SSD Modifications
Modification 5 Bloomfield Colliery Continuation Project
Cessnock City
Current Status: More Information Required
Interact with the stages for their names
- Prepare Mod Report
- Exhibition
- Collate Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Assessment
- Recommendation
- Determination
Bloomfield proposes to continue mining operations two additional areas known as:
• The Creek Cut area.
• The Workshop area.
Mining of these additional areas would extend the life of the mine until 31 December 2035.
EPBC
This project is a controlled action under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 and will be assessed under the bilateral agreement between the NSW and Commonwealth Governments, or an accredited assessment process. For more information, refer to the Australian Government's website.
Attachments & Resources
Notice of Exhibition (1)
Early Consultation (1)
Modification Application (12)
Response to Submissions (11)
Agency Advice (28)
Additional Information (7)
Submissions
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Patrick Geary
Support
Patrick Geary
Message
I have been involved with Bloomfield for 45 years,
We believe the continuation project will benefit many in the local area and the community!
I support the modification 5 Bloomfield colliery continuation project
P Geary
Tygear Operations Pty Ltd
Support
Tygear Operations Pty Ltd
Message
by extending the life of Their Bloomfield Colliery, this will ensure our small local business continues to grow and also support other local families employed by us.
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
The continuation of the mine will mean additional taxation payable to Governments and Royalties paid to The State contribute to funding NSW hospitals, schools, essential services and infrastructure. Many local community organisations have been supported through The Bloomfield Group Foundation with their investments.
The continuation of the mining project does not involve an increase in production and mining will not occur any closer to residential areas than has previously occurred. It will provide ongoing employment for its employees, contractors and supply companies.
Thank you for the opportunity to offer my support.
Name Withheld
Object
Name Withheld
Message
Grant Davies
Support
Grant Davies
Message
Wendy Heys
Object
Wendy Heys
Message
Peter Wood
Support
Peter Wood
Message
Continued community and charity support.
Will not increase mining footprint.
Reduce old shallow workings making ground safe from subsidence.
Janet Murray
Object
Janet Murray
Message
Attachments
Hannah Lumsden
Support
Hannah Lumsden
Message
Name Withheld
Support
Name Withheld
Message
Michael Jacobs
Object
Michael Jacobs
Message
Attachment has required information as to why I object, the main reason is that
(1) There are no local offsets to enhance biodiversity corridors, significant areas around the mine site should be rezoned to C2 - Environmental Conservation; C2, Environmental Management.
(2) If mine proceeds the community donations was a ridiculously low amount for the last Bloomfield approval and should be at least $500k/annum or 0.5% of revenue whichever is greater to local charities for each year of operation indexed to inflation.
Donations to be managed by an independent trust.
(3) The proposed area is incorrect as the water discharge from the mine will go down four mile creek which should be included in the study.
Attachments
Thomas Beautement
Support
Thomas Beautement
Message
Ellie Sawyer
Support
Ellie Sawyer
Message
Neil Fraser
Object
Neil Fraser
Message
1. Lower Hunter Spotted Gum-Ironbark Forest is an Endangered ecological community. It was determined to be Endangered by the NSW Scientific Committee on 5 November 2010.
2. The Lower Hunter Spotted Gum-Ironbark Forest is one of only three vegetation communities that provide habitat for the Critically Endnagerd Regent Honeyeater. There are estimated to be only 200-300 Regent Honeyeaters remaining in the wild today.
3. The Bloomfield Colliery site is only a few km from the key Hunter Valley site for Regent Honeyeaters, the Tomlapin Woodlands.
4. Any proposed offset site will not compensate for the loss of the above haitat.
5. There is no consideration of the impact of the addition production of a fossil fuel/coal on global heating and climate change.
5. Non of the above items are adequately addressed in the environmental impact statement.
Andrew Moss
Support
Andrew Moss
Message
Ann Lindsey
Object
Ann Lindsey
Message
Narelle Thurlow
Object
Narelle Thurlow
Message
Unfortunately, short sighted local, state and federal government departments have failed to develop large tracts of bushland responsibly. In the Lower Hunter, clearing of large tracts of land have been carried out poorly and recklessly with scant regard for the survival of native flora and fauna. Last September, the mass clearing of LHSGIF at Thornton resulted in injured and displaced fauna flooding Newcastle veterinary clinics to overcapacity. Then the clearing of a large tract of LHSGIF adjacent to Buchanan Road, Buchanan for a gas pipeline. And now a Continuation of Project from Bloomfield to clear another 51.69 hectares of LHSGIF.
The unalterable loss of so much habitat exacts a heavy price to the survival of our native fauna. As the Regent Honeyeater teeters on the brink of extinction, all efforts should be made to protect its habitat, the LHSGIF. This unique flora is their breeding and winter feeding grounds. In 2024, more than 30 Regent Honeyeaters were found within or nearby the LHSGIF. Therefore this vegetation type should be considered absolutely essential to the breeding and winter feeding habits of the Regent Honeyeaters.
I request that the Department of Climate Change, Energy, Environment and Water complete further assessment of the Regent Honeyeater in the proposed area of modification. The Regent Honeyeaters needs to be assessed during the breeding and winter feeding season and the flora that sustains them during this period.
In the event that this proposal be approved, biodiversity offsets should be on the untouched Bloomfield site to safeguard the longevity of the Regent Honeyeater’s existence.
Stop the clearing of LHSGIF. The Hunter Regional Plan 2041 explains the value in conserving high environmental value lands by supporting biodiversity connections across the LHSGIF 4 Mile Creek site.
If the local, state and federal government departments want to stop the decline of threatened species, then they have to work hard to protect this unique habitat. Do you want a legacy of extinction or preservation?
Dennis Thurlow
Object
Dennis Thurlow
Message
My wife and I built in Louth Park in 2012. Since then there has been major residential growth in the Maitland LGA. Both my wife’s family and mine have lived continuously in the Lower Hunter since the 1830s and 1850s respectively. I have been a member of the Bloomfield Community Consultative Committee for several years.
I have several objections to the BCC proposal.
1. The destruction of 51.69 hectares of the Lower Hunter Spotted Gum and Ironbark Forest (LHSGIF) is environmental vandalism at its most abhorrent.
This forest has a conservation status in NSW of Endangered Ecological Community, gazetted 18 February 2005. To achieve this recognition the area had to be thoroughly assessed by a number of qualified experts. The community is dominated by the Spotted Gum and several other Ironbarks and eucalypt species. The understory and ground layer are diverse with more than 20 identified species. In an undisturbed condition the structure of the community is typically open forest.
Before European settlement this community had a range of about 65 km by 35 km centred on the Cessnock - Beresfield area. Four large patches of the LHSGIF are estimated to have covered nearly 50,000 ha, representing 75% of the total distribution. The community is currently mapped as occurring in more than 4,800 fragments, of which more than 4,500 are less than 10 ha in area. The four largest patches now cover about 7,000 ha, representing less than one-quarter of the current distribution, or about 10% of the estimated pre-European distribution.
If most of the remaining LHSGIF community is less than 10 ha in area, then a fragment of 51.69 ha is of significant size.
2. Loss of habitat. The LHSGIF has provided essential habitat for birds and animals for thousands of years: food, nesting sites, living space. The Hunter Bird Observers Club (HBOC) has studied and reported on the critically endangered Regent Honeyeater. In the early 1900s these birds were among the most common species seen. Once widespread from Adelaide to central coast Queensland, today it is estimated only 250 - 350 Regent Honeyeaters remain in the wild. In 2024 when the Spotted Gums flowered there were more than 30 Regent Honeyeaters found within or nearby to the LHSGIF. This habitat is vitally important to Regent Honeyeaters because it is one of the few breeding/winter habitats remaining for a species with an extremely restricted contemporary range. Offsets cannot be relied upon to address ongoing habitat loss. HBOC has provided sound arguments that the claims regarding Regent Honeyeaters in the Bloomfield Biodiversity Development Assessment Report are flawed.
Other vulnerable birds are known to depend on the LHSGIF. The Swift Parrot, with a population size of around 300 - 500 individuals is critically endangered, with predictions that the species could be extinct by 2031.
The population of the Australian Masked Owl is declining and several states have placed the owl on the Species Conservation Status list. In NSW the Masked Owl is scheduled as Vulnerable under the Biodiversity Conservation Act (2016).
3. Land clearing for housing is causing anger and dismay in the community. The Newcastle Herald reported: ‘Newcastle is being hammered ‘ : how the housing boom is threatening species survival, 17 May 2025. The journalist, Matthew Kelly reported that Associate Professor Andrea Griffin, a wildlife conservation scientist and behavioural ecologist at the University of Newcastle, said that she was not aware of another region that was experiencing the amount of clearing that was occurring in the Lower Hunter. She said the loss of habitat corridors could have flow-on effects for species survival. “The animals that can occupy smaller patches, and it’s only some of them, become isolated populations. They inbreed, then you get problems with genetic diversity that can threaten species.”
Kelly also quoted Jacqui Mumford, NSW Nature Conservation Council. “While the state government had finally recognised the need for land clearing reform, the proposed solutions put forward to date had been inadequate. The government says it wants to stop species decline but at the same time we are losing wildlife and habitat.
The published comments to this article indicate the depth of feeling in the community:
“The Upper Hunter is already greatly impacted by large scale open cut mining. Carbon emissions are already detrimentally affecting our weather patterns and science shows that international commitments to reduce emissions are not being met.”
Another comment from the Australia Institute was equally to the point: “ … while politically powerful, the coal industry is a small employer, a reluctant tax payer, heavily subsidised and makes Australia a world leader in exporting climate pollution”. The Australia Institute calls “for a moratorium on new coal mines”.
4. Adverse effect on climate change. The IPCC (International Panel on Climate Change) is a trusted and credible source of information, assembled by the United Nations for taking climate action. Scientists from the IPCC have given the world until 2030 to substantially reduce CO2 emissions to restrict global warming to 1.5 C. Scope 3 emissions from burning coal must be considered and clearly they are incompatible with the world as a whole achieving the goals of the Paris Agreement, regardless or where the coal is burnt.
5. Greed. In the last year or two, the Bloomfield Group purchased the entire mine site from Ashtonfield Holding. This only makes sense if they have future plans for the site after they have finished mining it. So by extending the mining of the Workshop Cut they will take advantage of the existing rail loop. By mining this area Bloomfield will be able to stabilise the area to allow a future intermodal interchange.
6. If, you decide that the above arguments are insubstantial; that 51.69 ha of the LHSGIF can be destroyed; that the fauna can do their best elsewhere; that climate change is out of your control; then I ask that a biodiversity offset be located in the immediate area. If possible on the Bloomfield land.
Secondly, that after mining, the area be restored to vegetation similar to the LHSGIF. Bloomfield has practised “agricultural grazing” for all their mining, which manifests as a dozen Black Angus cattle wandering around in improved pasture. This looks “smart” in their publications, but is poor compensation for the hundreds of hectares of habitat loss.
Andrew Short
Support
Andrew Short
Message
Additionally, given the length of time mining has been conducted on the site, the extension will provide an opportunity to mine areas of shallow historic workings, removing the potential for voids to occur on the surface due to subsidence and providing improved options for the final landform design.