State Significant Development
Moss Vale Plastics Recycling Facility
Wingecarribee Shire
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Plasrefine is seeking approval for the construction and operation of a plastics recycling facility with the capacity to accept and process up to 120,000 tonnes of plastic waste per annum. The facility would also manufacture plastic fibers and resins
Attachments & Resources
Notice of Exhibition (2)
Request for SEARs (1)
SEARs (2)
EIS (14)
Response to Submissions (29)
Agency Advice (39)
Amendments (14)
Additional Information (10)
Recommendation (4)
Determination (2)
Approved Documents
There are no post approval documents available
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
There are no enforcements for this project.
Inspections
There are no inspections for this project.
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Carter Edwina
Object
Carter Edwina
Meaghan Ansell
Object
Meaghan Ansell
Jesse Ansell
Object
Jesse Ansell
Susan Ansell
Object
Susan Ansell
Peter McKern
Object
Peter McKern
Message
On reading the proposal I acknowledge that some attempt has been made by Plasrefine to address a few of the many concerns raised regarding the suitability of this business to exist on the current site. Whilst the revised access to the site may be considered by some as an improvement and the declared reduction in water use and height of buildings are welcome there are many concerns that have either been ignored or insufficient evidence provided to produce a satisfactory solution.
In the age of awareness around micro plastics it seems that at a minimum a business of this nature should be located remotely from residential areas to mitigate some of the hazards associated with this by-product. Wind and water ways will serve to carry this hazard easily to nearby communities. The local food chain will carry this threat much further afield than just this site. This is NOT THE RIGHT SITE.
Water usage. Evidence is needed to support the reduction of water usage. If recycling and capture form the basis of this reduction then the expected El Niño weather pattern will likely prevent these targets being achieved, if anything, the outcome is more likely it will be an increase on town supplied water not a decrease. This is NOT THE RIGHT SITE.
The obvious increase of heavy traffic (trucks) to and from the site will have its own impact on the local area. Noise, road damage, pollution and traffic jams all will increase as a function of running this business. This is NOT THE RIGHT SITE.
Aesthetics and the environment. A large factory so close to the local community generating noise, excessive light, significant increase in traffic and thus destroying the natural beauty, should never be allowed in this area. This is NOT THE RIGHT SITE.
If the Federal Government is considering supporting this business with tax payers money so as to meet their green objectives then they too will be complicit in facilitating a business not suited to this area. This is NOT THE RIGHT SITE.
Please reject this proposal and seek to place this business in a location where there is no adverse impact to local communities, water ways, animal life and significant risk of micro plastics can be managed. Thankyou
Alexandra Springett
Object
Alexandra Springett
Message
This sort of facility should not be sited within a township, on riparian land and close to a river, as is the case with the proposed Plasrefine project. To do so is to imperil hundreds of thousands of people within the Southern Highlands and Sydney (one of its major water catchments being polluted with microplastics).
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Plastic recycling is vitally important to our future, but it needs to be located in a suitable area. Where the proposed site is located defies logic.
There are several points which impacts the general livability of the surrounding areas and the southern highlands as a whole.
• Proximity to residential area ( processing plant within 100’s of metres of peoples homes). This plant will produce industrial outputs which will blow over nearby family homes and surrounding areas. As shown in the wind direction study. Being a 24/7 production plant means relentless noise, pollution and disturbance to nearby residents. This along with the increased traffic concerns will contribute to the physical and mental stress (wellbeing) of the surrounding neighbourhood and greater area.
• Major increase in heavy traffic movements in an area that already has high level traffic congestion on already damaged roads. Safety concerns, increased noise and traffic pollution, increased damage to roads due to increased heavy vehicle movements are all direct consequences of this proposed plant.
•Tourism and a major plastic recycling plant do not go hand in hand. The southern highlands area is a major destination for tourists and thus creates and supports many jobs in our area. To risk all these jobs by introducing more heavy industry to the area is not acceptable to the people who live and work here. The plant needs to be located away from peoples homes, work, schools, recreation spaces, tourist areas, wild spaces, etc. Acknowledgement must be made that the plant would create some new jobs but the highlands area employment as a whole relies heavily on tourism and related sectors.
Yes, we need recycling and we need recycling plants to deal with our insatiable appetite for plastic. But I would ask that you strongly consider that this recycling plant would be better suited to a more removed, isolated, less impactful location and not in residential Moss Vale.
Thank you for your time.
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
1.Creating more works for all the local people and local business
2. The Business stating that they will be using Solar Power to power their major operation, which is good for the environment.
3. Better for the environment, we can recycle our local plastic waste instead of hauling it else where to reduce carbon foot print
4. Bringing manufacture back in Australia.
Jean Mckern
Object
Jean Mckern
Australian BioResources, Garvan Institute of Medical Research
Comment
Australian BioResources, Garvan Institute of Medical Research
Message
Attachments
Cecilia Feldick
Object
Cecilia Feldick
Message
The reasons are numerous but most important are the potential hazards resulting from the recycling plastics at this facility. There are many scholarly studies that show how the resulting micro plastics would pollute our environment. The emissions of toxic forever chemicals could damage the environment and health of our citizens forever. These factors alone should prevent this facility from progressing.
Then there is the disruption to the lives of Southern Highlands residents by the constant truck movements involved in moving the plastics and removal of sludge and solid waste. The roads round Moss Vale are already chaotic and is a state of disrepair so the added impact of these additional trucks would make life miserable for locals. There would be other negative impacts such as noise, lighting, negative health impacts on the workers and increased fire hazards.
Craig Feldick
Object
Craig Feldick
Message
The health and safety issues related to air and water quality affected by microplastics should be sufficient on their own to keep this project from progressing. I am also very concerned about road safety issues. Yes, the proponent amended the proposed access route to the facility, but the currently proposed route still uses Berrima Road where heavy trucks continue to degrade the quality of the road faster than Council can make repairs (that often don't last more than a month). The number of trucks traveling to and from the proposed facility (a number that I believe has been underestimated by the proponent) will create traffic problems all along the route. There are issues with other facility emissions containing VOCs and POPs, with noise, with lighting, with removal of waste, with protection of facility employees from dangerous work hazards, with a higher risk of catastrophic fires and associated toxic smoke, the list goes on.
I cannot fathom circumstances where the Plasrefine Recycling Facility in Moss Vale should be approved. Yes, plastics are a real problem that needs to be addressed. But not with technology that lacks scientific certainty and specificity, and that actually contributes to microplastic pollution. And considering a variety of other objections to the project, only a few mentioned above, that clearly cry out: "Not the right location!", I urgently recommend that the application for the Moss Vale Plastics Recycling Facility development be disapproved.
Anna Phillips
Object
Anna Phillips
Message
Then the most major alarming possibility is FIRES - There have been 70 such fires in plastic facilities globally since 2019. 🔥🔥The Plasrefine site is just metres away from the Garvan Biomedical Research Institute - the only source of mice in Australia which are used for world renowned research into rare cancers and other diseases. Plasrefine would be 200 metres from residents, 2km from the centre of Moss Vale and situated on a riparian zone which feeds into Sydney’s Water Catchment. A fire would be catastrophic with toxins spread over homes, schools and into the water catchment. The nearest Hazmat teams are at least 45minutes away. Apart from this fire risk, plastic factories of this type are a threat to the health and safety of our community with the documented risk of emissions of micro plastics into air, soil and water. Our community should not be asked to carry these risks. We need Plasrefine to find a site more suitable for their factory further away from residents and fragile environments. I support the need for NSW to deal with plastic waste of course but this Is Not the Right Site.
Water usage also in question Plasrefine have now amended their daily use down from 40.5 kilolitres to 15.5 kilolitres - may tick their BOX on paper but I don't trust them and who is going to monitor their water usage? I expect the Council will with their water use levy however once they are in operation how on earth do we stop them using town water especially as we face yet another drought this 2023/2024 summer?
My morning walk with dogs for both my health and to support local businesses will be impacted by excess daily trucks - I don't believe Plaserefine saying that their drivers will have to stay on a set route. They say we can report them but HOW if the trucks to not carry a logo for Plasrefine. YOU don't have to be a rocket scientist to know that truck drives will find the easiest not congested route to and from the site.
This Plasrefine industry will most definitely impact the value of my property In Lytton Rd Moss Vale and of course 100's of other local residents too.
NOT THE RIGHT SITE!
NOT THE RIGHT SITE!
NOT THE RIGHT SITE!
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Transportation Infrastructure:
• Insufficient road and rail networks, contributing to local congestion.
Environmental Concerns:
• Proximity to riparian lands within the Sydney Water Catchment.
• Airborne microplastics risk, affecting local residential and educational areas.
Impact on Child Care Facilities:
• The close location to daycare centres, including the one attended by my child, raises particular concern for our youngest residents.
Community Impact:
• Estimated 100 extra daily truck movements negatively impacting New Berrima residents.
• Strain on existing local roads and level crossings.
Fire Safety:
• Significant fire risk, compounded by limited local firefighting resources. This is particularly alarming given the proximity to daycare centres and educational institutions.
Public Health:
• Emergent health risks associated with microplastics.
Alternative Sites:
• Availability of more suitable locations in the state that would lessen adverse community and environmental impacts.
I strongly urge you to reconsider the site proposed for Plasrefine. The overriding community message is straightforward: "This is Not the Right Site.”
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
The environment is a rural area with unsuitable roads for the number of trucks etc that would use the site. The Southern Highlands is a very desirable area to live as well as a tourist destination. It’s not the right environment to have a recycling plant as proposed.
Very negative feedback and reports about the non Australian company.
Carolyn McGregor
Object
Carolyn McGregor
Message
I recognise the necessity of plastic recycling but this site is totally unsuitable for this proposed development,
Asia Pacific BL Energy Group Pty Ltd
Support
Asia Pacific BL Energy Group Pty Ltd
Message
Furthermore, we are confident in the project's commitment to uphold the highest environmental standards. The innovative technologies promised by the facility ensure a virtually silent operation, negating noise pollution concerns that often accompany industrial endeavours. This consideration for local tranquillity is not just commendable; it's indicative of the project's broader respect for community welfare.
Equally important is the pledge that no waste emissions will pollute our air. This assurance, backed by cutting-edge recycling methods, not only alleviates environmental concerns but also reinforces the facility's role as a protector of local health and the natural beauty that defines Moss Vale.
In conclusion, Plasrefine's facility is more than an industrial project; it's a community enrichment initiative. We stand with them in their pursuit of a greener future, better opportunities, and a healthier community.
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
It would be the largest plastic reprocessing facility in southern hemisphere and it's a significant step that NSW has been made for processing their own waste instead of transport overseas or go to landfill.
Plasrefine listen to the feedback of stakeholders and is trying hard to reduce the impact on environment and community by using the most advanced technology.
The final proposed haulage route is the ideal access option, which has the minimal impact on local community.
I am happy to know that there is more and more people support this project, in WCS and NSW.
Wish Plasrefine could get the approval and start to serve our society ASAP!
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
1. Environmental Impact: Plastics are notorious for their adverse effects on the ecosystem. The manufacturing process of plastics, as well as their improper disposal, contribute to the pollution of air, water, and soil. A plastic refinery would only exacerbate this issue by bringing additional potential hazards to our area. The release of harmful pollutants and greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, such as volatile organic compounds and carbon dioxide, would be an inevitable consequence, intensifying global warming and climate change.
2. Extra traffic caused by trucks is a major concern and cannot be overlooked. These vehicles are essential for transporting goods and materials across long distances, but their presence in urban areas brings about numerous adverse effects. From environmental pollution to increased congestion, trucks pose significant challenges for towns. Caongestion caused by trucks in towns is a major concern. With their size and slower speeds, trucks often cause traffic jams and reduce the overall flow of traffic. This leads to longer commuting times for residents and generates frustration and stress. The increased congestion may also result in road accidents, as maneuvering around large trucks can be challenging for other drivers, especially in narrow urban streets. Additionally, the presence of trucks in towns creates noise pollution. The incessant sound emitted by truck engines and their frequent starting and stopping can disrupt the peace and quiet that towns usually offer. Noise pollution has been linked to various health issues, including insomnia, stress, and hypertension, making it crucial to address its sources, including trucks, in urban areas. Furthermore, the wear and tear caused by heavy trucks add to the deterioration of roads in towns. The load carried by trucks exceeds what roads are generally designed to bear. This leads to accelerated road deterioration, potholes, and cracks, which not only contribute to an unpleasant driving experience but also increase maintenance costs for the municipality. Repairing these damages represents a significant financial burden and diverts resources away from other crucial infrastructure projects.
3. Health Concerns: Plastics contain chemicals, such as phthalates and bisphenol A (BPA), which are known to have adverse health effects. Inhalation, ingestion, or absorption of these chemicals can disrupt hormonal balance, impair the reproductive system, and lead to potential long-term health issues. By locating a plastic refinery in our vicinity, there is a heightened risk of exposure to these hazardous substances, particularly for the workers employed in the refinery and nearby communities.
4. Negative Impact on Tourism and Local Economy: Communities often rely on natural attractions, cultural heritage, and a pristine environment to attract tourists, grow local businesses, and uplift their economies. The presence of a plastic refinery would inevitably tarnish these assets, discouraging tourists and potentially deterring new investments. Visitors seek appealing environments and sustainable practices, making it necessary to safeguard the natural beauty and integrity of the region while exploring sustainable development avenues that do not compromise the environment.
5. Sustainability and Long-term Viability: Investing in a plastic refinery contradicts the global effort towards achieving sustainable development and green technologies. The world is gradually shifting its focus towards renewable and environmentally friendly energy sources. Instead of investing in outdated and polluting industries, it is crucial to promote modern, sustainable sectors, like renewable energy, organic agriculture, or biodegradable alternatives to plastic. A plastic refinery would lock us into an unsustainable and obsolete industrial model, compromising the long-term viability of our local area.
Conclusion: Preventing the establishment of a plastic refinery in my local area is of paramount importance for the environment, public health, and sustainable development. The risks posed by the release of noxious pollutants, health hazards, negative economic impacts, and hindrance to long-term sustainability reaffirm the need to reject such a project. The negative impact of trucks in towns is evident through the pollution they emit, congestion they cause, noise pollution, and road deterioration they contribute to.