind turbines and associated infrastructure. Maximum blade-tip height of 300m above the ground. God Help Our Threatened Species that are Forgotten and Ignored WHY ?!
The claim “clean green renewable energy to power 500,000 homes” I Vehemently Object to. Vehemently ! You Cannot say this because it is not right you see. It is Very Wrong, this claim of “clean green “ . Very. You are getting away with a Crime Against Murray Darling Basin Food Bowl Region, Hay, and add the Unprotected yet Endangered More than Ever Wildlife, Without Protection in Australia and Across the World WHY ?!
https://majorprojects.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/prweb/PRRestService/mp/01/getContent?AttachRef=SSD-50505215%2120221207T005026.050%20GMT
The above document states that the site is “located within the Lower Murrumbidgee River Catchment on an alluvial floodplain between the Murrumbidgee River and Billabong Creek….Numerous ephemeral creek channels cross the project site .."
Catchments flow from high to low.
Cease and Desist Bullawah Wind project Immediately Now.
Add “…DPI and NPWS have reviewed .. SSD 50505215 on the Major Projects Portal...Given the location of the proposal in relation to the S-W REZ, the cumulative impact of electricity generation in the surrounding region should be assessed through application of the Cumulative Impact Assessment Guidelines for State Significant Projects….”
The Idiocy in government Must Cease Immediately Now. You are a Threat to Next 8 Generations futures and Are.
I Demand Cessation of yet another wind farm proposal on Hay Shire Murray Darling Basin Food Bowl catchments – absolutely State Significant and needing Protection Immediately. Immediately.
Add….". Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 (BC Act) sections 6.2(d) and s6.4(1) set out the requirement to apply the ‘avoid, minimise, offset’ hierarchy for development approvals. The proposal must demonstrate that impacts to threatened biodiversity have, in the first instance, been avoided. Currently the proposal shows turbines and ancillary infrastructure such as access tracks within native vegetation, this fails to demonstrate the requirement in the BAM to initially avoid biodiversity impact…….The Scoping Report has identified numerous threatened species and threatened ecological communities as present within the footprint and likely to be impacted by the proposed development. The threatened fauna listed in Table 3.6 includes numerous birds that have been found to be particularly susceptible to collision with wind turbines, including raptors such as the Black Falcon….”
Add, adjacent to a National Park, a National Park. I Have to have a Royal Commission into DPE Immediately. Threat to Endangered Species reasons.
Cease and Desist attempts to endanger Endangered Wildlife and Ecological communities. Ban 3 Bladed wind turbines Immediately Now.
Use Rooftops Only for All Renewables Now from Now, and Do So, and the Benefits will be to All On Country, FINALLY Under Protection as they Should be.
How Dare You, DPE, Add further Threat to State Significant MDB Food Bowl catchments, waterways yes, and our Endangered Wildlife, Still Without Protection, BUT WHY ?!
God Be Present and Assist Our Wildlife Be Under Protection Please God Please God Please God Please.
My own experience is this:
Drought following wind farm implementation.
https://majorprojects.planningportal.nsw.gov.au/prweb/PRRestService/mp/01/getContent?AttachRef=SSD-50505215%2120221207T005027.123%20GMT
DPI - Agriculture Department of Regional NSW - “…NSW DPI notes that the areas are pastoral lands of the Hay Plains considered Land and Soil Capability Class 4 and 6…”
Nonsense are gov.au – a Threat to State Significant MDB Food Bowl catchments.
Continuing…”This land is zoned RU1 Primary Production Land use…conflict is highly likely with siting the workforce accommodation camp on RU1 Primary Production zoned land. Although the DPI Landuse Conflict Risk Assessment has been referenced, specific land use conflicts must be identified and considered for this component of the project..”
You have NO right to be in charge of MDB Food Bowl, DPE, None at All, and this is Correct.
A Threat to Our Australian Food Bowl is DPIE I Demand be under Investigation for obvious reason.
Adding….”DPI Ag does not support the development of extra dwellings on RU1 Primary Production zoned lands remote from towns or villages due to the potential for land use conflicts..”
For Gods Sake this is a Disgusting project, is.
Is.
Is.
Cease and Desist the project Immediately Now. You, DPE, will not Restore this farmland State Significant you see. Industrial Waste will contaminate this region, State Significant.
How do you get away with it, DPE?
How??
“…..Biosecurity management issues during and post construction must be assessed in relation to potential agricultural impacts (pests, weeds, and emergency animal diseases such as Japanese Encephalitis and Foot and Mouth Disease) including a risk assessment outlining the likely plant, animal, and community risks…” have NOT included Contamination of State Significant MDB catchments.
I Demand MDB Food Bowl, Australia’s Food Bowl, be a State Significant Region, and be Under Protection from Paris Agreement, and why isn’t it ???
Paris Agreement Article 2, Section 1(b) 2015 states:
“(b) Increasing the ability to adapt to the adverse impacts of climate change and foster climate resilience and low greenhouse gas emissions development IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT THREATEN FOOD PRODUCTION.”
How Do you get away with it DPE, NSW Government?
I Demand DPE be under a Royal Commission and also Minister Bowen who has been unable to offer PROTECTION to Our Australian Food Bowl – the Murray Darling Food Bowl under Threat from the Renewables Agenda I Demand be in a Royal Commission Immediately Now.
In my personal opinion the personnel currently operating NSW are in need of Investigation re Threat to Australia’s Food Bowl, Correct.
You people Must Be Held Responsible to the time a New Way enters Awareness where you Will Be Able to Accept Full Responsibilty for Threat to Australia’s Food Bowl, Ours, not yours, to Harm and Cause Loss to.
I will continue trying to get a Royal Commission into :-
- Net Zero, the Greatest Scam so far offered by gov.au-multinationals-global.
- Wind Farms with 3 Blades not yet Bladeless, yet Increasing in height and width and impacting Life Planetary, Unprotected Still, WHY ???
One day you will all feel a Shame you will live with for your days upon Earth for what you have done, done, done, to MDB FARMLANDS in a land named Australia, prone to Drought, yes, and Unprotected WHY ???
God Help Us Please Cease and Desist 3 Bladed Wind Turbines Immediately Now in Australia and across the World.
https://www.baywa-re.com.au/en/wind/projects/bullawah-wind-farm
"BayWa r.e is working with residents of Hay, Deniliquin, Coleambally, Darlington Point and surrounds throughout the development stage. They
have supported a range of community initiatives since 2022 and supported an additional 13 organisations through the 2023 Community Grants Program. BayWa will continue….contribute to community benefit sharing schemes throughout the development and construction process.
BayWa r.e. is pleased to announce the second round of the Bullawah Wind Farm Community Grants Program. This follows the successful completion of our 2023 program which shared almost $35,000 to community and not-for-profit groups in Hay, Murrumbidgee and Edward River regions."
I see this as bribery. I need a Comment, and I do. Money Talks doesn’t it in this World of Multinational Control of My Nation Without Protection.
God Be Offering Awareness to those Unaware of the Threat wind farms are to Farmlands in Australia and worldwide.
Be Able to cease this Project, Bullawah Wind Farm, Hay shire Immediately Now, and Never allow another wind farm upon Australia – The Driest Continent On Earth, and Is.
Protect MDB Hay Shire Region from renewables outright, and especially 3 Bladed wind turbines/farms, a Threat to All On Country.
How do you get away with it DPE?
I Demand to know.
I Demand a Royal Commission into DPE, DCCEEW, and Minister Bowen and Minister Plibersek and I need one Immediately because I understand Catchments you see, and I feel our government has No idea how they Flow from High to Low continually.
Cease and Desist Immediately Now Bullawah Wind Farm proposal.
God. Offer the Right Way Forward being Cessation of renewables On Country On Farmland In Wilderness In Oceans, and Offer Land Care Instead.
“At BayWa r.e we r.e.think energy - how it is produced, stored and can be best used to enable the global renewable energy transition that is essential to the future of our planet.” Um……………Hey You in nsw.gov.au. Are you Listening to Elders On Country Planet Earth? No. No. No.
Gone are these:
- Respect For All on Country Planet Earth.
I Demand this company have No rights to a Dry Continent our government will Not Protect, and WHY? Why why why? What’s happening All over Earth? It’s Burning you see.
Burning.
Joke, Not.
Stop This Nonsense about climate change, and Cease and Desist All renewables Immediately Now, Immediately Now and have a very good look at Earth and Cease the Harm Caused to Her FOR NO REASON NO REASON NO REASON.
In my Way I learn Care for Country Care To The All On Country.
I do wonder How on Earth Elders support Renewables.
Rainforest Reserves Australia
Object
Rainforest Reserves Australia
Object
Bungalow
,
Queensland
Message
The Bullawah Wind Farm project, consisting of 143 wind turbines with a tip height of 300 meters and a 2.5 GW battery storage system (359 MW/2 hours), is one of the most important renewable energy investments in Australia, valued at $2.5 billion. Although such projects are important for transitioning to clean energy and reducing carbon emissions, they also bring substantial environmental challenges. This submission critically examines the environmental impacts of the Bullawah Wind Farm, with a focus on habitat fragmentation, incorrect carbon accounting, biodiversity loss, temperature changes, and legal compliance.
Attachments
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
GRIFFITH
,
New South Wales
Message
Wind & Solar so called ‘farms’ do not provide a reliable energy source.
They destroy the natural environment & in the nuclear age in the near future they will become detritus & will have to be removed at great expense to the Local Community, with the toxic Wind Turbine Blades not being able to be recycled.
These Wind ‘farms’ may appear to be of financial benefit to those who accommodate them but they risk being responsible for their extremely costly removal.
Hundreds of others will be negatively affected with pylons & cables criss-crossing adjacent lands.
The destruction of the environment will be significant & our iconic landscapes will be destroyed.
If we are to do away with Coal & Gas, the only reliable energy source is Nuclear.
When the powers that be realise that we are living in the Nuclear age & wish to remain an advanced country, much of what is planned for Hay & other districts will become obsolete.
The district will be stuck with the environmental vandalism caused by Government (taxpayer’s) heavily subsidised ‘renewable’ energy installations.
They destroy the natural environment & in the nuclear age in the near future they will become detritus & will have to be removed at great expense to the Local Community, with the toxic Wind Turbine Blades not being able to be recycled.
These Wind ‘farms’ may appear to be of financial benefit to those who accommodate them but they risk being responsible for their extremely costly removal.
Hundreds of others will be negatively affected with pylons & cables criss-crossing adjacent lands.
The destruction of the environment will be significant & our iconic landscapes will be destroyed.
If we are to do away with Coal & Gas, the only reliable energy source is Nuclear.
When the powers that be realise that we are living in the Nuclear age & wish to remain an advanced country, much of what is planned for Hay & other districts will become obsolete.
The district will be stuck with the environmental vandalism caused by Government (taxpayer’s) heavily subsidised ‘renewable’ energy installations.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Object
Springfield
,
Queensland
Message
I OBJECT to BayWa r.e.’s horrible plan for Bullawah Wind Electricity Generating Works + BESS with 143 ugly, destructive, short-term Turbines that only work part-time & create a massive pile of toxic waste that is ruining Australia.
Pagination
Project Details
Application Number
SSD-50505215
EPBC ID Number
2022/09423
Assessment Type
State Significant Development
Development Type
Electricity Generation - Wind
Local Government Areas
Hay Shire
Contact Planner
Name
Emma
Mitchell