State Significant Development
Warkworth Coal Mine Continuation
Singleton Shire
Current Status: Determination
Interact with the stages for their names
- SEARs
- Prepare EIS
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Consolidated Consent
Modifications
Archive
Application (1)
Request for SEARs (1)
SEARS (1)
EIS (18)
Agency Submissions (10)
Public Hearing (6)
Response to Submissions (2)
Assessment (11)
Recommendation (10)
Determination (3)
Approved Documents
Management Plans and Strategies (52)
Agreements (2)
Reports (31)
Independent Reviews and Audits (3)
Note: Only documents approved by the Department after November 2019 will be published above. Any documents approved before this time can be viewed on the Applicant's website.
Complaints
Want to lodge a compliance complaint about this project?
Make a ComplaintEnforcements
On 22 June 2023, NSW Planning issued an Official Caution to Warkworth Mining Ltd (WML) for exceeded noise impact assessment criteria at three noise monitoring locations for the Warkworth Continuation Project on 20 July 2022. WML had failed to implement their approved Noise Management Plan on the night of 20 July 2022 in the lead up to the exceedances. WML have since implemented measures to ensure compliance with their management plan and NSW Planningcontinues to monitor WML's noise reporting data and implementation of the NMP.
Inspections
14/12/2021
18/08/2022
27/09/2022
22/11/2022
27/04/2023
18/05/2023
26/10/2023
22/02/2024
2/09/2024
Note: Only enforcements and inspections undertaken by the Department from March 2020 will be shown above.
Submissions
Michael Anlezark
Support
Michael Anlezark
Message
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Craig Garlick
Support
Craig Garlick
Message
I would like to lodge my support for the continuation of the Mount Thorley Warkworth extension. This mine has been operating for 30 years. It is very responsive about meeting its environment and community obligations. The local area really needs the jobs and financial security that comes with the mine.
Its true, that mining leaves a nasty scar on the land. Its the price the human race pays for being reliant on coal energy for our electricity needs. I would say the best way forward to minimise the impact of mining on the environment is to get the most of existing mines. New mines are NOT what we need - at least, until the old ones are spent.
Lets proceed wth the Mount Thorley Warkworth extension and exercise a tighter control on any new mine developments.
Sincerely,
Craig Garlick
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Best Regards
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
WEAR PARTS SERVICES
Support
WEAR PARTS SERVICES
Message
Tamman Sahu-Khan
Support
Tamman Sahu-Khan
Message
Lisa Malloy
Support
Lisa Malloy
Message
Chris Golledge
Support
Chris Golledge
Message
Daniel Kostava
Support
Daniel Kostava
Message
I wish to stay in Singleton for the next 10 years at least and do not wish to leave MTW.
Mohammad Zabed Anwar
Support
Mohammad Zabed Anwar
Message
Barbara Kostava
Support
Barbara Kostava
Message
MIKE KELLY
Support
MIKE KELLY
Message
Mining developments, like MTW, have been part of the economic landscape for 30 years. They are also part of the social and community landscape. Over 30 years people develop a sense of community with their neighbours, business associates and work mates. In my opinion, the cessation of a major development like MTW would have profound social impacts like population reduction, family separation, relocation expense, and stress related health issues. There would also be significant impacts on community organisations who receive funding and in kind support from MTW.
There are about 40,000 people in the Upper Hunter and their economic well-being is largely dependent on the coal industry. MTW is a major producer and employer in that industry.
I support economic development which is done in an economically, environmentally and socially responsible way. It is obvious that mining developments do not please everyone, but I have little time for those few who put their personal views and lifestyle preferences ahead of the well-being of the majority.
I would urge the Department to consider the 'common good' in determining this development and recommend its' approval.